On 22/05/2015 5:21 am, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Thu 2015-05-21 11:59:07 -0400, mofo syne wrote:
You might see a few copies around. This one is edited and streamlined with
some advice from Hasimir to help keep this proposal focused. This is
mirrored in here
On Thu 2015-05-21 18:46:52 -0400, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
On 2015-05-21 15:21, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
The example you give toward the end of the spec (uri handlers in web
browsers) is an important example for arguing why something like this is
concretely useful. Have you tried to
On 2015-05-21 15:21, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Thu 2015-05-21 11:59:07 -0400, mofo syne wrote:
You might see a few copies around. This one is edited and streamlined with
some advice from Hasimir to help keep this proposal focused. This is
mirrored in here
So what are data uri classified as then?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_URI_scheme
Because this is based off datauri, in terms of structure. So since datauri
works, I'm inclined to think that there isn't any technical restriction to
including content within a uri context as long as the
Something that's mostly limited to web browsers and a couple of email
clients. It's meant for including data in-line in web pages, not as
separate documents, and has pretty close to nil adoption in the rest of
the ecosystem.
I'm not sure you need to wait for browsers to adopt this standard for
So what are data uri classified as then?
Something that's mostly limited to web browsers and a couple of email
clients. It's meant for including data in-line in web pages, not as
separate documents, and has pretty close to nil adoption in the rest of
the ecosystem.
Adopting a special OpenPGP
This proposal is to provide an alternative to the openpgp block
messages, in the form of a uri ( e.g. `http://` ).
The format of a URI is, generally, mechanism:address for that
mechanism. For instance, email has a URI scheme:
mailto:r...@sixdemonbag.org?subject=URI%20schemes
FTP has
On Thu 2015-05-21 11:59:07 -0400, mofo syne wrote:
You might see a few copies around. This one is edited and streamlined with
some advice from Hasimir to help keep this proposal focused. This is
mirrored in here
http://www.reddit.com/r/GnuPG/comments/36lmih/i_wonder_if_there_is_a_gpg_uri/
*=OPENPGP URI
PROPOSAL=## Brief/Objective
*
This proposal is to provide an alternative to the openpgp block messages,
in the form of a uri ( e.g. `http://` ). This would make such messages more
web friendly, as well as taking advantage
On 22/05/2015 1:59 am, mofo syne wrote:
You might see a few copies around. This one is edited and
streamlined with some advice from Hasimir to help keep this proposal
focused.
For the benefit of the rest of the list, Hasimir is my IRC handle on
freenode and a few other places. An /ns info
10 matches
Mail list logo
