[gmx-users] About the example case A toy peptide in water and other protein case (CG martini force field )

2008-10-24 Thread wang
Dear Sir ,
I used your CG parameters and gromacs V3.3 to simulate protein
aggregation. And my command is :
grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f aggre.mdp -c aggre.gro -p aggre.top -o aggre.trp
The error message is :
double-checking input for internal consistency...
Velocities were taken from a Maxwell distribution at 300 K
renumbering atomtypes...
converting bonded parameters...
# BONDS: 1935
# G96ANGLES: 2565
# IDIHS: 225
# CONSTR: 900
Walking down the molecule graph to make shake-blocks
initialising group options...
processing index file...
Analysing residue names:
Opening library file /opt/gromacs//share/gromacs/top/aminoacids.dat
There are: 76048 OTHER residues
There are: 1170 PROTEIN residues
There are: 0 DNA residues
Analysing Protein...
Analysing Other...

---
Program grompp_mpi_d, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: readir.c, line: 798

Fatal error:
Group Protein1 not found in indexfile.
Maybe you have non-default goups in your mdp file, while not using the
'-n' option of grompp.
In that case use the '-n' option.

But I tried your example case A toy peptide in water , I still got the
same error .
My command is :

1.grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f toypeptide.mdp -p toypeptide.top -c
toypeptide.gro -n index.ndx -o toypeptide.tpr

2.grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f toypeptide.mdp -p toypeptide.top -c
toypeptide.gro -o toypeptide.tpr


index.ndx :

[ prot_sort ]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20


The error message :

Walking down the molecule graph to make shake-blocks

initialising group options...

processing index file...

---

Program grompp_mpi_d, VERSION 3.3.3

Source code file: readir.c, line: 798

Fatal error:

Group TOYPEP not found in indexfile.

Maybe you have non-default goups in your mdp file, while not using the
'-n' option of grompp.

In that case use the '-n' option.



Sir, could you tell me how to fix the problem? By the way, I test other
cases in your website and I didn't get any error message .
Best regards

Wang Yeng-tseng




begin:vcard
fn:Yeng-Tseng Wang
n:Wang;Yeng-Tseng
org;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:=E7=94=9F=E6=8A=80=E9=86=AB=E7=99=82=E8=B3=87=E8=A8=8A=E7=B5=84;=E5=8D=97=E9=83=A8=E4=BA=8B=E6=A5=AD=E7=BE=A4
adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:;;=E5=8F=B0=E5=8D=97=E7=B8=A3=E6=96=B0=E5=B8=82=E9=84=89=E5=8D=97=E7=A7=91=E4=
	=B8=89=E8=B7=AF28=E8=99=9F;=E5=8F=B0=E5=8D=97=E7=B8=A3;=E6=96=B0=E5=B8=82=E9=84=89;74114;=E4=B8=AD=E8=8F=AF=E6=B0=91=E5=9C=8B(=E5=8F=B0=E7=81=A3)
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title;quoted-printable:=E8=B2=A1=E5=9C=98=E6=B3=95=E4=BA=BA=E5=9C=8B=E5=AE=B6=E5=AF=A6=E9=A9=97=E7=
	=A0=94=E7=A9=B6=E9=99=A2=E5=9C=8B=E5=AE=B6=E9=AB=98=E9=80=9F=E7=B6=B2=E8=B7=
	=AF=E8=88=87=E8=A8=88=E7=AE=97=E4=B8=AD=E5=BF=83
tel;work:+886-5050940 ext.738
tel;cell:+886-939875770
url:http://www.nchc.org.tw
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] About the example case A toy peptide in water and other protein case (CG martini force field )

2008-10-24 Thread wang
Dear Sir ,
I used your CG parameters and gromacs V3.3 to simulate protein
aggregation. And my command is :
grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f aggre.mdp -c aggre.gro -p aggre.top -o aggre.trp
The error message is :
double-checking input for internal consistency...
Velocities were taken from a Maxwell distribution at 300 K
renumbering atomtypes...
converting bonded parameters...
# BONDS: 1935
# G96ANGLES: 2565
# IDIHS: 225
# CONSTR: 900
Walking down the molecule graph to make shake-blocks
initialising group options...
processing index file...
Analysing residue names:
Opening library file /opt/gromacs//share/gromacs/top/aminoacids.dat
There are: 76048 OTHER residues
There are: 1170 PROTEIN residues
There are: 0 DNA residues
Analysing Protein...
Analysing Other...

---
Program grompp_mpi_d, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: readir.c, line: 798

Fatal error:
Group Protein1 not found in indexfile.
Maybe you have non-default goups in your mdp file, while not using the
'-n' option of grompp.
In that case use the '-n' option.

But I tried your example case A toy peptide in water , I still got the
same error .
My command is :

1.grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f toypeptide.mdp -p toypeptide.top -c
toypeptide.gro -n index.ndx -o toypeptide.tpr

2.grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f toypeptide.mdp -p toypeptide.top -c
toypeptide.gro -o toypeptide.tpr


index.ndx :

[ prot_sort ]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20


The error message :

Walking down the molecule graph to make shake-blocks

initialising group options...

processing index file...

---

Program grompp_mpi_d, VERSION 3.3.3

Source code file: readir.c, line: 798

Fatal error:

Group TOYPEP not found in indexfile.

Maybe you have non-default goups in your mdp file, while not using the
'-n' option of grompp.

In that case use the '-n' option.



