Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:01 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
I propose we do this:
* extract the GHCi UI from the GHC package, put it in the ghc-bin package
(maybe we should rename this package to ghc-main or something). This
removes the editline and bytestring (for
Simon Marlow wrote:
I think it's a good idea to avoid variant licenses, especially in
libraries. We want it to be easy for someone to know whether they're
complying with the licenses for the libraries they depend on, and if
those licenses depend on choices made at the time the library was
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 01:49:43PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:01 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
* Move to Haskeline for the default build. We have to bring in terminfo
and utf8-string as bootlibs. This gives us line-editing on Windows,
and removes
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:01 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
I propose we do this:
* extract the GHCi UI from the GHC package, put it in the ghc-bin package
(maybe we should rename this package to ghc-main or something). This
removes the editline and bytestring (for now) dependencies
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although another option would be to make GHCi a separate (GPL) frontend
to the (BSD) GHC API. The only downside is that (with static linking) we
have another large binary. Another upside is that other GHC API users
don't get
| I've actually been experimenting with something similar:
|
| darcs get http://code.haskell.org/~judah/ghci-haskeline/
|
| Current benefits over the readline/editline versions:
| - Works on Windows
|
| I can attest to that. Nice going Judah!
|
| $ cabal update
| $ darcs get
Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2008 10:49:47 Jules Bean wrote:
Philip Hölzenspies wrote:
Also, there are no de facto escape sequences, because special keys (like
function and arrow keys) have different sequences on different
terminals. A useful tip that may be useful to
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 11:59 +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2008 10:49:47 Jules Bean wrote:
Something must be very very broken : surely it is not expected behaviour
for editline to need configuration in this way?
One can call it broken, another will say users
Judah Jacobson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although another option would be to make GHCi a separate (GPL) frontend
to the (BSD) GHC API. The only downside is that (with static linking) we
have another large binary. Another upside is that other GHC
On Friday 21 November 2008 10:49:47 Jules Bean wrote:
Philip Hölzenspies wrote:
Also, there are no de facto escape sequences, because special keys (like
function and arrow keys) have different sequences on different
terminals. A useful tip that may be useful to include in the wiki is an
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Lynagh:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:12PM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Nov 4, at 20:26,
Jason Dagit wrote:
But, I still think I did something wrong because the first thing I
tried to build with 6.10 complained that -lgmp was not found. I have
checked, it's installed and I saw the ./configure script for the 6.10
installation find it.
Actually I have the same problem. I need to
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:51 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Duncan Coutts wrote:
What I really think is that we should add back optional readline
support. People building closed source ghc binaries would not use it but
linux distros could enable it and provide a better out of
Also note that gmp.h will not be found without:
export CPATH=/opt/local/include
This directory should be part of the include-dirs: for the rts
package. And again the file /opt/local/include/gmp.h could be simply
copied to prefix/lib/ghc-6.10.1/include/
Sorry for the trouble
Christian
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also note that gmp.h will not be found without:
export CPATH=/opt/local/include
This directory should be part of the include-dirs: for the rts
package. And again the file /opt/local/include/gmp.h could be simply
Hi Jason,
On Nov 21, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Lynagh:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:12PM -0500,
Jason Dagit wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also note that gmp.h will not be found without:
export CPATH=/opt/local/include
This directory should be part of the include-dirs: for the rts
package. And again the file /opt/local/include/gmp.h
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Gregory Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Nov 21, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also note that gmp.h will not be found without:
export CPATH=/opt/local/include
This directory should be part of the
Hello Greg,
On Friday 21 November 2008 15:56, Gregory Wright wrote:
...
ppc/
Leopard still
fails, but I now have an account on a machine that I can use to test
and debug.
And if you need such an access (now or in the future), please just say the
word and you can get access to my PPC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Simon Peyton-Jones
Sent: Fri 2008-11-21 10:39
To: Simon Marlow; Judah Jacobson
Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Subject: RE: ghci-haskeline (was: Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.10.1 - EditLine /
terminal incompatibility?)
| I've
On 11/21/08, Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 11:59 +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
On Friday 21 November 2008 10:49:47 Jules Bean wrote:
Something must be very very broken : surely it is not expected behaviour
for editline to need configuration in this
On 11/21/08, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose we do this:
* extract the GHCi UI from the GHC package, put it in the ghc-bin package
(maybe we should rename this package to ghc-main or something). This
removes the editline and bytestring (for now) dependencies from the
On 2008 Nov 21, at 9:01, Simon Marlow wrote:
* extract the GHCi UI from the GHC package, put it in the ghc-bin
package
(maybe we should rename this package to ghc-main or something).
