On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 21:02:08 -0500, Avi avi.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Why? Inline is simple and effective. I'm curious as to why you
feel MIME is so much better.
http://josefsson.org/inline-openpgp-considered-harmful.html
jamie.
pgpha2dSJArgJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:22:03 -0500, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org
wrote:
Just as an FYI to the list --
On Android's mail application, PGP/MIME attachments are nigh-unusable.
It won't render even the plaintext portions: it has to be downloaded and
opened with a text reader. If
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:08:08 +, MFPA expires2...@ymail.com wrote:
IMHO, the comment field is firmly in the you don't need this at all
category. If Heinrich Heine really wants his UID to be
Heinrich Heine (Der Dichter) heinri...@duesseldorf.de he can
type Heinrich Heine (Der Dichter) in the
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:10:58 -0500, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org
wrote:
On 2/3/11 4:30 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
my user survey is from several years of trying to personally help
dozens of people of all skill levels learn how to use OpenPGP for secure
messaging. Regardless
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:54:39 -0500, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org
wrote:
But i suspect he would not want to certify this User ID:
Daniel Kahn Gillmor (I am really Robert Hansen) d...@fifthhorseman.net
Correct. Because the presence of my signature means something. The
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:41:51 +0100, orionbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I use a python script to (a) open a file encrypted with a symmetric
cipher using a passphrase, (b) do some operations on it, and (c)
re-encrypt it.
You might try using one of the many python gpg interface libraries that
exist
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:17:27 +0100, Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
THanks, indeed the --with-colons gave a completely different output...
I was just about to ask of the date format (if it changes between
operating systems or such) but now I have a different problem in
understanding
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:58:31 -0600, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, help?
Hi, Aaron. You might be interested in some of the tools that come with
the Monkeysphere [0] package, which deals with a lot of OpenPGP for SSH
stuff. It comes with the utility openpgp2ssh, which
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:23:04 -0400, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org
wrote:
I'm not. This idea isn't good.
Do you use ssh-agent? Do you think their implementation of the same
thing is not good? If so, have you complained to them about it, or
asked why the implemented it?
jamie.
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:05:11 +0200, Hauke Laging
mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de wrote:
I just don't like the idea that access to the agent is not noticed by
design.
I strongly agree with this point. Let's think about it another way:
what if the user is themselves doing something that is
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:12:21 -0400, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org
wrote:
Do you use ssh-agent? Do you think their implementation of the same
thing is not good? If so, have you complained to them about it, or
asked why the implemented it?
This seems to be an argument from
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:56:52 +0200, Vjaceslavs Klimovs vklim...@gmail.com
wrote:
I did some quick tests on Nokia N900 (600 MHz ARM CPU), with gnupg
1.4.6, here is what I got:
Encrypting and signing, 2048 bit RSA keys:
real0m 2.50s
user 0m 0.50s
sys 0m 0.02s
Decrypting and
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:28:07 +0200, Vjaceslavs Klimovs vklim...@gmail.com
wrote:
2048 bit keys are suitable - it's user+sys what matters in this case,
but not real by all means, as that includes waiting for passphrase
input too.
I think this is really a UI issue, in which case real is what
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:25:21 +0200, Ludwig Hügelschäfer
mlis...@hammernoch.net wrote:
Ack. 1.5 seconds is about the limit where a good GUI should issue a
reaction. This is where the human mind is starting to think there's
something wrong.
We should be careful not to overstate the impatience
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:27:46 -0400, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
On Jun 22, 2010, at 2:36 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Can you elaborate on the usage you're describing?
I'm thinking of a situation involving three people: Alice, Bob, and Charlie.
Alice has met Bob in
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:51:58 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I think the situation Daniel points out is one of the better usages for
local signatures, and probably the main reason for having them in the
first place.
Actually, looking at the RFC 4880 now, I see
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 02:50:41 +0100, MFPA expires2...@ymail.com wrote:
So in order to be safe you need additional CPU load
either for TLS or for signing. Signing is superior IMHO
because it allows reuse of the data (one crypto action
(covering less data) for several users vs. one for each
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 06:27:12 -0400, Jerry gnupg.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
I am assuming that you wanted me to reply to this message. Its intended
purpose was not overly clear. At least not to me, but then again I have
not had my second cup of coffee this morning.
I think if he had wanted you
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:32:05 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
And i should probably add that it is indeed an infinitesimal drop in the
bucket compared to the other spam i receive; i'm not concerned about it.
Not to mention that the bother of a couple of extra spams is
Speaking of spam, I'm getting more spam from some sort of automated
ticketing system that seems to be subscribed to this list that I ever
have from a keyserver. The mail seems to come from:
secure.mpcustomer.com
and it often sets the From: to be from someone else. This is totally
uncool. Is
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:43:19 +0200, Crypto Stick
cryptost...@privacyfoundation.de wrote:
Each of the three keys can be up to 3072 bit. In fact they can even be
4096 bit long; but GnuPG does currently not support such key length in
cooperation with the Crypto Stick (but GnuPG can handle 4096
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:33:14 -0800, Smith, Cathy cathy.sm...@pnl.gov wrote:
We are migrating from OpenPGP which is a freeware version of PGP. Sorry for
the confusion.
I'm not familiar with OpenPGP, the software. I'm familiar with the PGP
Corporation's implementation (which I think is just
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:46:33 -0800, Smith, Cathy cathy.sm...@pnl.gov wrote:
We are starting to migrate from OpenPGP to GnuPG.
Just for clarification, GnuPG is software tool that is actually an
implementation of the OpenPGP specification [0]. OpenPGP is not
actually a piece of software itself,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:39:28AM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:41:52 +0100, Piotr Bratkowski wrote:
I have this code. And when I see output owner_trust = 4, but in gpg
from system I get 0. Do I need to somehow save this changes??
This is not directly supported by
24 matches
Mail list logo
