On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Ikai L (Google) wrote:
> Code download would only benefit Python, anyway, since Java source is not
> uploaded. There are a million reasons why this is a bad idea and some have
> been touched on. Personally, I cannot think of any situation in which I
> would use th
there is no further documentation about Custom Admin Console pages
Any ideas?
:- alex
On Feb 14, 9:00 am, Rob wrote:
> I just had to post to say thanks. Since the 1.3.1 datastore
> performance improvements and automatic (behind the scenes) retries,
> the number of errors on my app
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Danny Tuppeny wrote:
> If you mean fetching it server-side, then that won't work. I can't
> think of any nice way to do what you want, though there is a tickbox
> that says "Keep me signed in". If the user ticks this, surely that's
> what they want?
>
> Not sure i
Can a user be logged out by the app without having to visit a logout url
explicitly?
Is creeting a logout url then fetching it a possibility?
thank you
N.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to
ites will be branded through
mydomain.com in a straightforward and easy to manage way.
Alex
On Jan 24, 4:47 pm, Danny Tuppeny wrote:
> This definitely works, as I have a few www's set up like this.
>
> I had a very similar problem when I rem
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Danny Tuppeny wrote:
> > I assume the queued task has the same privileges as the request that
> queued it and which only works when logged in.
>
> I don't know for sure, but I'd guess that's not the case. You can use
> "login: admin" to stop users calling the task
have
requested could not be found. (404)' So something is aware of the
'www' subdomain setup as a CNAME record and then not finding the site.
Thanks
Alex
On Jan 24, 11:30 am, Nickolas Daskalou wrote:
> It might be a problem with Google Sites in Google Apps.
have
requested could not be found. (404)' So something is aware of the
'www' subdomain setup as a CNAME record and then not finding the site.
Thanks
Alex
On Jan 24, 11:30 am, Nickolas Daskalou wrote:
> It might be a problem with Google Sites in Google Apps.
Any help appreciated
Alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appeng
Hello,
Can an application send mail From: the logged in user's Gmail account?
The documentation at
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/mail/sendingmail.html
has this to say
"The sender address can be either the email address of a registered
administrator for the application, or the emai
nswers to these questions is
worrying. Where have I gone wrong?
Thanks
Alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
On Dec 10, 1:44 pm, Alex Popescu
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Can anyone explain the meaning of the CancelledError? I read the
> documentation and I must confess that I'm not very sure what triggers
> it (at least I don't agree it is "explicitly").
>
> Here is th
ically takes care of this for you. The libraries
> in question are Python libraries, not App Engine ones.
>
Nick,
What would be the recommended way to solve the above issue? I am
getting it myself and by looking at the decode() method I don't seem
to understand how it would be possibl
On Dec 10, 1:33 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Alex Popescu <
>
>
>
>
>
> the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Nick,
>
> > On Dec 9, 1:58 pm, "Nick Johnson (
cessed it is
scheduling a new task to continue the processing later
Any comments, ideas, help are much appreciated,
./.alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@go
Hi Nick,
On Dec 9, 1:58 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> The standard way to determine if you are running on the development server
> is this:
> DEBUG = os.environ['SERVER_SOFTWARE'].startswith('Dev')
>
Awesome! That's exac
omething at the application/startup level. I am pretty
sure that I could find a local import that might tell me that the app
is using the SDK, but that seems like a really "dirty" solution and
I'm pretty sure the Googlers have some hints ;-).
./.alex
> On Dec 8, 6:28 pm, Ale
On Dec 9, 1:25 am, Alex Popescu
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am wondering if there is a 'recommended' solution for enabling a set
> of URIs when the app is running locally for testing purposes.
>
> Until recently I had a setup which was defining additional URI
> mapping
ml.
But it looks like a change in the SDK is now ignoring all modules
excluded in app.yaml so I lost this feature.
Any ideas?
tia,
./alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send em
I want to design an online compiler app on GAE,but i don't know if
the google app engine can support executing the gcc by the python in
the GAE server .
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to
ue)
Is there a way to get 'dob' into my 'form' to render in the html with
{{ form.dob }} ? I would also like it to be subject to my own date
widget code for rendering as any date input field in the application.
