Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > On 08/08/2016 02:56 PM, David Gossage wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, David Gossage > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian wrote: >>

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 August 2016 at 12:23, David Gossage > wrote: > > Since my dev is now on 3.8 and has granular enabled I'm feeling too lazy > to > > roll back so will just wait till 3.8.2 is

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 9 August 2016 at 12:23, David Gossage wrote: > Since my dev is now on 3.8 and has granular enabled I'm feeling too lazy to > roll back so will just wait till 3.8.2 is released in few days that fixes > the bugs mentioned to me and then test this few times on my dev.

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 August 2016 at 07:23, Joe Julian wrote: > > Just kill (-15) the brick process. That'll close the TCP connections and > the > > clients will just go right on functioning off the

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 9 August 2016 at 07:23, Joe Julian wrote: > Just kill (-15) the brick process. That'll close the TCP connections and the > clients will just go right on functioning off the remaining replica. When > you format and recreate your filesystem, it'll be missing the volume-id

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > On 08/08/2016 02:56 PM, David Gossage wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, David Gossage > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian wrote: >>

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 08/08/2016 02:56 PM, David Gossage wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, David Gossage > wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian > wrote: On

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 08/08/2016 02:37 PM, David Gossage wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian > wrote: On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote: So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of course

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, David Gossage wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > >> >> >> On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote: >> >> So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of >>

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote: > > So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of > course looking for what to break next. > > Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/08/2016 6:39 AM, David Gossage wrote: > >> Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil on >> mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I may need with >> a 3 way

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote: So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of course looking for what to break next. Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil on mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I may

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 9/08/2016 6:39 AM, David Gossage wrote: Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil on mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I may need with a 3 way replica. I was going to one by one change them to basically raid10 letting it heal in between.

[Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of course looking for what to break next. Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil on mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I may need with a 3 way replica. I was going to one by