DDtKey commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080981598
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
DDtKey commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080981598
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
tustvold commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080984521
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33781:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33781#issuecomment-1396656366
Thanks for opening a pull request!
If this is not a [minor
PR](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#Minor-Fixes).
Could you open an
Ziy1-Tan opened a new pull request, #33781:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33781
### Rationale for this change
closes https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33723
### What changes are included in this PR?
### Are these changes tested?
DDtKey commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080981598
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
DDtKey commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080981598
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
DDtKey commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080981598
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
DDtKey commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080981598
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
tustvold commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080978777
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
tustvold commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080978777
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
tustvold commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080978777
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
DDtKey commented on code in PR #3365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3365#discussion_r1080977374
##
arrow-csv/src/reader/records.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,266 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33780:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33780#issuecomment-1396644079
Revision: 13bcdda82ae4b1c4ef2eb3d0953b1fc9222ecb8f
Submitted crossbow builds: [ursacomputing/crossbow @
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33780:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33780#issuecomment-1396641338
* Closes: #33779
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
thisisnic commented on PR #33780:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33780#issuecomment-1396641320
@github-actions crossbow submit test-r-versions
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
thisisnic opened a new pull request, #33780:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33780
This PR fixes a test which is failing on R versions < 4.0 due to the use of
the function `data.frame()` which had a change in default parameter value for
`stringsAsFactors` (from `TRUE` to `FALSE`)
kou commented on issue #33701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33701#issuecomment-1396633315
BTW, is LTO support important in R?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
kou commented on issue #33701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33701#issuecomment-1396632780
Ah, it seems that we have more places that construct `arrow::DataType`
directly instead of using type construct function such as `arrow::int32()`. The
following patch uses type
chrisirhc commented on PR #33735:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33735#issuecomment-1396620671
Addressed comment.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
chrisirhc commented on code in PR #33735:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33735#discussion_r1080950208
##
go/arrow/flight/server.go:
##
@@ -64,6 +63,24 @@ func RegisterFlightServiceServer(s grpc.ServiceRegistrar,
srv FlightServer) {
mustafasrepo opened a new issue, #4980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4980
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
Currently API of `maintains_input_order` is as follows `fn
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33778:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33778#issuecomment-1396601967
Revision: de1d764d08c6d051e9577ac4144ac4476f79a88c
Submitted crossbow builds: [ursacomputing/crossbow @
thisisnic commented on PR #33778:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33778#issuecomment-1396599413
@github-actions crossbow submit test-r-minimal-build
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33778:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33778#issuecomment-1396596284
* Closes: #33777
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
mustafasrepo opened a new issue, #4979:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4979
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
During range calculation for window frames, we can use linear search instead
viirya closed issue #4962: Change count field from unsigned integer to signed
integer in Sum
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4962
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
viirya closed pull request #4963: Change count field from unsigned integer to
signed integer in Sum
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4963
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
viirya commented on PR #4963:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4963#issuecomment-1396589937
For the integration purpose, we need the second state field to be a `bool`.
But due to `retract_batch`, seems it is not possible. We may think of another
approach to deal with
mustafasrepo opened a new issue, #4978:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4978
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
Currently, the query below
```sql
SELECT
SUM(c1) OVER (ORDER BY c3
mingmwang commented on PR #4767:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4767#issuecomment-1396575697
@jackwener
Do you have some idea ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
mingmwang commented on PR #4767:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4767#issuecomment-1396574575
One question regarding the Subquery Alias generation logic:
Why does the `InSubquery` generate a Subquery Alias, but the `Exists`
Subquery does not ?
--
This is an
mapleFU commented on PR #33776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33776#issuecomment-1396555264
I generate a test file, and update it here:
https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/34
You can merge that. And after that, we can run testing here.
--
This is an
ursabot commented on PR #33728:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33728#issuecomment-1396552408
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline =
7319250597b0f4e3b5f859eb073264ce3c72a1bd and contender =
705e04bb15f481e476c9e7a8e2ac92460890ad0c.
