On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:25:46PM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
The easy-fix keyword in bugzilla has been renamed to gnome-love[1].
We would like to encourage people to use this keyword for bugs that
would be suitable for a new developer looking for a task.
The report shows the comment made
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:57:29AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 5/11/05, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 11 mai 2005 à 00:49 +0200, Samuel Abels a écrit :
Am Dienstag, den 10.05.2005, 16:25 -0600 schrieb Elijah Newren:
We've pinged d-d-l a few times about this. My
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:02:56PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
I've been filing a couple bugs/patches for Hurd-related GNOME issues for
a while, and it is getting tiresome having to tick 'OS: other'. Plus,
I've been approached by one of the upstream Hurd developers whether a
good overview of
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 11:14:04AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 6/11/05, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
Seconded. Ideally I'd want all the stuff to be moved over, proving
live.gnome.org gets some love (it is ugly). Oh, and that someone else
moves the content over ;)
Also
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 07:50:44AM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 7/11/05, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:01:30PM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Hey, dudes, dudettes-
My name is Luis, and I have a bug habit. Also, a question. How do I
query on isgnome? Like
Such an option will be part of 2.20, but for now you can use
Greasemonkey to automatically cc yourself.
Requires Mozilla/Firefox.
Instructions:
1. Install Greasemonkey from http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/
2. Download http://www.gnome.org/~ovitters/bz.fun.user.js
3. Change the email address in
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:55:17AM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Or so it seems to me. If anyone wants to whip this up it would rock ;)
Luis (can make database dumps available on request for people who want
to play with this)
[1] It *did* make the bugtrack less full of bugs by a nice amount,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:07:15AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 10/18/05, Paolo Borelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno mar, 18/10/2005 alle 11.30 +0200, Olav Vitters ha scritto:
In 2.20 the products will be divided into classifications. Currently
the following classifications exist
Soon it will be time to make Bugzilla unavailable for 5 hours. This will
be done on Sunday 18 December on 9.00 UTC or:
http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=12day=18year=2005hour=9min=0sec=0p1=0
During the downtime I'll upgrade bugzilla.gnome.org to a customized
Bugzilla 2.20.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:03:48PM +0100, Nelson Benítez wrote:
Olav Vitters escribió:
I changed it now... you will not get the checkbox if you are the
reporter.
Thanks. Btw, the new look is nice but, as a suggestion, I would change
the bug summary to have a bigger font size, like in old
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:50:34AM +0100, Christian Kirbach wrote:
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:31:03 +0100, Nelson Benítez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you attach a screenshot of how big it is now? I now for some
reason it is very small in Opera 8.5.
Attached screenshot in firefox, I
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:41:23AM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Is there any way we can reorder the categories here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi
Having Bindings and Deprecated (huge) at the top isn't very useful, and it
bothers me that the very first product there is for Glade code
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:24:50PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
by using some of the new integrated stock responses in bugzilla (e.g.
bad_stacktrace), a report is automatically set to 'needinfo' status.
imo, we should also add a sentence like 'setting to NEEDINFO, please
REOPEN when
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 02:17:37PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:56:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugs.skolelinux.no/show_bug.cgi?id=947
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:33:18AM -0500, Kyle Stevens wrote:
I started triaging a couple days ago, and I have helped with 3-4 bugs
that were unconfirmed. I also reported a bug, and posted a very trivial
patch to fix it. It is difficult triaging when you have to ask someone
else to do
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:19:17AM -0500, Kyle Stevens wrote:
I just started triaging the other day, and I do not yet have permission
to make changes.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329610
I just looked at Bug 329610. There does not seem to be any duplicates.
I would make
The XML-RPC post by fer showed a Bug-Buddy which didn't ask for any
information (steps to reproduce or an email address). See
http://www.gnome.org/~fherrera/blog/new-bugbuddy.html
I'm against allowing anonymous users to submit crasher bugs. Mainly
because I fear this will cause a huge increase in
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
can you please update the default assignee for the camorama product to
some camorama-maint-alias? I'm currently working on some stuff and Greg
no longer has time to maintain camorama, so it would be good if camorama
got such an
I posted some stats about Bug-Buddy usage per GNOME version at:
http://blogs.gnome.org/view/ovitters/2006/05/31/0
I couldn't really make any conclusions about it and the comments on that
blog also point that out (unfortunate, because I hoped someone would see
something insightful).
I did make
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:46:16AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le jeudi 01 juin 2006 à 22:39 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
[..]
This will remove a lot of the reasons I can think of why we are not
getting a 1000 bugreports a day. So I have to wonder what happens when
2.16.0 is released
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:03:12PM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 6/3/06, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:46:16AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
While 1000 bugs per day would be nice for my bugzilla points (most of
the bugs should be duplicates for crashers
F-spot bugs are now by default assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] All
existing bugs that where assigned to lewing have been reassigned.
Use the 'Users to watch' feature in your bugzilla email settings prefs
to watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Email settings).
