On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 11:41 +, Patrick Costello wrote:
Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 22:00 -0400, Steven Garrity wrote:
I'm working on evaluating (and hopefully improving) the consistency of
save confirmation dialogs in Gnome [1] and there's a bug in the HIG
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 00:09 +1000, Andrew Burton wrote:
G'day all
Where can I download the latest CVS version of the Desktop User Guide
(http://www.gnome.org/learn/users-guide/2.10/index.html)? cvs.gnome.org
doesn't seem to have it (or it's hiding somewhere!)
I've noticed quite a few
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 14:36 +0530, Arunprakash wrote:
Hi,
The patch for UI bug #235830 sets the title of the
contact editor as Contact Editor - file name.
This is set while opening existing contacts also.
This was not earlier.
The file name is the file name of the contact.
Does the
I've added an xref formatter to gnome-doc-utils for prefaces.
The default formatting is exactly the same as for glossaries.
_msg
msgidpreface.xref/msgid
msgstrtitle//msgstr
/_msg
--
Shaun
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
In the last few release cycles, our documentation has rotted. It's been
incredibly difficult to get new contributors hacking docs quickly, in
part
due to a high barrier to entry.
In order to encourage collaborative editing, I've placed an outline for
the User Guide on the wiki:
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 08:48 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Hi Shaun,
Yesterday at 23:19, Shaun McCance wrote:
In the last few release cycles, our documentation has rotted. It's been
incredibly difficult to get new contributors hacking docs quickly, in
part due to a high barrier to entry
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 20:49 +0200, Christian Persch wrote:
Hi,
For quite some time, the general inconsistency of strings in the various
GNOME modules has irritated me. For example, let's just look at some
strings in GNOME:
[snip]
You'll notice:
- the varying messagestyle: [do] it?, Would
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 10:15 -0400, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
On 10/15/05, Brent Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Standardize the titles of each document by removing version numbers,
fixing capitalization, removing unnecessary articles and adding a type
to the title such as Manual,
I'm CCing gnome-i18n. Translators, there's a special
message to you at the bottom.
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 21:57 +0545, Pawan Chitrakar wrote:
i have copied user-guide-C.omf file to user-guide-ne.omf file and
changed the location of docbook file and language code to ne then i
updated
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 11:37 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
ScrollKeeper is hosted on SourceForge. I haven't seen
any of the maintainers around in a long while, and the
ChangeLog shows no updates in the last seven months.
But hopefully we'll find a way to get Nepali support
in and get a release
Hey Alexander,
Very sorry for the late reply. The fact is, nobody really
knows how everything works at this point. The Documentation
Project is in complete disarray.
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 16:32 +0200, Alexander Shopov wrote:
Please guys,
I really need help.
I have a Bulgarian translation
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 00:17 -0500, Fred Koschara wrote:
All of the screenshot links on the Web site at
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4/screenshots.html
are broken.
I would have sent this message to an email address associated with Web site
maintenance, but if there *is* such an
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 23:07 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Daniel Espinosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is to help in the improviment of the
documentation avariable, and to
the manager of the page above to use, comment or
modify this work, and
finaly to include in the sources.
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 23:07 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The User Guide is horribly out of date. And without
an
active community of good technical writers, I can't
make
any guarantees as to when it will cease to suck.
I've checked out
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 10:28 +0100, karderio wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:07 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 17:32 +0100, karderio wrote:
Lastly, the image you've submitted for the link emblem
doesn't match what I have on my system. Emblems change
with system
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 10:37 +0100, karderio wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:11 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
I noticed .../gnome-user-docs/gnome-users-guide is the 1.4
documentation, is that because GNOME 1 is still maintained in CVS ?
The intention was that they would be two separate
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 23:44 -0700, Brent Smith wrote:
I've written a manual for Yelp that uses gnome-doc-utils.
Please let me know if it works for you and if you think
certain sections need addressed or additional topics need
added.
Hi Brent,
Thanks, we've needed some Yelp documentation for
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 20:09 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Daniel Espinosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying change the contents and order in the
Gnome User Guide, and
becouse I don't have enough time, for the moment, to
study the XML DocBook
and how to create or edit
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:17 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Don Scorgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. In section 2.1.1.3, about changing the size of
the cursor. It
currently says:
Select one of the following cursor size options:
Small
Medium
Large
Cursor or pointer? :)
From the
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 19:05 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, January 25, 2006 16:24, Joachim Noreiko
wrote:
--- Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, in some locales, it's not even possible
to
show 12-hour since
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 17:56 +, Matthew East wrote:
Dear doc-lists,
I just noticed a new category has come into Yelp: GNU Info files.