Sir, could you tell me how to fix the problem? By the way, I test other
cases in your website and I didn't get any error message .
Best regards

Wang Yeng-tseng

begin:vcard
fn:Yeng-Tseng Wang
n:Wang;Yeng-Tseng
org;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:=E7=94=9F=E6=8A=80=E9=86=AB=E7=99=82=E8=B3=87=E8=A8=8A=E7=B5=84;=E5=8D=97=E9=83=A8=E4=BA=8B=E6=A5=AD=E7=BE=A4
adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:;;=E5=8F=B0=E5=8D=97=E7=B8=A3=E6=96=B0=E5=B8=82=E9=84=89=E5=8D=97=E7=A7=91=E4=
	=B8=89=E8=B7=AF28=E8=99=9F;=E5=8F=B0=E5=8D=97=E7=B8=A3;=E6=96=B0=E5=B8=82=E9=84=89;74114;=E4=B8=AD=E8=8F=AF=E6=B0=91=E5=9C=8B(=E5=8F=B0=E7=81=A3)
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title;quoted-printable:=E8=B2=A1=E5=9C=98=E6=B3=95=E4=BA=BA=E5=9C=8B=E5=AE=B6=E5=AF=A6=E9=A9=97=E7=
	=A0=94=E7=A9=B6=E9=99=A2=E5=9C=8B=E5=AE=B6=E9=AB=98=E9=80=9F=E7=B6=B2=E8=B7=
	=AF=E8=88=87=E8=A8=88=E7=AE=97=E4=B8=AD=E5=BF=83
tel;work:+886-5050940 ext.738
tel;cell:+886-939875770
url:http://www.nchc.org.tw
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] About the example case A toy peptide in water and other protein case (CG martini force field )

2008-10-24 Thread wang
Dear Sir ,
I used your CG parameters and gromacs V3.3 to simulate protein
aggregation. And my command is :
grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f aggre.mdp -c aggre.gro -p aggre.top -o aggre.trp
The error message is :
double-checking input for internal consistency...
Velocities were taken from a Maxwell distribution at 300 K
renumbering atomtypes...
converting bonded parameters...
# BONDS: 1935
# G96ANGLES: 2565
# IDIHS: 225
# CONSTR: 900
Walking down the molecule graph to make shake-blocks
initialising group options...
processing index file...
Analysing residue names:
Opening library file /opt/gromacs//share/gromacs/top/aminoacids.dat
There are: 76048 OTHER residues
There are: 1170 PROTEIN residues
There are: 0 DNA residues
Analysing Protein...
Analysing Other...

---
Program grompp_mpi_d, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: readir.c, line: 798

Fatal error:
Group Protein1 not found in indexfile.
Maybe you have non-default goups in your mdp file, while not using the
'-n' option of grompp.
In that case use the '-n' option.

But I tried your example case A toy peptide in water , I still got the
same error .
My command is :

1.grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f toypeptide.mdp -p toypeptide.top -c
toypeptide.gro -n index.ndx -o toypeptide.tpr

2.grompp_mpi_d -np 2 -f toypeptide.mdp -p toypeptide.top -c
toypeptide.gro -o toypeptide.tpr


index.ndx :

[ prot_sort ]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20


The error message :

Walking down the molecule graph to make shake-blocks

initialising group options...

processing index file...

---

Program grompp_mpi_d, VERSION 3.3.3

Source code file: readir.c, line: 798

Fatal error:

Group TOYPEP not found in indexfile.

Maybe you have non-default goups in your mdp file, while not using the
'-n' option of grompp.

In that case use the '-n' option.



Sir, could you tell me how to fix the problem? By the way, I test other
cases in your website and I didn't get any error message .
Best regards

Wang Yeng-tseng
begin:vcard
fn:Yeng-Tseng Wang
n:Wang;Yeng-Tseng
org;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:=E7=94=9F=E6=8A=80=E9=86=AB=E7=99=82=E8=B3=87=E8=A8=8A=E7=B5=84;=E5=8D=97=E9=83=A8=E4=BA=8B=E6=A5=AD=E7=BE=A4
adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:;;=E5=8F=B0=E5=8D=97=E7=B8=A3=E6=96=B0=E5=B8=82=E9=84=89=E5=8D=97=E7=A7=91=E4=
	=B8=89=E8=B7=AF28=E8=99=9F;=E5=8F=B0=E5=8D=97=E7=B8=A3;=E6=96=B0=E5=B8=82=E9=84=89;74114;=E4=B8=AD=E8=8F=AF=E6=B0=91=E5=9C=8B(=E5=8F=B0=E7=81=A3)
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title;quoted-printable:=E8=B2=A1=E5=9C=98=E6=B3=95=E4=BA=BA=E5=9C=8B=E5=AE=B6=E5=AF=A6=E9=A9=97=E7=
	=A0=94=E7=A9=B6=E9=99=A2=E5=9C=8B=E5=AE=B6=E9=AB=98=E9=80=9F=E7=B6=B2=E8=B7=
	=AF=E8=88=87=E8=A8=88=E7=AE=97=E4=B8=AD=E5=BF=83
tel;work:+886-5050940 ext.738
tel;cell:+886-939875770
url:http://www.nchc.org.tw
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] cannot generate .top file

2008-10-24 Thread Kwee Hong
Hi.
I seem having some problem in running ./pdb2gmx. Here is the output file.
Can you help me in giving me some idea to deal with this?

bcsb09s-imac52:bin bcsb09$ pdb2gmx -f 1aml.pdb -p 1aml.top -o 1aml.gro
 :-)  G  R  O  M  A  C  S  (-:

Getting the Right Output Means no Artefacts in Calculating Stuff

:-)  VERSION 3.3.3  (-:


  Written by David van der Spoel, Erik Lindahl, Berk Hess, and others.
   Copyright (c) 1991-2000, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
 Copyright (c) 2001-2008, The GROMACS development team,
check out http://www.gromacs.org for more information.