PS lewing: @gnome.bugs, @gnome.org = sysadmin
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 06:07:48PM -0600, Brent Smith wrote:
I'm just wondering if there are plans to make the (current) hard
dependency on libnm_glib in bug-buddy a compile time dependency? As far
as I know, this library is not part of the official gnome libraries.
Fer changed/fixed
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:01:16PM -0700, Brian Kerrick Nickel wrote:
One change I would recommend is the link provided in the BAD STACK TRACE
stock response.
Since the majority of people would be sending from bug-buddy (I think), and
all of them already are sending stack traces, sending them
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 12:15:22PM -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
Proposal: Drop $version-before-last-stable crasher reports when
$new-stable comes out
So in practice:
Drop 2.16 when 2.20 comes out?
FYI: I proposed dropping 2.16 at the time of 2.18. IIRC @d-d-l. It
wasn't appreciated.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 06:16:24PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Our bugzilla has a lovely http://bugzilla.gnome.org/duplicates.cgi to
look for the bugs with the highest number of duplicates. Is there
custom code to generate this page? If so, where can I get it? :)
Only a slight
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:50:22PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Thanks to Olav for running the script (he did so on Jan. 6th instead of
early Jan. 1st, so the stats might have a slight skew, but it's unlikely
to have had a major effect).
Last year it was the same.. also ran only on 6 Jan.. so
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:50:03PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
Currently Bug Buddy bugs are only accepted for GNOME 2.18 and newer. I
suggest to change this to 2.20. Meaning: don't accept anything older.
Done. IIRC only since ~5-10min ago (did the commit earlier today, but
did not update
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:03:22AM -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
CC'ing our awesome sysadmin to get you the powers. But we can just
start sending emails in there I think. Actually cc'ing the list too to
test that. (first p0st!!! l0lz!!!)
I do not know the password for patchsquad-list.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:53:33AM -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote:
This message wasn't intended to discuss GNOME's Bugzilla but I brought that
up. Apparently there has been some discussion about this, just wondering
what it was and whether there'd be any chance of getting this (and I guess
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:33:16AM +0100, Tim Richardson wrote:
It is not listed anywhere that would be at least half obvious, in my
humble opinion.
OpenOffice is not part of GNOME. They have their own bugreporting
system.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 01:58:50PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Alex: *ping*
I've already closed it for bugreports. However, bugbuddy import thingy
doesn't check it. Patch welcome.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:57:54PM -0600, Gabriel Burt wrote:
What is the process for getting permission to give others bug-editing
permission? What are the requirements?
1) You never give someone permissions if you don't check how that person
is doing.
2) Don't hand out permissions if it
FYI,
Please join the discussion on desktop-devel-list, or reply with
mka...@bugzilla.org cc'ed.
--
Regards,
Olav
---BeginMessage---
Hello!
My company, Everything Solved, has been working on porting forward
GNOME's Bugzilla customizations to Bugzilla 3.4 for the past several
months,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Pietro Battiston wrote:
Then, once someone offers to be the glade bugs maintainer, I think we
could ask that he checks every bug once a year.
You're restating what has been suggested.
If a bug is valid, mark it as NEW. It was already proposed that the
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:26:52PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
It hasn't really made updating Splinter any more like updating the rest
of Bugzilla - it's just moved the 'make install' procedure that has to
be documented from the server to the developer's machine.
I prefer the complexity to be on
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
We, the Bugsquad, want to have a bugday in around 8 weeks *yay*.
To show that the actions of the newbies are highly appreciated and to
convince people who are rather new on bugzilla to take part in the
bugday, we want to have a
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:36:43AM -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
Generally a good thing to help newbies finding their way to the magics
of Triaging. The problem with newbies closing bugs is, though, that
Read the discussion on #bugs partly. Noticed someone remarking that
there aren't a lot of
I've put the following into a daily cron:
/sbin/service bugzilla-queue restart
--
Regards,
Olav
___
gnome-bugsquad mailing list
gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:47:44AM -0300, Pedro Villavicencio Garrido wrote:
Chile and it might make sense to have the permissions to give triaging
rights and people already asked us for mentoring during the last GNOME
done. Click Administration at the top of any page, then Users, search
for
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:59:01PM -0500, Jeff Fortin wrote:
Hey there, I've been doing bug triaging for pitivi for over a year (and
you may remember me as the freak who filed ~200 bugs on it in 2009), but
I lack permissions. I can't change bug statuses / mark duplicates / set
target
ok, done
--
Regards,
Olav
___
gnome-bugsquad mailing list
gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:45:44PM +0200, Christian Kirbach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 22.07.2010, 11:03 +0100 schrieb Philip Withnall:
I've been pushing for bgo#624419 to be fixed for a week now, since I'm
working on libfolks with Travis Reitter, and collaboration would be a
whole lot
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
However I'd prefer to first see the defaults for new products
documented on a wikipage (like Voting defaults, default QA and assignee
virtual email addresses style etc) to avoid inconsistencies (cf.
