[Gluster-devel] Update on Process Automation initiatives

2018-03-12 Thread Amar Tumballi
Hi all, As a step towards achieving our promise on Goals for the year 2018 [1], we have taken up automating some of the work flow of glusterfs development cycle. Below is the update on one such effort. This work intends to make the development process more efficient by automating aspects o

[Gluster-devel] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

2018-03-12 Thread Amar Tumballi
Hi all, Below is the proposal which most of us in maintainers list have agreed upon. Sharing it here so we come to conclusion quickly, and move on :-) --- Until now, Gluster project’s releases followed x.y.z model, where x is indicating a major revision, and y a minor, and z as a patched release

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2018-03-12-a96c7e74 (master branch)

2018-03-12 Thread staticanalysis
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2018-03-12-a96c7e74 ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

2018-03-12 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > Hi all, > > Below is the proposal which most of us in maintainers list have agreed > upon. Sharing it here so we come to conclusion quickly, and move on :-) > > --- > > Until now, Gluster project’s releases followed x.y.z model, where x is >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] New web proxy for our web application

2018-03-12 Thread Michael Scherer
Le lundi 26 février 2018 à 18:07 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit : > Hi folks, > > I finally managed to complete the deployment of a High Availiability > reverse proxy for server hosted in the community cage[1]. While the > switch should be invisible to everybody, and likely bring nothing > (except

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Proposal to change the version numbers of Gluster project

2018-03-12 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
On 03/12/2018 10:34 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > * > > After 4.1, we want to move to either continuous numbering (like > Fedora), or time based (like ubuntu etc) release numbers. Which > is the model we pick is not yet finalized. Happy to hear opinions. > > > Not sur

[Gluster-devel] Release 4.1: LTM release targeted for end of May

2018-03-12 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
Hi, As we wind down on 4.0 activities (waiting on docs to hit the site, and packages to be available in CentOS repositories before announcing the release), it is time to start preparing for the 4.1 release. 4.1 is where we have GD2 fully functional and shipping with migration tools to aid Gluster

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 4.1: LTM release targeted for end of May

2018-03-12 Thread Poornima Gurusiddaiah
Hi, Below are the features we are targeting for 4.1: 1. https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364 - Write behind aggregate. The patch is merged, documentation is pending. 2. https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/274 - Re-read dentry cache The patch is under review, hopefully

Re: [Gluster-devel] Announcing Softserve- serve yourself a VM

2018-03-12 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Deepshikha Khandelwal wrote: > Hi, > > We have launched the alpha version of SOFTSERVE[1], which allows Gluster > Github organization members to provision virtual machines for a specified > duration of time. These machines will be deleted automatically afterwards