On 27/08/2009 11:37, Sittampalam, Ganesh wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
I suggest if we stick with the independent repo approach that we
have some automation to check that changes are indeed getting
pushed upstream.
[snip unhelpful suggestion from me]
Yes, it tells you that
On 27/08/2009 11:25, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 18:15, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com
mailto:marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
* Boot libraries are of several kinds:
- INDEPENDENT: Independently maintained (e.g. time, haskeline)
- COUPLED: Tightly
On 28/08/2009 10:05, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 27/08/2009 11:37, Sittampalam, Ganesh wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
I suggest if we stick with the independent repo approach that we
have some automation to check that changes are indeed getting
pushed upstream.
[snip unhelpful
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 11:42 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Can anyone think of a good reason not to upgrade darcs to 2.3.0 on
darcs.haskell.org? I can think of 3 reasons to do so:
- this script, for preventing accidental divergence from upstream
- faster pushes, due to transfer-mode
-
