Hi there,
Is there any news on inotify support for GlusterFS? I see this in 3.4 list
but I didn't see any progress anywhere.
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning34/Inotify
Thanks,
Kent
___
Gluster-users mailing
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
While trying to figure out the cause of the bottleneck i've realised
that the bottle neck is coming from the client side as running
concurrent test from two clients would give me about 650mb/s per each
client.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:48:03 +0100
Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
While trying to figure out the cause of the bottleneck i've realised
that the bottle neck is coming from the client side as running
Hi Joe,
i know you have much to do. But do you have already opened a bug report?
--
Best regards
Yannik Lieblinger
Am Dienstag, 28. August 2012 18:44 CEST, Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org
schrieb:
I was able to cause client crashes with the 3.5 kernels in Fedora and have
opened a bug
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:29:25AM +0800, Jack Wang wrote:
below patch should fix your bug.
Thank you Jack - that was a very quick response! I'm building a new kernel
with this patch now and will report back.
However, I think the existence of this bug suggests that Linux with software
RAID is
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:03:14AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Yes - so in workloads where you have many concurrent clients, this isn't a
problem. It's only a problem if you have a single client doing a lot of
sequential operations.
That is not correct for most cases. GlusterFS
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:39:18 +0100
Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:29:25AM +0800, Jack Wang wrote:
below patch should fix your bug.
Thank you Jack - that was a very quick response! I'm building a new kernel
with this patch now and will report back.
2012/9/10 Stephan von Krawczynski sk...@ithnet.com:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:39:18 +0100
Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:29:25AM +0800, Jack Wang wrote:
below patch should fix your bug.
Thank you Jack - that was a very quick response! I'm building a new
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:44:26 +0100
Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:03:14AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Yes - so in workloads where you have many concurrent clients, this isn't a
problem. It's only a problem if you have a single client doing a
Dear gluster experts,
I'm trying to use glusterfs libgfapi to write glusterfs application. But I
fail to find any directory related functions in libgfapi. Any one gives me
a clue?
Thank you very much.
--
符永涛
___
Gluster-users mailing list
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:03:41AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Brian, please re-think this. What you call a stable kernel (Ubuntu 3.2.0-30)
is indeed very old.
I am talking about the official kernel for the Ubuntu 12.04 Long Term
Support server release.
If you're saying that Ubuntu
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
If you have small files you are busted, if you have workload on the clients
you are busted and if you have lots of concurrent FS action on the client you
are busted. Which leaves you with test cases nowhere near real
Hi,
I don't know about Gluster support, but I use inotify via incrontab to watch
mounted Gluster filesystems and it works well. Most of my use of it is just
triggering scripts when new files arrive.
See: http://inotify.aiken.cz/?section=incronpage=doclang=en
There are limitations. It has to
Whit, thanks for your reply. Yes, I am looking for the support of the second
case. Seems it's in the plan for 3.4
BRs,
Kent
--
Kent Liu
kur...@outlook.com
在 2012年9月10日星期一，下午8:19，Whit Blauvelt 写道：
Hi,
I don't know about Gluster support, but I use inotify via incrontab to watch
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:06:51 -0400
Whit Blauvelt whit.glus...@transpect.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
[...]
If you're lucky you reach something like 1/3 of the NFS
performance.
[Gluster NFS Client]
Whit
There is a reason why one
Well, I would say there is a reason, if the Gluster client performed as
expected.
Using the Gluster client it should in theory access the file(s) directly from
the nodes where they reside and not having to go though a single node exporting
the NFS folder which would then have to gather the
On 09/10/2012 08:56 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:06:51 -0400
Whit Blauvelt whit.glus...@transpect.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
[...]
If you're lucky you reach something like 1/3 of the NFS
performance.
htmlbodyEveryone,
This is just a response to the issue of nfs vs glusterfs and the performance
for glsuter as I think some of the information may be useful here and has not
been discussed.
For the sake of clarity, I do not run infiniband..but I am running 10GB. My
normal production speeds
Hi,
We got a huge problem on our sun grid engine cluster with glusterfs
3.3.0. Could somebody help me?
Based on my understanding, if a folder is removed and recreated on
other client node, a program that tries to create a new file under the
folder fails very often.
We're using 3ware Inc 9750 SAS2/SATA-II RAID controllers in a 4-brick, 400TB
gluster system. The 4 have performed very well overall in about 6mo of
production work, alerting us to problem disks, etc. Tho 3ware is an LSI
product now, this model retains the familiar if somewhat grunty 3dm2
On 09/10/2012 01:06 AM, Yannik Lieblinger wrote:
Hi Joe,
i know you have much to do. But do you have already opened a bug report?
Looks like this is it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852224
--
@jasonbrooks
___
Gluster-users
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:39:18AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:29:25AM +0800, Jack Wang wrote:
below patch should fix your bug.
Thank you Jack - that was a very quick response! I'm building a new kernel
with this patch now and will report back.
It has been
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Manhong Dai da...@umich.edu wrote:
**
Hi,
We got a huge problem on our sun grid engine cluster with glusterfs 3.3.0.
Could somebody help me?
Based on my understanding, if a folder is removed and recreated on other
client node, a program that tries to
I am trying to use directory quota in our environment and face two problems:
1. When new quota is set on a directory, it doesn't take effect until
the volume is remounted on the client. This is a major inconvenience.
2. If I add a new quota, quota stops working on the client.
This is how to
Hi Avati,
Thanks a lot! In my case, the application that tries to create a new file
is not inside the folder.
I write a simple bash scrip to demo this problem.
#!/bin/bash
FOLDER=/home/mengf_lab/daimh/temp/testdir
for ((i=0; i100; i++))
do
echo ###$i###
ssh mengf-n1 rm -r
I found these in the client log:
[2012-09-10 18:56:07.728206] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:64:mgmt_cbk_spec]
0-mgmt: Volume file changed
[2012-09-10 18:56:08.751162] D
[glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1441:is_graph_topology_equal] 0-glusterfsd-mgmt:
graphs are equal
[2012-09-10 18:56:08.751175] D
Manhong Dai,
Thanks for the script. Could you give the volume configuration also so that
we can re-create the problem in our setups.
Pranith.
- Original Message -
From: Manhong Dai da...@umich.edu
To: Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.com
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Tuesday,
This is a limitation of the 'handle' nature of FUSE filesystems. You will
have to set a lower entry-timeout (mount option) to fix this problem.
Avati
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Dai, Manhong da...@umich.edu wrote:
Hi Avati,
Thanks a lot! In my case, the application that tries to
Also, I find it very suspect that 3.2.x did not have the same behavior!
Avati
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a limitation of the 'handle' nature of FUSE filesystems. You will
have to set a lower entry-timeout (mount option) to fix this
29 matches
Mail list logo
