GNUstep Testfarm Results

2007-11-10 Thread Adam Fedor
Test results for GNUstep as of Sat Nov 10 06:34:09 EST 2007 If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see

Getting to 1.0 for gui

2007-11-10 Thread Gregory John Casamento
All, I'd like to have a discussion and come to a consensus on what everyone feels would comprise a 1.0 gui release. Please let me know your thoughts on the matter. Thanks, GJC -- Gregory Casamento -- OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer ___

Re: Release Policy

2007-11-10 Thread Adam Fedor
On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: On Nov 8, 2007 1:07 PM, Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a related note. It appears that the gui release will rely on base = 1.15.1 So what does that mean? Does gui 0.13.0 not work with base 1.14.1? (Just saw the new Library

Re: Release Policy

2007-11-10 Thread Stefan Bidigaray
Well, what I was trying to get to with my previous e-mail was that we should only have 1 release, released more often, at a time, exactly to reduce the amount work needed on each release (by everyone). But this is fine too. :) Stefan On Nov 10, 2007 11:07 AM, Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Getting to 1.0 for gui

2007-11-10 Thread Stefan Bidigaray
Wow, I've been writing e-mails all morning! Not that any of them are useful. I would consider gui at 1.0 when the cairo backend gets completed. It's already very good in my opinion (kudos to Fred). And have full support for at least PNG (wasn't there a GSoC for this?), as well as make PNG the

GNUstep on OpenSuse 10.3

2007-11-10 Thread Fred Kiefer
Just updated my system to OpenSuse 10.3 and recompiled GNUstep. Here is how far I could get up to now: In base I get this (new?) warning messages: Compiling file NSException.m ... NSException.m:59: warning: ‘GSPrivateBaseAddress’ defined but not used NSPage.m:43:23: warning: linux/sys.h: Datei

Re: Getting to 1.0 for gui

2007-11-10 Thread Fred Kiefer
Stefan Bidigaray wrote: I would consider gui at 1.0 when the cairo backend gets completed. It's already very good in my opinion (kudos to Fred). And have full support Here you could help by testing and reporting the remaining problems. for at least PNG (wasn't there a GSoC for this?), as

Re: Getting to 1.0 for gui

2007-11-10 Thread Stefan Bidigaray
On Nov 10, 2007 5:48 PM, Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here you could help by testing and reporting the remaining problems. I do, but for the past we weeks I haven't had my test computer up and running, and before that I had a known compilation issue with cairo version 1.4.9 (I had