 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

   :-)  pdb2gmx  (-:

Option Filename  Type Description

  -f   1aml.pdb  InputGeneric structure: gro g96 pdb tpr tpb tpa
   xml
  -o   1aml.gro  Output   Generic structure: gro g96 pdb xml
  -p   1aml.top  Output   Topology file
  -i  posre.itp  Output   Include file for topology
  -n  clean.ndx  Output, Opt. Index file
  -q  clean.pdb  Output, Opt. Generic structure: gro g96 pdb xml

Option   Type   Value   Description
--
-[no]h   bool   no  Print help info and quit
-niceint0   Set the nicelevel
-[no]merge   bool   no  Merge chains into one molecule definition
-ff  string select  Force field, interactive by default. Use -h for
information.
-water   enum   spc Water model to use: with GROMOS we recommend
SPC,
with OPLS, TIP4P: spc, spce, tip3p, tip4p, tip5p
or f3c
-[no]inter   bool   no  Set the next 6 options to interactive
-[no]ss  bool   no  Interactive SS bridge selection
-[no]ter bool   no  Interactive termini selection, iso charged
-[no]lys bool   no  Interactive Lysine selection, iso charged
-[no]arg bool   no  Interactive Arganine selection, iso charged
-[no]asp bool   no  Interactive Aspartic Acid selection, iso charged
-[no]glu bool   no  Interactive Glutamic Acid selection, iso charged
-[no]gln bool   no  Interactive Glutamine selection, iso neutral
-[no]his bool   no  Interactive Histidine selection, iso checking
H-bonds
-angle   real   135 Minimum hydrogen-donor-acceptor angle for a
H-bond (degrees)
-distreal   0.3 Maximum donor-acceptor distance for a H-bond
(nm)
-[no]una bool   no  Select aromatic rings with united CH atoms on
Phenylalanine, Tryptophane and Tyrosine
-[no]ignhbool   no  Ignore hydrogen atoms that are in the pdb file
-[no]missing bool   no  Continue when atoms are missing, dangerous
-[no]v   bool   no  Be slightly more verbose in messages
-posrefc real   1000Force constant for position restraints
-vsite   enum   noneConvert atoms to virtual sites: none, hydrogens
or aromatics
-[no]heavyh  bool   no  Make hydrogen atoms heavy
-[no]deuterate bool no  Change the mass of hydrogens to 2 amu

Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/FF.dat

Select the Force Field:
 0: GROMOS96 43a1 force field
 1: GROMOS96 43b1 vacuum force field
 2: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihedrals)
 3: GROMOS96 45a3 force field (Schuler JCC 2001 22 1205)
 4: GROMOS96 53a5 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
 5: GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
 6: OPLS-AA/L all-atom force field (2001 aminoacid dihedrals)
 7: Encad all-atom force field, using scaled-down vacuum charges
 8: Encad all-atom force field, using full solvent charges
2
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG43a2.rtp
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/aminoacids.dat
Reading 1aml.pdb...
Read 'AMYLOID A4', 598 atoms
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/xlateat.dat
26 out of 26 lines of xlateat.dat converted succesfully
Analyzing pdb file
There are 1 chains and 0 blocks of water and 40 residues with 598 atoms

  chain  #res #atoms
  1 ' '40598

All occupancies are one
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG43a2.atp
Atomtype 50
Reading residue database... (ffG43a2)
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG43a2.rtp
Residue 96
Sorting it all out...
Opening library file /usr/local/gromacs/share/gromacs/top/ffG43a2.hdb
Opening library file 

RE: [gmx-users] stochastic dynamics , langevin

2008-10-24 Thread Berk Hess




 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
 Subject: RE: [gmx-users] stochastic dynamics , langevin
 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:32:02 -0700
 
 Along these same lines...
 (a)is there an thermostat setting in GROMACS that comes close to the DPD
 thermostat as described in (T. Soddemann, B. D¨unweg, and K. Kremer.
 Dissipative particle dynamics: A useful thermostat for equilibrium and
 nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. E, 68:046702,
 2003.)

No.

 (b) if nothing approaches DPD, how would a one go about starting to write a
 new thermostat in GROMACS?

Implementing a new thermostat in Gromacs is easy, except for DPD,
since it interferes both with the neighborlist and the integration.
I have considered implementing DPD, but it is a lot of work
and also difficult to do efficiently, since the DPD interactions are
more expensive that the Coulomb and LJ interactions.

Note that you only really need DPD for non-equilibrium phenomena
where hydrodynamics plays a role.

Berk


 
 -Matt
 
 -
 Matthew Hoopes
 Biophysics Graduate Group
 University of California, Davis
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 530-752-6452
 - 
 
 
 Hi,
 
 Brownina dynamics is a Langevin equation for the coordinates (no inertia).
 Stochastic dynamics is a Langevin equation for the velocities (with
 inertia).
 
 Everything depends on what you want to do, which you do not tell in detail.
 If you want to leave out the solvent, but you want to simulate a system in
 solvent, SD is not going to help you, since there is no implicit solvent
 potential, so your potential and therefore your sampling is nonsense.
 
 tau_t has no effect on the distribution, only on the dynamics. If you want
 the correct dynamics, you will have fit tau_t to reproduce some kinetic
 quantity that you are interested in. For different quantities tau_t can be
 different.
 
 Berk
 
 
 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:31:16 +0200
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
 Subject: [gmx-users] stochastic dynamics , langevin
 
 Dear All,
 I am trying to perform Langevin dynamics of large peptides / proteins. After
 reading the manual  going over some old mails in this list, I have two
 points I hope you could clear for me:
 
 [Gromacs version 3.3.3]
 
 1) I am a bit confused with Brownian vs. Langevin dynamics. Is this the
 proper keywords I should use for Langevin dynamics: integrator = sd ;
 
 bd-fric= 0 ;
 tau_t  = 10 ;
 ref_t  = 300 ;
 With bd-fric=0, the friction is taken as the inverse tau_t.
 
 
 2) From your experience, what are good values of tau_t (or 1/tau_t) for
 simulating a protein? In 2006 list, David has commented that choosing tau_t
 is very important (
 http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2006-July/023089.html ).
 
 
 Your help is appreciated. Omer.  
 Koby Levy research group,
 Weizmann Institute of Science. 
 http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] table_bonded.xvg

2008-10-24 Thread A.Rzepiela

Dear Users

In gromacs 4.0, in file force.c  in function make_bonded_tables line 
(1007)
 sprintf(tabfn + strlen(basefn)  - strlen(ftp2ext(efXVG)) - 
1,_%s%d.%s, tabext, i, ftp2ext(efXVG));


produces table_bonded_bonded.xvg  instead of  table_bonded.xvg

Greetings

Andrzej Rzepiela
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] cannot generate .top file

2008-10-24 Thread Mark Abraham

Kwee Hong wrote:
Hi. 

