On 04/29/2014 03:41 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:30:14AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi Kaleb,
Investigating a failure in rpm.t on Rackspace, in release-3.5
branch (but not master).
Noticed something interesting while looking. (May not be related
to the problem). In
At last week's community meeting we tentatively agreed on tomorrow — May
14th — as the date we would release 3.4.4beta and 3.5.1alpha.
Three changes for 3.4.4 need to be reviewed before they can be merged:
1 Ubuntu code audit results (blocking inclusion in Ubuntu Main repo):
GlusterFS-3.4.4beta1 and GlusterFS-3.5.1beta1 RPMs for el5-7 (RHEL,
CentOS, etc.) and Fedora 19-21 are now available in the YUM repos at
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.4.4beta1/
and
On 05/27/2014 09:43 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
So, before I expend a ton of effort replacing this code, does anyone
else think it shouldn't be done and that the enhancements should be made
to the current OpenSSL code instead?
The most compelling arguments — to me — are the speed with which things
On 05/27/2014 11:00 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
In any event, it's license didn't pollute our code. Do we need
to have our attorney bless the change.
_its_ license didn't pollute our code.
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel
To be sure, 64-bit alignment is not required on x86_64, and the hit from
the extra insn cycles from the transparent fix-up is negligible ( 0.05%
on x86_64). And modern RISC hardware that we would be likely to care
about, e.g. PPC and aarch64 (i.e. ARM), also does transparent fix-up, so
it's
Meeting Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2014-08-27/gluster-meeting.2014-08-27-12.04.html
Full Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2014-08-27/gluster-meeting.2014-08-27-12.04.log.html
--
Kaleb
___
As a wishlist item, I think it'd be nice if debug builds (or some other
build-time option) would disable the pools. Then valgrind might be more
useful for finding leaks.
Maybe for GlusterFS-4.0?
On 09/18/2014 11:40 AM, Dan Lambright wrote:
If we could disable/enable ref tracking
On 09/18/2014 12:09 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 09/18/2014 09:35 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 09/18/2014 09:31 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
As a wishlist item, I think it'd be nice if debug builds (or some
other build-time option) would disable the pools. Then valgrind might
[~/work/glusterfs]
sh$ git grep '} else {' | wc -l
1331
[~/work/glusterfs]
sh$ git grep 'else {' | grep -v '}' | wc -l
142
So going by just numbers, } else { is 10x more common than }\n else
{. I also find that believable based on familiarity of seeing this
pattern in the code.
On 10/30/2014 04:36 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
I think a compat package would make the coupling between server and client
looser, (i.e. one could run old clients on the same machine as a new server).
Due to limited time and dependency on qemu on some of my testing machines, I
still have not
On 10/30/2014 01:50 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-10-30 14:52, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
On 10/30/2014 04:36 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
I think a compat package would make the coupling between server and client
looser, (i.e. one could run old clients on the same machine as a new server
On 10/30/2014 04:34 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-10-30 20:55, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
On 10/30/2014 01:50 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
On 2014-10-30 14:52, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
On 10/30/2014 04:36 AM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
I think a compat package would make the coupling between server
Many thanks to all our users that have reported bugs against the 3.4
version of GlusterFS! glusterfs-3.4.6beta2 has been made available for
testing.
If you filed a bug against 3.4.x and it is listed as fixed in the
Release Notes, please test it to confirm that it is fixed. Please update
the
On 01/15/2015 08:02 AM, Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana wrote:
On 15-Jan-2015, at 5:38 pm, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/15/2015 12:13 PM, Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana wrote:
In a quest to find why good programmers are wary of the Go To
statement, came across this interesting article by
On 01/21/2015 04:43 AM, Bhaskarakiran Yarlagadda wrote:
Hi,
I have filed the above bug for the error during rpm build. Could someone look
into this.
You need to install the redhat-rpm-config RPM
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Hi,
Lalatendu Mohanty, Niels de Vos, and myself will be holding GlusterFS
Office Hours at FOSDEM.
Look for us at the CentOS booth, from 16h00 to 17h00 on Saturday, 31
January.
FOSDEM is taking place this weekend, 31 Jan and 1 Feb, at ULB Solbosch
Campus, Brussels. FOSDEM is a free event,
On 01/29/2015 07:43 AM, Rudra Siva wrote:
Hi,
Have been able to get Gluster running on Intel's MIC platform. The
only code change to Gluster source was an unresolved yylex (I am not
really sure why that was coming up - may be someone more familiar with
it's use in Gluster can answer).
At the
glusterfs-3.6.2 has been released.
