Sorry, no java code. But the programming is simple (unless you are having
trouble with the interactive I/O - if that is the case then say so). This
problem is more a puzzle to find the right strategy for picking numbers.
The problem works like this: You pick 100 different numbers between 1 and
Suppose after your program chooses the numbers 0 to 99, the server sends
you 100 through 198 and 9. Now half the sum of all the numbers is
59850 but the set you choose will always be less than that if you exclude
9, and always more if you include it. You need a different strategy
than
If, like me, you ignored walking and just teleported to a random sample of
the rooms, you would have found that you got a perfect score on the cases
in the local testing tool, but wrong answer on the real data.
What the analysis is trying to say is that practically the only cases where
you will
The input time ranges for case 3 were:
99 150
1 100
100 301
2 5
150 250
JCCJC means to assign 1-100, 100-301, and 150-250 to C, but the last two of
those overlap.
While sorting the tasks by starting time in order to determine who can
handle each one is a good strategy, you have to also retain
A...ABC: The n-2 A's give us n possible values from n-2 to (n-2)n as A
varies from 1 to n.
The B and C can independently vary from 1 to n. If they are both n, then
the sum is (n-2)A +2n = nA + 2n - 2A
When you increase A by 1 and reduce B and C to 1, then the sum becomes
(n-2)(A+1) + 2 = nA + n -
And check the columns in your 4,10. It's not a Latin square.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 4:59 PM Andrii Kovalov
wrote:
> From your dictionary you are missing 2,4; 3,9, a whole bunch of 4's, and
> if you want to pass the small test set, you need to add 5's as well.
>
> On Tuesday, 7 April 2020
I solved Indicium pretty slowly (17 hours after the other problems...) when
I had a brainstorm.
It is a lot like what you suggested, but your solution is not complete.
(a) if k is a multiple of n, a circulant square with k/n on the diagonal
works.
(b) When k=n+2, or k=n^2-2, or n=4 and k=10, find
If there are three tasks that conflict in the same period of time, then it
is impossible, yes. But consider this input:
1
4
0 100
400 500
0 300
200 600
A working allocation is to put tasks 1 and 4 on one parent and 2 and 3 on
the other. But by processing them in the original order and always
That is the trade-off you face when choosing a language. Some languages may
have more helpful features but be slower. In this case, once you start
doing math with bignums the speed advantage may be mostly negated, plus you
spend time coding up your own bignum class in C++. I will point out this
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:18 PM Pinku Deb Nath wrote:
> I tried to solve this problem but running the interactive_runner locally
> does not respond. Online submission gave TLE. I called the runner in the
> following way:
> python interactive_runner.py python testing_tool.py -- ./a.out
>
Each model contains the five figures in some order, such as ABCDE.
There are indeed 5! = 120 possible models.
We have 119 of the 120 possible models and they are all lined up next to
each other on a very long shelf.
If we only had three models ABCDE, ABCED, and EDCBA, then this might look
like
Your analysis is incorrect.
For both of your examples, all the horizontal moves win for Becca as she
takes the entire board.
After 0 1 V or 0 2 V on the 1x4 board, Terry plays the other of those two
moves, leaving two isolated cells.
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 1:08 PM Ryabokon Sergiy wrote:
> I
The 1-day rings duplicate every day, so their contribution to the sum moves
one bit left in the binary representation every day. After 63 days, since
we only get the value mod 2^63, the 1-day rings make no contribution to the
value you get.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:05 AM Ramesh Kumar
wrote:
>
Remember that when you are rhyming words, you are assigning an accent on a
particular letter. So when you rhyme (C)ENT and RE(C)ENT, you can retain
SCENT and use it later putting the accent on the E to rhyme SC(E)NT and
W(E)NT. Now SC(E)NT does not rhyme with (C)ENT because the tail -(C)ENT is
The problem is about matching pairs of rhymes. Apparently we know that the
poems in this alien language only ever use each rhyming-ending twice. Or
maybe it's that we want to see how complex the rhyme scheme could be, in
terms of different rhyming endings. Since rhymes are determined based on
the
My solution was simpler than this. I didn't worry about comparing pairs. I
didn't even really worry about the identities of the words; just made sure
to count things properly. But like you, I did a search starting with the
longest repeats. I think that part may be required to get a working
Yes, Bartholomew, that is what I did in my solution. I tested this locally
with m=100 and it took 4 seconds to build the mapping, so I figured it
was good enough and also that searching for the answer in each test case
would time out.
