During the last release cycle, we worked on a number of the documents
collaboratively. We got quite a few new writers involved, and that was
really nice. But there was often confusion as to the status of all the
documentation, and this hurt our efforts to have community-build docs.
I'm proposing
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 10:27 +, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:27:44 -0600, "Shaun McCance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > During the last release cycle, we worked on a number of the documents
> > collaboratively. We got quite a few new writers
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 20:17 +, Alan Horkan wrote:
> The documentation style guide said this was the place to send feedback
> http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/titlepage.html
>
> The following section of the Documentation style guide concerns me:
>
> http://developer.gnome.org/d
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 22:00 -0400, Steven Garrity wrote:
> I'm working on evaluating (and hopefully improving) the consistency of
> save confirmation dialogs in Gnome [1] and there's a bug in the HIG that
> is holding me up. [2]
>
> As the comments on the bug explain, the problem is that the "Cl
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 11:41 +, Patrick Costello wrote:
>
> Shaun McCance wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 22:00 -0400, Steven Garrity wrote:
> >
> >>I'm working on evaluating (and hopefully improving) the consistency of
> >>save confirmation dialogs
The impact is low enough. I'd say go for it.
--
Shaun
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 09:39 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> I can't comment on the doc implications, but it seems like a useful
> fix to me and would make the foot menu more useful than it currently
> is.
> Luis
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:13:0
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 14:57 +0900, Ryan McDougall wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-25-02 at 10:44 +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> > As you know, the Sun docteam has been updating and creating
>> > documentation for the Sun release of the Java Desktop System. I have put
>> > the following tarballs i
s there is a l10n.xml file in ../style/ that we should translate.
>> Is there any plan for this?
>
>I'm CCing gnome-docs list because I think Shaun McCance created the
>stylesheet for us. Maybe he has an idea.
>
>However, this will probably need to wait for 2.12.
Oh gosh,
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:54 -0500, Dave Malcolm wrote:
>(Cross-posting to evolution-patches and to gnome-doc-list)
>
>Attached is a first-pass at a patch to the Evolution documentation.
>Doesn't yet have a ChangeLog since I'd like feedback from the Evolution
>and GNOME docs people.
[snip]
I'll l
Stable is gnome-2-10, all the fun happens on HEAD.
--
Shaun
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
So I've actually released a Yelp 2.10.0, despite the fact
that accessibility regressions prevent it from being in
the Gnome 2.10 release set. It has come to my attention
that distros have been shipping 2.9.x from CVS, and that
nothing I say or do is going to stop them. So I might
as well release
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 08:33 -0400, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> Quick question: what determines the main font used by yelp? And how it
> can be changed?
Hey Sasha,
As of the non-existant 2.10 release, Yelp has font preferences
for the normal document font and the monospace font. By default
it use
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 08:35 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
> hi,
>
> (reposting as the first post never came thru)
>
> I'd like to work on the user-documentation for gtk-doc. The current bits
> are under FDL and several people said that does not go well with the
> GPL/LGPL.
> What is the suggested
In an effort to open up the development process, I've just created
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-devel-list
This is a technical list, where we'll discuss the *development* of
Yelp, gnome-doc-utils, and any other documentation utilities that
might come along (l
Regrettably, I had to change the string ", " in gnome-doc-utils to
the more obscure ", ". That extra msgstr wrapper
is ignored by my i18n stylesheets. Its only purpose is to prevent
intltool from mangling the very important trailing whitespace.
On the plus side, I put in a much better comment ex
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 00:09 +1000, Andrew Burton wrote:
> G'day all
>
> Where can I download the latest CVS version of the Desktop User Guide
> (http://www.gnome.org/learn/users-guide/2.10/index.html)? cvs.gnome.org
> doesn't seem to have it (or it's hiding somewhere!)
>
> I've noticed quite a fe
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 14:36 +0530, Arunprakash wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patch for UI bug #235830 sets the title of the
> contact editor as "Contact Editor - ".
>
> This is set while opening existing contacts also.
> This was not earlier.
>
> The is the file name of the contact.
Does the i18n team
I've added an xref formatter to gnome-doc-utils for prefaces.
The default formatting is exactly the same as for glossaries.
<_msg>
preface.xref
--
Shaun
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listi
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 11:04 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> any update on this?
>
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le mercredi 17 août 2005 à 09:55 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
> >
> > > On 8/17/05, Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The attached patch changes most of t
In the last few release cycles, our documentation has rotted. It's been
incredibly difficult to get new contributors hacking docs quickly, in
part
due to a high barrier to entry.