705e04bb15f481e476c9e7a8e2ac92460890ad0c
mingmwang commented on PR #4969:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4969#issuecomment-1396543284
LGTM
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
Treize44 commented on issue #33759:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33759#issuecomment-1396539880
I use pyarrow 10.0.1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
Sach1nAgarwal commented on issue #53:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/53#issuecomment-1396513788
Parallel column is increasing the performance. I checked by creating
multiple `ParquetRecordBatchStream` for each column and all
`ParquetRecordBatchStream` reading parallely,
viirya commented on PR #4963:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4963#issuecomment-1396475988
No, you're correct. The change at `retract_batch` is wrong. I don't follow
how `retract_batch` works correctly.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jackwener commented on PR #14351:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14351#issuecomment-1396469562
It's a good feature.
Can someone push the progress of this PR？❤️
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
mapleFU commented on issue #15173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15173#issuecomment-1396461820
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15173#issuecomment-1385858560 can be
reproduce like this:
```
diff --git a/cpp/examples/parquet/low_level_api/reader_writer.cc
ursabot commented on PR #14814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14814#issuecomment-1396438935
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline =
627caf3fe63ef3eebd9a3eb25367e5f05cb20c00 and contender =
7319250597b0f4e3b5f859eb073264ce3c72a1bd.
7319250597b0f4e3b5f859eb073264ce3c72a1bd
kou commented on PR #33716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33716#issuecomment-1396433386
> What is needed for authentication?
Integration with user information in PostgreSQL. We should not require users
to configure additional authentication related things.
> Could
kou commented on code in PR #33660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33660#discussion_r1080797181
##
docs/source/developers/reviewing.rst:
##
@@ -255,3 +255,43 @@ Social aspects
* Like any communication, code reviews are governed by the Apache
`Code of Conduct
bkmgit commented on PR #33716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33716#issuecomment-1396397369
What is needed for authentication? Could pluggable authentication modules be
used? How often could authentication be required - in particular are there
performance requirements?
--
mapleFU commented on PR #33776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33776#issuecomment-1396387844
Well, why should I have a assignee but I cannot edit the description of
patch? Should someone be assignee or assign this task to me? ╮(￣▽￣"")╭
--
This is an automated message from the
wjones127 commented on code in PR #33660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33660#discussion_r1080767036
##
docs/source/developers/reviewing.rst:
##
@@ -255,3 +255,43 @@ Social aspects
* Like any communication, code reviews are governed by the Apache
`Code of
quinnj commented on issue #375:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/375#issuecomment-1396384853
that looks like a good fix to me; if you make a PR, that'd be great. If you
have an example arrow file that exhibits the problem that we can use to test it
with, even better.
--
mapleFU commented on PR #33776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33776#issuecomment-1396382437
@pitrou @wjones127 @emkornfield Mind take a look?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
quinnj commented on PR #381:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/381#issuecomment-1396382366
This seems fine to me, but @ericphanson, are we not able to get TagBot to
run for the repo? The advantages of TagBot are:
* automated once the release is published in the General
ziggythehamster commented on issue #33733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33733#issuecomment-1396381666
In my case, no, because I would first have to uninstall openssl11-devel (and
anything already installed in my base image that depends on it) and then put it
back when I'm
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33776#issuecomment-1396378871
* Closes: #15164
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
mapleFU opened a new pull request, #33776:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33776
### Rationale for this change
Previously, C++ BloomFilter is implemented in 2019, but standard change in
BloomFilter, which could be seen here:
vibhatha commented on PR #33725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33725#issuecomment-1396374820
@westonpace seems like the CI's are unrelated to this modification. Reviews
are addressed. Thank you for working on this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
vibhatha commented on code in PR #33725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33725#discussion_r1080759071
##
docs/source/cpp/streaming_execution.rst:
##
@@ -113,12 +109,12 @@ Read Relations
* The ``projection`` property is not supported and plans containing this
Frankonly commented on code in PR #3544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3544#discussion_r1080755836
##
arrow/src/pyarrow.rs:
##
@@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ impl PyArrowConvert for RecordBatch {
let module = py.import("pyarrow")?;
let class =
Frankonly opened a new pull request, #3560:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/3560
