2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Were you running an updated version of Scripts? The current version
> > > should handle Glibc installation fine.
> > michael@ ~]ls -l /Programs/Scripts/Current
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 gobo gobo 5
On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upgrade Glibc.
> Can anyone take a look into this? Maybe by running gobo inside qemu or
> other emulator.. I don't ha
On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upgrade Glibc.
> > Can anyone take a look into this? Maybe
2007/3/6, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upg
On 3/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upgrade Glibc.
> > Can anyone take a look into this? Maybe
2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself
On 3/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I think this can have something to do with glibc's --with-kernel
> > parameter. We used a very recent release, so this can be a problem.
> > Should be the case of adding Linux 2.6.x to
On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With a 2.6.20 kernel everything is fine. It was actually VERY smooth.
> Nice job.
Ah, good to know it worked!
> Disk space is cheap. I guess we could have a config file somewhere to
> prune Unmanaged. It would we worthwhile for packages oth
On 3/6/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With a 2.6.20 kernel everything is fine. It was actually VERY smooth.
> > Nice job.
>
> Ah, good to know it worked!
>
> > Disk space is cheap. I guess we could have a config file so
On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > I think this can have something to do with glibc's --with-kernel
> > > parameter. We used a very recent release, so this can b
BTW, regarding wifi support at boot...
Would it be possible to have it try wired ethernet first and wifi if it
succeeds? Also, it would be lovely if it choosed the "best" essid
(fastest, highest signal strength, and open), or prefer specific ones if
the user has specified some in an array?
As I h
Jonas Karlsson wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a
2.3 system moving to a 2.4. I have ne
On 3/6/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you referring to /Programs/Linux-Headers? As I understand it, that's
> only the kernel headers for which the current libc is compiled against,
> and not the headers corresponding to the actually installed kernel. So,
> we need both.
Is
On 3/6/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Disk space is cheap. I guess we could have a config file somewhere to
> > > prune Unmanaged. It would we worthwhil
Hi,
I've finished a pre-release new version of Freshen, that's had all the
features updated so that they actually work as expected. As well as
that, there are a couple of new features:
- upgrade-system actually works now, and pretty much flawlessly. I've
just used it to update mine.
- Included in
On 3/6/07, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are you referring to /Programs/Linux-Headers? As I understand it, that's
> > only the kernel headers for which the current libc is compiled against,
> > and not the headers corresponding to the
On 3/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
> Module name:tools
> Changes by: Jonas Karlsson 07/03/07 01:25:48
>
> Modified files:
> ChrootCompile/bin: ChrootCompile
>
> Log message:
> Fixing that dependencies from reci
18 matches
Mail list logo