In order to encourage collaborative editing, I've placed an outline for
the User Guide on the wiki:
http://live.gnome
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 08:48 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Hi Shaun,
>
> Yesterday at 23:19, Shaun McCance wrote:
>
> > In the last few release cycles, our documentation has rotted. It's been
> > incredibly difficult to get new contributors hacking docs quickly, in
&
Subject says it all. 2.12 work continues on the gnome-2-12
branch. New hotness happens on HEAD.
--
Shaun
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 20:49 +0200, Christian Persch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For quite some time, the general inconsistency of strings in the various
> GNOME modules has irritated me. For example, let's just look at some
> strings in GNOME:
[snip]
> You'll notice:
> - the varying messagestyle: "[do] it?
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 10:15 -0400, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> On 10/15/05, Brent Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 2) Standardize the titles of each document by removing version numbers,
> > fixing capitalization, removing unnecessary articles and adding a type
> > to the title such as "Man
I'm CCing gnome-i18n. Translators, there's a special
message to you at the bottom.
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 21:57 +0545, Pawan Chitrakar wrote:
> i have copied user-guide-C.omf file to user-guide-ne.omf file and
> changed the location of docbook file and language code to ne then i
> updated scrollk
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 11:37 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> ScrollKeeper is hosted on SourceForge. I haven't seen
> any of the maintainers around in a long while, and the
> ChangeLog shows no updates in the last seven months.
> But hopefully we'll find a way to get Nepali
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:39 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's with great pleasure that I announce that gnome-utils HEAD has
> been
> ported to gnome-doc-utils.
>
> I've never really did this, so I'm not sure that everything is working
> as it should: I've followed the GnomeDocUtils
Hey Alexander,
Very sorry for the late reply. The fact is, nobody really
knows how everything works at this point. The Documentation
Project is in complete disarray.
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 16:32 +0200, Alexander Shopov wrote:
> Please guys,
> I really need help.
>
> I have a Bulgarian translati
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 20:58 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> Looking at gosbasic.xml...
>
> What's the difference between 'grab' and 'click and
> hold'? I don't see any. Either one should be removed,
> or if doc writers use both, one should be picked as
> the entry in the table, with the other ment
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 00:17 -0500, Fred Koschara wrote:
> All of the screenshot links on the Web site at
> http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4/screenshots.html
> are broken.
>
> I would have sent this message to an email address associated with Web site
> maintenance, but if there *is* such an a
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 23:07 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Daniel Espinosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is to help in the improviment of the
> > documentation avariable, and to
> > the manager of the page above to use, comment or
> > modify this work, and
> > finaly to include in the so
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 18:36 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> At Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:05:21 + (GMT),
> Manish Chakravarty wrote:
> > 2) Will i be assigned credit for the docs i write? or will the
> > maintainer keep the copyright/credit?
>
> Do you really care about this? Put youself as "author" a
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 18:13 +, Manish Chakravarty wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I thank everyone for such a warm welcome for my last
> email. I have got the hand of DocBook and its time for
> me to do my bit.
> Before i begin (and raise any more unnecessary
> questions) i want to ask:
>
> 1)What
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 19:11 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Manish Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Sorry if my questions bug you, but i assure this is
> > the sort of questions many newbies are having. This
> > question is not answered in
> > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gdp
On Sun, 2005-12-25 at 23:37 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- karderio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Joachim, what files are you working on, or planning
> > to work on, in
> > gnome-user-docs ?
>
> - submitted a patch for the mouse preference panel
> (not yet been committed, AFAIK)
> - working
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 02:33 +0100, karderio wrote:
> Should there not be more screenshots in the docs ? From the GNOME
> Handbook of Writing Software Documentation I understand there should be
> a screenshot for each window described.
Screenshots are overrated. Help files should generally be
writ
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 17:32 +0100, karderio wrote:
> > Lastly, the image you've submitted for the link emblem
> > doesn't match what I have on my system. Emblems change
> > with system theme. Which are you using (and which icon
> > theme is GNOME default?). I'm using the icon theme
> > called 'GNOM
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 17:44 +0100, karderio wrote:
> > I know from Shaun that part1.xml and part2.xml are
> > officially deprecated, but I don't know what the
> > status of the others is.
>
> How does something get "officially deprecated" ? I noticed that several
> screenshots are no longer useful
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 16:55 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- karderio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed .../gnome-user-docs/gnome-users-guide is
> > the 1.4
> > documentation, is that because GNOME 1 is still
> > maintained in CVS ?