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #3543
# Rationale for this change
A follow up PR of #3544
# What changes are included in this PR?
Pass
assignUser commented on PR #33751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751#issuecomment-1396368957
The pytest seg fault is also happening in verification
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/3954649758/jobs/6772203240#step:5:2810
--
This is an automated message
lidavidm commented on PR #33716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33716#issuecomment-1396367552
Yes, the ADBC driver wraps libpq and should let you work with other
databases that use the PostgreSQL wire protocol, with the caveat that it has to
convert the data (of course).
kou commented on PR #33716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33716#issuecomment-1396362498
@alamb @jacobmarble Thanks for your comments!
> It might help to start this document with an expected usecase.
It makes sense. I'll add it.
> I originally thought it was
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751#issuecomment-1396348454
Revision: f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d
Submitted crossbow builds: [ursacomputing/crossbow @
ursabot commented on PR #33682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33682#issuecomment-1396348022
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline =
85a111f8d5cef3a668c9cf8c47ccb943048e50f6 and contender =
627caf3fe63ef3eebd9a3eb25367e5f05cb20c00.
627caf3fe63ef3eebd9a3eb25367e5f05cb20c00
kou commented on PR #33751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751#issuecomment-1396345063
@github-actions crossbow submit --group verify-rc-binaries --group
verify-rc-wheels --param release=11.0.0 --param rc=0
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
westonpace commented on PR #33738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33738#issuecomment-1396340861
Here's a trace from a dataset write. There are still things that could be
cleaned up here. Pretty much all of the `DatasetWriter::` traces are a mix of
active CPU time and idle I/O
kou commented on issue #33733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33733#issuecomment-1396338565
OK. We can remove `arrow-devel` after we install `red-arrow` gem. Does `gem
install red-arrow && yum remove -y arrow-devel` work with your use case?
--
This is an automated message
ava6969 commented on issue #33747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33747#issuecomment-1396337269
thanks just did
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
kou commented on issue #33773:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33773#issuecomment-1396333470
Ah, sorry. I forgot this. Could you work on this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
andygrove opened a new issue, #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/138
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
Add example that calls a Python UDF from SQL
**Describe the solution
kou commented on code in PR #33660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33660#discussion_r1080723781
##
docs/source/developers/reviewing.rst:
##
@@ -255,3 +255,43 @@ Social aspects
* Like any communication, code reviews are governed by the Apache
`Code of Conduct
andygrove closed issue #134: Add script for Python linting
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/134
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
andygrove merged PR #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/pull/115
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
andygrove opened a new pull request, #137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/pull/137
# Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
# Rationale for this change
# What changes are included in this PR?
# Are there any user-facing
kou commented on issue #33747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33747#issuecomment-1396316487
Yes. But you need to subscribe the mailing list before you send an e-mail.
See https://arrow.apache.org/community/ how to subscribe.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
jdye64 commented on PR #115:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/pull/115#issuecomment-1396315054
LGTM. That was a bear. Thanks for tackling it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
anjakefala commented on issue #33618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33618#issuecomment-1396304799
> If local filesystems are the odd one out, perhaps it doesn't make sense in
the filesystem API and we should instead recommend a work around for that
special case.
Since
westonpace commented on PR #33738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33738#issuecomment-1396299760
> In the figure, why does WaitForFinish(SinkNode:) end earlier than the
ScalarAggregate?
The code looks roughly like:
```
void SinkNode::ReceiveLastBatch(batch) {
EpsilonPrime commented on PR #33775:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33775#issuecomment-1396295962
This replaces PR 14956.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33775:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33775#issuecomment-1396295419
Thanks for opening a pull request!
If this is not a [minor
PR](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#Minor-Fixes).
