[GOAL] Re: COAR-recting the record

2015-05-21 Thread Stevan Harnad
I will not do yet another point-by-point rebuttal http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1150-Elsevier-updates-its-article-sharing-policies,-perspectives-and-services.html, just to have it all once again ignored by Alicia/Elsevier, responding yet again with nothing but empty jargon and

[GOAL] International survey on scholarly communication - and its relevance for open access

2015-05-21 Thread Bosman, J.M. (Jeroen)
Dear all, How do open (access) publication strategies fit into a research workflow? Do researchers use Google Drive instead of Word? Papers instead of Endnote? Google Scholar instead of Scopus? Megajournals instead of topical journals? ResearchGate instead of repositories? We are engaged in

[GOAL] mBio: good model for a noncommercial license

2015-05-21 Thread Heather Morrison
mBio has some what I consider to be a good model for explaining what they mean to include and exclude by using a CC noncommercial license - worth repeating below, this comes after the brief explanation of the license copied exactly from the CC website (another good practice); Noncommercial

[GOAL] In conversation with Ben Ryan from the EPSRC

2015-05-21 Thread Danny Kingsley
Hello all, Last week Cambridge University hosted a meeting with respresentatives from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) which as a policy that data underpinning published research is made available. It kicked in on 1 May 2015. Apart from the policy itself there is

[GOAL] Re: CC-BY journal draft policy: possibly of interest

2015-05-21 Thread Heather Morrison
I agree with Marc's comments but would add that authors need to know that use includes commercial use (this includes for-sale and for-profit re-use), and remix. Re-use doesn't mean the kind of re-uses we like, it just means re-use. It might mean a serious scholar re-using part of our work in

[GOAL] CC-BY journal draft policy: possibly of interest

2015-05-21 Thread Heather Morrison
The Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports has posted a Proposed Creative Commons notice which may be useful for discussion purposes. My perspective is that it is helpful to have this explanatory information, good to see clarification of author copyright retention and active encouragement for

[GOAL] Re: CC-BY journal draft policy: possibly of interest

2015-05-21 Thread Couture Marc
Hi all, Although I don't share Heather's fears as to the dangers of CC BY in scientific publishing, I agree that authors should be able to make an informed choice when they are asked to accept it as a publication condition. The verb share certainly doesn't convey the full scope of the rights