Thanks
Alex
--
Running both python and java runtimes (under different version
strings) is an intriguing idea.
Is it possible to have both the python and java local dev appservers
to use the same local datastore?
(If not, it seems difficult to properly test the apps.)
Are there any other specific worms in this
Could be weekly but with multiple apps it seems like I'm getting
billed almost every day. Are the apps not consolidated under the same
billing account?
On 9/16/09, Nick Johnson (Google) wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> Normal billing is weekly. Are you sure you're getting billing emails d
It's a bit annoying to get daily billing emails and having 30 tiny
charges on my credit card bill every month instead of one. In
addition to being annoying, it complicates the accounting. I think
every other hosting company charges on a monthly basis. Any chance
App Engine could start using th
eturn ret
# using the cookie in subsequent requests:
result = urlfetch.fetch(url=url,
headers={'Cookie' : make_cookie_header(cookie)})
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Alex
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:09 AM, aig wrote:
>
> Prompt please, I wish to make autom
Hi,
I uploaded my application and always worked from the same computer.
Now I want to work from another place, how can I get the code of my
application?
I failed finding it in the documentation.
Thank you for your time,
Alex.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
tities and update them one by one. But then again
>> there's too much data to do it in a single request, so I should
>> process only this much entities at a time and enqueue the rest of
>> processing.
>> It just sounds like too much co
code for the initial scenario and report
back.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
On Jul 10, 7:17 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Here's the relevant ops that one of these pages
> (ex:http://www.nmaps.net/172547) does:
>
> self.user = model.User.
Bug created: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1850
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
On Jul 10, 2:49 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> You're right - this is a bug. Although the correct behaviour may be to
&
ses in my
app so far
(except some on which I'm doing extremely aggressive caching).
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
On Jul 10, 2:46 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> It's impossible to give a useful comment without first seeing t
round 18k datastore roundtrips with 0
results.
How do you comment on this data when compared with the public
announcements you've done in the past about the amount of requests an
app can serve based only on free quota?
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
PS: I have argued (and
On Jul 9, 1:32 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Can you show us the definition of the class mentry is an object of?
> Where are you getting the instance of mentry from?
>
Nick,
Thanks a lot for getting back to me on this issue.
I have figured out why
I am getting a rather weird exception on this piece of code:
[code]
logging.info('auto-publish: %s resulted in %i', str(mentry.key()),
status)
[/code]
File "/base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/
__init__.py", line 643, in key
elif self._key_name:
AttributeError: 'ModeratedEn
e "/base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/memcache/
__init__.py", line 177, in _validate_encode_value
'received %d bytes' % (MAX_VALUE_SIZE, len(stored_value)))
ValueError: Values may not be more than 100 bytes in length;
received 1041848 bytes
Whoops!
Cheers
Everything is completely down right now. This sucks. My site is
losing users every minute.
On Jul 2, 2:08 pm, stelg wrote:
> See for this issue this
> informationhttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/brows...
>
> On Jul 2, 8:01 pm, stelg wrote:
>
> > Are all Google
Another thing to note is that the "system status" dashboard did not
pick this up:
http://code.google.com/status/appengine
On Jul 1, 3:10 pm, Alex Epshteyn wrote:
> My app's URL, typeracerdata.appspot.com was completely unreachble for
> 10 minutes and then mostly unreacha
My app's URL, typeracerdata.appspot.com was completely unreachble for
10 minutes and then mostly unreachable for an hour today between
Wed Jul 01 13:43:16 UTC 2009 and
Wed Jul 01 14:51:09 UTC 2009
I'd like to request a post-mortem to be conducted on this particular
outage.
I'm concerned becau
up my
self.response.write.out. So - is there a way in the request handler to
send the YUI handshake(assuming success) *and* follow that up (still
in the same request handler) with the template rendering below? Don't
hold back if this way of doing things shouldn't be going on.
Thanks. Alex
On Jul 1
7;hello world' without success). I don't have to add
myfile.html to app.yaml do I? Any insight so welcome.
Alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I should add that this quota message doesn't seem to be impacting the
application in any way (i.e. there are no actual quota denial errors).
On Jul 1, 12:49 am, Alex Epshteyn
wrote:
> I just started seeing this message as well today after I enabled
> billing on my app (id = ty
Confirmed. I'm also on XP with FF 3.5.