While I applaud the fact that more information is available from Yelp,
it now means that there are two categories on the front page of our
GNOME help
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 10:20 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno lun, 06/02/2006 alle 10.26 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto:
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 08:50 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le lundi 06 février 2006 à 00:26 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
Hi all,
I've branched
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 12:07 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
Our situation is that we need writers. We need to
lower the barriers to entry, and one of them is
expecting new doc writers to build themselves a
complete GNOME from CVS before they can write
documentation.
My experiences would
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 13:34 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
I've just noticed that the most recent version of the
gnome manual online at http://www.gnome.org/learn/ is
2.10.
Also, while on the subject of docs online, could we do
something about the masses of dross we have at the top
of
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 21:15 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we used my stylesheets, this stuff would
automatically
be put onto a separate title page.
Can we?
Absolutely. If any issues come up, then we just
need to tell me, and I can get
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 21:29 +, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
O/H Shaun McCance έγραψε:
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 12:07 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
Our situation is that we need writers. We need to
lower the barriers to entry, and one of them is
expecting new doc writers to build
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 15:35 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
On 09/02/2006, at 8:16 AM, Matthew East wrote (in introduction):
I've been looking at the possibility of spicing up the yelp look a
bit. I've
only done a bit of brief experimentation, I thought I'd ask first
and see if
this
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 16:56 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But somehow, somebody thought it would be a good
idea
to mark hyperlinks with underlines, seriously
hurting
readability. It's become such an accepted idiom
that
you create
Most of you are probably familiar with the fake
accounts we have in bugzilla. They have account
names along the lines of product[EMAIL PROTECTED]
These are really handy, because they don't tie your
bugs to any particular person. This is especially
useful when you have a high turnover, like we
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 11:06 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Is there a tendency to standartize the directories
of the documentation in all official Gnome modules -
similarly to the position of translations - in po*
directories? (I do remember some of the Gnome modules
having different
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:35 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 17:28 +, Joachim Noreiko a écrit :
--- Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 00:11 -0600, Shaun
McCance a écrit :
Here is a list of modules that contain (or should
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 17:21 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
I went through the headings in the Preferences and
tidied them up a bit.
I removed the initial verbs that didn't really add any
meaning and took up most of the navigation pane:
'Configuring', 'Setting', 'Choosing' etc.
Now they all
Big thanks to Joachim, Daniel, and everybody else
who's taken the initiative to Get Stuff Done.
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 20:14 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
Just a quick update of what I'm doing...
I've just added the section 'Giving Focus to a Window'
to CVS. Thanks Daniel for your work on
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 15:10 +0100, Paolo Maggi wrote:
Hi,
gedit/docs ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Is it ok for you if we create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias?
Sure. It's entirely up to the module maintainers.
Maintainers are perfectly free to use accounts or
aliases specific to their project, rather
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 16:34 +, Calum Benson wrote:
On 16 Feb 2006, at 14:43, Victor Osadci wrote:
Any chance of having a review for Epiphany ? There was a lot of
work on
the bookmarks system, toolbars, preferences, etc., and a review
would be
quite useful for the upcoming
I've just migrated gnome-user-docs to gnome-doc-utils.
It works: builds, installs, passes distcheck, all that
fun stuff. Do we want to convert the documents to use
XInclude instead of SYSTEM entities? (Joachim, this
question is mostly to you.)
--
Shaun
As it is written in the Book of Gnome:
And in the final days of the First Steward, the
people will have grown weary, and the kingdom
shall be barren. But from the Majestic Isles,
there shall come a hero, and through him the
people will be galvanized. From death, there
shall come life.
On
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:43 +, Matthew East wrote:
Hi all,
I have a quick question about the string freeze: does it apply to
documentation? By the sound of the activity on the list, it doesn't: so
when is documentation freeze? Or is there no freeze? Obviously,
translators will work on
Matthias pointed out that the OMF files in
gnome-user-docs weren't being installed.
In fact, there were no OMF files, because
I forgot to add the .omf.in files to CVS.
I've added them and rolled a new release.