I seem having some problem in running ./pdb2gmx. Here is the output 
file. Can you help me in giving me some idea to deal with this?


bcsb09s-imac52:bin bcsb09$ pdb2gmx -f 1aml.pdb -p 1aml.top -o 1aml.gro


snip

---
Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: futil.c, line: 313

File input/output error:
1aml.top
---


This means it can't write 1aml.top, which likely means you don't have 
write permission to the directory in which pdb2gmx resides. This is a 
Good Thing. You should do daily work in a suitable subdirectory of (say) 
your home directory, and adjust your environment variables to give you 
ready access to GROMACS stuff by using source /path/to/GMXRC using the 
 path in which you installed the GROMACS binaries. I guess this is your 
attempted working directory above.


I seem to be having problem in running the test tun as well. Below is 
its output: 


bcsb09s-imac52:bin bcsb09$ ./gmxtest.pl
Usage: ./gmxtest.pl [ -np N ] [-verbose ] [ -double ] [ simple | complex 
| kernel | pdb2gmx | all ]

   or: ./gmxtest.pl clean | refclean | dist


Again this won't work in a directory in which you don't have write 
permissions. The above message tells you that an empty command line 
isn't acceptable to gmxtest.pl. *Technically* it ought to be acceptable 
per the usage line, since square brackets denote optional things and 
|-symbols denote a series of mutually-exclusive possibilities. I think 
the brackets should be missing around simple | complex | kernel | 
pdb2gmx | all.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Warning with L-BFGS minimization

2008-10-24 Thread Jochen Hub
Hi,

with l-bfgs minimzation, grompp always reports

WARNING 1 [file em.mdp, line unknown]:
  For efficient BFGS minimization, use switch/shift/pme instead of cut-off.

even if the mdp gives
; Method for doing electrostatics
coulombtype  = PME
rcoulomb_switch  = 0
rcoulomb = 1.

I could't find anything on that in the archive. Is that a known issue?

Cheers,
Jochen


-- 

Dr. Jochen Hub
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Computational biomolecular dynamics group
Am Fassberg 11
D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
Email: jhub[at]gwdg.de
Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-2312

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Warning with L-BFGS minimization

2008-10-24 Thread Mark Abraham

Jochen Hub wrote:

Hi,

with l-bfgs minimzation, grompp always reports

WARNING 1 [file em.mdp, line unknown]:
  For efficient BFGS minimization, use switch/shift/pme instead of cut-off.

even if the mdp gives
; Method for doing electrostatics
coulombtype  = PME
rcoulomb_switch  = 0
rcoulomb = 1.

I could't find anything on that in the archive. Is that a known issue?


Maybe it's case-sensitive... try pme

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Gromacs 4 SRC RPM?

2008-10-24 Thread Mike Hanby
Is there any eta on when the gromacs-4.0-1.src.rpm is going to show up
on:

ftp://ftp.gromacs.org/pub/gromacs/rpm

 

Thanks,

 

Mike

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] Warning with L-BFGS minimization

2008-10-24 Thread Jochen Hub
Mark Abraham wrote:
 Jochen Hub wrote:
 Hi,

 with l-bfgs minimzation, grompp always reports

 WARNING 1 [file em.mdp, line unknown]:
   For efficient BFGS minimization, use switch/shift/pme instead of
 cut-off.

 even if the mdp gives
 ; Method for doing electrostatics
 coulombtype  = PME
 rcoulomb_switch  = 0
 rcoulomb = 1.

 I could't find anything on that in the archive. Is that a known issue?
 
 Maybe it's case-sensitive... try pme

No, same warning. :-(

Jochen



 
 Mark
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
 
 .
 


-- 

Dr. Jochen Hub
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Computational biomolecular dynamics group
Am Fassberg 11
D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
Email: jhub[at]gwdg.de
Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-2312

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Warning with L-BFGS minimization

2008-10-24 Thread David van der Spoel

Jochen Hub wrote:

Mark Abraham wrote:

Jochen Hub wrote:

Hi,

with l-bfgs minimzation, grompp always reports

WARNING 1 [file em.mdp, line unknown]:
  For efficient BFGS minimization, use switch/shift/pme instead of
cut-off.

even if the mdp gives
; Method for doing electrostatics
coulombtype  = PME
rcoulomb_switch  = 0
rcoulomb = 1.

I could't find anything on that in the archive. Is that a known issue?

Maybe it's case-sensitive... try pme


No, same warning. :-(


src/kernel/readir.c



Jochen




Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

.







--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell  Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] Warning with L-BFGS minimization

2008-10-24 Thread Berk Hess
Hi,

The problem is you vdwtype setting, not coulombtype.

Berk


 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:08:14 +0200
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Warning with L-BFGS minimization
 
 Mark Abraham wrote:
  Jochen Hub wrote:
  Hi,
 
  with l-bfgs minimzation, grompp always reports
 
  WARNING 1 [file em.mdp, line unknown]:
For efficient BFGS minimization, use switch/shift/pme instead of
  cut-off.
 
  even if the mdp gives
  ; Method for doing electrostatics
  coulombtype  = PME
  rcoulomb_switch  = 0
  rcoulomb = 1.
 
  I could't find anything on that in the archive. Is that a known issue?
  
  Maybe it's case-sensitive... try pme
 
 No, same warning. :-(
 
 Jochen
 
 
 
  
  Mark
  ___
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
  interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
  
  .
  
 
 
 -- 
 
 Dr. Jochen Hub
 Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
 Computational biomolecular dynamics group
 Am Fassberg 11
 D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
 Email: jhub[at]gwdg.de
 Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-2312
 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 4 SRC RPM?

2008-10-24 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 09:06 -0500, Mike Hanby wrote:
 Is there any eta on when the gromacs-4.0-1.src.rpm is going to show up
 on:
 
 ftp://ftp.gromacs.org/pub/gromacs/rpm


You may be able to use the one in Fedora, e.g.
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/9/SRPMS.newkey/gromacs-4.0-3.fc9.src.rpm

Or, if you have Fedora / RHEL, just use the compiled RPMS available from
the mirror nearest to you.
-- 
--
Jussi Lehtola, FM, Tohtorikoulutettava
Fysiikan laitos, Helsingin Yliopisto
[EMAIL PROTECTED], p. 191 50632
--
Mr. Jussi Lehtola, M. Sc., Doctoral Student
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] Gromacs 4 SRC RPM?

