On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Arthur Sale wrote:
> Christian Gutknecht wrote:
>
> I really like the idea to let researchers feel that subscription is an
> outdated model. And an easy way to do that without upsetting them too much,
> is to
; From: goal-boun...@eprints.org <mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org>
> [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org <mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org>] On Behalf
> Of Stevan Harnad
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 January 2016 02:24 AM
> To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
y, January 4, 2016 2:19 PM
To: 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Quo vadere?
I don’t have access to the raw data now apart from knowing that we fulfill
13,000+ requests a year, but the University of Tasmania has operated a free
unlimited-quantity service for 15 years
nts, 18% of whom are from
> outside Australia).
>
> If someone wants to mine the data, contact the University Librarian.
>
>
>
> Arthur Sale
>
> University of Tasmania, Australia
>
>
>
> *From:* goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] *On
> Beha
half Of
> Stevan Harnad
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 January 2016 02:24 AM
> To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
> Subject: [GOAL] Re: Quo vadere?
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Christian Gutknecht
> <christian.gutkne...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
> Stevan,
>
If someone wants to mine the data, contact the University Librarian.
>
>
>
> Arthur Sale
>
> University of Tasmania, Australia
>
>
>
> *From:* goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Stevan Harnad
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 5 January 2016 02
On 5 Jan 2016, at 08:13, Jan Velterop
> wrote:
This is most interesting, Arthur. Is this a unique case, as far as you know? Is
there anything that makes this possible at the U of Tasmania but not elsewhere?
You say that the economics stack up.
Straw man of no relevance
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Stevan Harnad
Sent: Wednesday, 6 January 2016 03:59 AM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Quo vadere?
Dana, the question is not about whether pay-per
] Re: Quo vadere?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Christian Gutknecht
<christian.gutkne...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
Stevan,
[ahjs] …
But I really like the idea to let researchers feel that subscription is an
outdated model. And an easy way to do that without upsetting them to
Christian, and other readers of this list,
It seems to me that many researchers are unhappy with any kind of
requirement or imposition, resorting to the 'academic freedom' argument
rather (all too?) quickly and easily. But librarians are in a bind. They
can't really cancel most subscriptions
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Christian Gutknecht <
christian.gutkne...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
> Stevan,
>
> I guess the record in RoarMap about the policy of the University of Zurich
> is not correct at that point. The deposition of at least the metadata of a
> publication in the IR is required to
Stevan,
I guess the record in RoarMap about the policy of the University of Zurich is
not correct at that point. The deposition of at least the metadata of a
publication in the IR is required to get included in the annual report, which
is the foundation of research evaluation. It’s however
12 matches
Mail list logo