Since there were no real changes, aside
from build stupidity, I've versioned it
at
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 01:34 +1300, John Stowers wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I have attached my first pass at the updated nautilus documentation.
Please comment on what you think of this.
I am sorry I did not submit a patch against the old gonautilus docs,
It was very large so I thought it
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 16:34 +, Calum Benson wrote:
On 21 Feb 2006, at 14:12, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
I can *sort of* see the reason for this, because you
get simpler items in the menu, eg 'Archive Manager'.
But the policy isn't carried through system wide,
because when you choose
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 20:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to help a little on the User Guide. I have more experience now
than the last time I worked on GNOME 2.8. Let me know what I could do.
Sincerely,
Angela Boyle
Hi Angela!
How are things going for you in the real
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 12:03 -0500, William Jon McCann wrote:
Hey Elijah,
Elijah Newren wrote:
Does this affection documentation at all? If not, this is simple
enough so here's one of two approvals.
I'm not really sure if there is any documentation that refers to or
shows asterisks
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 14:37 +0200, Alexander Shopov wrote:
Hi guys,
This will certainly wait for the months after the March release and
subversion migration but I *do* think that we should all press to get
the structure for the documentation of packages heavily standardized.
The
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 13:04 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Hi Al,
(this is more of a question for gnome-doc-devel-list)
Yesterday at 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. This obviously does not apply to the credits for translations of docs,
for
there is a special syntax:
NAME EMAIL,
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:17 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. In fact, I generally push for a
two-directory layout,
like so:
/sound-juicer/help/sound-juicer/C/sound-juicer.xml
The downside of that is once I start working on two
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:15 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Bulgarian Gnome translation team we have
standartized on the following
way of writing the credits:
Translatorname In Bulgarian
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 15:25 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
On 28/02/2006, at 11:07 PM, Alexander Shopov wrote (in part):
1. We have po* subdirectories to hold the translations. We should
expect the help to always be in help*
I can definitely represent the less-experienced doc. translator
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 23:17 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
For gnome-doc-utils using modules, a minimal commit setup might be:
module/help/Makefile.am (to add your language to DOC_LINGUAS)
module/help/ChangeLog
module/ChangeLog (if there is no former)
module/help/vi/
where you pick
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 14:14 +0200, Victor Osadci wrote:
Hi,
Brent Smith wrote:[Wed Mar 08 2006, 07:57:49AM EET]
I've been working on generating some new PDFs for the documentation in
the gnome-user-docs package. I've come up with some build scripts[1]
that generate some decent
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 09:54 +0200, Sean Wheller wrote:
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 07:57, Brent Smith wrote:
I've been working on generating some new PDFs for the documentation in
the gnome-user-docs package. I've come up with some build scripts[1]
that generate some decent output using
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 08:42 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:39:07PM +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
What should they be called?
Applet is in the Style Guide:
http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/gnome-glossary-desktop.html
If there's a better term,
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 11:37 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
I've just been pointed to Ubuntu's docs, which are
online in both the stable and unstable versions:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam
This really puts us to shame.
Go to http://www.gnome.org/support/ and you find the
user
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 07:33 +0200, Sean Wheller wrote:
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 11:32, Emmanuel Pacaud wrote:
I don't think PDF is well suited for on screen reading. Font rendering
and glyph spacing make document harder to read than when it's in html.
PDF is every bit as readable as any
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 07:24 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Matthew East [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 16:25 +, Joachim Noreiko
wrote:
However, I do see your point about wanting to
mouse-wheel through the whole thing to see what
catches your eye.
After
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 07:49 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Joachim Noreiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun wrote on bugzilla...
Oh, I meant to say something else too. I've said
it
before, but I'm going to
keep saying it over and over and over until
everybody
knows not to
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 10:12 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
Shaun, is it ok to add a new section to the UG for
2.14.1 on contributing to GNOME and joining the
project -- cross-linking to the feedback docs for now?
[1]
My reasoning is that 2.14.1 will go into Ubuntu
Dapper, which will be
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 23:05 -0800, Ryan Paul wrote:
I recently noticed an error in the GNOME 2.14 release notes, and it has
been bothering me. I'm not exactly sure if this is the right place to
bring it up, but I'd like somebody to correct it.
On the page titled What's New For Users
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 14:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 13:13 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
I wonder, how much does this Linux/X/GNOME/Distro
stack hurt us, and how much does it help us?
