Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-29 Thread Paul Smith
The educational aspect of the competition is incredibly important of course! However, I think there's a big distinction here. Google are running a competition which has intrinsic educational value. That does not make it their responsibility to extract that educational value for you. As long as

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-29 Thread Vexorian
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 2:05:36 PM UTC-4, Aaron Chan wrote: > It's top 1000 T-shirts. Regardless, it's just about the same as the TopCoder > open, which also only the top 24 people gets on site invites. Yeah, and it is also a big waste of time from a competitive aspect. Tournaments used to h

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Bruno Oliveira
Actually, GCJ does a really good job with analysis publication and the insights it gives... If you're frustrated by the competitive aspect, maybe you can choose a different contest? :) On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Andres Felipe Ruiz < andresfelip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vexorian, > > I have

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Andres Felipe Ruiz
Vexorian, I have seen you around marathons for a while, and you of all people should know how this works... it's really unexpected seeing someone with the trajectory you have complaining for such things. ASDF On Apr 26, 2014 12:35 PM, "Stanislav Zholnin" wrote: > Vexorian, > > The fact that the

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Stanislav Zholnin
Vexorian, The fact that there are so many very competitive contestor and that there are some not so competivie contestors (like me and it seems you too) is not problem of Google Codejam organizers. This is just how life is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Aaron Chan
It's top 1000 T-shirts. Regardless, it's just about the same as the TopCoder open, which also only the top 24 people gets on site invites. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Vexorian
>Such a post is just unfair towards the organizers. >They organize a competition. They do not organize a course. As a competition, codejam is really a waste of time. It is totally exclusive, top 25 advance? That's basically no one. 500 t-shirts? Also a very small proportion and AFAIK t-shirts do

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-25 Thread Stanislav Zholnin
I agree with bigonion. There are zillions of problems with analysis on the internet from all different contests. There are hundreds (around two hundreds) problems from previous years of Codejam with analysis. Also important that QR problems have the least possible relevance for solving R1 prob

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-24 Thread bigonion
Such a post is just unfair towards the organizers. They organize a competition. They do not organize a course. If you really needed an explanation earlier, you could just post a question on this very forum. I bet someone would be willing to give you a full solution with additional explanation on

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-24 Thread Leandro Coutinho
I agree Alex. By the way it should be something they already had before the contest start, and they probably have, so I don't understand why not disclose. On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Alex Polozov wrote: > > > By the way, one could argue that such a delay diminishes the educational > value of

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-24 Thread bigonion
On Friday, April 25, 2014 12:50:05 AM UTC+3, Alex Polozov wrote: > On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:29:22 PM UTC-7, Bartholomew Furrow wrote: > > > You must not have competed two years ago. We used to be way later. :-) > > > > > > > > > We'll get them up soon™, and email this list when they're

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-24 Thread Alex Polozov
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:29:22 PM UTC-7, Bartholomew Furrow wrote: > You must not have competed two years ago. We used to be way later. :-) > > > We'll get them up soon™, and email this list when they're there. Sorry for > the delay! > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Satyaj

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-16 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
You must not have competed two years ago. We used to be *way* later. :-) We'll get them up soon™, and email this list when they're there. Sorry for the delay! On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Satyajit Bhadange < satyajit.bhada...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why there is no contest analysis for qualific

[gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-16 Thread Satyajit Bhadange
Why there is no contest analysis for qualification round 2014 ? GCJ team is never this late to put contest analysis. Thanks & Regards, *Satyajit Bhadange* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and s