On 26/02/15 18:15, Helmut Waitzmann wrote:
> I tried
>
> gpg2 --verbose --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --send-keys --
> 72ABFF0923A87CF22D0ED7C4FDEE765D017077F1
>
> and got the message
>
> gpg: sending key FDEE765D017077F1 to hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net
> gpgkeys: HTTP post er
On 05/03/15 11:33, Paulo Lopes wrote:
> If I could suggest something else, what about having official packages, say:
>
> * official ppa for ubuntu
> * official rpm for RHEL/Centos/Fedora/SUSE
> * official Arch AUR
>
> Of course this is quite some work and lots of distros are not here but for
> ex
On 13/03/15 21:13, Joey Castillo wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm working on a Kickstarter right now that aims to popularize smart
> cards as an easier way for the average user to adopt GnuPG.
>
> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/joeycastillo/signet-simple-online-privacy-cards
>
Geographic distrib
On 26/03/15 03:39, Dave Kimble wrote:
> Ubuntu 14.04 with gnupg 1.4.16 installed from Ubuntu repository.
> Enigmail says it is about time I upgraded to gnupg v2.
> Ubuntu Software Centre says I have the latest version.
>
I have a ubuntu flavour 14.04 and gnupg2 is certainly available in its
reposi
Using UbuntuStudio 1404 (and updates), gnupg 1.4.16 and gnupg2 2.0.22 (ubuntu
installation)
I came across this line (see subject) in an enigmail debug log recently and it
was held as the likely cause of the display of an alertbox containing absolutely
no information.
Now today, while using the co
On 19/05/15 18:14, Werner Koch wrote:
>
> You are trying to sign using SHA-512 and a small key. This is most
> likely due to custom preferences set on your key or in your config.
I do have SHA-512 set as first preference in gpg.conf for both "message digest
algorithm used when signing a key" an
On 20/05/15 12:24, Werner Koch wrote:
> gpg tried to verify a key signature and ran into that problem. Of
> course it should not abort here. It would be helpful if you can you
> figure out which key causes the problem. Maybe the key shown last or
> the one which would be shown next. Running wit
On 27/05/15 10:36, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> On 05/22/2015 02:27 AM, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> The key ID was 0x6e767393
>
> It seems for me that this key has subkey of ECC, and that's the cause
> of your trouble.
You're right - this key has an ECC subkey for signing.
On 27/05/15 15:05, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> It was done soon after 2.0.22. I think that 2.0.23 or later doesn't
> have this issue. The signature check is just skipped as unknown algo.
One of the problems with using linux distribution packages. The latest for
Ubuntu 1404 is 2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3 which
Using gnupg 2.1.3 on an old portable with Debian Jessie.
gpg -K lists all private keys
gpg2 -K lists all private keys and follows this with eight identical lines of
"gpg: error computing keygrip"
'gpg2 -K myname' lists all private keys without any error messages
gpg2 --with-keygrip -K lists a
On 27/08/15 20:41, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I, personally, don't think it's a big deal to drop mention of 1.4 except
> to talk about "it's for system administrators, not regular users".
> However, I'd really like to hear your feedback on this. Should we make
> this change? Yes or no?
Yes
sig
On 10/12/15 01:50, MFPA wrote:
> On 6th December I switched the order of these lines, so that the RSA
> signature comes last. An Enigmail and GnuPG 2.0 user told me he was
> not seeing the "good" signature from 0x6B7C74CEB31F25F0. It appears
> that if there are multiple signatures present, Enigmail
On 11/12/15 22:42, MFPA wrote:
>
>> > On my laptop, with Debian Jessie and gpg2.1.7, the
>> > signature verifies ok. Again normal for 2.1.x
> Do both signatures verify correctly for you with 2.1.x, or does
> Enigmail still only pass on the result of one of them?
>
I don't use the laptop regular
On 27/04/16 11:10, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Using a netbook with a touchpad, Debian Jessie/stable and Iceweasel
> 38.7.1esr-1~deb8u1 (Debian package), I encounter an issue with the menu
> at the top of the website.