2008-10-24 Thread Mike Hanby
Thanks for the link, I'll take a look at that one. I have to build my
own RPM to compile it with Intel compilers and OpenMPI.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jussi Lehtola
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:44 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 4 SRC RPM?

On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 09:06 -0500, Mike Hanby wrote:
 Is there any eta on when the gromacs-4.0-1.src.rpm is going to show up
 on:
 
 ftp://ftp.gromacs.org/pub/gromacs/rpm


You may be able to use the one in Fedora, e.g.
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/9/SRPMS.newke
y/gromacs-4.0-3.fc9.src.rpm

Or, if you have Fedora / RHEL, just use the compiled RPMS available from
the mirror nearest to you.
-- 
--
Jussi Lehtola, FM, Tohtorikoulutettava
Fysiikan laitos, Helsingin Yliopisto
[EMAIL PROTECTED], p. 191 50632
--
Mr. Jussi Lehtola, M. Sc., Doctoral Student
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Warning with L-BFGS minimization

2008-10-24 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Jochen,

It's probably the rvdw cutoff (from readir.c):

if (ir-eI == eiLBFGS  (ir-coulombtype==eelCUT || ir-vdwtype==evdwCUT)
  ir-rvdw != 0) {
warning(For efficient BFGS minimization, use switch/shift/pme
instead of cut-off.);
  }

Bummer!

Tsjerk

On 10/24/08, Jochen Hub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

  with l-bfgs minimzation, grompp always reports

  WARNING 1 [file em.mdp, line unknown]:
   For efficient BFGS minimization, use switch/shift/pme instead of cut-off.

  even if the mdp gives
  ; Method for doing electrostatics
  coulombtype  = PME
  rcoulomb_switch  = 0
  rcoulomb = 1.

  I could't find anything on that in the archive. Is that a known issue?

  Cheers,
  Jochen


  --
  
  Dr. Jochen Hub
  Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
  Computational biomolecular dynamics group
  Am Fassberg 11
  D-37077 Goettingen, Germany
  Email: jhub[at]gwdg.de
  Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-2312
  
  ___
  gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
  http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
  Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
  Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
  www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] table_bonded.xvg

2008-10-24 Thread Berk Hess
Hi,

According to me it does not.
I never change the default names.
But with the default names the table file name option is table.xvg
and for a tabulated bond table number 0, it correctly opens table_b0.xvg

Berk


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:45:53 +0200
 Subject: [gmx-users] table_bonded.xvg
 
 Dear Users
 
 In gromacs 4.0, in file force.c  in function make_bonded_tables line 
 (1007)
   sprintf(tabfn + strlen(basefn)  - strlen(ftp2ext(efXVG)) - 
 1,_%s%d.%s, tabext, i, ftp2ext(efXVG));
 
 produces table_bonded_bonded.xvg  instead of  table_bonded.xvg
 
 Greetings
 
 Andrzej Rzepiela
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
 www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] atoms not part of any of the T-coupling groups

2008-10-24 Thread garry


I  am a novice at Gromacs (although I used Gromos 20+ years ago!)I  
have a dimer with two zincs per monomer, and I get the following  
complaint when running the grompp with pr.dmp, which I assume is  
referring to the 4 zincs.



There are:  6789  OTHER residues
There are:   262PROTEIN residues
There are: 0DNA residues
Analysing Protein...
Analysing Other...

---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.2
Source code file: readir.c, line: 865

Fatal error:
4 atoms are not part of any of the T-Coupling groups
---

the zincs are in the pdb file as (properly formatted in the pdb file!):

ATOM   2103  SG  CYS B 133 -10.574  -5.438  18.502  1.00  
51.42   S
ATOM   2104  C   CYS B 133 -10.084  -9.287  20.134  1.00  
50.50   C
ATOM   2105  O   CYS B 133  -9.171  -9.545  20.923  1.00  
50.69   O
HETATM 2106 ZN   ZN2+C   1 -12.350   1.941   1.066  1.00  
43.80  ZN
HETATM 2107 ZN   ZN2+C   2 -21.690   2.493  -3.958  1.00  
38.99  ZN
HETATM 2109 ZN   ZN2+C   3 -11.783  11.509  10.159  1.00  
28.52  ZN
HETATM 2108 ZN   ZN2+C   4 -17.911   8.618  18.155  1.00  
32.42  ZN


What am I doing wrong ?

Many thanks
Garry

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] atoms not part of any of the T-coupling groups

2008-10-24 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



garry wrote:


I  am a novice at Gromacs (although I used Gromos 20+ years ago!)I 
have a dimer with two zincs per monomer, and I get the following 
complaint when running the grompp with pr.dmp, which I assume is 
referring to the 4 zincs.



There are:  6789  OTHER residues
There are:   262PROTEIN residues
There are: 0DNA residues
Analysing Protein...
Analysing Other...

---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.2
Source code file: readir.c, line: 865

Fatal error:
4 atoms are not part of any of the T-Coupling groups
---

the zincs are in the pdb file as (properly formatted in the pdb file!):

ATOM   2103  SG  CYS B 133 -10.574  -5.438  18.502  1.00 
51.42   S
ATOM   2104  C   CYS B 133 -10.084  -9.287  20.134  1.00 
50.50   C
ATOM   2105  O   CYS B 133  -9.171  -9.545  20.923  1.00 
50.69   O
HETATM 2106 ZN   ZN2+C   1 -12.350   1.941   1.066  1.00 
43.80  ZN
HETATM 2107 ZN   ZN2+C   2 -21.690   2.493  -3.958  1.00 
38.99  ZN
HETATM 2109 ZN   ZN2+C   3 -11.783  11.509  10.159  1.00 
28.52  ZN
HETATM 2108 ZN   ZN2+C   4 -17.911   8.618  18.155  1.00 
32.42  ZN


What am I doing wrong ?