>
> There's a lot of weird stuff in CVS.
> One time I f
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 23:07 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The User Guide is horribly out of date. And without
> > an
> > active community of good technical writers, I can't
> > make
> > any guarantees
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 17:37 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> Is the Style Guide available in CVS?
> I've spotted one or two mistakes in it. It also has
> bit about 'Eliminate Superfluous Information...
> Over-exposed legal information, Over-exposed author
> information', which the guide itself doesn
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 12:20 -0700, Brent Smith wrote:
> I think string freeze starts January 2nd, with the release of
> 2.13.4 - If we want modifications to be translated, we will
> have to commit the patches before that deadline, right?
While an admirable goal, the GDP has yet to follow
string fr
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 10:28 +0100, karderio wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:07 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 17:32 +0100, karderio wrote:
> > > > Lastly, the image you've submitted for the link emblem
> > > > doesn't mat
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 10:37 +0100, karderio wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 14:11 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > I noticed .../gnome-user-docs/gnome-users-guide is the 1.4
> > > documentation, is that because GNOME 1 is still maintained in CVS ?
> >
> > The int
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 07:44 +0530, Manish Chakravarty wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a newbie to this list. I want to help out with the GNOME
> documentation project
> Last few days i have been reading that many people have been
> "committing" changes to some packages (eg evolution).
> I would like to help ou
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 23:44 -0700, Brent Smith wrote:
> I've written a manual for Yelp that uses gnome-doc-utils.
> Please let me know if it works for you and if you think
> certain sections need addressed or additional topics need
> added.
Hi Brent,
Thanks, we've needed some Yelp documentation f
A few release cycles back, the documentation team began
asking for announcements of UI and string changes. We
already had a string change announcement period in place
for the benefit of the translators, so the release team
just made it all coincide. Easy, no problems.
Unfortunately, people tend
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 20:16 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A few release cycles back, the documentation team
> > began
> > asking for announcements of UI and string changes.
> > We
> > already
The feature freeze is nigh, and that means it's time for
our intrepid writers to dig into our documentation. As
valiant as they are, they can't do this alone. We need
your help.
Sunday, January 15 will be the first Documentation Love
Day of the 2.14 release cycle. This is an excellent
opportuni
Every translator I heard from supported this
change, so I did it. The string 'ltr' has
been changed to 'default:LTR'. This is the
same string GTK+ uses, so it should help with
translation memory and such.
--
Shaun
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnom
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 20:09 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Daniel Espinosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying change the contents and order in the
> > Gnome User Guide, and
> > becouse I don't have enough time, for the moment, to
> > study the XML DocBook
> > and how to create or edi
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:17 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Don Scorgie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. In section 2.1.1.3, about changing the size of
> > the cursor. It
> > currently says:
> > "Select one of the following cursor size options:
> > Small
> > Medium
> > Large"
>
> Cursor or p
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 11:46 +, Don Scorgie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 17:53 +, Matthew East wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to make some distro-specific customisations to the css in Yelp
> > recently, so I tentatively modified data/default.css and copied it
> > to /usr/share/y
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 19:05 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, January 25, 2006 16:24, Joachim Noreiko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> However, in some locales, it's not even possible
> > to
> > >> sho
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 17:56 +, Matthew East wrote:
> Dear doc-lists,
>
> I just noticed a new category has come into Yelp: GNU Info files.
>
> While I applaud the fact that more information is available from Yelp,
> it now means that there are two categories on the front page of our
> GNOME h
I've just added the string "Command Line Help" to
Yelp. If man or info are enabled (which they both
are now by default), this is used as an extra node
under which the man and info page nodes are placed.
--
Shaun
___
gnome-doc-list mailing list
gnome-d
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 14:52 +, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 14:06 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> > --- Simos Xenitellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I spoke to Brent on IRC who said Shaun has a plan
> > > to
> > > > rewrite the guide from scratch so it can be under
> >
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:40 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:06 -0500, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> > On 2/4/06, karderio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anybody asked the copyright holders if they wouldn't mind
> releasing
> > > under a new license ? I don't see what
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 10:20 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 06/02/2006 alle 10.26 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 08:50 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > Le lundi 06 février 2006 à 00:26 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I've
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 14:43 +0200, Alexander Shopov wrote:
> I am very strongly opposed to changing the license of Gnome Documentation.
>
> I have very little compassion to the Debian hypocrites that had to think
> of a stupid and erroneous reason to be against GFDL.