>
> When you hover the pointer over a menu category (Home, Donate, Download,
> ...) i
ansceive failed: (0x1000a)
gpg: apdu_send_simple(0) failed: card I/O error
gpg: using subkey 0x79D467BFF5DF6C91 instead of primary key
0x26BD500A23543A63
gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit RSA key, ID 0x79D467BFF5DF6C91, created
2014-10-28
"Philip Jackson (Jan 2013 +) "
gpg: public key d
g and "gpg2 -o output_file -d
input_file.gpg" fail with the same message :
gpg: public key is 0x79D467BFF5DF6C91
gpg: using subkey 0x79D467BFF5DF6C91 instead of primary key
0x26BD500A23543A63
gpg: using subkey 0x79D467BFF5DF6C91 instead of primary key
0x26BD500A23543A63
gpg: encrypted with
On 10/09/16 06:27, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> I don't have any experience with this error behavior. Please describe
> the situation and the interaction; Did you input passphrase and push
> [OK] button, and then gpg failed?
>
> Please try again with pinentry-curses and/or pinentry-tty. Does it work?
On 10/09/16 20:56, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Have you recreated the key stubs on the new system after having imported
> your public key first?
>
No - how do you do that ? I am just a user nunky-dunk.
> And before, still on 14.04, did you use the --export-secret-keys command?
Not specifically before
On 11/09/16 19:49, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Which type of smartcard do you have? Which gnupg versions were installed
> on the the old system and with which of it did you generate keys?
The smartcard is a version2.0 made by ZeitControl and bought from
Kernel-concepts and used with a SCT3512 usb holde
On 16/09/16 22:09, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response.
> It's not enough to simply copy and paste all the files into the new
> ~/.gnupg directory, as you write you did in your previous mail. You have
> to run gpg2 with the --import option to import your public key and then
> (havi
On 19/09/16 13:02, Stephan Beck wrote:
>> then run tests. Can now sign and encrypt emails, sign and encrypt and
>> > decrypt files although verify on its own causes me a problem but I
>> > shouldn't think that is connected with the smartcard.
> Another wild guess: maybe it's because the ownertrust
On 18/02/17 16:15, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> O Come, All Ye Hackful! Adeste Fiddle-es[2]!
Yea !
Philip
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-u
I can't send signed or encrypted emails in Thunderbird.
I am using Thunderbird 24.5, enigmail 1.6, UbuntuStudio 14.04. Gnupg 1.4.16 was
already installed in the linux distribution and I installed gnupg2 v2.0.22. I
also installed Kleopatra and GPA because I am used to those gui's in Win7. I
impor
Thank you Bernhard for your reply :
On 20/06/14 09:03, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 at 19:04:16, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> It appears to me (in all my ignorance) that there is a problem connected
>> with gpg-agent and PINentry. The Synaptic Package Manag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/06/14 11:41, Tristan Santore wrote:
> On 20/06/14 08:03, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
>> On Wednesday 18 June 2014 at 19:04:16, Philip Jackson wrote:
>>> It appears to me (in all my ignorance) that there is a problem
>>> c
On 11/07/14 11:45, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> In what folder does gpg4win store it's gpa.conf and pubring.gpg files?
>
In Windows 7, 64bit, these files are in
/Users/your_user_name/AppData/Roaming/gnupg/
regards,
Philip
0x23543A63.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signat
On 10/08/14 09:13, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Am at a loss now. I've Thunderbird 31 and Enigmail 1.7
>
> Since this upgrade I've had various issues - unable to sign unable to encrypt
> - I get an
> error message from Enigmail "Error - bad passphrase" - when I've not even
> entered it
On 11/08/14 21:05, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> For some of us relatively new Ubuntu Linux users installing the
>> latest gnupg can be a challenge.
>
> The latest GnuPG is in the Ubuntu repositories, last I checked.
> Ubuntu's normally pretty good about keeping current.
