> On 30 Sep 2017, at 11:33, Nilanka Indunil Kumari Ekanayake
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've created the following mesh. For the boundary layer I've used extrude
> command. As I need to define physical volume for the farfield (bounded by the
> box and hemisphere). Here I considered two volumes cr
> On 5 Oct 2017, at 16:03, Luca Azzolin wrote:
>
> Dear Mr./Mrs.,
>
> I have been using gmsh to mesh this biventricle_together.stl file. The things
> that I wanted to do are:
> - fill the gap between the external boundary and the 2 internal boundaries
> with 3D elements ( so that I will have
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 16:06, Robin Martens wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a 2d mesh of a volume made with GMSH. I load it with merge and mesh it
> to make it a 3d mesh.
> But the numbering of the nodes on the surface will change. I know the
> numbering is done inside GMSH but maybe one of you k
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 23:40, joel gervais wrote:
>
> Dear Christophe,
>
> Thanks for this great software.
> Some .geo files I wrote many weeks ago lead to errors with the new version
> 3.0.5 of gmsh.
> It seems that something has changed between version 2.8.4 and 3.0.5 on
> windows 7 64 bits
Hello Christophe,
Thank you again for responding to my message.
I see now, a MLine is used for the 1D case and a MEdge is used in the 2D
case.So since I am dealing exclusively with 2D meshes, would I really need
the MLine class? Or will there be cases when a 2D mesh uses the MLine class?
I belie
Hello Christophe,
thank you for taking the time to send a response.
My suspicion was correct then. As much as I would like to use GMSH as a
library, I am not so sure it is the best idea for a user experience. I am
creating this project as open source and I would like anyone to be able to
compile
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 18:58, phillip mobley wrote:
>
> Hello Christophe,
>
> Thank you again for responding to my message.
>
> I see now, a MLine is used for the 1D case and a MEdge is used in the 2D
> case.So since I am dealing exclusively with 2D meshes, would I really need
> the MLine cl
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 18:54, phillip mobley wrote:
>
> Hello Christophe,
>
> thank you for taking the time to send a response.
>
> My suspicion was correct then. As much as I would like to use GMSH as a
> library, I am not so sure it is the best idea for a user experience. I am
> creating th
Hello,
I have a 2d mesh of a volume made with GMSH. I load it with merge and mesh
it to make it a 3d mesh.
But the numbering of the nodes on the surface will change. I know the
numbering is done inside GMSH but maybe one of you knows a trick.
Hope someone could help me with this.
Kind regards,
> On 6 Oct 2017, at 17:04, Lik Chuan Lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I tried to join 2 volumes by "BooleanUnion" in the last line of the
> following code, it has an error "cannot bind multiple regions to single tag
> 15". Does anybody know what that error means?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> SetFactory("
> On 8 Oct 2017, at 04:35, phillip mobley wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am attmepting to extract the code from the GMSH API that will be able to
> create a 2D mesh. After looking through the code for a couple of days now, I
> have a question about how the code is structed.
>
> So far, I have
Hi Phillip,
No, MLine is a mesh element of type line (a "1D" element). MEdge is a
topological edge, joining two vertices.
There is currently no documentation of the API; one of our objectives for Gmsh
4.0 is to design and distribute a high-level C API. This will not expose any of
the internal
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 13:16, Benedikt Oswald wrote:
>
> Dear gmsh,
>
> assume I have created a geometry in FreeCAD,
>
> exported it as a STEP file and imported
>
> into gmsh.
If you use FreeCAD, import directly the .brep file in Gmsh - it's much more
efficient than STEP, and you will avoid
Dear gmsh,
assume I have created a geometry in FreeCAD,
exported it as a STEP file and imported
into gmsh.
How do I ensure conformal boundary meshes
for periodic analysis when I generate the mesh
in gmsh ?
Thanks for some hints,
Benedikt
--
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