Filed a bug for this:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1799
On Jun 30, 11:13 pm, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am just trying out Firefox 3.5 (windows xp - yeah I know ;-) and
> noticed that in the appengine dashboard that I am u
A recent email from the App Engine team said:
--
* On June 22nd, as previously announced, standard free quota levels
are being
adjusted: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#Free_Changes
* On July 6th, two weeks later, your application's special elevated
free quota
will revert
I just started seeing this message as well today after I enabled
billing on my app (id = typeracerdata)
On Jun 29, 8:20 pm, "Jeff S (Google)" wrote:
> This quota has been reset, apologies for the inconvenience.
>
> Happy coding,
>
> Jeff
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:35 PM, gae123 wrote:
>
> >
Uploads are working again for me as of this morning.
On Jun 28, 6:59 pm, Alex Epshteyn
wrote:
> I've been having the same problem since yesterday (with a Java app),
> Judging by how many messages there are on the groups about this the
> past couple of days, this is most likel
I've been having the same problem since yesterday (with a Java app),
Judging by how many messages there are on the groups about this the
past couple of days, this is most likely a global app engine issue
happening this weekend. I don't think it's related to the actual
number of versions people cu
Yes, I just did that and it worked.
Thank you very much!
On Jun 23, 2:18 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Did you create your apps using a Google Apps account? If so, you need to log
> in athttp://appengine.google.com/a/yourdomain- for
> example,http
problem before? Please let me know if it
did and it fixed.
Best regards,
Alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google
Nick,
Thanks for your answers. I will follow up with a post including my
suggestions and update this thread.
./alex
On Jun 16, 5:04 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. Responses inline.
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009
- it includes framework API internal calls CPU usage and this is not
under developers' control
- framework API calls are already billable separately
The letter can be read here
http://themindstorms.blogspot.com/2009/06/open-letter-to-google-app-engine.html
./alex
http://the.dailycloud.ne
The appcfg.cmd (or appcfg.sh) has no vacuum_indexes command.
How can I vaccum_indexes? Is it possible on Python only?
Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to thi
ode upon import.
For lists, things sound even more complex. I must confess that I
haven't tried it yet, but (I don't know why exactly) I believe that
specifying 'list' as a conversion type will not be enough.
Has anyone tried any of these scenarios and have any hints for m
Is there any status update on this issue? I have noticed other posts
on the list speaking about the same problem.
./alex
On Apr 27, 2:59 pm, Alex Popescu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have defined a new index for an entity based on a datetime and 1char
> string property. Currently there are
Unfortunately I haven't seen your message and posted about it here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/7660c2b0002a7d66#
./alex
On Apr 26, 1:38 am, timwee wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone is facing the same issue as me...
> I have indexes on an
long time, except a problem with the backend.
The application id: dailycloud.
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google
and only leave the 250-per-day
quota?
Alex Foley
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscr
ng free
> > version.
As reported in this thread too [1], I have started to see
DeadExceededErrors that seem to be related to both the datastore and
memcache set operation.
My app ID: dailycloud.
Looking forward to some quick follow up. I'll continue to investigate
the issue on m
e graphs it does not appear on
> > my dashboard logs so i have no idea what that was.
Not 100% same behavior here, but I have started to see
DeadExceededErrors that seem to be related to both the datastore and
memcache set operation.
My app ID: dailycloud.
Loo
On Apr 18, 1:43 am, Alex Popescu
wrote:
> On Apr 18, 1:17 am, powera wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 17, 2:58 pm, Alex Popescu
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 17, 8:32 pm, 风笑雪 wrote:
>
> > > > ";" is not a valid char in url, you need en
On Apr 18, 1:17 am, powera wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2:58 pm, Alex Popescu
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 17, 8:32 pm, 风笑雪 wrote:
>
> > > ";" is not a valid char in url, you need encode it.>>> from urllib import
> > > quote
>
> > > quote
n-has-to-say%3Bb.html'
>
Even so, the App Engine drops it.
And according to RFC3986 my understanding is that the semicolon can be
part of the URL (I'll not reproduce the EBNF here as it is quite
complex).