This
removes the editline and bytestring (for now) dependencies from
the GHC
package.
* Move to
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 20:45 +0100, Philip Hölzenspies wrote:
On Nov 19, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Would it be worth adding this hard-won lore somewhere on a Wiki
where it can be found later?
Dear Simon, all,
I don't think logging a specific option on the Wiki is
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 20:45 +0100, Philip Hölzenspies wrote:
On Nov 19, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Would it be worth adding this hard-won lore somewhere on a Wiki
where it can be found later?
Dear Simon, all,
I don't think logging a specific option on
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:51 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Duncan Coutts wrote:
What I really think is that we should add back optional readline
support. People building closed source ghc binaries would not use it but
linux distros could enable it and provide a better out of the box
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:52:12PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
My selfish suggestion is that we maintain the readline configuration and
let the people who originally wanted editline support do the work to
maintain that configuration.
Those people are GHC HQ: readline is GPL (not LGPL), so if
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 15:16 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:52:12PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
My selfish suggestion is that we maintain the readline configuration and
let the people who originally wanted editline support do the work to
maintain that configuration.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:43:49PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 15:16 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:52:12PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
My selfish suggestion is that we maintain the readline configuration and
let the people who originally
Jason Dagit:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ian Lynagh:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:12PM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
wrote:
On 2008 Nov 4, at 20:26, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL
: Philip K.F. Hölzenspies
| Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.10.1 - EditLine / terminal
incompatibility?
|
| On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 09:14 -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
| On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Duncan Coutts
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| I get some working and some non-working. Eg
On Nov 19, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Would it be worth adding this hard-won lore somewhere on a Wiki
where it can be found later?
Dear Simon, all,
I don't think logging a specific option on the Wiki is particularly
useful (maybe you would have a default editrc file),
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ian Lynagh:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:12PM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Nov 4, at 20:26, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Magicloud wrote:
Hi,
It is a few days after the release. But why the darcs repos of 6.10
is still changing?
The 6.10 repo is a branch. We tagged the 6.10.1 release, and we're now
working towards a 6.10.2 release.
Cheers,
Simon
___
Hi,
It is a few days after the release. But why the darcs repos of 6.10
is still changing?
Ian Lynagh wrote:
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.1
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
judah.jacobson:
Note that haskeline has a lot of dependencies and requires
TemplateHaskell and many other language extensions.
I'm also somewhat wary of switching to haskeline in ghc-6.10. I think
these issues could
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:39:42AM -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
judah.jacobson:
Note that haskeline has a lot of dependencies and requires
TemplateHaskell and many other language extensions.
I'm also somewhat
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 01:49 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:33:57PM -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
bind \e[3~ ed-delete-next-char
It's a shame this doesn't just work out of the box in an xterm, on
Debian at least. Perhaps we should consider switching to haskeline? Do
It's a shame this doesn't just work out of the box in an xterm, on
Debian at least. Perhaps we should consider switching to haskeline? Do
we know anything about how portable and complete that is?
If a haskell-based solution could be made to work, that would be
great - if you think that editline
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 14:59 +, Claus Reinke wrote:
Talking about dependencies of cabal packages:
- some packages depend on everything and the kitchen-sink,
following the ah, great, here's another package I should use
idea of what it means to provide a modern haskell package.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Duncan Coutts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 01:49 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:33:57PM -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
bind \e[3~ ed-delete-next-char
It's a shame this doesn't just work out of the box in an xterm, on
judah.jacobson:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Duncan Coutts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 01:49 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:33:57PM -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
bind \e[3~ ed-delete-next-char
It's a shame this doesn't just work out of the
Hi Philip,
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
After the announcement, I downloaded and installed the final release of
6.10.1. At some prior stage, I used the RC1 release, which had the same bug,
but I had generally assumed it to be an RC-phenomenon.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Alexander Dunlap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I apologize if this is off-topic, but I'm having a similar (but
distinct) problem: editline thinks that my delete key is a tilde
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Judah Jacobson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Alexander Dunlap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I apologize if this is off-topic, but I'm having a
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:33:57PM -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
bind \e[3~ ed-delete-next-char
It's a shame this doesn't just work out of the box in an xterm, on
Debian at least. Perhaps we should consider switching to haskeline? Do
we know anything about how portable and complete that is?
