-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >You seem to misunderstand. The resulting overall program containing
>> >independent works for all its components is indeed "still just a
>> >compilation". But it now contains a derivative program (among other
>> >computer program works) -- a derivative set of instructions to
>> >eliminate FSF.
>>
>> So all compilations of independent works are also derivative works in
>> their own right? Is that what you are saying?
>
>Not at all. An independently created compilation is never a derivative
>work.
So really it was just a poor example you made up?
- --
You're proposing to build a box with a light on top of it. The light is
supposed to go off when you carry the box into a room that has a Unicorn
in it. How do you show that it works?
- Dr. Gene "spaf" Spafford, at Dr. Wenliang Du's qualifing exam
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Please fetch my new key 804177F8 from hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net/
iD8DBQFD8OKFwyMv24BBd/gRAqYeAJwNAoI2uXc/xPn4O1FM75/y7+bXOACeIPd7
24N5BnE9/G/c12+1oAGG4Ik=
=dQwA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