You need to flush AFTER you write a line.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:38 PM Waffle 3z wrote:
> I spent the last hour of this contest trying to figure out what this
> interactive system wants. I know my solution is correct, I just don't get
> this interactive inputs thing and debugging is
If the message contains a pattern like ABA, then two consecutive values
will be the same. Your code generates the wrong values in this case
(because gcd = value and dividing out the gcd gives 1 instead of one of the
primes), and probably puts more than 26 values into prime_list, which leads
to
It is possible when the message starts something like ABA for the first two
values to be the same. In this case, you get gcd = values[0] instead of the
prime shared between the first two values, and this wrong calculation leads
to some of your later numbers being fractions, which probably leads to
We are told in the problem statement that N always contains a 4, so you do
not actually have to worry about one of your numbers in the constructive
solution ending up as a 0. A number with only one non-zero digit is also
not a concern, since this would result in 4000...0 = 2000...0 + 2000...0
and
This is actually what the analysis for the large case describes. Because
the percentages all really sum to 100%, you want to make as many of them
round up as possible. Once one has rounded up, it takes more than an
addition of 0.5% to make it round up to the next integer, but it takes only
0.5% to
possible, given the total
number of voters and the votes cast by a portion of them.
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:27 AM Samuel Jawahar <insidej...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot sir,5*round(100/6) is not valid?,in case1 it is
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2018, 17:39 Joseph DeVincentis <dev..
No. If five people choose one language and one chooses another, than the
language with 5 people represents 5/6 = 83.33...% and you get 83 + 17 = 100.
If six people all chose different languages then each of six languages
would have 17% and the total would be 102, but that option is not available
As I solved this problem, I noted that the range of dimensions for the
cookies was limited to 1 to 250. This interval is less than sqrt(2)^16, and
I realized it meant that if you keep track of the intervals, merging them
as they overlap, you will never have too many different intervals.
Start
Hidden *subproblems*. The subproblems are going to be equivalent to
different inputs, visible and hidden ones being equivalent to small and
large inputs of past Code Jams in the sense that you got the results from
small inputs immediately after you submitted them but large input results
were not
Registration is open and the full schedule is up.
https://code.google.com/codejam/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Code Jam" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
It's too late to get involved this year, but look for it to return at the
same time next year and use this year's schedule as an estimate.
https://code.google.com/codejam/schedule
Follow the other navigation links at the top for more information. The
brief summary follows:
Registration starts
I received my shirt Friday, so if you are due one, expect it soon.
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Pedro Osório
wrote:
> Any idea when are the t-shirts being sent out?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Code
For the small case where there are only two customers, the greedy strategy
you should be using is to try to wear down the largest stacks of tickets on
the same seat first. In that case, after picking any two tickets for
different seats in your ride 1, you will pick one of the seat 3 tickets in
Paul's technique is how I solved Bathroom stalls. Because there can be a
very large number of stalls, you can't simulate every stall, but if you
just keep track of how many intervals of empty stalls of each size that
there are, then you can do all intervals of one size at once (which all
split the
You can also go to
https://code.google.com/codejam/
where there is a countdown timer to the start of the round.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, shashanktandon20009 <
shashanktandon20...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 7 April 2017 22:15:27 UTC+1, shrutijha.1305 wrote:
> > hello,i am new to the
I'm not even sure how this program is expected to work, but part of the
difficulty of this problem is that there are many solutions for most
possible inputs and you need to come up with an algorithm that gives you a
good one quickly. But consider the output you get from this input:
2
6 13
6 12
Your solution fails for the small case when the complexity is 1. In that
case you have to uncover every tile. Your assumption that all the students
will see gold when the first tile is gold is only valid when the complexity
is at least 2.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:35 AM, frederik
if X is
the product of the number of keys containing each letter of the target,
then the expected number of matches is X*(S-L+1)*K^(S-L)/K^S, or simply
X*(S-L+1)/K^L.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Joseph DeVincentis dev...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was already qualified, so I didn't wake up at 5
I was already qualified, so I didn't wake up at 5 this morning to solve
this round, but I just completed all the problems in practice.
For typewriter monkey, the maximum matches is easy. Find the longest
initial substring which matches a final substring of the target, shorter
than the whole
Here's how I solved haircut.
First, write a function which calculates the number of haircuts which have
started at or before m minutes after the store opens. A barber who takes mk
minutes to do one haircut will have started 1+floor(m/mk) haircuts by
minute m. Add this up over all barbers.
Then
OK, the qualification round is over, so here's how I solved all the
problems:
A. Standing Ovation: Make a single pass through the list from 0 to max
shyness, keeping track of (shyness level minus total audience members less
shy than this), which is the number of additional 0-shy members needed to
Take a look at the first and last letters of the alphabet in case 7.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Amit Thakur he...@amitthakur.org wrote:
Hello!