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 01:49:43AM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:33:57PM -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
bind \e[3~ ed-delete-next-char
It's a shame this doesn't just work out of the box in an xterm, on
Oh, the other thing I meant to say is that it seems to behaves
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 01:49:43AM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:33:57PM -0800, Judah Jacobson wrote:
bind \e[3~ ed-delete-next-char
It's a shame this doesn't just work out of the box in an xterm, on
On 2008 Nov 8, at 22:13, Rohan Drape wrote:
Emacs sends text to processes in packets of at most 255 characters.
In between these ghci now gets a ^D character sequence inserted into
the text. This did not happen previously (ie. with 6.8.2).
This sounds like a bug: either editline or ghci
On 2008-11-09, Reiner Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if this is Emacs' fault, but when I run GHCi through
Emacs, entered text is printed to stdout or stderr immediately after
Enter is pressed; when this is done after a file is loaded, ^J is
appended.
Also here, and there is a
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Ian, all,
After the announcement, I downloaded and installed the final release of
6.10.1. At some prior stage, I used the RC1 release, which had the same bug,
but I had generally assumed it to be an
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Duncan Coutts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get some working and some non-working. Eg backspace, del, home, end
work, but the ctl-left/ctl-right to jump words does not.
Does anyone know how libedit is supposed to be configured? readline
uses /etc/inputrc but
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 12:13 +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote:
It seems editline has some incompatibility with my terminal. Maybe, I should
configure something differently, but any and all of the control characters I
type and work for all readline based (and all custom line-readers I have
Dear Ian, all,
After the announcement, I downloaded and installed the final release of
6.10.1. At some prior stage, I used the RC1 release, which had the same bug,
but I had generally assumed it to be an RC-phenomenon. Which bug? Well...
It seems editline has some incompatibility with my
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 13:02 -0800, Don Stewart wrote:
Does anyone know how libedit is supposed to be configured? readline
uses /etc/inputrc but libedit either does not or doesn't understand all
of it.
/me wonders if it was really necessary to switch from readline
I'll note that it
duncan.coutts:
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 13:02 -0800, Don Stewart wrote:
Does anyone know how libedit is supposed to be configured? readline
uses /etc/inputrc but libedit either does not or doesn't understand all
of it.
/me wonders if it was really necessary to switch from readline
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Ian, all,
After the announcement, I downloaded and installed the final release of
6.10.1. At some prior stage, I used the RC1 release, which had the same bug,
but I had generally assumed it to be an
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:12PM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Nov 4, at 20:26, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure it does deinstall the 6.8 compiler?
After installing 6.10, there should be a
Ian Lynagh:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:12PM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
wrote:
On 2008 Nov 4, at 20:26, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure it does deinstall the 6.8 compiler?
After installing 6.10, there
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.1
==
The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new major release of GHC. There
have been a number of
Hello fellow GHC users,
Ian Lynagh wrote:
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.1
==
[snip]
How to get it
~
The easy way
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get it
~
The easy way is to go to the web page, which should be self-explanatory:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
We supply binary builds in the native package format for many
platforms, and the
Jason Dagit:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get it
~
The easy way is to go to the web page, which should be self-
explanatory:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/
We supply binary builds in the native package format for many
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get it
~
The easy way is to go to the web page, which should be self-explanatory:
On 2008 Nov 4, at 20:26, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Manuel M T Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Dagit:
I'm on OSX and I currently have ghc-6.6.1 and ghc-6.8.3 (installed
from a pkg). I would like to add ghc-6.10.1 to my system. I tried
to
do this with RC1
66 matches
Mail list logo