I'm also a new Ubuntu user (
On 12/08/14 21:05, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:50, ps...@ubuntu.com said:
>> We used to use different keys for signing and encrypting ( DSA & El
>> Gammel ), but these days just seem to use a single RSA key by default.
>
> That is not the case. GnuPG creates an RSA signing key and
On 22/08/14 18:13, Nicolai Josuttis wrote:
> to deal with faked keys, some guys had the idea to use
> email verification and let then certification servers
> take that as "casual signing".
I take it that a 'faked key' in this context is one associated with an
unverified email address. If I send
Hi,
I'm looking for some help here please. I'm trying to install 2.0.26 using the
./configure, make, make install procedure. This is something completely
unknown to me and this is a first time attempt at this sort of thing in linux.
I downloaded the tar.bz2 file and checked its signature ok.
On 24/08/14 17:29, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 08/24/2014 04:48 PM, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> I noted the dependencies and the order to install them. So I
>> downloaded the libgpg-error-1.9.tar.bz2 file and set about
>> extracting, configure, make, make install. Al
On 24/08/14 18:23, Philip Jackson wrote:
> Wow, that's a pretty dumb mistake to make. I just assumed the latest version
> was at the bottom of the list on the ftp page. Sorry about that.
>
I've now got the four dependencies noted in the gnupg-2.0.26 README installed
under /u
On 26/08/14 15:55, Werner Koch wrote:
>
> If you want to build it yourself:
>
> #
> # zlib
> #
> server http://zlib.net
>
> # checked: 2014-06-20 ah
> file zlib-1.2.8.tar.gz
> chk a4d316c404ff54ca545ea71a27af7dbc29817088
>
Thanks Werner. zlib now installed and gnupg 2.0.26 ins
On 27/08/14 09:57, Werner Koch wrote:
>
> BZIP2 support is optional. If the bzip2 package is not installed you
> won't have bzip2 support. You may want to "apt-get install libbz2-dev"
> or similar and rebuild gnupg.
>
>> I suppose gnupg-1.4.16 and the new 2.0.26 share the same gpg.conf so I cou
On 27/08/14 21:06, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:42, philip.jack...@nordnet.fr said:
>
>> My linux distribution already has libbz2-1.0 but it will be elsewhere in the
>> file structure and I haven't yet found out how to make use of it for my
>> installation of 2.0.26.
>
> As usual y
On 28/08/14 00:58, Steve Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:56:11 +0200
> Philip Jackson wrote:
>
>> - the email address belongs to a person who does control the key and
>> he may or may not be the person named in the email address. I am
>> risking my secrets wit
On 01/09/14 08:16, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 23:27, tristan.sant...@internexusconnect.net said:
>
>> Yes the card can have a 4096bit Auth, Sign and Encryption key. You have
>
> Correct.
>
>> to generate them on a machine though, not on card.
>
> The cards generate them just fine.
On 01/09/14 23:04, Ville Määttä wrote:
> I bought my SCR3500 and SCR335 V2 from Identive / Chipdrive [1]. I had a
> problem adding VAT number to the order myself but at least they ship (and
> kindly handled fixing the bill afterwards). Though, they only seem to have an
> SCT3511 there, not a 351
On 20/09/14 02:13, Murphy wrote:
> For my Ubuntu
> machine hHere is a brief summary of the steps, in order
>
> 1. Install latest libraries: npth, libgpg-error, libgcrypt, libksba,
> libassuan
> 2. Execute the following command: sudo ln -sf /dev/null
> /etc/xdg/autostart/gnome-keyring-gpg.desktop
On 20/09/14 16:23, Murphy wrote:
>> What, please, is the reason for the step no. 2 in the above list ?
> This is a command to prevent gnome from hijacking pinentry. Without
> it or something like it error messages are generated during execution
> of the gpg2 command. I forget who suggested it but
I've finally received my smartcard from Kernel-concepts and I have a USB reader
SCT3512 from SCM. I am trying to follow the howto on this page :
https://www.gnupg.org/howtos/card-howto/en/smartcard-howto-single.html
and I've reached step 2.3.1 CCID
The file gnupg-ccid.rules downloaded ok from t
I'm using UbuntuStudio1404.
