Since these tests are looking good, I’m going to commit a large backlog of TDRS
and EKF tests that have been piling up. I anticipate some failures to show up
when they finally run in the test system, especially in the Linux runs. I'll
clean them up when they appear.
-Original Message-
Simulator_AsteroidOccultation is appearing as a crash/hang on Linux and passing
on Win.
From: Darrel Conway
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 10:01 AM
To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; Nguyen, Tuan D. (GSFC-5830)
; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-buildtest] Results:
I'll deal with the test case issues. I think for now I will just defer them all
(unless there is objection to that), since I'll be revisiting them all in the
next few months as part of more detailed testing for making SN data
operational. I can bring each back on-line when I get to revisiting
: 2019-10-10
(GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)
Yes, the trial (r2019a stand alone) was over. We went back to the network
R2017b. How could you tell?
-Original Message-
From: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] via Gmat-buildtest
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 6
?
-Original Message-
From: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] via Gmat-buildtest
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 6:38 AM
To: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] Test results: 2019-10-10
(GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017
Was there just a change in the MATLAB version on the test machine?
-Original Message-
From: d.s.cooley--- via Gmat-buildtest
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 5:06 AM
To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ;
gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-buildtest] Test results:
OK, thanks. I didn’t respond yet, so I won’t...
Regarding question 1 – you need some kind of SGP4 propagator, which GMAT
doesn’t currently provide, but tools like STK do.
Question 2: This (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_motion) Wikipedia page
describes how to derive SMA from mean motion. I
I can probably answer his questions, unless someone else is appointed to
respond to user questions or has already responded.
From: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950)
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 9:40 AM
To: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON]
Cc: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net
I'll address the new failures related to the ProcessNoiseModel when I return
next week.
-Original Message-
From: Darrel Conway
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 11:12 AM
To: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-09-13
Would it help to set C:\Users\gsfc580gmattest\Documents\ScriptTest\gmat\bin as
the MATLAB startup directory? If that's not already the case...
From: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950)
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 3:49 PM
To: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] ;
Reviewing the past archive of test results, this seems to have started
happening for the first time on 2019-05-06. There were prior major test system
issues before this, but this is the first occurrence I note of the error
"Invalid file identifier. Use fopen to generate a valid file identifier"
ds
Maybe some Windows process (upgrade prep, virus scan, general flak from
Redmond) kicked off in the background during the console run?
- DJC
On 8/12/19 5:57 AM, Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] via
Gmat-buildtest wrote:
For an LRO test case I got 395 seconds in GmatConsole and 276 sec
5:57 AM, Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] via
Gmat-buildtest wrote:
For an LRO test case I got 395 seconds in GmatConsole and 276 seconds in
GMAT.exe. I'll submit this as a new ticket.
From: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 8:19 AM
To: Cooley, D
Why is GmatConsole so much slower than GMAT.exe (at least on PC)? For
GroundStation_Iono_XEast, if I run the following:
GmatConsole.exe --run
"G:\GMAT\Testing\jazz-repo\test\script\input\Resources\FRR-15_GroundStation\scripts\GroundStation_Iono_XEast.script"
The script takes about 240 seconds
I ran GroundStation_Iono_XEast 10 times on my machine and didn't get any
failures. I also don't recall seeing this occur in Darrel's runs. Has anyone
seen it fail on a machine other than the test machine? I'm running Matlab
R2018b - what version is the test machine running? Is the test machine
This might help
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/taskkill
From: John McGreevy
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 10:25 AM
To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; McGreevy, John J.
(GSFC-583.0)[EMERGENT SPACE TECH., INC]
Cc: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net
The GroundStation test is failing for MATLAB reasons. I checked in a update to
hopefully fix the SpacecraftNavigation case.
From: gmat-nav On Behalf Of Cooley, D S.
(GSFC-5950) via gmat-nav
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2019 12:31 PM
To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ;
The error message is just:
*** Error loading "libFminconOptimizer": Either libMatlabInterface could not
load or is disabled, or the MATLAB Optimization Toolbox is not available.
Disable the appropriate PLUGIN line in bin/gmat_startup_file.txt to remove this
error.
The matlab version is
I actually already added ExtendedKalmanFilter and ProcessNoiseModel on the
Resources tab. You can move them somewhere else if that is appropriate.
From: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950)
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:01 AM
To: John McGreevy
Cc: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net; Slojkowski, Steven
These test cases are failing due the bug fix for light-time. The bug affected
AOS/LOS times for occulting bodies, and for some reason I set these test cases
up using Moon-centered orbits. I'll fix them shortly.
GroundStation_Tropo_Marini_DsnSeqRange [Found 5729 output records and
5722
The LatestCompleteVersion in mesa-file has not been updated since 11/28.
***
* Steven Slojkowski *
* Omitron, Flight Dynamics Facility *
* NASA Goddard Space Flight Center*
* (301) 286-1957 *
*
I committed the first large batch of angle measurement tests. I expect there'll
probably be failures on Linux and Mac (and possibly Win), so I'll deal with
them this week as they occur.
***
* Steven Slojkowski *
* Omitron, Flight Dynamics
22 matches
Mail list logo
