On 11/11/19 4:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
But if you mean me personally,
> then no, I don't want to shame rms by trying to formulate what I think
> we (as in we GNU hackers together) believe is the mission of the GNU
> project. In fact I hope he will agree that it correctly describes what
> we
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, 2019-11-09 at 22:55 +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 03:15:16PM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Is glibc purely GNU? It borrows code from a variety of sources and
> > was not written completely from scratch. (Although there are many
> > parts
* Mark Wielaard [2019-11-11 14:50]:
> Hi Brandon,
>
> On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 16:36 +, Brandon Invergo wrote:
> > A social contract is only a necessity in a community-run organization
> > because it helps prevent the organization from moving off-course. When
> > the moral compass of the
Hi Brandon,
On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 16:36 +, Brandon Invergo wrote:
> A social contract is only a necessity in a community-run organization
> because it helps prevent the organization from moving off-course. When
> the moral compass of the organization is set and maintained by a leader
> or
* Ludovic Courtès [2019-11-11 15:44]:
> I think the whole “us vs. them” discourse, plus telling that “they” have
> ulterior motives, is uncalled for. Once again, your scenario that “they”
> are trying to publicly shame the GNU Project is not only insulting: it’s
> implausible because “they”
Jean Louis,
I stepped over a personal line in writing my message on Friday. I am
moderating myself on this list now.
> That is hypocrisy. The public shamings page as published by Guix and
> Ludovic states "Joint statement on GNU project" while you are thinking
> Dr. Stallman. You speak about
On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 18:52 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The dynamics I’ve observed over the last decade is that people who’d
> like GNU to be more welcoming, more transparent, and/or community-
> run,
> would eventually give up and silently leave. I’ve seen brilliant
> people
> leave, and
Hello,
"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2...@kylheku.com> skribis:
> By the way, "contract" seems like a misnomer, because a contract is
> a signed-off agreement between two parties (or more) in which they
> exchange something of value; the contract requires a contribution
> from at
Hi Florian,
Florian Weimer skribis:
> You are very, very wrong. We are trying very hard to stay within GNU,
> but the feedback we have received so far on GNU mail lists suggests
> that we are not wanted here.
There is a part of GNU that includes myself that really wants you (you
personally,
Hi Brandon,
Brandon Invergo skribis:
> Given that nothing has changed in how GNU is being run, it appears that
> the cart is being placed well before the horse. However, I would be
> shocked if they didn't already expect rms not to step down and therefore
> to reject their Social Contract
10 matches
Mail list logo
