Re: Buglist compiling 2.05 with 2.05 for Linux

1997-08-04 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
after succesfully compiling ghc 2.05 with ghc 0.29 on Linux (with Sven Pannes Patch) I now do try to compile 2.05 with 2.05 and found some small bugs. After doing this corrections it compiled without any further problems. Thanks, I've incorporated the fixes you had to make into the

More questions on installing 2.05

1997-08-04 Thread Ian Collier
I apologise for jumping in with more questions, but I have at least joined the list now. So, ghc-2.05 finished compiling, apparently. It didn't take much longer than a week. :-) I had to add GhcHcOpts=-H12m to my build file to get it to stop complaining (12m was a guess, but the default of 6m

Re: Problems with profiling when using -Ofile

1997-08-04 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Olaf Chitil writes: I'm using the -Ofile option to be able to call a transformation I added to GHC. I think that Great stuff - when compiling with -prof, one STG options that has to be set is -fmassage-stg-for-profiling. This isn't done by the driver for -Ofile (though it should be), so

Buglist compiling 2.05 with 2.05 for Linux

1997-08-04 Thread Stefan Westmeier
Hi, after succesfully compiling ghc 2.05 with ghc 0.29 on Linux (with Sven Pannes Patch) I now do try to compile 2.05 with 2.05 and found some small bugs. After doing this corrections it compiled without any further problems. I did not use the Readline-Lib. So I did not find any bugs relating