--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:36:25 +0200
From: Nicolas Pettiaux nico...@pettiaux.be
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) goal@eprints.org
Message-ID: 0dc964714b6dac8a8128979b61ec6...@pettiaux.be
Content-Type: text
Dear Mr Pettiaux,
I seem to have been archivangelizing for almost as long as you have been
teaching.
If there is one thing I can say with near-certainty it is that the slow
progress toward green and (fair) gold OA has not been because of their
names, nor because of their complexity, because it
Dear Mr Harnad,
It has taken me some days, even though I had been gently warned, to
digest your mail and to compose a response.
Without any doubt, you have been an important and long time actor of and
around open access. I am indeed a newcomer to this list, but not
completely a newcomer to
hi Nicolas,
It is a very good thing to see that works of scholars whose careers are ended
are being made freely available online; thanks for your efforts on the Gilbert
and other digithèques.
My question for you, if the authors have passed away and the heirs are not
interested in exploiting
- Original Message -
From: Danny Kingsley
To: goal@eprints.org
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 6:56 PM
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
Hi all,
There is some appetite it seems for looking at definitions at the moment. In
the last couple of weeks I have
:
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20150814/8a94cdff/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:28:01 +0200
From: H?l?ne.Bosc hbosc-tcher...@orange.fr
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Objet : [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
I strongly agree with Jeffrey Beall ... journals, like 'ACS Central Science',
that provide OA without author charges need to be recognized and applauded!
Dana L. Roth
Millikan Library / Caltech 1-32
1200 E
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
Hi all,
Well, I don't know exactly what part of Jeffrey Beall's post Dana Roth agrees
with, but I'm wondering about that part of the same post:
most peer-reviewed open access journals
: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On
Behalf Of Danny Kingsley
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:56 AM
To: goal@eprints.org
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
Thanks Helene,
Yes you are not the first to be confused which was which because I put
(Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
1. Green OA means OA provided by the author (usually by self-archiving the
refereed, revised, accepted final draft in an OA repository)
2. Gold OA means OA provided by the journal (often for a publication fee)
3
Dear Stevan and all
I am very engaged by the GOAL open access list and I find reading it
informing, educating, stimulating, and inspiring by turn. The debate it
engenders is laudable.
But I have never posted to the list. May I say I thought this comment
below was a rather inappropriate way to
Patience, Stevan. Patience, please...
jc
--
Jean-Claude Guédon
Professeur titulaire
Littérature comparée
Université de Montréal
Le vendredi 14 août 2015 à 12:28 -0400, Stevan Harnad a écrit :
Perhaps it’s time for our newcomer, Nicolas Pettiaux, to stop posting for
a while and do a little
Perhaps it’s time for our newcomer, Nicolas Pettiaux, to stop posting for
a while and do a little reading to inform himself about OA and its (short)
history. Otherwise he is just making us recapitulate it for him.
On Aug 14, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Nicolas Pettiaux nico...@pettiaux.be wrote:
Dear
, August 14, 2015 3:40 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
According to DOAJ, 67.6% of journals listed (6,283 journals), while 32.3%
(2,999 journals) do not have article processing charges. This information is
historical
: RE: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
Dr. Couture is correct that the passage I cited does not itself cite the 2012
SOAP study, and I apologize for this error.
Here is what I really should have included:
The overwhelming majority (nearly 70%) of OA journals charge no APCs
[mailto:jeffrey.be...@ucdenver.edu]
Envoyé : 14 août 2015 15:30
À : Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Cc : Couture Marc
Objet : RE: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
Dr. Couture is correct that the passage I cited does not itself cite
the 2012 SOAP study
Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) goal@eprints.org
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 7:33 PM
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
Dear Stevan and all
I am very engaged by the GOAL open access list and I find reading it
informing, educating, stimulating, and inspiring by turn
: Thursday, August 13, 2015 6:56 PM
Subject: [GOAL] Re: libre vs open - general language issues
Hi all,
There is some appetite it seems for looking at definitions at the moment.
In the last couple of weeks I have tweeted about the following:
a.. COAR has a 'Resource Type
Dear
I appreciate these discussions and clarifications. For me, and for most
people who are nex to the subjects and I meet, Gold open access and
green open access are confusing terms, even though they have been used
for a long time in official documents.
Green refers to nature and gold to
Hi all,
There is some appetite it seems for looking at definitions at the
moment. In the last couple of weeks I have tweeted about the following:
* COAR has a 'Resource Type Vocabulary Draft' - standard naming of
items in repositories available for comment -
20 matches
Mail list logo