The release source tar file and packages for Fedora {20,21,rawhide},
RHEL/CentOS {5,6,7}, Debian {wheezy,jessie}, Pidora2014, and Raspbian
wheezy are available at
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.6/3.6.2/
(Ubuntu packages will be
Thanks for everyone who attended our Weekly Gluster Community Meeting
on IRC a few minutes ago.
Meeting Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-03-18/gluster-meeting.2015-03-18-11.59.html
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Many thanks to all our users that have reported bugs against the 3.4
version of GlusterFS! glusterfs-3.4.7beta2 has been made available for
testing.
N.B. glusterfs-3.4.7beta1 was released but did not build with gcc-5.
If you filed a bug against 3.4.x and it is listed as fixed in the
Hi,
Just FYI, what you propose is called bundling in Fedora packaging
parlance, and Fedora's packaging guidelines forbid bundling. It is
possible to get an exception granted, but it's not safe to presume that
an exception will be granted.
(For downstream this is a non-issue, but here on
Hi,
Sorry for the top-post. Just to Amplify a but if what Niels has already
said——
Yes, in Fedora, the glusterfs.spec file has a line
%global _hardened_build 1
at the top. This enables PIE and RELRO in Fedora and EPEL builds.
This line exists in the glusterfs.spec.in file in the Gluster
On 04/02/2015 08:22 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the top-post. Just to Amplify a but if what Niels...
Just to Amplify a bit of what Niels
(Naughty fingers.)
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Announce GA of Ganesha V2.2.0
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:30:44 -0700
From: Frank Filz ffilz...@mindspring.com
To: 'NFS Ganesha Developers' nfs-ganesha-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Branch: Master
Tag: V2.2.0
Release Highlights:
Executive summary is:
+ vdsm needs (wants) glusterfs-3.7.x packages for el-based
distributions, and for Fedora secondary architectures like ppc64.
+ Furthermore they would also like to have packages for RHEL ppc64le.
Presumably because they would like to provide vdsm for all these
On 04/30/2015 03:01 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Ran into Configuration Error several times today. The error message
states:
The HTTP server did not provide the username in the GITHUB_USERheader
when it forwarded the request to Gerrit Code Review...
Switching browsers was useful for me to overcome
On 05/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
* Retire NFSv3
I believe the right way to express this is: retire the Gluster NFS
(gnfs) server. (Ganesha does NFSv3, and will continue to do NFSv3, as
well as 4, 4.1, 4.2, and pNFS.)
Regards
--
Kaleb
From: Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:41:50AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
On 14 May 2015, at 10:19, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am happy to announce that Gluster 3.7.0 is now generally
3.7.0 won't be packaged into Ubuntu LTS nor
On 04/15/2015 04:39 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
Hi All,
In about 20 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 8:00 EDT, 12:00 UTC, 12:00 CEST, 17:30 IST
Hi,
As 3.7 release approaches, here's a summary of our current thinking
about the RPM versions that will ship in various versions of Fedora.
Fedora 20: glusterfs-3.5.x
Fedora 21: glusterfs-3.6.x
Fedora 22: glusterfs-3.6.x
Fedora 23 (rawhide) glusterfs-3.7.x
N.B. we will continue to provide
Hi All,
In about 20 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 8:00 EDT, 12:00 UTC, 12:00 CEST, 17:30 IST
(in your terminal, run: date -d 12:00 UTC)
- agenda:
The Gluster community is please to announce the release of GlusterFS-3.4.7.
The GlusterFS 3.4.7 release is focused on bug fixes. The release notes
are available at
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/v3.4.7/doc/release-notes/3.4.7.md.
Download the latest GlusterFS 3.4.7 at
Recent commits to xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-common.c calls functions
which are not defined.
Was a file with dht_inode_ctx_get_mig_info() and
dht_mig_info_is_invalid() definitions omitted in a change set?
Right now the release-3.7 branch does not compile in jenkins smoke tests
and on
On 06/23/2015 08:07 AM, Ramesh wrote:
Hi,
glusterfs-server installation fails with the following error in F21.
##
Installing : glusterfs-server-3.7.2-2.fc21.x86_64 1/1
Error unpacking rpm package
Hi,
There will be no new or updated RPMs for Fedora 20 after today.
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkara...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster builds are failing in rpmbuilding
I see that kaleb already sent a patch for this:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11007 - master
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11008 - release-3.7
The corresponding patch
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Fernandes josfe...@redhat.com
Agree with Jeff
But now the question is should we have this patch go through or leave it to
float in time and space :)
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11214/
The patch just makes the existing inline calls static or
I have knowledge that more than one of our Gluster developers are still
using Fedora 19 (or earlier?) for their development work.
