Re: [gobolinux-devel] Firefox branding

2006-10-03 Thread Carlo Calica
On 10/3/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:47:59 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nah. XFree86 was stagnating for awhile before the fork. X > > > development exploded after the fork which is why no one (

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Firefox branding

2006-10-03 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 10/3/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Carlo Calica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this a real issue, ie is mozilla.org slow with bug fixes? And are > > these bug fixes available elsewhere? > > I have found mozilla.org to be slow to apply bug fixes in the past, > particularly when th

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Firefox branding

2006-10-03 Thread MJ Ray
Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:47:59 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nah. XFree86 was stagnating for awhile before the fork. X > > development exploded after the fork which is why no one (almost) uses > > XFree86 anymore. > > That's not what

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Firefox branding

2006-10-03 Thread MJ Ray
"Carlo Calica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this a real issue, ie is mozilla.org slow with bug fixes? And are > these bug fixes available elsewhere? I have found mozilla.org to be slow to apply bug fixes in the past, particularly when they only affect Unix-like platforms (something to do wit

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Firefox branding

2006-10-03 Thread Jonas Karlsson
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:47:59 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/2/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I suggest that we wait for Debian to settle on something and that we >> follow their lead. My guess is that more distributions will follow >> sooner >> or later.