Maybe we should call it:
G/linl - Gnu/linux is not linux.
That should clear up all the confusion ;)
-Andy
Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
As I was parusing Kero5hin, I came accross a great article. It is a
public apology to the Linux world for getting RMS on the GNU/Linux
kick. Funny
Hi,
When RMS started the campaign, I thought it was a big pain in the butt. On
the other hand, I did agree that the work that the FSF and others (XFree86,
KDE, etc.) was getting lost in the commotion about Linux.
While I still tend to call the OS Linux, now I mention the FSF and the
other
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, at 4:26pm, Jon Hall wrote:
So his campaign worked, to a large extent.
Unfortunately, his campaign also alienated a lot of (potential)
supporters. I have to wonder if he didn't end up with a net loss.
--
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The opinions expressed in this
In a message dated: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:42:39 EST
Jerry Feldman said:
Robert Bork was never a Judge on The Supreme Court. He was nominated, but
his nomination was not approved by the Senate. We was, however, US
Solicitor General as well as a judge and did have a distinguished career.
My
Robert Bork was never a Judge on The Supreme Court. He was nominated, but
his nomination was not approved by the Senate. We was, however, US
Solicitor General as well as a judge and did have a distinguished career.
Paul Lussier wrote:
If you haven't already, read this article at Linux
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Tod Hagan wrote:
Some open-source geeks are as open-minded about sex as they
are about hacking.
Oh great, now in addition to being called Communists, Stallman and
other open source programmers will be labelled "deviants" too.
I didn't see the author calling them