What does your .mdp file look like?  Have you included the Zn2+ within one of 
your tc-grps?


-Justin


Many thanks
Garry

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww 
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php



--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] How to assign/make ionion bonds ?

2008-10-24 Thread Chih-Ying Lin
Hi
How to assign / make ionion bonds?

Thank you
Lin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] Does gromacs simulate rotation correctly?

2008-10-24 Thread Arthur Roberts

Hi, all,

Just curious.  Does gromacs simulate rotation correctly?  From my  
observation, it would appear that every object in the simulation both  
small and large has a similar rotational correlation time, which is  
not reality.  I would expect water for example to have an extremely  
short rotational correlation time with respect to a protein.  I  
appreciate your input.


Best wishes,
Art Roberts
University of Washington
Seattle, WA

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] How to assign/make ionion bonds ?

2008-10-24 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Chih-Ying Lin wrote:

Hi
How to assign / make ionion bonds?



Assign them yourself in the [ bonds ] section of the topology.  As for what 
parameters to assign to such a species, that's up to you; they probably don't 
exist in the standard force fields within Gromacs...


-Justin


Thank you
Lin




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] Does gromacs simulate rotation correctly?

2008-10-24 Thread Xavier Periole

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:42:26 -0700
 Arthur Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi, all,

Just curious.  Does gromacs simulate rotation correctly?  From my 
observation, it would appear that every object in the simulation both  small 
and large has a similar rotational correlation time, which is  not reality. 
I would expect water for example to have an extremely  short rotational 
correlation time with respect to a protein.  I  appreciate your input.

The answer has actually nothing to do with gromacs itself, as it is only
a software. It has to do with the force field used to describe the system.

This said the current force fields describe the rotational diffusion of
water and proteins quite reasonably well. The correlation times are a
bit too small (a factor 2-4) for both water and proteins.
For water (SPC, TIP3P, etc) it would be of the order of picoseconds
For proteins depending (on the size) from one to a few nanoseconds.

So the force fields do reproduce the relative rotational diffusion in
function of the size of the objects.

Best,
XAvier.

Best wishes,
Art Roberts
University of Washington
Seattle, WA

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


-
XAvier Periole - PhD

- Molecular Dynamics Group -
NMR and Computation
University of Groningen
The Netherlands
-
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] The structure property

2008-10-24 Thread Chih-Ying Lin
Hi
From the following tutorial, the protein pdb file is downloaded from the
Protein Data Bank. Before running the MD simulation, we have to make sure
the structure property. I have some questions about this tutorials.

http://nmr.chem.uu.nl/~tsjerk/course/md-tutorial/

1. Make sure that there are NO Missing residues, missing atoms-
   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/1lw9.pdb
Search for the presence of REMARK entries with numbers 465 and/or 470.
 = there are no REMARK 465 and REMARK 470  ???


2. The protonation state and side chain orientation of histidine residues
may be problematic. = How could I know if they are problematic? = How to
do the protonation process on the system?


3. From the tutorial = Note the numbers of ions added, and verify that an
excess of 8 chloride ions is added for neutralization. Having replaced a
number of water molecules with ions, the system topology in 1LW9.top is not
correct anymore. Edit the topology file and decrease the number of solvent
molecules. Also add a line specifying the number of NA+ ions and a line
specifying the amount of CL-. 
 = Would you please explain this more?

Thank you very much

Lin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] The structure property

2008-10-24 Thread Justin A. Lemkul



Chih-Ying Lin wrote:


Hi
 From the following tutorial, the protein pdb file is downloaded from 
the Protein Data Bank. Before running the MD simulation, we have to make 
sure the structure property. I have some questions about this tutorials.


http://nmr.chem.uu.nl/~tsjerk/course/md-tutorial/

1. Make sure that there are NO Missing residues, missing atoms-
   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/1lw9.pdb
Search for the presence of REMARK entries with numbers 465 and/or 
470.  = there are no REMARK 465 and REMARK 470  ???





These REMARK lines would correspond to missing atoms or residues.  You should 
always search a .pdb file for such lines; I believe that is the point being made.


2. The protonation state and side chain orientation of histidine 
residues may be problematic. = How could I know if they are 
problematic? = How to do the protonation process on the system?





It is dependent on the protein, and histidines should be protonated according to 
hydrogen bonding networks, whether or not they are involved in catalysis (and 
how the protonation state might affect the active site!), coordination of metal 
ions, etc.


Gromacs will try to guess the appropriate protonation state.  It is your job to 
thoroughly research your system and determine if any special considerations are 
necessary.


3. From the tutorial = Note the numbers of ions added, and verify that 
an excess of 8 chloride ions is added for neutralization. Having 
replaced a number of water molecules with ions, the system topology in 
1LW9.top is not correct anymore. Edit the topology file and decrease the 
number of solvent molecules. Also add a line specifying the number of 
NA+ ions and a line specifying the amount of CL-.  
 = Would you please explain this more?


What genion does is replace water molecules with ions.  So if 8 Cl- are added, 
then 8 water molecules are removed.  The corrections to the topology are thus 
trivial to implement.  Otherwise, you can pass the -p flag to genion and have it 
make the changes for you.


-Justin



Thank you very much

Lin







___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] atoms not part of any of the T-coupling groups

2008-10-24 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Wouldn't it be better to couple the Protein and Zn2+ together (i.e., index group 
Protein_Zn2+)?  Coupling ions separately often leads to weird 
behavior/explosions when they're free in the solvent.  I've never dealt with 
proteins that have ions bound, so I'm curious to see what everyone else thinks 
about this, just as a point of curiosity.


-Justin

Andy Shelley wrote:

Garry,

I believe you are trying to not temperature couple the 4 zincs. To do 
this put the 4 zincs in one group and include that group in the listing 
of tc_grps and then correspondingly assign tau_t. tau_t=0 means no 
temperature coupling, but I think you will also need to give a 
temperature for the tau_t=0 even though that group does not have 
temperature coupling. See section 7.3.13 in the gromacs user manual.


