Quoting robert engels (2018-09-23 22:50:54)
>I'm often confounded when people discuss Java (at least in comparison
>to Go) as being "heavy". If you read early interviews with Gosling it
>is clear that his design was more about what to leave out, not what to
>include (macros,
Hi Justin,
I'm not sure where that gotest.tools is coming from in your particular
build, and not sure of the root cause of the issue with your http proxy.
However, one thing you could try is a 'replace' directive to try to get
gotest.tools directly from github. I don't know if that will help
Choosing a virtual machine target was the wrong decision. All machines have
a machine in them, why add a virtual one? C already could be compiled on
every platform, all we got out of it was processing latency and a whole
extra layer of performance wrinkles that the CPU maker probably already
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 5:33 AM, Tamás Király wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can anyone explain why the following does not work?
> i want to have the return value's address not the method itself.
>
> package main
>
> func main() {
> //first
> addressofstring := ()
> }
>
> func method() string {
> return
I’m often confounded when people discuss Java (at least in comparison to Go) as
being “heavy”. If you read early interviews with Gosling it is clear that his
design was more about what to leave out, not what to include (macros,
pre-processor, unsigned arithmetic, etc.) He is a brilliant
I'm converting one of my internal projects from glide to a module, after
having done two other conversions. But I am hitting a problem that I can't
yet solve.
$ GO111MODULE=on go mod tidy -v
Fetching https://gotest.tools?go-get=1
https fetch failed: Get https://gotest.tools?go-get=1: Forbidden
Hi,
can anyone explain why the following does not work?
i want to have the return value's address not the method itself.
package main
func main() {
//first
addressofstring := ()
}
func method() string {
return "value"
}
https://play.golang.org/p/UbJ7SK0m9w6
regards
Tamás Király
--
You
Hi everybody. I'm a beginner at Golang. Anyone who has the talent to Golang
please let me please
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 1:05 AM Ian Denhardt wrote:
> Quoting Robert Engels (2018-09-23 13:38:04)
> > I wasn’t suggesting that Go should resemble Java. I was just trying to
> point out that many of
You did not offend me. This is a place for earnest ideas and all are
welcome.
Your comment is not yet persuasive, but it might become so. Still thinking.
I first heard from James Gosling about Java when Java was Oak. He seemed
proud to say, "C++ has objects. Well, I'll show them, I'll make
Quoting Robert Engels (2018-09-23 13:38:04)
> I wasn’t suggesting that Go should resemble Java. I was just trying to point
> out that many of the current issues under debate for Go2 have been resolved
> quite well in other languages, and looking to them for direction should not
> be out of
I wasn’t suggesting that Go should resemble Java. I was just trying to point
out that many of the current issues under debate for Go2 have been resolved
quite well in other languages, and looking to them for direction should not be
out of bounds just because they are not Go. That’s a little
On 9/23/18, Robert Engels wrote:
> I take offense to that. I apologized for my statement that was worded more
> harshly than intended. But if you think that Go is beyond criticism just
> because of ??? Anything??? Go is a GREAT tool for many classes of
> applications, but it is certainly not
I take offense to that. I apologized for my statement that was worded more
harshly than intended. But if you think that Go is beyond criticism just
because of ??? Anything??? Go is a GREAT tool for many classes of applications,
but it is certainly not appropriate for all use cases. Maybe with
I take exception to that statement, your notion of "understood
languages much better" doesn't parse in light of the fact that you are
here, debating the merits of Java in the primary Go forum instead of
writing wonderful code using the language you respect so much.
That's either hypocritical or
I’m sorry. I did not mean to offend anyone. It came out wrong and I apologize.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 23, 2018, at 5:01 AM, Louki Sumirniy
> wrote:
>
> The thing that people are concerned about is creating a construct that
> enables you to write legal but confusing and unclear code.
There is a lotta stuff that can be done with html and css now without
javascript, but for this kind of application I think that the display side
(the webkit/blink engine) has to have a websocket to the server backend to
allow pushing updates to the DOM, at least refreshes. But this is not a
The thing that people are concerned about is creating a construct that
enables you to write legal but confusing and unclear code. Let's say we
steal triple equals ===, and then use it to mean some kind of special
assignment operation. Or we make = become an addition operator infix for a
Hi @thepudds,
Good to hear and glad to have followed up so as to have introduced in the
conversation how to address the concern in that post.
Thanks for the great summary of how to give effective feedback about about
modules and the general context.
Best,
Scott
On Saturday, 22 September
Issues like these highlight the deficiencies of Go compared to Java. The Java
designers understood languages far better, and from the start realized that
identity and reference equality were different concepts. Everyone in Go land
are debating these solved issues. Pick and chose what you want
19 matches
Mail list logo
