ray r...@zianet.com writes:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0500, DFS wrote:
Rjack wrote:
Yaaawn.
FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability claims
for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the Freetard spin.
The Cisco v. Free Software case was
Here's the SFLC's GPL litigation track record:
1. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
2. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
3. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
4. Dismissal With Prejudice.
5. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
6. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
7. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
8. Dismissal With
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Here's the SFLC's GPL litigation track record:
1. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
2. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
3. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
4. Dismissal With Prejudice.
5. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
6. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
7. Dismissal Without
DFS nos...@dfs_.com wrote in message
news:v%ohl.32331$v8.27...@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
Rjack wrote:
Yaaawn.
FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability claims
for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the Freetard spin.
The Cisco v. Free Software
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:24:57 +0200, Hadron wrote:
ray r...@zianet.com writes:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0500, DFS wrote:
Rjack wrote:
Yaaawn.
FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability
claims for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the
The Cisco v. Free Software case was dismissed with prejudice and
without award of court costs. (On PACER court record 4/22/2009)
I don't see this on the pacer site. Anyone got a direct link?
There's no mention of this on any news site.
--
Ciarán O'Riordan, +32 487 64 17 54,