We normally change very Ubuntu-specific stuff in the LiveCD, where that
is
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 21:30 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
Recent bug report mentions in passing:
This search was performed because there was no help
text for the Editable menu accelerators checkbox in
the Menu and Toolbar Preferences config dialog
How on earth is a docs writer supposed to
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 10:21 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 21:30 +0100, Joachim Noreiko
wrote:
Recent bug report mentions in passing:
This search was performed because there was no
help
text for the Editable menu
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 23:15 -0600, Brent Smith wrote:
I've been playing around with python, libxml2, libxslt and gconf schemas
files... This is what I've come up with:
http://www.gnome.org/~bmsmith/gconf-keys/index.html
I was wondering if there were any opinions about generating a key
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 12:05 -0600, Brent Smith wrote:
Unfortunately, a lot of cases of backwards-compatibility breaks
(and forwards-compatibility breaks) just won't be detectable with
any sort of script that I can think of, and that would be really
nice data to have. (Not so that we can
I've just posted the following call for mockups to my blog:
http://blogs.gnome.org/edit/shaunm/2006/06/09/0
Basically, I'm looking for talented designers to submit mockups
for our help pages. I've been largely the sole designer of the
layout for quite some time, and I think it'll be good to get
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 11:44 -0500, jorge alberto garcia gonzalez wrote:
Hello, my name is Jorge Alberto Garcia Gonzalez, i have bee searching
a good tutorial about libxml o xerces because i have been working in a
configuration tool for multiterminals linux machines with the faketty
module,
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:52 -0700, Lynn Monsanto wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on Orca, a screen reader and magnifier for people with
disabilities (see http://live.gnome.org/Orca). I'm working on
accessibility to yelp, and discovered that yelp uses mozilla to present
help information. A
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 14:19 +0200, karderio wrote:
Hi :o)
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 17:14 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 23:02 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- karderio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this seems somewhat similar to what we had
already : an index
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 15:16 -0400, Peter Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 13:45 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
NAME MY XML FORMAT!
How about the ... Help Text Markup Language. Shouldn't cause any
confusion there!
Seriously, I'm really interested in helping Mallard get off the
ground
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 20:26 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
Bug 325806 reminds me that the Style Guide section on
standard terms needs a polish. (Ok, the WHOLE style
guide needs work, but let's do this in chunks we can
feasibly handle!)
Debating each term on this list or the usability list
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 11:41 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
* Don Scorgie:
(Resend. Hopefully it'll go through this time)
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 13:45 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 14:19 +0200, karderio wrote:
snip
Now here's everybody's first chance to get
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 08:55 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now here's everybody's first chance to get in on the
fun:
The code name for the project-as-a-whole is Project
Mallard.
This is sort of an inside poke at DocBook.
O.
NOW I
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 14:13 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 12:04 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 11:41 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
* Don Scorgie:
(Resend. Hopefully it'll go through this time)
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 13:45 -0500, Shaun McCance
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 10:53 +0200, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had originally intended to make a topic-oriented format that
used DocBook as its within-the-page content model. Use the same
block and inline elements, etc. Years of working with DocBook
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 18:11 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
The recent rewrite of the Ataxx docs raises a point:
When the Animation checkbox is selected, the pieces
will visually change when captured. The animation is
different for each tile set. [NOTE: This feature is
really buggy. When the
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 13:34 +0200, karderio wrote:
[snipsnip snip, here's what's left]
It's not really so sudden. The idea of replacing DocBook has
been
floating around for years now. Discussions have happened in
lots
of places, including IRC. (Sidebar: somebody please create
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 09:32 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not just give all the elements simple and
consistent names
to begin with? Nobody can even remember the
DocBook elements,
so
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:00 +0100, Andrew Jeffries wrote:
Hi everyone (and thanks to Karderio who pointed me to this list),
I've had a comment for a while on the GNOME/GTK developer docs but never
known where to send it.
I'm an infrequent GNOME/GTK developer and am by no means an expert.
http://svn.gnome.org/~rossg/migration-priority-2.list
yelp, gnome-doc-utils, and gnome-user-docs are all
in the priority 2 list. I've been told that these
should *probably* be migrated by the middle of next
week. Just, you know, FYI.
--
Shaun
___
I've changed the string Sound Vision to
Sound Video. This string is used as a
category for documentation, and corresponds
directly to the applications in the Sound
Video applications menu.
