after succesfully compiling ghc 2.05 with ghc 0.29 on Linux (with Sven
Pannes Patch) I now do try to compile 2.05 with 2.05 and found some
small bugs. After doing this corrections it compiled without any
further problems.
Thanks, I've incorporated the fixes you had to make into the
I apologise for jumping in with more questions, but I have at least joined
the list now.
So, ghc-2.05 finished compiling, apparently. It didn't take much longer
than a week. :-)
I had to add GhcHcOpts=-H12m to my build file to get it to stop complaining
(12m was a guess, but the default of 6m
Olaf Chitil writes:
I'm using the -Ofile option to be able to call a transformation I added
to GHC. I think that
Great stuff - when compiling with -prof, one STG options that has to be
set is -fmassage-stg-for-profiling. This isn't done by the driver for
-Ofile (though it should be), so
Hi,
after succesfully compiling ghc 2.05 with ghc 0.29 on Linux (with Sven
Pannes Patch) I now do try to compile 2.05 with 2.05 and found some
small bugs. After doing this corrections it compiled without any
further problems.
I did not use the Readline-Lib. So I did not find any bugs relating