By static does that also exclude JavaScript? GWT/UiBinder etc will generate
static files that can go in zip or served by apache and will produce the
DOM you want in the browser...
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 9:22:35 PM UTC+1, Seth wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to generate static html from a
Daniel,
Thanks for the background info.
In my applications (non public web apps for banking purposes) I tend to
use GIN, Guava, UiBinder + Widgets + GWT-RPC.
- GWT-RPC has been a limitation (I filled several issues in the passed) and
I was looking for a REST/JSON replacement but it was not
Thanks Daniel.
It's great that the steering committee are discussing the topic this early
in the process; in particular, in the context of how GWT dev's can help
themselves to be future proof (e.g. your Modernizing GWT talk).
I completely understand how certain GWT generator based libraries
CssResources and such might be a bit more work... we were planning to
move to GssResources ... will those remain ? probably not...
CssResources will continue to work, the generator can be adapted to use APT
api instead of GWT generators.
Widgets ... by switching to GQuery we can avoid widgets
Hi Daniel,
it would be nice, if the team can provide early access to the new compiler.
As the owner of mvp4g I would like to do the necessary changes to get mvp4g
running with the new version.
Also I like the idea that the new version contains the basic classes, to
write old school widgets.
On Monday, June 15, 2015 at 3:49:10 PM UTC+2, Ivan Hetman wrote:
Thanks, got it. But why don't release special GWT 2.8 version with source
level 1.8 only? Without improved collection API Java 8 benefits in GWT are
low.
You can write lambdas and use defender methods in your own
Thanks, got it. But why don't release special GWT 2.8 version with source
level 1.8 only? Without improved collection API Java 8 benefits in GWT are
low.
четвер, 11 червня 2015 р. 23:59:09 UTC+3 користувач Thomas Broyer написав:
You cannot use classic DevMode with a Java 7 JVM and
Thomas is rigth, using lambdas is are really game changer for subscribing (you
have 6 lines less on each one) to handlers and also you can use guava Optional
class and functional idioms until idioms
until we have fully java8 streams.
Be aware that current GWT-2.8.0-SNAPSHOT compiler doesn't
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. It doesn't necessarily exclude JS, even though I'm
pretty sure you can't include script tags in uibinder (at least when using
it conventionally), but currently yes, the static page would not need any
JS. And just to clarify I'm not talking about creating a new module
Yea, that sounds like it would work out great too. I might end up choosing
that over the JSP method. Thanks again Jens, I really appreciate the ideas.
On Monday, June 15, 2015 at 3:13:19 PM UTC-4, Jens wrote:
I see,
maybe you can generate a second representation of your constant values as
IMO, stream API is totally replaceable (almost unnecessary), 80% of your
uses cases can be solved with lamdas + Guava FluentIterables, and for
advanced use cases libraries like RxJava (or whatever implements reactive
streams interfaces) or IxJava are much more advanced and easy to extends.
Not
Hi Jens,
Thanks for weighing in. I have a class that houses constant values which I
reference in my GWT app. What I want to be able to do is reference one of
those values like the team name in another static page like the About page
that way I could just update the value in one place if a
The UiBinder generator produces Java code and there is no configuration
option to tell UiBinder to do anything else than that. Of course you could
fork UiBinder and adjust it to your needs.
Actually I don't know what you want to develop but if you just want to
generate static html pages using
I see,
maybe you can generate a second representation of your constant values as
part of the build process. I could imaging slapping an annotation on your
interface/enum that defines your constants and using an annotation
processor to generate a different output format.
Then you place some
I'm not any kind of official voice for GWT or anyone, but my take is:
1) It might be true that UiBinder will be discontinued to favor some other
templating system, but right now there's no replacement so we're using it
extensively and I think a replacement will only be available long-term.
2)
To solve an issue with our particular use of GWT, we implement our own
post Linker for GWT. This post linker appends a block of JS code to the
end of module.nocache.js, by detecting the nocache.js file when it's
passed to the link() command in the ArtifactSet, and replacing it with a
new
Please some advice on the following situation (gwt 2.7.0):
From xml I generate display snippets like a menu with some different type
of buttons that extends from a Button class.
In the code I need to find RichButton instances in the menu, that are a
subclass of the Button class (for further
Why don't you use instanceof?
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
Why don't you use instanceof?
Good point, sorry I forgot some info: I want to use a general method that
searches for the widget types.
Details:
I have my own Widget tree (its root is called Elemento ;), It's a kind of
builder pattern, that constructs GWT Element instances (I hope I can
Extra note: I noticed that I have an increase of 9% initial code download
(according to the soyc report). I went from 631Kb to 690Kb (unzipped), when
enabling the meta class info (-XdisableClassMetaData)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web
20 matches
Mail list logo