--
Shaun
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 19:40 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
Cool.
BTW, this bug was set as assigned to Shaun.
Is gnome-applets docs component set to do that
automatically? It's not a good idea.
If you want the docs team to be notified of bugs, set
the docs component of your product to
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 22:02 -0700, Ryan Paul wrote:
Hi,
I just finished the new gataxx docs. I have attached a patch to this
e-mail as well as the complete docbook xml file. Comments and criticism
are appreciated. Did I do everything right?
Hi Ryan,
This looks really good, though I didn't
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:34 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Shaun McCance wrote:
I think you severely over-estimate my power. I can't force
people to do anything.
I think I'm not. I understand that you might feel uneasy about this,
but it is your duty. Fearless leaders take decisions
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 17:59 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Don Scorgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:51 -0400, Richard Stallman
wrote:
Meanwhile, if the maintainers who deal with
substantial issues in the
code don't want to fix these problems, that
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 17:33 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:51 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
I am not saying you don't have my support. What I'm saying is
that I'm not the silver bullet that you think I am. Maintainers
will WONTFIX a use GNU/Linux
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 19:59 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 19:51 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
snip
How much can DogTail automate?
Can everything about how a screenshot should be made
be codified into a script? -- eg window size, document
contents, menus,
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:02 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
scrubbing all the accumulated CC's. Either they're on the doc-list or
they won't be interested
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:36 -0700, Ryan Paul wrote:
I just finished putting together a simple proof-of-concept utility that
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 19:45 +0800, Mustapha Abubakar wrote:
Hello G-NOME family. I wish to join the documentation team
and also the translation team please I need friends to put
me through.
You've come at just the right time. We're now in
the second half of our release cycle leading up to
the
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 18:06 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:49 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
snip
I think this went nicely, and I expect the release team
will continue doing this. In light of this new process,
I've been thinking over the last week of proposing
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 17:15 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/21/06, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le dimanche 20 août 2006, à 18:00, Srinivasa
Ragavan a écrit :
Hi,
I have added icons to the new quick search
menu in
string.Format (Catalog.GetString (b{0}/b of b{1}/b Sticky Notes
+
were successfully imported into Tomboy.),
numNotesImported,
numNotesTotal)
Shouldn't this be using GetPluralString?
--
Shaun
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 11:36 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Shaun McCance
I want the query string to be in the common key=value form, like
http://api.gnome.org/yelp/forums?query=this+is+a+test
It should silently ignore any keys other than query, so that we can add
information
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 08:24 -0700, Rich Burridge wrote:
Hi Don,
It was brought to my attention on IRC that the gcalctool manual was
missing a screenshot (gcalctool_advanced_window.png).
Since all the screenshots in the manual are from different themes, I
spent a few minutes recreating
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 14:42 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Stoffers, Robert LAC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other alternatives are: (1) split the Gnome
material out again, and
(2) relicense our desktop guide in a way which
allows us to use the
Gnome material, or (3) ask
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 10:04 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
--- Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 14:42 +0100, Joachim Noreiko
wrote:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/2006-September/thread.html
I think the much bigger question is, why does
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 20:57 +0200, karderio wrote:
Hi :o)
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 11:16 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
In the end, maybe we should
just switch to a license that people hate less.
I have been pondering documentation licences since the beginning of this
thread, considering
Let me make a few things perfectly clear:
* This has nothing to do with Debian. In fact, I was
voicing concerns about the FDL well before people at
Debian were. You have no sense of history in this
conversation.
* You stated some insignificiant part of the Free
Software community hates
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:34 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
The Free Software Foundation has just announced the publication of the
first discussion draft for version 2 of the GNU Free Documentation
License:
http://www.fsf.org/news/gfdl-dd1.html
Thanks for the notice, Yavor. The text so far
gnome-doc-utils has been branched for gnome-2-16
--
Shaun
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 17:15 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
Since now is the quiet time of the cycle, I figure we
should look at our own documentation -- the GDP
Handbook and the Style Guide...
I'm going to start going through the bugs currently
files in these.
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 17:38 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
There's a big section of the Hadbook called Getting
Started.
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gdp/handbook/gdp-handbook/ar01s03.html
I've been around for two release cycles now, and even
now, it's enough to scare me off.
It
1 - 100 of 786 matches
Mail list logo