./alex
> 2009/4/18 Alex Popescu
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
&
-kevin-has-to-say
I have opened a ticket for
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1340
so please help me out to get it fixed as soon as possible by voting it
up.
thanks a lot,
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
m the same place going to the same place --
classic DoS.
Alex Foley
On Apr 15, 2:19 am, Barry Hunter wrote:
> One thing that has become apprent is appengine, is designed to scale
> under real world usage.
>
> So if your App went from 0/1 users to 500 in a matter of seconds, then
>
Got a class that extends db.Model with an IntegerProperty among the
others. It's gets set at creation time (moreover, has required=True).
Now, when I fetch an instance of this class, all other properties
resolve just fine (StringProperty, DateTimeProperty, etc.). Now,
passing IntegerProperty to st
Dear Ivan,
It is a quota issue, basically saying that you've exceeded the number
of times you can call the application config python file. I've found
if you change the version in your app.yaml file and upload it, it will
successfully upload under the quota limits.
Alex Foley
On Apr
But I'm not sure where to find that:
Google Plugin for Eclipse 3.4 (1.0.0.v200904062334) requires plug-in
"org.eclipse.wst.xml.core".
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To po
Dear Marzia,
I don't know if it was you or something else but the default version
is now set properly -- Thanks!
Alex
On Mar 30, 2:49 pm, Marzia Niccolai wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Can you please provide the app id for which you are experiencing this issue?
>
> -Marzia
>
&g
> On Mar 30, 12:24 pm, Alex Popescu
>
> wrote:
> The following code results in an ImportError with the SDK 1.1.9:
>
> from django.utils import simplejson
>
> while it is working as expected in SDK 1.1.8 and 1.1.7.
>
> Any ideas what have changed meanwhile?
>
I've checked sys.path with both versions (1.1.9 and 1.1.8) and there
is no difference in there, so my guess is that in 1.1.9 django.utils
is filtered out somewhere in the google.appengine.tools.dev_appserver
code (but I might be wrong).
./alex
On Mar 30, 12:24 pm, Alex Popescu
wrote:
The following code results in an ImportError with the SDK 1.1.9:
from django.utils import simplejson
while it is working as expected in SDK 1.1.8 and 1.1.7.
Any ideas what have changed meanwhile?
./alex
PS: I haven't opened a ticket yet for the issue as I'm trying firstly
to under
The following code results in an ImportError with the SDK 1.1.9:
from django.utils import simplejson
while it is working as expected in SDK 1.1.8 and 1.1.7.
Any ideas what have changed meanwhile?
./alex
PS: I haven't opened a ticket yet for the issue as I'm trying firstly
to under
I'm having a bit of problem with my app -- somehow my application has
lost its ability to set a default version. I've got two versions up,
1 and 2, and neither is set as the default, so my main app site
(*.appspot.com) doesn't work but both of my version sites
(1.*.appspot.com and 2.*.appspot.com
Looks like I've forgot to include the link to the discussion thread:
Latency Issues Stabilized:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/c1e5c4ca861362f
./alex
On Mar 17, 12:07 pm, Alex Popescu
wrote:
> I've just read the "Latency
at the beginning of next
week.
[/quote]
there is no clear indication in the second message (dated Mar.16) if
the issue is solved and if the latency is completely back to normal.
cheers,
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
>
> *chuckle*
>
> So wait, you lack capability, but rather than be forthcoming about
> your needs, you wish to screen the people volunteering to help you?
>
> Sounds like yet another pseudo-"entrepreneur" who wants to take
> advantage of techies.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar
Hi Linbo!The questions that it will answer is Where it is and what it is
using Google map, reader and google finance.
Drop me a few lines about your expereince and I will send out a full
description as soon I have read through all the people who has shown their
interest.
Regards
Alex
logs, profiling sessions,
etc), I think it would be great to post them to that thread so we all
be able to track this problem.
cheers,
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine"
logs, profiling sessions,
etc), I think it would be great to post them to that thread so we all
be able to track this problem.
cheers,
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine"
/0611cefc1408977d
I've just received a Google AppEngine Team notification through email
that mentions some improvements. Unfortunately, it's extremely late
for me to test them right now, but I'll surely look into it after a
nap.
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
Thanks.