This is bad for many reasons, but perhaps the worst one is that Fedora
22 ships with gcc-5.1.x. which now defaults to newer versions of the C
standard among
From: Raghavendra Bhat rab...@redhat.com
glusterfs-3.6.4 has been released and the packages for
RHEL/Fedora/Centos can be found here.
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.6/LATEST/
There are packages there for other distributions there as well, e.g. Debian
Wheezy,
Sorry for the late mailing
Meeting summary
Roll Call (kkeithley, 12:00:56)
kshlm to check back with misc on the new jenkins slaves (kkeithley,
12:04:10)
ACTION: kshlm to check back with misc on the new jenkins slaves
(kkeithley, 12:05:03)
krishnan_p and atinmu will remind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/05/2015 07:08 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 novembre 2015 à 12:44 +0100, Niels de Vos a écrit :
>> [fixed CC to gluster-devel@gluster.org]
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 06:13:52AM -0500, Kaleb KEITHLEY
On 11/06/2015 02:08 AM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently we use TCP loopback connection for communicating between gluster
> Client and Server.
> Hyper-convergence may also require communication with a server running in the
> same hyper-visor.
>
> I was initially wondering
I have knowledge that more than one of our Gluster developers are still
using Fedora 19 (or earlier?) for their development work.
This is bad for many reasons, but perhaps the worst one is that Fedora
22 ships with gcc-5.1.x. which now defaults to newer versions of the C
standard among other
On 09/07/2015 12:47 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>>> - Support for SSL transports - thought we wouldn't be using this
>>> initially, we would require it later on.
>>
>> Control-plane security is important enough that I think it has to
On 12/08/2015 10:25 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> We already have devrpms jobs which test building rpms, so building
> rpms again seems unnecessary.
>
> The reason I'm asking this is because I'm facing issues trying to get
> this working in the saltstack configured environment I'm fixing. I
> don't see
On 12/03/2015 03:10 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
> Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Brief Background:
>>
>> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
>> the applications for most number of fops.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/17/2015 10:05 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:05:04PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
>
>> But yes, if we do want to expose this information via the mount
>> point, then maybe /mount/.meta is a good place.
>
> Indeed,
On 01/07/2016 02:24 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I was in the middle of composing a reply along pretty much the same
>> lines when I saw Jeff's reply land in my inbox.
>>
>> We are migrating from gnfs to N
1. You should have inherited a tracker bug with a good alias for your
release version, if not please create one.
2. Use gerrit search something like [1] to find all the patches that
were merged after previous release and ensure that the bugs they are
using are already added to depends-on list of
Hi,
As discussed during today's Bug Triage meeting it is proposed to remove
the Target Release from all GlusterFS bug reports.
This field is apparently not used by anyone, and it's not described in
the Bug Triage process at
http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Contributors-Guide/Bug-Triage/
On 11/24/2015 08:03 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> As discussed during today's Bug Triage meeting it is proposed to remove
>> the Target Release from all GlusterFS bug reports.
>>
> From: "Niels de Vos"
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:56:54AM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> > Hi Raghavendra,
> >
> > I noticed that for the below patches Gluster Build system hasn't voted
> > and hence the verified flag doesn't have an ack from it even if the
> > regression
> From: "Raghavendra Talur"
> >
>
> Is this still applicable after removing the voting from smoke, rpmbuild and
> other such projects?
> IIRC, we removed voting lines from these scripts because of the race reason.
>
I don't know. Probably not.
--
Kaleb
Please attach the logs to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304348
(or mail them to Kaushal and/or me.
Thanks
- Original Message -
> From: "Ronny Adsetts" <ronny.adse...@amazinginternet.com>
> To: "Kaleb Keithley" <kkeit...@redhat.c
Hi,
If you're a Debian Wheezy user please give the new packages a try.
Thanks
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
On 01/20/2016 04:08 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Yes, there are couple of messages like this in my logs too (I guess one
> message per each remount):
>
> ===
> [2016-01-18 23:42:08.742447] I [fuse-bridge.c:3875:notify_kernel_loop] 0-
> glusterfs-fuse: kernel notifier loop terminated
> ===
>
On 01/21/2016 06:59 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> I see extra GF_FREE (node); added with two patches:
>
> ===
> $ git diff HEAD~2 | gist
> https://gist.github.com/9524fa2054cc48278ea8
> ===
>
> Is that intentionally? I guess I face double-free issue.
>
I presume you're referring to the
On 02/13/2016 08:37 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:41 PM, André Bauer wrote:
>>> Already asked myself why this not exists.
>>>
>>> so... +1 from me.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Serkan Çoban"
>
> Will those patches be available in 3.7.7?