Andy

garry wrote:
 
  I  am a novice at Gromacs (although I used Gromos 20+ years ago!)I
  have a dimer with two zincs per monomer, and I get the following
  complaint when running the grompp with pr.dmp, which I assume is
  referring to the 4 zincs.
 
 
  There are:  6789  OTHER residues
  There are:   262PROTEIN residues
  There are: 0DNA residues
  Analysing Protein...
  Analysing Other...
 
  --
-
  Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.2
  Source code file: readir.c, line: 865
 
  Fatal error:
  4 atoms are not part of any of the T-Coupling groups
  ---
 
  the zincs are in the pdb file as (properly formatted in the pdb file!):
 
  ATOM   2103  SG  CYS B 133 -10.574  -5.438  18.502  1.00
  51.42   S
  ATOM   2104  C   CYS B 133 -10.084  -9.287  20.134  1.00
  50.50   C
  ATOM   2105  O   CYS B 133  -9.171  -9.545  20.923  1.00
  50.69   O
  HETATM 2106 ZN   ZN2+C   1 -12.350   1.941   1.066  1.00
  43.80  ZN
  HETATM 2107 ZN   ZN2+C   2 -21.690   2.493  -3.958  1.00
  38.99  ZN
  HETATM 2109 ZN   ZN2+C   3 -11.783  11.509  10.159  1.00
  28.52  ZN
  HETATM 2108 ZN   ZN2+C   4 -17.911   8.618  18.155  1.00
  32.42  ZN
 
  What am I doing wrong ?
 

What does your .mdp file look like?  Have you included the Zn2+ within 
one of

your tc-grps?

-Justin




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--


Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin


___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] The structure property

2008-10-24 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Lin,

Justin is right on all points. The first is indeed a check you should
always perform, but in this case (1LW9), there are no missing
residues/atoms. The point is that one should be aware that there
could. The same thing goes with the hint for the histidines. I could
have not written you should check for missing residues/atoms and mind
protonation states, but then you might take it for granted in any
structure, thus running into problems or just making the MD program an
expensive random number generator.

Anyway, I'll probably polish the tutorial somewhat in the near future
(and expand the analysis part). Do note that this mailing list is not
the mailing list for the tutorial ;) Comments and questions primarily
relating to the tutorial rather than to Gromacs are better sent to me
personally.

Cheers,

Tsjerk


On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Justin A. Lemkul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Chih-Ying Lin wrote:

 Hi
  From the following tutorial, the protein pdb file is downloaded from the
 Protein Data Bank. Before running the MD simulation, we have to make sure
 the structure property. I have some questions about this tutorials.

 http://nmr.chem.uu.nl/~tsjerk/course/md-tutorial/

 1. Make sure that there are NO Missing residues, missing atoms-
   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/files/1lw9.pdb
Search for the presence of REMARK entries with numbers 465 and/or 470.
  = there are no REMARK 465 and REMARK 470  ???



 These REMARK lines would correspond to missing atoms or residues.  You
 should always search a .pdb file for such lines; I believe that is the point
 being made.

 2. The protonation state and side chain orientation of histidine residues
 may be problematic. = How could I know if they are problematic? = How to
 do the protonation process on the system?



 It is dependent on the protein, and histidines should be protonated
 according to hydrogen bonding networks, whether or not they are involved in
 catalysis (and how the protonation state might affect the active site!),
 coordination of metal ions, etc.

 Gromacs will try to guess the appropriate protonation state.  It is your job
 to thoroughly research your system and determine if any special
 considerations are necessary.

 3. From the tutorial = Note the numbers of ions added, and verify that
 an excess of 8 chloride ions is added for neutralization. Having replaced a
 number of water molecules with ions, the system topology in 1LW9.top is not
 correct anymore. Edit the topology file and decrease the number of solvent
 molecules. Also add a line specifying the number of NA+ ions and a line
 specifying the amount of CL-.   = Would you please explain this more?

 What genion does is replace water molecules with ions.  So if 8 Cl- are
 added, then 8 water molecules are removed.  The corrections to the topology
 are thus trivial to implement.  Otherwise, you can pass the -p flag to
 genion and have it make the changes for you.

 -Justin


 Thank you very much

 Lin





 

 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
 interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

 --
 

 Justin A. Lemkul
 Graduate Research Assistant
 Department of Biochemistry
 Virginia Tech
 Blacksburg, VA
 jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

 
 ___
 gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
 http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
 Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
 or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecular NMR, Bijvoet Center
Utrecht University
Padualaan 8
3584 CH Utrecht
The Netherlands
P: +31-30-2539931
F: +31-30-2537623
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


RE: [gmx-users] f(x) g(x) h(x)in the user defined potential functions

2008-10-24 Thread He, Yang
Hi Mark,

Thank you for your reply. From your point of view,   I wonder whether you mean 
I need to write a table based on different interaction types and then change 
the source code  for recognition when running my case in the gromacs .I just 
have no idea about that .Can you give me further suggestion about that? I am 
stuck by this point

Thank you very much.

Yang

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:11 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] f(x) g(x) h(x)in the user defined potential functions

He, Yang wrote:
 Hi all users,

 When I am defining the user potential functions using the table, I 
 encountered a problem that there are several unstable parameters  in the 
 separate f(x),g(x),h(x) .For example, in the g(x), there is a parameter 
 epsilon whose value will depend on different pairs.In this situation, I can 
 not get a specific value in the table file . I don't know how to solve this 
 problem.

 Can anyone of you give me some suggestions about that?

So your nonbonded interaction depends on your atom types. You could
write a table for each interaction type, modify GROMACS to read them all
in, and then modify the routine that calls the kernels to use the
correct one. This additional memory usage would grow as the square of
the number of atom types. You would also see some performance loss which
you could minimize by arranging to evaluate all of one type of nonbonded
interaction close together in the nonbonded routines, to minimize cache
misses.

Better would be if some of these functions (conveniently) differed only
by a multiplicative or additive constant so that you could re-use the
same table and then apply a correction function, but you'll have to look
at your own maths for that.

Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] gromacs 3.3.1/4.0 and fftw 3.1.2

2008-10-24 Thread chris . neale

Hello,

can anybody confirm if fftw-3.1.2 is compatible with gromacs 3.3.1 and  
gromacs 4.0?


