Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

For me the issue is whether we're looking at something closer to 1e7 or 1e9 operations per second, which has a pretty significant impact on what algorithms can work to solve a problem. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:13 PM wrote: > Actually you can figure out for yourself

[gcj] Keeping old rounds open for training?

One strength of the old contest format was that it's very easy for you to keep the judge system up and running after the contest - it just needed to provide small and large inputs and check that the uploaded solutions match the correct answers. What will you do in this new contest format? Do

[gcj] Re: Finding another competitor on the score board?

On Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 7:14:57 PM UTC+5:30, meir wrote: > I seem unable to find a way to look up another player in the scoreboard. > I used to do this, to track both real life friends and other notable > competitors I become aware of. > Is this feature missing from current incarnation?

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

That's a good point about not being able to test your new solution on the same input that you know you got right, Dmitriy. A few other thoughts: - I don't know whether the UI makes this clear -- note to team, hopefully there's a really clear indication that you still have points from previous

[gcj] Why this code is wrong (practise session Q.1) - not accepted

#include using namespace std; int main() {int t ; cin>>t; for(int i=0;i>a>>b; cin>>n; for(int j=0;j>x; if(x>b) cout<<"TOO_BIG"<

[gcj] Re: Will common libraries be available?

so are only standard libraries supported? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

[gcj] Re: Getting "Runtime error" as result but don't have a clue why.

You are not checking for "WRONG_ANSWER" condition -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[gcj] Re: The Qual Round is over!

On Monday, April 9, 2018 at 2:29:36 AM UTC+8, newbie007 wrote: > Usually in the qualification round the first two problems are simple and with > no tricks. > > I got A and B correct for the small data sets, so I assumed it was fine. > > But then wrong for A large and time exceed for B large. Oo

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

Actually you can figure out for yourself without running the code if a idea will got TLE or not. It is normally if you know the complexity of your solution and compare it to problem restriction. For example, it is obviously that O(T * n^2) will got TLE in Trouble sort problem, because the size

Re: [gcj] The Qual Round is over!

Bartholomew: there is another concern. Let's imagine that I've solved the Visible dataset, and I know for sure that this doesn't solve the Hidden one. I submit the solution, I get the positive verdict, and I start the better implementation. In the old platform I can always compare the results

Re: [gcj] Re: Finding another competitor on the score board?

I wholeheartedly agree with bringing back that feature. Otherwise if a contestant had written a solution in an outrageous choice of programming language, then written a python interpreter for that language, found it too slow and so written a C++ interpreter instead, what way would there be for

Re: [gcj] Re: Finding another competitor on the score board?

Luke, I'm glad you brought up what we were all thinking. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:53 PM Luke Pebody wrote: > I wholeheartedly agree with bringing back that feature. Otherwise if a > contestant had written a solution in an outrageous choice of programming > language, then