Working from :
https://www.gnupg.org/howtos/card-howto/en/smartcard-howto-single.html
I completed the steps in 2.3.1 using the section "With udev (preferred
installation)".
I took it that the following stuff under the heading "With hotplug (deprecated
in modern syste
On 26/09/14 11:43, Don Saklad wrote:
> in plain neophyte english what are those .asc 's in that message?
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
the 2 attachments.asc are :
1. t
During a recent encryption of a file, I made a mistake in the command options
and gpg looked as if it was going to encrypt to another key. It picked a key
which was in my keyring but not specified as a default in gpg.conf. (my own key
is specified as default in the gpg.conf)
My mistake was to mis
On 05/10/14 21:18, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 05/10/14 20:44, Philip Jackson wrote:
>>> desktop:~$ gpg2 -encrypt filename.txt
>
> Remember that a single dash introduces *short* options, so each letter is an
> option. I think this becomes:
>
> $ gpg2 --encrypt --dry-run
After a couple of weeks away from the smartcard issue, I've tried again from
scratch. Under Windows7 using GpG4win 2.2.2 with an SCM3512 reader, SCM's
drivers and G10's openpgp v2 card, gpg --card-status provides the following
output :
Application ID ...: D2760001240102052870
Version
On 21/10/14 09:25, Pete Stephenson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Philip Jackson
> wrote:
> [snip]
>> This looks promising but I didn't take it any further because I want to get
>> it
>> going under my UbuntuStudio 1404 linux. Using gnupg2 2.0.26.
>
On 21/10/14 12:59, Tristan Santore wrote:
> On 20/10/14 23:36, Philip Jackson wrote:
snip
>> going under my UbuntuStudio 1404 linux. Using gnupg2 2.0.26.
>>
>> Trying to use the GnuPG driver to access CCID cards, "gpg2 --card-status"
>> yield
On 21/10/14 14:58, Pete Stephenson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Philip Jackson
> wrote:
>> On 21/10/14 09:25, Pete Stephenson wrote:
>>> What is the result of running the command:
>>>
>>> echo $GPG_AGENT_INFO
>>
>> echo $G
On 21/10/14 15:33, Tristan Santore wrote:
> On 21/10/14 14:10, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> On 21/10/14 12:59, Tristan Santore wrote:
>>> On 20/10/14 23:36, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> snip
>>
>>>> going under my UbuntuStudio 1404 linux. Using gnupg2
On 22/10/14 09:34, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote:
> On 2014-10-21, Philip Jackson wrote:
>
>> It then treats the other protocol, PC/SC, but all it says is "TODO
>> - To use PC/SC make sure you disable CCID by passing the
>> --disable-ccid option to GnuPG."
>&
Thank you for all this, Peter. It will take me a little while to digest and
check out.
Philip
On 22/10/14 11:19, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 21/10/14 00:36, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> I've followed, I believe, all the instructions in the gnupg.com smartcard
>> howto.
>>
On 22/10/14 09:34, Jens Lechtenboerger wrote:
> On 2014-10-21, Philip Jackson wrote:
>
> Did you really verify that pcscd is not running? It can cause your
> error messages: https://blogs.fsfe.org/jens.lechtenboerger/?p=89
>
Your blog provides a lot of good stuff that I shall
Peter, I've had time to read and try to get to grips with the contents of your
email. They've helped me make some progress :
On 22/10/14 11:19, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 21/10/14 00:36, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> I've followed, I believe, all the instructions in the gnupg
On 27/10/14 20:51, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Since you seem to be requesting it explicitly, I'll share that I'm
>> interested personally.
>
> I just don't want to ask my friend to put together something on the
> subject and then discover there's no interest in it -- it seems
> disrespectful to Pr
On 14/11/14 03:36, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Whoops!