3.7.7 was released yesterday, so no.
But 3.7.7 has another issue; there won't be packages available from
download.gluster.org.
Pranith has already indicated that we will
value for the nfs.disable option, please feel free to
post them here in mailto:gluster-us...@gluster.org.
Regards,
--
Kaleb KEITHLEY
[1] https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http
It's not clear to some of us that anyone is using this xlator.
The associated contrib/qemu sources are very old, and there is nobody currently
maintaining it. It would take a substantial effort to update it – to what end,
if nobody actually uses it?
Bundled in the source, the way it is now,
There are a handful of centos regressions that have been running for over eight
hours.
I don't know if that's contributing to the short backlog of centos regressions
waiting to run.
--
Kaleb
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
On 04/28/2016 06:51 AM, Shakti Rathore wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am using Centos 7 and when I enter the command:
>
>
>
> wget -P /etc/yum.repos.d
> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/RHEL/glusterfs-epel.repo
>
>
>
> I get the message that it was not found.
>
It
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-05-10/bug_triage.2016-05-10-12.04.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-05-10/bug_triage.2016-05-10-12.04.txt
Log:
On 07/21/2016 02:38 PM, Samuli Heinonen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m running oVirt 3.6 and Gluster 3.7 with ZFS backend.
> ...
> Afaik ZFS on Linux doesn’t support aio. Has there been some changes to
> GlusterFS regarding aio?
>
Boy, if that isn't a smoking gun, I don't know what is.
--
Kaleb
On 08/04/2016 08:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:53AM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:30:28AM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>
> ...
>>> ./tests/bugs/gfapi/bug-1093594.t ; Failed 1 times
>>> Regression Links:
>>>
On 07/12/2016 03:00 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
>
>
> On 31/07/15 19:29, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> On 07/30/2015 05:16 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:27:15PM +0530, Soumya Koduri wrote:
Hi,
With the applications using and loading different libraries,
On 07/21/2016 10:19 AM, David Gossage wrote:
> Has their been any release notes or bug reports about the removal of aio
> support being intentional?
Build logs of 3.7.13 on Fedora and Ubuntu PPA (Launchpad) show that when
`configure` ran during the build it reported that Linux AIO was enabled.
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Scherer"
>
> so I was reading coverty scan reports (as Nigel tricked me into looking
> them), and one of the first is this:
>
On 10/19/2016 04:57 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hello,
glusterfs fails to build from source against openssl 1.1.0b:
fixed in http://review.gluster.org/15629 on master. I haven't backported
to the other branches yet.
Making all in crypt
Making all in src
libtool: compile: gcc
use the unbundled/decoupled storhaug component for common-ha to include Samba.
This entails
1) removing the .../extras/ganesha/... bits,
2) removing the ganesha CLIs in gluster and glusterd,
3) updating storhaug to include the additions and enhancements that have been
made, e.g.
Nothing?
- Original Message -
> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY"
>
>
> There was considerable discussion in the community meeting yesterday.
>
> If we're not going to get one (any time soon) I'm contemplating a
> 3.9.0-n+1 update in Fedora, Ubuntu Launchpad PPA, etc.,
- Original Message -
> From: "Niels de Vos"
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:00:56AM -0800, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> >
> >
> > I realize we're behind on this, but I'd like us to make sure we're all
> > aligned on releasing good product. Can we say by EOD Tuesday, we're
- Original Message -
> From: "Kaleb Keithley" <kkeit...@redhat.com>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com>
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:00:56AM -0800, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> > &
- Original Message -
> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY"
>
> This is built on top of glusterfs-3.12. Obviously this will change to
> 4.0 (4.0rc0, etc.) This is derived from the
> .../extras/rpms/glusterd2.spec in the glusterd2 source.
>
> see
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:47 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I tried this recently, and the issue of rpcgen is real, and is not
> straight-forward is what I felt. Would like to pick this up after
> glusterfs-6.0 release.
>
rpcgen is in its own separate package.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:22 AM Deepshikha Khandelwal
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:06 AM Kaleb Keithley
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:13 PM Deepshikha Khandelwal <
>> dkhan...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:41 AM
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:43 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> We recently noticed that in one of the package update on builder (ie,
> centos7.x machines), python3.6 got installed as a dependency. So, yes, it
> is possible to have python3 in centos7 now.
>
EPEL
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:36 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:43 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
> atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> We recently noticed that in one of the package update on builder (ie,
>> centos7.x machines), python3
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 5:27 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:35 PM Niels de Vos wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 02:11:21PM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:13 PM Niels de Vos wrote:
>
>
> I
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 7:39 AM Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 20 juin 2019 à 06:57 -0400, Kaleb Keithley a écrit :
> > AFAICT, working fine right up to when EPEL and python3 were installed
> > on
> > the centos builders. If it was my decision, I'd undo that change.