>
> If a part of Debian deve
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 12:07 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> Our situation is that we need writers. We need to
> lower the barriers to entry, and one of them is
> expecting new doc writers to build themselves a
> complete GNOME from CVS before they can write
> documentation.
>
> My experiences woul
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 13:34 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> I've just noticed that the most recent version of the
> gnome manual online at http://www.gnome.org/learn/ is
> 2.10.
>
> Also, while on the subject of docs online, could we do
> something about the masses of dross we have at the top
> o
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 21:28 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> I'm looking at the GDP handbook's
> crossreferencing.xml.
> Both the online version and the yelp version show
> smart quotes, making it impossible to copy and paste
> examples of docbook code.
> This is the docbook source:
>
>
>
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 21:15 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If we used my stylesheets, this stuff would
> > automatically
> > be put onto a separate title page.
>
> Can we?
Absolutely. If any issues come up, th
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 21:29 +, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> O/H Shaun McCance έγραψε:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 12:07 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> >
> >> Our situation is that we need writers. We need to
> >> lower the barriers to entry, and one of them is
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 09:58 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When straight quotes (U+0022) are required by some
> > syntax,
> > the quote element should absolutely, positively not
> > be used.
>
> > Joachim
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:03 -0500, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Also, I know it's become popular lately on Planet Gnome
> > and desktop-devel-list to be hostile and accusational,
> > and to call thing
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:42 +0200, Alexander Shopov wrote:
> > I am neither a Debian developer nor a Debian user.
> Neither am I.
>
> > Although
> > I often try out various distributions, just to see how Gnome
> > looks across the board,
>
> As I am the committer of the Bulgarian Gnome translatio
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:30 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 15:41 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
>
> > I generally try to avoid bringing my employer into
> > these threads, to make it clear that my involvement
> > with Gnome is entirely my own. But I can
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 22:14 +, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> O/H Shaun McCance έγραψε:
> > In fact, there's absolutely no way a DocBook document can
> > guarantee its compliance with the FDL, given how much leeway
> > processing applications have with DocBook. For ins
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 15:35 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> On 09/02/2006, at 8:16 AM, Matthew East wrote (in introduction):
>
> > I've been looking at the possibility of spicing up the yelp look a
> > bit. I've
> > only done a bit of brief experimentation, I thought I'd ask first
> > and see i
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 16:56 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But somehow, somebody thought it would be a good
> > idea
> > to mark hyperlinks with underlines, seriously
> > hurting
> > readability. It's be
Most of you are probably familiar with the fake
accounts we have in bugzilla. They have account
names along the lines of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These are really handy, because they don't tie your
bugs to any particular person. This is especially
useful when you have a high turnover, like we do in
the
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 13:11 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> At what point should we add ourselves to the author
> list in the docbook? Does this happen just prior to
> release and we count all work done since 2.12 as one
> new revision?
Add yourself now. You've already made significant
contributi
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 11:06 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. Is there a tendency to standartize the directories
> of the documentation in all official Gnome modules -
> similarly to the position of translations - in po*
> directories? (I do remember some of the Gnome modules
> having different
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:35 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 17:28 +, Joachim Noreiko a écrit :
> > --- Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 00:11 -0600, Shaun
> > > McCance a écrit :
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 17:21 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> I went through the headings in the Preferences and
> tidied them up a bit.
> I removed the initial verbs that didn't really add any
> meaning and took up most of the navigation pane:
> 'Configuring', 'Setting', 'Choosing' etc.
> Now they a
Big thanks to Joachim, Daniel, and everybody else
who's taken the initiative to Get Stuff Done.
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 20:14 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> Just a quick update of what I'm doing...
>
> I've just added the section 'Giving Focus to a Window'
> to CVS. Thanks Daniel for your work on
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 13:20 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 2/13/06, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached is a patch that makes some minor changes to the SJ UI
> > (following a UI review with Calum etc):
> >
> > * add accelerator labels to main window artist/title/genre
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 22:42 +0200, Victor Osadci wrote:
> Hi
>
> În data de Mi, 08-02-2006 la 17:37 +, Joachim Noreiko a scris:
> > --- Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > But in general, where in bugzilla should problems in
> > > the handbook and style guide be reported? Is there
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 15:10 +0100, Paolo Maggi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > gedit/docs ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Is it ok for you if we create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias?
Sure. It's entirely up to the module maintainers.
