--- Mario Goveia wrote:
The fact that it was incomprehensible to you and not
to several other readers is something you will have
to figure out for yourself.
--- Mervyn Lobo wrote:
My dear Mario,
If you read my post AND understood it, you may
realize that is exactly what I said.
I am
There is a saying, When one is in a hole, stop digging! It only makes matters
worse.
How many Goanetters thought that the experiment that I described in my original
post was:
1. I personally provided and injected the sample of cancer cells in the mice?
2. The mice chest surgery done by me?
Frederick:
One of Goanet's causes celebres in vogue these days appears to be
Propagation of a Falsehood. Observing the proceedings of this vitriolic,
verbal donnybrook has piqued my appetite for bizarre belligerence and
drollery. The raging polemic manifesting platitudes galore, incongruously
--- Mario Goveia wrote:
If a mistake is perceived in ANY post, it should
be questioned, even criticized, in a constructive
manner and a clarification obtained. There is no
excuse to rush to judgement using selected excerpts
from a post, ignoring other comments in the same
post, followed
I request Gilbert to provide the reference to the
original paper that described the good scientific
study that he claims below was mounted to validate the
myth - Goan and American.
Also, I don't recall that post in the Science as a
Religion thread described scientists and a laboratory
that found
--- Mervyn Lobo wrote:
Mario,
1) Gilbert's original article was extremely badly
written.
2) A board certified oncologist can make mistakes.
3) There are people who are capable of pointing out
mistakes that a person is making in another
profession.
Mario responds:
I agree with all three
Frankly I am yet to figure out what the falsehood or mistakes or what was
badly written in the original post. I will admit, I am not a linguist or an
English scholar. I may have spent half hour to write the post; with half the
time aimed at making the post short, sweet, and easily readable.
Mario Goveia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dear Mario,
A few days ago you claimed you do not get to see my
posts. Now it seems you do.
Just in case you did not see it the first time, here
are some questions I directed your way.
1) There is no trash section of the Goanet archives.
2) It would
Mario wrote: Santosh is correct that I was mistaken in the specific
instance described above.
That reminds me of a joke from Pothen Joseph, a doyen of Indian journalism:
There was a boss who thought he was infallible. One day he walked into
the office and declared, For once I was mistaken!
You
Mario Goveia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario observes:
Santosh is correct that I was mistaken in the
specific instance described above.
However, I was not mistaken about the gist of the
entire post by Gilbert, which was to explain how
some Goan kaneos can seem accurate whereas that is
--- Radhakrishnan Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario wrote: Santosh is correct that I was
mistaken in the specific instance described above.
That reminds me of a joke from Pothen Joseph, a
doyen of Indian journalism:
There was a boss who thought he was infallible. One
day he walked
--- Santosh Helekar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The post appended below propagates a falsehood about
me. It is falsely claimed that the following quote
is my verbiage, and not Gilbert's:
Thus the grandmother's observation was accurate.
The truth is that this quote comes directly from the
In Gilbert's defence, one needs to clarify which one
of his many grandmothers you folks are talking about.
In Gilbert's case it works like this: If the
historical observations in any way negatively
implicate the church (as was the case with the
destruction of the Hindu temples during the
The post appended below propagates a falsehood about
me. It is falsely claimed that the following quote is
my verbiage, and not Gilbert's:
Thus the grandmother's observation was accurate.
The truth is that this quote comes directly from the
following post of Gilbert:
14 matches
Mail list logo
