-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
But that does not change that the copyright holder can ask a court to
stop Microsoft from distributing his software, and can claim damages
if he can make a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Basically, this is not the GPL, but a different license using the same
words in large parts. Maybe the FSF could demand that they call their
license something else (but I don't know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancefire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am confusing on GPL now, I need someone to clear me.
Or maybe you're not confused, but just unhappy that it doesn't condone
your desire to take away some of your customers' freedoms.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, I've received my assignment forms, but I'm not sure if I got the
right ones. I checked yes to is there anyone who may have a claim to
the work, since at the very least I used company equipment, and also
even company time for some of the work,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rui
Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe, but since there's no source code, there's little value in using
the GPL, and if it was used, a distributor could find himself in
infringement since he could not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stefaan A Eeckels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There can only be what the copyright holder decides the source code
to be. If there's nothing left but the binary, then obviously the GPL
makes little sense; any license that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rui
Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:32 +, Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
The reason I wonder is that there is still an awful lot of old
software floating around that is still useful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Or however the GPL defines source code.)
Suppose I want to release some software but I either don't want to or
cannot (my house burned down 10 years ago and I lost the source
scenario) release source code for it.
Is it still possible for (legal)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alfred M\. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The employer cannot say that I am not allowed to do so, since that
would violate the license.
The employer may not legally redistribute *and* then also require the
recipients to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The GPL can only give the owner of a copy rights.
What if I, as a homeless vagrant scouring the city dump for cool stuff,
some across a three-year-old CD with a bunch of GNU packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Terekhov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Terekhov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You seem to misunderstand. The resulting overall program containing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Terekhov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original:
unsigned explosive_power = 0;
while (still_not_eliminated(FSF))
send_a_bomb(FSF, explosive_power += 10/*kiloton*/);
Derivative:
unsigned explosive_power =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stefaan A Eeckels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, as far as I understand it, you would be the only person in
trouble. The company might have a pre-release of David's GPLed
software, but this does not give you, their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Terekhov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The MySQL Protocol is proprietary.
[...]
Because this is a GPL protocol, [...]
Make up your mind.
- --
IBM has more patent litigation lawyers than SCO has employees. -
14 matches
Mail list logo
