Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
LOL!
Summary:
For those who have been reading/hearing Stallman for the past 10-plus
years as I have, this admission is shocking in the extreme. The GPL,
which is supposed to be the ultimate guarantor of software freedom, may
deliver the opposite.
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
LOL!
Summary:
For those who have been reading/hearing Stallman for the past 10-plus
years as I have, this admission is shocking in the extreme. The GPL,
which is supposed to be the ultimate guarantor of software
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
LOL!
Summary:
For those who have been reading/hearing Stallman for the past
10-plus years as I have, this admission is shocking in the
extreme. The GPL, which is supposed to be the ultimate
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Stallman told the European Commission that
the lack of a more flexible license for MySQL will present considerable
barriers to a new forked development path for MySQL
THis is nothing new. The FSF's recommendation has always been
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
THE LACK OF A MORE FLEXIBLE LICENSE FOR MYSQL WILL PRESENT CONSIDERABLE
BARRIERS TO A NEW FORKED DEVELOPMENT PATH FOR MYSQL.
Uh, you conveniently forgot to mention that this is about MySQL being
licensed GPLv2 _only_ (not as common, GPLv2 or later). Since GPLv2
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
THE LACK OF A MORE FLEXIBLE LICENSE FOR MYSQL WILL PRESENT CONSIDERABLE
BARRIERS TO A NEW FORKED DEVELOPMENT PATH FOR MYSQL.
Uh, you conveniently forgot to mention that this is about MySQL being
licensed GPLv2 _only_
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
THE LACK OF A MORE FLEXIBLE LICENSE FOR MYSQL WILL PRESENT CONSIDERABLE
BARRIERS TO A NEW FORKED DEVELOPMENT PATH FOR MYSQL.
Uh, you conveniently forgot to mention that this is about
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Nonsense. The affirmative act is accomplished in advance when the
copyright holder acts according to the recommendation:
Go to doctor, idiot dak.
One just can't be a party (licensor or licensee) to an intellectual
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
GPL is a license, not a contract.
Yeah.
LOL.
Heck, why are you, German GNUtian dak, still pretending to be in denial
regarding the judgments of the courts in Munich and Frankfurt about
contractual status of the GPL, stupid dak?
(Munich)
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
One just can't be a party (licensor or licensee) to an intellectual
property license under unknown/unspecified/future/later terms.
God damn, you are a stupid POS.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
Apart from that, or later is utter legal nonsense because absent
sublicensing, the later license terms may come into effect only by
the affirmative act of the copyright holder and for that nobody needs
or later clause.
Idiot.
David Kastrup wrote:
[... the GPL is not a contract ...]
Both courts unequivocally said that the GPL is a contract.
(Munich)
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf
http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_munich_gpl.pdf
(Frankfurt)
http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[... the GPL is not a contract ...]
Both courts unequivocally said that the GPL is a contract.
How comes you snip everything relevant from my reply before stomping
your feet again? As I already said: contract law applies since
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[... the GPL is not a contract ...]
Both courts unequivocally said that the GPL is a contract.
How comes you snip everything relevant from my reply before stomping
your feet again? As I
David Kastrup wrote:
[... There are differences which I listed ...]
Go to doctor, with all the differences which you listed, dak.
BTW... Who's paying for your health care insurance, dak?
If you you're going to trigger freedom of speech now just like Alan,
please explain why.
regards,
In article 87oco0rjli@lola.goethe.zz, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
wrote:
Dak, dak, dak. Stallman told the European Commission that
the lack of a more flexible license for MySQL will present considerable
barriers to a new forked development path for MySQL
In article hbmvug$2ik...@colin2.muc.de, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de
wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Stallman told the European Commission that
the lack of a more flexible license for MySQL will present considerable
barriers to a new forked
17 matches
Mail list logo