While working on my app I've started to put together a series of
lessons I've learnt and hope to publish it soon. But I have to firstly
complete the app :).
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
erform better:
models = ModelName.get(key_sequence) (with the option
ModelName.get_by_id(id_sequence))
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email
7;t
show it for yesterday metrics that have already been acknowledged by
the Google team).
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send
On Mar 4, 2:29 am, Brett Slatkin wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> We're aware of elevated Serving and Datastore latencies and are
> working hard to rectify the situation. We're very sorry for any
> trouble this is causing your application and others. Thanks for your
> patie
142ms 116ms-cpu 0kb
The operation is performed in the same conditions and the data set is
the equivalent in size.
The appid is dailycloud. I'm looking forward to hearing the reasons
for this degradation of the datastore performance.
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
rs - the chances are very good that prospects will hit
> the site during these times.
>
> So Google, please consider doing this on a Saturday/Sunday in the
> furture.
Where is this info available?
tia,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
--~--~-~--~~--
raise errors[err.application_error](err.error_detail)
Timeout
[/code]
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
> On 28/02/2009, morten wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I'm seeing this problem as well - seems to timeout well before the
> > allowed 30 seconds
On Feb 28, 5:49 pm, Alex Popescu
wrote:
> Today starting around 07.42am the datastore has started to through
> Timeout exceptions. I haven't read anywhere about an announced
> maintenance window, so I do consider this a critical issue.
>
Forgot to mention that I am getting
Today starting around 07.42am the datastore has started to through
Timeout exceptions. I haven't read anywhere about an announced
maintenance window, so I do consider this a critical issue.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
My app DailyCloud: http://the.dailyclou
lf, value):
if value is None:
return None
result = {}
for i in xrange(0, len(value), 2):
result[value[i]] = value[i+1]
return result
Basically, I'd be interested to figure out ways to:
1. be able to perform searches by key or by
On Feb 26, 5:27 pm, Alex Popescu
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've spent a lot of time lately profiling my app. Basically, I've been
> looking for spots where optimizations can be done so that I better
> understand its state and figure out how soon I might need to look at
>
▲
While not directly related, I do see an old index on my Dashboard that
I cannot get rid of even if it doesn't appear in my index.yaml or in
any query. I was wondering what can I do to finally remove it (I have
read the articel "How Index Building Works" [1], but I still cannot
figur
Last summer, when I would upload my app with app_cfg without changing
the version number in app.yaml, the admin console showed a minor
version number. Example:
Say I upload version "3" twice - I would get roughly the following in
the console:
version 3.1 (default)
version 3.2
The subdomain 3.l
tored).
While I do know how to write the code to get the referenced entity
key, I have no idea how can I enhance db.Model to automatically
provide this feature.
I'd appreciate any hints on how to get this functionality (or even
better the implementation). Many thanks in advance,
./alex
--
Cloud
other scenarios
Many thanks in advance,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send em
sting bit that I've missed while reading the docs,
but it is quite consistent with the statistics I've noticed. Anyways,
from my tests any result set that goes beyond 20-30 results is quickly
degrading the performance.
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rec
hmap, so fetching only the key set should
not be a real problem. Now, I don't know the details of the
implementation, but there might be another implementation where the
entities are just serialized and the engine is using some surrogate
keys (that are not v
ut if you have a simple environment just try to emulate the above
scenario.
tia,
./alex
On Jan 8, 10:03 pm, Bill wrote:
> Alex,
>
> I've had no problem running 2 dev web servers on my MacBook Pro
> (Leopard OS X). What OS are you using and are you launching
> dev_appserver
round?
tia,
./alex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
Is there any particular reason for having the Request class extend the
WebOb Request, while the Response is just extending object? As far as
I checked the Request class is the single dependency on WebOb
framework and I find it quite curious.
./alex
This dev_appserver issue has not gone away, and is still rather
annoying during development.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=182
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App E
Ah, I see. It's safe because a new request will not be processed by
the same instance of the python interpreter until the previous request
has fully completed, right?
Thanks, Ryan!
On Dec 16, 7:37 pm, Ryan Barrett wrote:
> hi alex! you're right to be cautious, but happily, req
701 - 800 of 842 matches
Mail list logo