>> so 10**30 years. The universe is about 10 billion years old, or
>> 10**13 years, so ... our brute-force key cracker takes 10**17 times
>> longer than the age of the universe in order to brute-force a 128-bit
>> key.
>
> 10 billion is 10**10,
On 15/11/14 03:42, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Heinz Diehl wrote:
>>||__|| | Please don't |
>> / O O\__ feed |
>> / \ the troll |
>
> Best forcibly un-subscribe .
>
> Cheers,
> Julian
>
On 16/11/14 05:59, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
> Werner,
>
> I have partly resolved the problem - which seems to be related to gnupg2
> Thunderbird and
> Enigmail running on a 64 bit Linux. The only error message am now getting is
> "bad
> passphrase" when I've not even entered a passphrase but am a
I see on :
https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gnupg/Option-Index.html#Option-Index
references to both --with-keygrip and --with-fingerprint. When I try
--with-keygrip on gnupg2.0.26, it appears not to be a valid option.
The only other time I have seen a reference to a keygrip (and I do
On 30/11/14 01:32, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> The keygrip is protocol-agnostic whereby the fingerprint would differ
> e.g. between OpenPGP and X.509. From [0] (note "[2]"):
>
> The keygrip is a unique identifier for a key pair, it is
> independent of any protocol, so that the same key can be u
I've been looking for documentation with info on adding a photo id to a gpg key.
The instructions for adding are available but I can't find any advice for the
size, format, dpi etc of the image to be used.
I guess that the image size should be kept down somewhat to avoid making the key
too large.
On 31/12/14 14:27, Sandeep Murthy wrote:
> https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gnupg/OpenPGP-Key-Management.html#OpenPGP-Key-Management.
>
> The command is the `addphoto` subcommand of `—edit-key` - one adds a photo by
> executing
>
> `$ gpg —edit-key addphoto`
>
> which prints out the
On 31/12/14 15:31, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
>> I've been looking for documentation with info on adding a photo id to a gpg
>> key.
>> The instructions for adding are available but I can't find any advice for the
>> size, format, dpi etc of the image to be used.
>
> The major problem is there is
On 04/01/15 13:18, Giordano Lipari wrote:
> My machine runs with on a Ubuntu 14.04 LTS distribution. This comes with a
> default GnuPG 1.4.16 located mainly in /usr/bin as gpg. My competency in
> software engineering is limited. Following the indications in
> https://www.gnupg.org/download/index.ht
On 05/01/15 16:54, Sandeep Murthy wrote:
> I thought the maximum was 4096? For example, GPGKeychain (the GUI keychain
> utility from the GPGTools suite which installs the GnuPG/MacGPG) doesnt’t
> allow
> key sizes bigger than 4096. In any case, choosing 8192 fails with `gpg`:
>
> gpg: keysi
Using GPA 0.9.4 in linux.
I downloaded a file and its signature as a .asc from a website that I have used
many times. While looking at the spelling of the filename, I accidentally
clicked on the signature file and launched GPA so decided to use it to verify
the download. GPA gave me a 'bad' stat
On 24/01/15 20:25, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 24/01/15 20:05, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> Using GPA 0.9.4 in linux.
>>
>> I downloaded a file and its signature as a .asc from a website that I have
>> used many times. While looking at the spelling of the filename, I
>
On 25/01/15 11:05, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> I think it's quite likely --batch comes into play in your scenario, although
> I'm
> not well acquainted with the source code.
>
> By the way, I think it'd be helpful if you could indicate your distribution
> and
> the version of GPA you use. Also, if yo
On 25/01/15 11:48, Damien Goutte-Gattat wrote:
> On 01/24/2015 08:05 PM, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> Using GPA 0.9.4 in linux. [...]
>> So it appears to be a bit hit and miss trying to use GPA to verify downloaded
>> .asc signatures.
>
> It looks like bug 1637 [1], whic
On 25/01/15 12:05, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> It seems Philip is confusing signed files and detached signatures, by the way:
>
>> > gpg --clearsign test1.txt gpg --clearsign -a test1.txt gpg --sign -a
>> > test1.txt
> The first two are exactly equivalent. Neither three produce a detached
> signature,
I've been a linux user for less than a year and the only configure/make/install
I've done is for 2.0.26 and its dependencies (when I couldn't get the distro
supplied package 2.0.22 to work).