Could you open an
EpsilonPrime opened a new pull request, #33775:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33775
Adds binary round kernel for float types.
Provides fallback for binary round from int types to double. Does not
provide fallback for binary round for decimal types.
Minor:
Fixes
EpsilonPrime closed pull request #33774: GH-15200: [C++] Add specific ndigits
value for round
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33774
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
EpsilonPrime commented on PR #33774:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33774#issuecomment-1396292787
Wrong bug, I'll try again.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
EpsilonPrime commented on PR #33774:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33774#issuecomment-1396292123
Replaces PR 30309.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #33774:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33774#issuecomment-1396292270
* Closes: #15200
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
EpsilonPrime opened a new pull request, #33774:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33774
Adds binary round kernel for float types.
Provides fallback for binary round from int types to double. Does not
provide fallback for binary round for decimal types.
Minor:
Fixes
westonpace commented on code in PR #33738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33738#discussion_r1080703912
##
cpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/filter_node.cc:
##
@@ -103,17 +103,9 @@ class FilterNode : public MapNode {
}
void InputReceived(ExecNode* input, ExecBatch
westonpace commented on PR #14867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14867#issuecomment-1396289231
I've rebased this and will merge if CI is still passing.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
ava6969 commented on issue #33747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33747#issuecomment-1396287943
how does mailing list discussion work, do i email d...@arrow.apache.org
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
assignUser commented on PR #14610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14610#issuecomment-1396287665
Oh I totally missed this! Very nice! We should add this to the release
guide! I will open an issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
westonpace merged PR #33648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33648
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kou commented on PR #33751:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751#issuecomment-1396286922
Passed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
westonpace commented on code in PR #33738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33738#discussion_r1080701548
##
cpp/src/arrow/compute/exec/sink_node.cc:
##
@@ -335,19 +327,13 @@ class ConsumingSinkNode : public ExecNode, public
BackpressureControl {
void Resume()
ava6969 commented on issue #33747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33747#issuecomment-1396285442
that would be great if it could be integrated as i had to copy some internal
files.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
westonpace commented on PR #33725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33725#issuecomment-1396284268
Thanks @felipecrv / @vibhatha . I believe I have addressed the reviews.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
westonpace commented on code in PR #33725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33725#discussion_r1080700095
##
docs/source/cpp/streaming_execution.rst:
##
@@ -86,25 +86,21 @@ Plans
^
* A plan should have a single top-level relation.
- * The consumer is currently
westonpace commented on code in PR #33725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33725#discussion_r1080699744
##
docs/source/cpp/streaming_execution.rst:
##
@@ -86,25 +86,21 @@ Plans
^
* A plan should have a single top-level relation.
- * The consumer is currently
andygrove opened a new issue, #136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/136
**Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe
what you are trying to do.**
We should release a new version based on DataFusion 16
**Describe the
westonpace commented on code in PR #33725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33725#discussion_r1080698976
##
docs/source/cpp/streaming_execution.rst:
##
@@ -113,12 +109,12 @@ Read Relations
* The ``projection`` property is not supported and plans containing this
kou commented on code in PR #356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/356#discussion_r1080698782
##
c/driver/flightsql/adbc-driver-flightsql.pc.in:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license
andygrove opened a new issue, #135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/135
**Describe the bug**
The test works for me locally but fails in CI/
```
2023-01-19T00:06:25.0267445Z df =
2023-01-19T00:06:25.0268026Z
2023-01-19T00:06:25.0268336Z
emkornfield commented on PR #14879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/14879#issuecomment-1396267669
Looks like ASAN/UBSAN are still potentially real: `61 -
parquet-reader-test (Failed)`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
emkornfield commented on code in PR #17877:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/17877#discussion_r1080690591
##
cpp/src/parquet/column_reader_test.cc:
##
@@ -757,6 +760,63 @@ TEST_F(RecordReaderTest, BasicReadRepeatedField) {
/*levels_position=*/0);
}
+//
601 - 700 of 172155 matches
Mail list logo