626156#c2).
nazgul, could you
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 07:36:14PM +0200, Tobias Mueller wrote:
Bonjour,
On 13.08.2010 14:58, Andre Klapper wrote:
I'm ok depending on who is suggested.
I offer my help.
So do I.
I'd also appreciate kind of a documentation that states what needs to be
done in order to create a
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:21:49PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 07:36:14PM +0200, Tobias Mueller wrote:
Bonjour,
On 13.08.2010 14:58, Andre Klapper wrote:
I'm ok depending on who is suggested.
I offer my help.
So do I.
I'd also appreciate kind
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:20:22PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 22.08.2010, 21:50 +0200 schrieb Olav Vitters:
As a first step I've set you both as maintainers. Still have to write
down how to create products. Couldn't find the standard text on
live.gnome.org, so perhaps need
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 09:50:38PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Another thing:
bugmas...@gnome.org actually goes to:
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/bugzilla-maintainers
I forgot the list password. Either I can ask Elijah, search my old
emails, or reset it. Anyway, please subscribe
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 07:53:22PM +0200, Christian Kirbach wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 22.08.2010, 23:20 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
Am Sonntag, den 22.08.2010, 21:50 +0200 schrieb Olav Vitters:
On http://live.gnome.org/BugzillaMaintainers I'd set up two sections:
1) Contacting
fyi
--
Regards,
Olav
---BeginMessage---
Hey folks! So, the first Bugzilla Administrators Users Group meeting
was a success, I've got a write-up about it here:
http://bugzillaupdate.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/the-first-bugzilla-users-administrators-group-august-4-2010/
If anyone has been triaging for a while and wants to hand out bugsquad
permissions to (assist) new people, please reply and specify your email
address used on GNOME Bugzilla.
Just make sure to follow new people and guide them.
Note: You can always request the handing out permissions to
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 06:00:11PM -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
Yes, count me in: hgg...@gmail.com -- we are trying to get more
bugSquadders helping on b.g.o
Done. See the Administration link at the top of every page. Just make
sure to give editbugs as well as canconfirm (in case there are 2
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:24:42PM -0400, Fabio Duran Verdugo wrote:
me too.
Done!
Copy/pasting 3rd time: See the Administration link at the top of every
page. Just make sure to give editbugs as well as canconfirm (in case
there are 2 checkboxes next to eachother, you want the ones in the 2nd
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 01:39:05PM +0300, Tobias Mueller wrote:
Does that make kind of sense? Could we write a module (or whatever) for
bugzilla to implement that behaviour?
I understand it, but I don't see how you could implement it. I don't
want major code changes vs upstream, so the
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:40:54AM +0530, Akhil Laddha wrote:
I just wanted to let you all know that after getting node from
straw [1] maintainers / developers, i have closed all the straw bugs as
WONTFIX. Straw development has been stalled and it has been unmaintained
for a few years
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:58:48PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
Do *NOT* touch Bugzilla. As mentioned before, there are *load* and
with the not touching I meant in case of an intended action of just
upgrading to a new vanilla upstream version.
--
Regards,
Olav
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:17:54PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 16:48 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up Andre. I can try to work on the upgrade
but I never touched Bugzilla before since Olav was used to manage it.
I've searched around for the upgrade
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:42:16PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 17:24 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
Would be helpful if Olav could outline that, yes. There's a raw codedump
of some stuff at http://bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/extensions/ which is
untested and non-working
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:06:03AM -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Is there some way we could make these extensions and patches we can put in
a puppet install? I realize the database portion is going to be the manual
stuff, but it seems that it would be easier to be able to automate it. Of
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:21:38PM -0200, Enrico Nicoletto wrote:
I and my collegue Rafael Ferreira are facing problems in push the
catalog pt_BR.po in Gnome Calculator´s module in Git.
We, from the Brazilian Portuguese Translation Team, believe that
this error is caused by a permission
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 03:09:44AM -0700, Timothy Arceri wrote:
I have been contributing patches to various Gnome projects such as
GTK, Glib, Gvfs, Nautilus etcfor the past two years and the more I
contribute the more annoying it is to not have edit access in bugzilla
for example I've been
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 06:02:29PM +, Djalaliev, Peter wrote:
> Can you please assist in getting access to the bugs above?
I've removed the security restrictions from all bugs which have a public
commit. One bug unfortunately discussed another bug, so I kept that one
closed.
--
Regards,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 05:04:28PM +, Ahmad Hazimeh via gnome-bugsquad
wrote:
> My name is Ahmad Hazimeh, and I'm a Ph.D. candidate at EPFL with the HexHive
> group.
> I am currently working on a project that involves analyzing bug reports and
> published fixes.
> I have come across many
Dear subscribers,
Please cc me on replies.
We've set up https://discourse.gnome.org a year and a half ago, as part of
an attempt at making the GTK mailing list more friendly to newcomers. This
experiment seems to have proven itself well enough, and has since expanded
to other territories as
64 matches
Mail list logo
