Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash

Thank you very much for all the efforts.I have deployed a new cluster with 3 servers and used nfs-ganesha instead of the native nfs, so far it's working fine, also, i tried to reproduce this issue in a test environment but i had no luck and it just worked as it should be.Do you think i should

Re: [Gluster-users] What is op-version?

Thanks Atin for your answer. I just tried a "gluster v get cluster.op-version" on my Gluster volume and Option  Value   --  -   cluster.op-version

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote: So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of course looking for what to break next. Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil on mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I may

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/08/2016 6:39 AM, David Gossage wrote: > >> Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil on >> mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I may need with >> a 3 way

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote: > > So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of > course looking for what to break next. > > Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, David Gossage wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > >> >> >> On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote: >> >> So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of >>

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 9/08/2016 6:39 AM, David Gossage wrote: Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil on mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I may need with a 3 way replica. I was going to one by one change them to basically raid10 letting it heal in between.

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 08/08/2016 02:37 PM, David Gossage wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian > wrote: On 08/08/2016 01:39 PM, David Gossage wrote: So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of course

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 08/08/2016 02:56 PM, David Gossage wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, David Gossage > wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian > wrote: On

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > On 08/08/2016 02:56 PM, David Gossage wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, David Gossage > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Julian wrote: >>

[Gluster-users] What is op-version?

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Niels de Vos > wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:37:43PM +0530, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: > > > > On 08/07/2016 04:17 PM, ML mail wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can someone explain me what is

[Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

So now that I have my cluster on 3.7.14 and sharded and working I am of course looking for what to break next. Currently each of 3 nodes is on a 6 disk (WD Red 1TB) raidz6 (zil on mirrored ssd), which I am thinking is more protection than I may need with a 3 way replica. I was going to one by

[Gluster-users] gluster profile mode - showing unexpected WRITE fops

Hi, I’m doing some benchmarking vs our trial GlusterFS setup (distributed replicated, 20 bricks configured as 10 pairs). I’m running 3.6.9 currently. Our benchmarking load involves a large number of concurrent readers that continuously pick random file / offsets to read. No writes are ever

Re: [Gluster-users] Tiered Volumes and Backups

On 9/08/2016 12:01 AM, Dan Lambright wrote: By default, files are marked for promotion on the first I/O. So if you did a backup and touched every file, they would all be marked for promotion. You ought to be able to change that, so only files touched some number of times (2X?) are promoted.

[Gluster-users] Improvements in Glusterd NFS-Ganesha integration for GlusterFS3.9

Hi all, Currently all the configuration related NFS Ganesha is stored individually in each node belong to ganesha cluster at /etc/ganesha. The following are the files present in it : - ganesha.conf - configuration file for ganesha process - ganesha-ha.conf - configuration file high

[Gluster-users] Need help to design a data storage

HI, I want to store data which is 135TB, and main requirement is data redundancy, i can scarify of data performance, but data should not be lost. ​can you help me in a design​ -- -- Regards.: SHAM P. ARSIWALA. RHC{E-A-I} M.: 9099099855 ___

Re: [Gluster-users] What is op-version?

On 08/08/2016 08:59 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Niels de Vos > wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:37:43PM +0530, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: > > On 08/07/2016 04:17 PM, ML

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 August 2016 at 07:23, Joe Julian wrote: > > Just kill (-15) the brick process. That'll close the TCP connections and > the > > clients will just go right on functioning off the

Re: [Gluster-users] Change underlying brick on node

On 9 August 2016 at 07:23, Joe Julian wrote: > Just kill (-15) the brick process. That'll close the TCP connections and the > clients will just go right on functioning off the remaining replica. When > you format and recreate your filesystem, it'll be missing the volume-id

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash

Well, i'm not entirely sure it is a setup-related issue. If you have the steps to recreate the issue, along with the relevant information about volume configuration, logs, core, version etc, then it would be good to track this issue through a bug report. -Krutika On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:56 PM,

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster reverting directory owndership?

Hi Sergei, Will need few information to proceed ahead. - Is the chown operations were performed on a root directory ? - Was there any add-brick operation performed before you saw the ownership getting reverted ? In the mean time will try to reproduce the issue and get back to you. Regards,

Re: [Gluster-users] Reconnecting Client to Brick

- Original Message - > From: "Danny Lee" > To: gluster-users@gluster.org > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 1:25:43 AM > Subject: [Gluster-users] Reconnecting Client to Brick > > Hi, > > I have a 3-node replicated cluster using the native glusterfs mount, and >

Re: [Gluster-users] ec heal questions

Is reading the good copies to construct the bad chunk is a parallel or sequential operation? Should I revert my 16+4 ec cluster to 8+2 because it takes nearly 7 days to heal just one broken 8TB disk which has only 800GB of data? On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Ashish Pandey

Re: [Gluster-users] ec heal questions

Serkan, Heal for 2 different files could be parallel but not for a single file and different chunks. I think you are referring your previous mail in which you had to remove one complete disk. In this case heal starts automatically but it scans through each and every file/dir to decide if

Re: [Gluster-users] What is op-version?

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:37:43PM +0530, Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: > > On 08/07/2016 04:17 PM, ML mail wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can someone explain me what is the op-version everybody is speaking about > > on the mailing list? > op-version is a way to determine which gluster version you are

[Gluster-users] ec heal questions

Hi, Assume we have 8+2 and 16+4 ec configurations and we just replaced a broken disk in each configuration which has 100GB of data. In which case heal completes faster? Does heal speed has anything related with ec configuration? Assume we are in 16+4 ec configuration. When heal starts it reads

Re: [Gluster-users] ec heal questions

Hi, Considering all the other factor same for both the configuration, yes small configuration would take less time. To read good copies, it will take less time. I think, multi threaded shd is the only enhancement in near future. Ashish - Original Message - From: "Serkan Çoban"

Re: [Gluster-users] What is op-version?

On 08/07/2016 04:17 PM, ML mail wrote: Hi, Can someone explain me what is the op-version everybody is speaking about on the mailing list? op-version is a way to determine which gluster version you are running. This is quite useful during upgrade process, to check for backward

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash

Hi, Sorry I haven't had the chance to look into this issue last week. Do you mind raising a bug in upstream with all the relevant information and I'll take a look sometime this week? -Krutika On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Mahdi Adnan wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, i got

Re: [Gluster-users] Tiered Volumes and Backups

- Original Message - > From: "Mohammed Rafi K C" > To: "Lindsay Mathieson" , "gluster-users" > > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 1:03:19 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Tiered Volumes and Backups > > > > On