I attempted Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues.
Here is the code with output:
https://ideone.com/WtSxtd
The output
This problem (1C A Consonants) can be solved in O(N).
Proceed through the string character by character, keeping a counter
indicating the number of consecutive consonants. When it reaches n, do the
following:
1. Compute the number of substrings that contain this group of n consonants
by
There are N cards.
The probability that the first card is in the subset is 0.5.
The probability that the second card is in the subset is 0.5.
...
The probability that the Nth card is in the subset is 0.5.
So if there were 3 cards called A, B, and C, then there are 8 equally
likely subsets: ABC,
There are 30 possibilities, but they are not all equally likely, because of
the result that after 4 diamonds are stacked on one side, the next one is
forced to the other side.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Betlista betli...@gmail.com wrote:
But that would say there are 32 possibilities, but
The point is that removing a mote out of the middle of the sorted sequence
doesn't help. If you can already eat that mote then you are better off not
removing it. If you can't eat that mote without adding other motes, then
you will have to add other motes to be able to eat the next larger
0
and all of them.*
I didn't understand this.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Joseph DeVincentis dev...@gmail.comwrote:
The point is that removing a mote out of the middle of the sorted
sequence doesn't help. If you can already eat that mote then you are better
off not removing it. If you
, Joseph DeVincentis dev...@gmail.comwrote:
The point is that removing a mote out of the middle of the sorted
sequence doesn't help. If you can already eat that mote then you are better
off not removing it. If you can't eat that mote without adding other motes,
then you will have to add other
Introduce 2 to get to 5, introduce 4 to get to 9, introduce 8 to get to 17,
and then eat the motes.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Mutley prabra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, May 4, 2013 12:09:49 PM UTC-7, Mutley wrote:
Can someone please run this and let me what test cases fail? My code
In your cases with 10 diamonds, you have probabilities of 1/16, 4/16, 6/16,
4/16, and 1/16 of being in the respective cases. To get to the first case
with 11 diamonds, if you are in the 1/16 case, you will always go there,
and in the 4/16 case, you will go there half the time, so the correct
I used that O(N log N) strategy for my solution (though I got the large
input wrong because I did not check for RE, sigh), so let me explain how
my solution worked:
First, make a copy of all the activity values with their original indexes
attached, and sort these in descending order. This is the
The problem with this is that pow(foo, 0.5) performs a floating point
calculation which is not accurate to the 18 significant figures required
for this result.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:55 AM, wonjun wonj...@gmail.com wrote:
I used the following logic for the problem -
Let k be the required
, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Joseph DeVincentis dev...@gmail.comwrote:
To solve Treasure, first make sure that the problem has some solution.
This requires:
1. There are enough copies of each key available somewhere.
2. There is some viable sequence of chest-openings to unlock each
chest
I just got my confirmation email.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Ajay Yadav ajayyadav...@gmail.com wrote:
when will they send confirmation mail
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Jugesh Sundram
jugeshsund...@gmail.comwrote:
I scored an easy 40 for the Quals and I am waiting for
me how to implement this problem...
thanks a lot...
On 28 March 2013 03:14, Joseph DeVincentis dev...@gmail.com wrote:
No DFS is needed for the problem you pose here. It can be solved in a
single pass through the input.
On Mar 27, 2013 5:16 PM, mandeep khatkar mandeep...@gmail.com wrote
zig has a minimum base of 3, since it has 3 different digits. But it could
have a larger base where some digits are not used, in the same way that 187
can be a number in base 10, with digits 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 unused.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Aneesh Dogra lionane...@gmail.com
I am not sure what this is for, but in problems that ask for something like
this, you usually only need x^y modulo m, or the last so many digits of the
number, which is equivalent. There are shortcuts to calculate this without
calculating all of x^y.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:12 PM, upen
With the size fixed at 3x4, this should be solvable as a pruned brute force
search. Just go cell by cell, iterating over all possible letters that can
go there. A letter is not allowed if it appeared in that row or column of
the original, or if you have already placed it in another cell. For each
You have the product, although you have only done it for one string so far.
The problem tells you how to get the mod 47 value; this is in fact such a
common operation in computing that your language has an operator to perform
it.
If your numbers are small, you just have to compare the mod 47
If you keep track of the results as a set of nonoverlapping operations,
that is, after adding 1 to papers 1 to 10 and subtracting 2 from pages 5 to
20, then you end up with three operations: +1 from 1-4, -1 from 5-10, and
-2 from 11-20. Instead of applying each operation to potentially every
57 matches
Mail list logo