Maintainers are perfectly free to use accounts or
aliases specific to their project, ra
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 16:34 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On 16 Feb 2006, at 14:43, Victor Osadci wrote:
> >
> > Any chance of having a review for Epiphany ? There was a lot of
> > work on
> > the bookmarks system, toolbars, preferences, etc., and a review
> > would be
> > quite useful for the u
I've just migrated gnome-user-docs to gnome-doc-utils.
It works: builds, installs, passes distcheck, all that
fun stuff. Do we want to convert the documents to use
XInclude instead of SYSTEM entities? (Joachim, this
question is mostly to you.)
--
Shaun
_
As it is written in the Book of Gnome:
And in the final days of the First Steward, the
people will have grown weary, and the kingdom
shall be barren. But from the Majestic Isles,
there shall come a hero, and through him the
people will be galvanized. From death, there
shall come life.
On behal
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:43 +, Matthew East wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a quick question about the string freeze: does it apply to
> documentation? By the sound of the activity on the list, it doesn't: so
> when is documentation freeze? Or is there no freeze? Obviously,
> translators will work
Matthias pointed out that the OMF files in
gnome-user-docs weren't being installed.
In fact, there were no OMF files, because
I forgot to add the .omf.in files to CVS.
I've added them and rolled a new release.
Since there were no real changes, aside
from build stupidity, I've versioned it
at 2.13.
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 01:34 +1300, John Stowers wrote:
> Hey Everyone,
>
> I have attached my first pass at the updated nautilus documentation.
> Please comment on what you think of this.
>
> I am sorry I did not submit a patch against the old gonautilus docs,
> It was very large so I thought it
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 16:34 +, Calum Benson wrote:
> On 21 Feb 2006, at 14:12, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> >
> > I can *sort of* see the reason for this, because you
> > get simpler items in the menu, eg 'Archive Manager'.
> > But the policy isn't carried through system wide,
> > because when you
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 20:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to help a little on the User Guide. I have more experience now
> than the last time I worked on GNOME 2.8. Let me know what I could do.
> Sincerely,
> Angela Boyle
Hi Angela!
How are things going for you in the r
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 17:43 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> On 22/02/2006, at 5:01 AM, Shaun McCance wrote:
>
> > Now, I'm all for saying what an application is in the
> > menu, regardless of whether we use the real name. I
> > have no problems with items like "
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 12:03 -0500, William Jon McCann wrote:
> Hey Elijah,
>
> Elijah Newren wrote:
> > Does this affection documentation at all? If not, this is simple
> > enough so here's one of two approvals.
>
> I'm not really sure if there is any documentation that refers to or
> shows ast
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 09:54 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Danilo Å egan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Today at 20:46, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any way we can mark a whole docbook
> > section
> > > as not worth translating because it's going to get
> > > rewritten complet
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 14:37 +0200, Alexander Shopov wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> This will certainly wait for the months after the March release and
> subversion migration but I *do* think that we should all press to get
> the structure for the documentation of packages heavily standardized.
> The main
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 13:04 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> (this is more of a question for gnome-doc-devel-list)
>
> Yesterday at 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > 4. This obviously does not apply to the credits for translations of docs,
> > for
> > there is a special syntax:
> > N
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:17 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree. In fact, I generally push for a
> > two-directory layout,
> > like so:
> >
> > /sound-juicer/help/sound-juicer/C/sound-juicer.xml
> &g
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:15 +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > In the Bulgarian Gnome translation team we have
> > standartized on the following
> &g
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 15:25 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> On 28/02/2006, at 11:07 PM, Alexander Shopov wrote (in part):
>
> > 1. We have po* subdirectories to hold the translations. We should
> > expect the help to always be in help*
>
> I can definitely represent the less-experienced doc. tra
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 23:17 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> For gnome-doc-utils using modules, a minimal commit setup might be:
>
> module/help/Makefile.am (to add your language to DOC_LINGUAS)
> module/help/ChangeLog
> module/ChangeLog (if there is no former)
> module/help/vi/
>
> where you
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 14:14 +0200, Victor Osadci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brent Smith wrote:[Wed Mar 08 2006, 07:57:49AM EET]
> > I've been working on generating some new PDFs for the documentation in
> > the gnome-user-docs package. I've come up with some build scripts[1]
> > that generate some dec
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 09:54 +0200, Sean Wheller wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 March 2006 07:57, Brent Smith wrote:
> > I've been working on generating some new PDFs for the documentation in
> > the gnome-user-docs package. I've come up with some build scripts[1]
> > that generate some decent output us
1 - 100 of 1015 matches
Mail list logo