A colleague has recently indicated that I must use fftw 2.1.5 for  
gromacs mpi. However, I have been using fftw-3.1.2 for quite a while  
now. It compiles fine and my searching today turned up some other  
usage here:  
http://lindahl.sbc.su.se/outgoing/workshop2007/tutorial1/tutorial1.pdf


I did find mention of some problems with fftw 3.0.1 and gromacs here:  
http://www.pathscale.com/building_code/gromacs.html and also on the  
gromacs users mailing list, but I am hoping that fftw 3.1.2 is fine.


Second question, if there is some problem with fftw 3.1.2 and mpi  
gromacs then is this a problem of a) inability to compile, b) slow  
execution with PME, or c) incorrect dynamics?


Thanks,
Chris.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Is there a way to measure the shortest distance between two groups of atoms?

2008-10-24 Thread Arthur Roberts

Hi, all,

I was wondering if there is a way to measure the shortest distance  
between two groups of atoms? g_dist seems to only measure the average  
distance between the two groups.  Your input would be greatly  
appreciated.


Sincerely,
Art Roberts

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] Is there a way to measure the shortest distance between two groups of atoms?

2008-10-24 Thread chris . neale

g_mindist (with or without -pi depending on what you want)


Hi, all,
I was wondering if there is a way to measure the shortest distance   
between two groups of atoms? g_dist seems to only measure the  
average  distance between the two groups.  Your input would be  
greatly  appreciated.




___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] gromacs 3.3.1/4.0 and fftw 3.1.2

2008-10-24 Thread Nicolas

[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

Hello,

can anybody confirm if fftw-3.1.2 is compatible with gromacs 3.3.1 and 
gromacs 4.0?


A colleague has recently indicated that I must use fftw 2.1.5 for 
gromacs mpi. However, I have been using fftw-3.1.2 for quite a while 
now. It compiles fine and my searching today turned up some other 
usage here: 
http://lindahl.sbc.su.se/outgoing/workshop2007/tutorial1/tutorial1.pdf


I did find mention of some problems with fftw 3.0.1 and gromacs here: 
http://www.pathscale.com/building_code/gromacs.html and also on the 
gromacs users mailing list, but I am hoping that fftw 3.1.2 is fine.


Second question, if there is some problem with fftw 3.1.2 and mpi 
gromacs then is this a problem of 
a) inability to compile,
I have compiled several times gromacs-3.3.3 with fftw-3.1.2 on different 
machines and never had any problem related to fftw, but I'm really not a 
gcc wizard. Same think with gmx-3.3.1 and gromacs-4

b) slow execution with PME
I have never noticed any slowdown with fftw-3.1.2 on any gromacs version 
 3.3.1

or c) incorrect dynamics?
I have briefly compare gromacs-3.3.1 + fftw-2.1.5 (on cluster X) and 
gromacs-3.3.3+fftw-3.1.2 (on cluster Y) and didn't notice any 
significant difference, but as I said, it was a quick comparison. 
Additionally, it is said on the website that Gromacs is compatible with 
fftw-3.x:

http://www.gromacs.org/content/view/23/33/

Nicolas


Thanks,
Chris.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww 
interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php




begin:vcard
fn:Nicolas Sapay
n:Sapay;Nicolas
org:University of Calgary;Biological department
adr:;;2500 University drive NW;Calgary;AB;T2N 1N4;Canada
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Post-doctoral fellow
tel;work:403-220-6869
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

[gmx-users] The code : from .pdb to .gro

2008-10-24 Thread Chih-Ying Lin
Hi
Could anyone please to direct me the code / the command (pdb2gmx)
, which can transfer .pdb file to .gro file?


Thank you
Lin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Re: [gmx-users] gromacs 3.3.1/4.0 and fftw 3.1.2

2008-10-24 Thread Mark Abraham

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello,

can anybody confirm if fftw-3.1.2 is compatible with gromacs 3.3.1 and 
gromacs 4.0?


A colleague has recently indicated that I must use fftw 2.1.5 for 
gromacs mpi. However, I have been using fftw-3.1.2 for quite a while 
now. It compiles fine and my searching today turned up some other usage 
here: 
http://lindahl.sbc.su.se/outgoing/workshop2007/tutorial1/tutorial1.pdf


Possibly your colleague's memory is antiquated. FFTW 2.x had parallel 
FFTs that might have been used by GROMACS at the time. This might 
explain your colleague's association of MPI GROMACS and FFTW 2.1.5. 
However certainly by 3.3.1, GROMACS is perfectly happy with any FFTW 
version, since it handles the parallelism itself and so needs only 
serial FFT routines.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] f(x) g(x) h(x)in the user defined potential functions

2008-10-24 Thread Mark Abraham

He, Yang wrote:

Hi Mark,

Thank you for your reply. From your point of view,   I wonder whether you mean 
I need to write a table based on different interaction types and then change 
the source code  for recognition when running my case in the gromacs.


Yes that's what I said.


I just have no idea about that .Can you give me further suggestion about that? 
I am stuck by this point


I'm afraid you'll have to look carefully at the data structures GROMACS 
builds during neighbour-searching and build in some hook to allow you to 
use the correct tables later in src/gmxlib/nonbonded.c. You're own your 
own there.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


Re: [gmx-users] The code : from .pdb to .gro

2008-10-24 Thread Mark Abraham

Chih-Ying Lin wrote:


Hi
Could anyone please to direct me the code / the command (pdb2gmx)
, which can transfer .pdb file to .gro file?


It's unlikely you actually need a .gro file for your purpose. pdb2gmx is 
a tool for making topology files. editconf is the easiest tool for 
making simple changes to coordinate files.


Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


[gmx-users] gromacs 3.3.1/4.0 and fftw 3.1.2

2008-10-24 Thread chris . neale
Hi Mark, did you post something on this topic? There is a link  
indicating that you did but it is broken for some reason. The links  
above and below work fine. If you wouldn't mind, could you please  
repost?


Thanks,
Chris.

___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php