Now when I look at the dependencies for gnupg 2.1.1, I see that I need to
upgrade libassuan to 2.2.0, libg
On 10/02/15 23:53, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> The questions you're asking are very much the sort of thing that
> distributions are designed to address.
>
> What distro are you using? what version? 2.1.1 has been packaged for
> some distros already (as have some of these dependencies), and you
On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
> In Debian, the experimental repo has gpg 2.1 with all dependencies. Follow the
> instructions at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental
Thank you for that suggestion, Brian. I looked into the link you provided and
decided that to see the precise name o
On 11/02/15 16:20, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I find that distro packages (for Ubuntu) lag well behind what is
>> available and I do appreciate that there is a trade-off between
>> proven reliability and up-to-dateness and also that distros rely on
>> maintainers who may well be volunteers...
>
>
On 11/02/15 21:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2015-02-11 14:02:49 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
>> On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
>>> In Debian, the experimental repo has gpg 2.1 with all dependencies. Follow
>>> the
>>> instructions at https:
On 12/02/15 13:10, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 11/02/15 20:40, Werner Koch wrote:
>> > Since the start of the funding campaign in December several thousand people
>> > have been kind enough to donate a total of 25 Euro to support this
>> > project. In addition the Linux Foundation gave a grant o
Hi Stephan,
On 12/02/15 22:46, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Hi, Philip,
>
> Am 11.02.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Philip Jackson:
>> On 11/02/15 21:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> On Wed 2015-02-11 14:02:49 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
>>>> On 11/02/15 14:59, Bria
On 15/02/15 22:42, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Hi, Christopher,
>
> Am 15.02.2015 um 20:14 schrieb Christopher Beck:
>>
>> On Sunday 15 February 2015 16:30:33 Stephan Beck wrote:
>>> Am 15.02.2015 um 12:26 schrieb Ludwig Hügelschäfer:
On 14.02.15 23:05, Stephan Beck wrote:
>
>>
>> Sometimes my sig
I passed an interesting Sunday afternoon : removed gnupg2.0.26 and attempted to
replace it with gnupg-2.1.2. The experience was not entirely successful.
I got the updated libraries installed using configure/make/checkinstall. I used
checkinstall because various howto articles on ubuntu's wiki re
gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.11 in UbuntuStudio 16.04 LTS
libgcrypt 1.6.5
At the end of April, I made a detached signature of a file that I was
distributing. Today I updated that file and tried to make another
detached signature. The operation failed with a not very informative
error message :
gpg: signing fa
ent established
gpg: using subkey 0x79D467BFF5DF6C91 instead of primary key
0x26BD500A23543A63
# off=271 ctb=d2 tag=18 hlen=2 plen=0 partial new-ctb
:encrypted data packet:
length: unknown
mdc_method: 2
gpg: using subkey 0x79D467BFF5DF6C91 instead of primary key
0x26BD500A23543A63
gpg: encr
On 14/09/17 07:26, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> Philip Jackson wrote:
>> I have the log file which I attach.
>>
>> It shows a number of reports of the same error (lines 89,91,97,99,101)
>> ERR 83886254 Unknown option , before it asks me for the pin
>> (line 111). It
On 06/01/18 06:27, Charles E. Blair wrote:
> However, the command
>
> gpg testfile.gpg yields the message
>
>> gpg: WARNING: no command supplied. Trying to guess what you mean ...
>> gpg: AES encrypted data
>> gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase
> and creates a plaintext file without asking for
> a
On 08/12/2019 18:48, Joseph Bruni via Gnupg-users wrote:
I recall from the early days of PGP that there was a way to create a corporate
key, fragmented into a certain number of potions, which would require some
quorum to be able to perform decryption. I pored over the GnuPG documentation
but c
85 matches
Mail list logo
