Re: [gobolinux-devel] SymlinkProgram bug

2007-02-22 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 2/22/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has been hitting me in the head for a few hours tonight. > Basically, SymlinkProgram only calls FixLibtoolLa for lib/*.la. This > ignores *.la in subdirs of lib. Pseudo patch: > > (around line 227) > -FixLibtoolLa *.la > +

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-23 Thread MJ Ray
"André Detsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On 10/22/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > André Detsch wrote: > > > Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release. > > > Ok? > > > > Why? It's a quite serious bug with an easy fix. > > The -f option works, re

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-22 Thread André Detsch
On 10/22/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > André Detsch wrote: > > Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release. > > Ok? > > Why? It's a quite serious bug with an easy fix. The -f option works, reducing the severity of the problem, IMHO. I would like

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-22 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
André Detsch wrote: > Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release. > Ok? Why? It's a quite serious bug with an easy fix. -- /Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.com )=- ___ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gob

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-22 Thread Jonas Karlsson
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:27:07 +0200, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only --force (-f) is working. Looking at the code, it seems that the > introduction of --force has made the -c option being ignored. > My fault. Forgot that checks against passed options has to be done with the functio

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-22 Thread Hisham Muhammad
On 10/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release. > Ok? In this case, the best to do is to keep the patch posted as an open bug at Bugs. -- Hisham > On 10/22/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun,

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-22 Thread Jonas Karlsson
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:18:20 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 >> release. >> Ok? > > In this case, the best to do is to keep the patch posted as an open

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-22 Thread André Detsch
Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release. Ok? On 10/22/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:27:07 +0200, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Only --force (-f) is working. Looking at the code, it seems that the > > introdu

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-22 Thread André Detsch
Only --force (-f) is working. Looking at the code, it seems that the introduction of --force has made the -c option being ignored. On 10/22/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SymlinkProgram -c overwrite doesn't work. It doesn't overwrite... > > -- > /Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.

Re: [gobolinux-devel] symlinkprogram bug

2006-10-22 Thread Hisham Muhammad
On 10/22/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SymlinkProgram -c overwrite doesn't work. It doesn't overwrite... Ouch. I can't look at it in the next hour-and-a-half, but please post it at bugs.gobolinux.org so it doesn't get overlooked. (I'm really liking this bugtracker thing, it's