=In a message dated: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:00:21 EST
=Thomas M. Albright said:
=
=Hi all.
=
=I use pine for email. Pine uses ~/.signature for my sig. I'd like to be
=able to have a text file full of different sigs that Pine would use,
=instead of the one static sig.
=
=Does anyone have any tips
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Thomas M. Albright wrote:
I use pine for email. Pine uses ~/.signature for my sig.
The online help for the signature option in Pine's setup explains how to
use a program instead of a file to get the signature.
Combine that with any of the n auto-signature programs out
Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
Have you tried a kernel that works? I have seen similar weird problems
trying to install 2.4-based distros at home, which promptly disappeared
when I switched back to 2.2.
No, I'd long since upgraded my entire infrastructure to support 2.4, and
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Thomas M. Albright wrote:
I use pine for email. Pine uses ~/.signature for my sig. I'd like to be
able to have a text file full of different sigs that Pine would use,
instead of the one static sig.
Does anyone have any
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 12:09, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Paul Lussier wrote:
Adaptec has had a lot of problems, especially with Linux drivers.
There was one person maintaining his own drivers for linux, then Adaptec
came along and said ...
Yet another reason to avoid
On 14 Jan 2002, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
... And Linus has never hidden the fact that he has no problem
publishing kernels that break drivers ...
... it's not 2.4's fault if Adaptec's made this happen ...
... As for other issues with 2.4 -- they're getting worked on ...
I'm not trying to lay
In a message dated: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:09:33 EST
Benjamin Scott said:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Paul Lussier wrote:
Adaptec has had a lot of problems, especially with Linux drivers.
There was one person maintaining his own drivers for linux, then Adaptec
came along and said ...
Yet another
Quoting Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have you tried a kernel that works? I have seen similar weird
problems
trying to install 2.4-based distros at home, which promptly disappeared
when
I switched back to 2.2.
I had this problem a few weeks ago with a SCSI tape drive. I added the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Ken D'Ambrosio hath spake thusly:
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 12:09, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Paul Lussier wrote:
Adaptec has had a lot of problems, especially with Linux drivers.
There was one person
I have to disagree. I remember 1.0.0, 1.2.0, 2.0.0, and 2.2.0 -- *all*
of them had their share of nay-sayers.
And I have to disagree with you. I've generally found that if you
want your system to actually work well and reliably, you'll want to
wait until at least the point where Linus
10 matches
Mail list logo