&g
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:13 PM Deepshikha Khandelwal
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:41 AM Kaleb Keithley
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:36 AM Kaleb Keithley
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:43 AM
Yes, please open github issues for these RFEs and close the BZs.
Thanks
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:46 AM Soumya Koduri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To track any new feature or improvements we are currently using github .
> I assume those issues refer to the ones which are actively being worked
> upon. How
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:21 AM Harold Miller wrote:
> Has Red Hat security cleared the Slack systems for confidential / customer
> information?
>
> If not, it will make it difficult for support to collect/answer questions.
>
I'm pretty sure Amar meant as a replacement for the freenode #gluster
*TL;DNR: *updates from glusterfs-5.8 to glusterfs-5.9 and from
glusterfs-6.4 to glusterfs-6.5, — using the package repos on
https://download.gluster.org or the Gluster PPA on Launchpad— on buster,
bullseye/sid, and some Ubuntu releases may not work, or may not work
smoothly. Consider yourself
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:38 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> *... *and some Ubuntu releases
>
Specifically Ubuntu Disco and Eoan.
___
Community Meeting Calendar:
APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejea
ed?
>
TL;DNR: if it was, I would have said so. ;-)
The Debian packager didn't change the packaging on stretch or bionic and
xenial. The gluster community packages for those distributions are the same
as they've always been.
>
> Thank you for additional information
>
> Ingo
&g
package is installed).
> I'm attaching relevant terminal output.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Barak
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 2:25 PM Kaleb Keithley
> wrote:
>
>>
>> you must not use --without-libtirpc on RHEL8.
>>
>> rpcgen is in the rpcgen package on
you must not use --without-libtirpc on RHEL8.
rpcgen is in the rpcgen package on RHEL8 and Fedora 29+
--
Kaleb
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:11 AM Barak Sason wrote:
> Greeting all,
>
> I've made a fresh installation of RHEL 8 on a VM and have been trying to
> set up Gluster on that system.
>
>
ill persists.
>
> I'm attaching the repo file and terminal output.
> Might you have any idea what I'm doing wrong?
>
> Thank you very much for your assistance,
>
> Barak
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 2:40 PM Kaleb Keithley
> wrote:
>
>
I personally wouldn't call three years ago — when we started to deprecate
it, in glusterfs-3.9 — a recent change.
As a community the decision was made to move to NFS-Ganesha as the
preferred NFS solution, but it was agreed to keep the old code in the tree
for those who wanted it. There have been
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:39 AM Rinku Kothiya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Release-7 RC1 packages are built. We are planning to have a test day on
> 26-Sep-2019, we request your participation. Do post on the lists any
> testing done and feedback for the same.
>
> Packages for Fedora 29, Fedora 30, RHEL 8,
Support of upstream, community-built packages is pretty nebulous. If it
builds, with little or no work, typically we package it. Actual support, as
in help with problems, comes from the "community."
Niels and I discussed building glusterfs-5 for C8 and decided we'd wait and
see if anyone actually
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:46 AM Deepshikha Khandelwal
wrote:
>
> - The "regression" tests would be triggered by a comment "/run
> regression" from anyone in the gluster-maintainers[4] github group. To run
> full regression, maintainers need to comment "/run full regression"
>
> [4]
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:33 AM Sunil Kumar Heggodu Gopala Acharya <
shegg...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Regards,
>
> Sunil kumar Acharya
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:54 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:33 AM Sunil Kumar Heggodu Gopala Acharya <
> shegg...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sunil kumar Acharya
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:32 AM Niels de Vos wrote:
>
> For me, the following works:
>
> $ mkdir centos8-fluster
> $ cd centos8-gluster
> $ vagrant init centos/8
> $ vagrant up
> $ cat << EOF | vagrant ssh -c 'sudo sh'
> dnf -y update
> dnf -y install epel-release
>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 8:32 AM Strahil Nikolov
wrote:
> Hi Rinku,
>
> can you tell me how the packages for CentOS 7 are build, as I had issues
> yesterday bulding both latest and v7 branches ?
>
Generally speaking, CentOS packages are built in CBS (CentOS Build System).
They are built using
I was wrong: nfs-ganesha-2.8's fsal_gluster calls glfs_ftruncate() and
glfs_fsync(), which appeared in glusterfs-6.0.
Sorry for any confusion.
--
Kaleb
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:07 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> GFAPI_6.0 is a reference to a set of versioned symbols in
>
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo