-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Bernd Jendrissek wrote: >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >You seem to misunderstand. The resulting overall program containing >> >independent works for all its components is indeed "still just a >> >compilation". But it now contains a derivative program (among other >> >computer program works) -- a derivative set of instructions to >> >eliminate FSF. >> >> So all compilations of independent works are also derivative works in >> their own right? Is that what you are saying? > >Not at all. An independently created compilation is never a derivative >work.
So really it was just a poor example you made up? - -- You're proposing to build a box with a light on top of it. The light is supposed to go off when you carry the box into a room that has a Unicorn in it. How do you show that it works? - Dr. Gene "spaf" Spafford, at Dr. Wenliang Du's qualifing exam -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Please fetch my new key 804177F8 from hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net/ iD8DBQFD8OKFwyMv24BBd/gRAqYeAJwNAoI2uXc/xPn4O1FM75/y7+bXOACeIPd7 24N5BnE9/G/c12+1oAGG4Ik= =dQwA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnuemail@example.com http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss