What development effort? It's already an option to build GnuCash on windows
using MinGW64 instead of MinGW32 (setting aside that there's a Webkit problem
with the Windows build so neither is possible right now). Most of the Linux
distros are 64-bit only, though Debian insists on packaging
Hello Simon,
Am 30.12.23 um 19:31 schrieb ora...@sbutler.co.uk:
I built GNUcash a couple of years back on a Raspberry pi, got the
quotes working IIRC (I had definitely installed Finance::Quote and even
applied an update to a new version), started trying to learn how to use
it
-Original Message-
From: gnucash-user On
Behalf Of gnucash-user-requ...@gnucash.org
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 3:27 PM
To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org
Subject: gnucash-user Digest, Vol 250, Issue 45
Send gnucash-user mailing list submissions to
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To
Hi Jim,
I am sorry for the delay. I inserted my view inline.
Am 25.12.23 um 01:14 schrieb Jim DeLaHunt:
I recently had a problem[1] with getting online quotes from GnuCash 5.5
on macOS. It caused me to reflect on some shortcomings[2] of the GnuCash
wiki page on Online Quotes[3]. This message
Clarification:
Windows 10 end of life is not until 14th October 2025 according to
Microsoft:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/windows-10-home-and-pro
"Windows 10 will reach end of support on October 14, 2025. The current
version, 22H2, will be the final version of
There is no 32-bit Windows 11 OS but 32-bit programs will still run on the
64-bit Windows 11 OS - the same with Windows 10.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 4:30 PM John Ralls wrote:
> An x64 build will work only on 64-bit PCs, a 32-bit build works on both.
> Windows 11 doesn't support 32-bit and
But, as R Losey pointed out, that would take considerable development
effort. Is there any actual benefit to switching to a 64-bit program,
and is that benefit large enough to justify the development effort, even
if all the needed libraries are available in 64-bit forms.
It seems to me that the
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by
Also the database/XML file itself refers them as splits (i.e, each
transaction is made up of two or more splits), so if we start using
different terminology for what people on the frontend it could get
really confusing if we are trying to resolve a problem and have to
refer to what's in the data
An x64 build will work only on 64-bit PCs, a 32-bit build works on both.
Windows 11 doesn't support 32-bit and Windows 10, which does support 32-bit
computers, goes end-of-life this May. We don't "officially" support operating
systems after EOL so I guess at some point after that we can switch
There is a known bug with reports in GnuCash version 5.5 on a Windows machine.
The bug is well-understood, but the fix is not so easy.
Moving down to 5.4 will fix the report problem.
> On 01/17/2024 3:29 PM PST Ignacio Ayuste wrote:
>
>
> Hi All, for a lot reports i noticed the file
Hi All, for a lot reports i noticed the file generated in temp folder but
the app crash, I run the app using winDbg and the error is:
(4130.c2c): Access violation - code c005 (!!! second chance !!!)
eax= ebx=62f200a0 ecx= edx= esi=1049fff0
edi=0004
eip=62d400d3
I suspect it is fair to say that the UI design results in different uses of the
same English terms from accounting, thus a "split" in terminology.
> On 01/18/2024 12:03 PM PST Adrien Monteleone
> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, this is an example where it isn't just the terminology of users,
> but
Yes, this is an example where it isn't just the terminology of users,
but rather that the UI uses the term 'split' for two different meanings.
I too have memo transactions with only one split and no value.
Regards,
Adrien
On 1/18/24 1:45 PM, Stan Brown (using GC 4.14) wrote:
Don't forget,
Perhaps.
But does that translate well to the Basic View mode when there are 3 or
more debits/credits?
Regards,
Adrien
On 1/18/24 1:53 PM, Eric Chapman wrote:
FWIW: How about "Simple transactions" (with one debit & one credit) and
"Compound transactions" (those with more than one debit or
That is how I currently understand it.
When I use 'a split' I mean a single debit or credit.
When I use 'split transaction' I mean a transaction that has 3 or more
combined debits/credits.
Regards,
Adrien
On 1/18/24 1:43 PM, David T. via gnucash-user wrote:
The Gnucash community has had
Ah yes, another case of 'split' and I have lots of those!
-
For the record, Transaction Journal view shows each debit and credit and
the Memos for each.
Double-Line shows the Notes field and is independent of Transaction
Journal view.
Regards,
Adrien
On 1/18/24 1:28 PM, Patrick James
FWIW: How about "Simple transactions" (with one debit & one credit) and
"Compound transactions" (those with more than one debit or more than one
credit)?
On 1/18/24 11:56, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
Fair enough. We need a new term for one of these things. It is a
repeated source of confusion &
The Gnucash community has had this discussion many times in the past. My
recollection is that the following terminology is accepted:
* Each line is a "split," and thus a basic transaction has two such splits.
* A transaction with more than two splits is referred to as a multi-split
transaction.
Don't forget, changing "split" to a "new term" would mean program
changes. When I click on a line within a transaction and then click the
delete icon, a popup asks whether I want to delete "the split". And that
happens whether there are two splits in the transaction or more than two.
(It is of
A "simple journal entry" is a journal entry that involves no more than two
accounts.
A "compound journal entry" is a journal entry that involves more than two
accounts.
That's the 'easy' part.
Now there are entries that involve multiple debits or multiple credits, or
both, that only impact
David,
I would be happy with just changed amounts. Phone bills, cable bills,
subscriptions all adjust upward in random ways at random times due to the
designed in inflation of our economy, plus newly invented or rescinded taxes
and fees. Wrong first take -- I cannot imagine being able to
Fair enough. We need a new term for one of these things. It is a
repeated source of confusion & consternation.
Regards,
Adrien
On 1/18/24 9:54 AM, Michael or Penny Novack wrote:
Except I would never refer to a transaction that affect JUST TWO
accounts to have any "splits". When I use the term
The OP referenced an adjustment for inflation, so it seems like simply
upping various amounts.
Hence my suggestion to leave the template with the current amounts, and
add a variable multiplier which will be prompted by GnuCash.
But that suggestion didn't take into account creating
Apologies for my confusion.
Regards,
Adrien
On 1/18/24 3:09 AM, David H wrote:
I don't think I suggested you thought otherwise but since you've quoted me
in your reply you must think that I did. I was simply replying to Gyles
comment along the lines of the following.
Regards David H.
On 1/17/2024 10:04 PM, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
A little more detail to what Michael is asking for:
While viewing the Checking account register, click on View >
Transaction Journal. That will show all splits in all transactions.
Except I would never refer to a transaction that affect JUST
I'm not part of the team, but I am a software engineer, and I've done
conversion to 64-bits. In the best case, it's just a matter of
re-compiling... but that's never worked except for very small programs.
All of the libraries used must have 64-bit versions, and then each call to
the library needs
Dear GnuCash team,
I would like to know when you will create the Windows x64 release builds?
We are in 2024, x64 is here since Windows XP Pro.
The goal is to have like other softwares, a x64 version in more x86.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neustradamus
I don't think I suggested you thought otherwise but since you've quoted me
in your reply you must think that I did. I was simply replying to Gyles
comment along the lines of the following.
Regards David H.
Instead of having 11 or 12 sx templates, why not have one that fires monthly?
Sent from
Ok David so what are you changing on your template that you want to update
to your already created txns ? Is it just a changed amount, are you adding
further splits, making significant changes ?
A bit roundabout but this is how I would handle the situation of a
significant change to a template
30 matches
Mail list logo
