we're waiting on a patch to CLDR 25
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:15 PM, 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote:
Hi all,
we just settled on a GWT 2.7 release plan:
- We *code freeze* on *October 7th* and branch for GWT 2.7.
- As soon as we
The GWT team thinks that this should be the default behaviour going forward.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Should I make this default behavior in GPE? On by default?
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 3:40:15 PM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Hi all,
while bringing GSS support into GWT, I discovered that the closure
styleheets compiler actually requires Java7.
This means that we either have to do a back port of the compiler (I haven't
looked at it seriously) or require Java7 for development with GWT (probably
only if you are using
Hi Ivan,
why would you want to edit the JavaScript instead of editing your Java code?
How long does your compile take with the current GWT 2.7 Snapshot?
-Daniel
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ivan Markov ivan.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
(Background: I'm trying to further shorten the
Hi Arnaud,
are those 10s after the changes we made or before?
-Daniel
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all of you who participated to this very good things !
I am now able (from the trunk) to have a great experience debugging with
Gwt +
I am experiencing the same thing, but it seems like my colleagues do not. I
was thinking it was just me.
I'll invoke the oncall people.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Andrei Korzhevskii a.korzhevs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Currently I'm experiencing very slow work of Gerrit (since
This should be resolved now.
On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 2:13:48 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote:
Yeah it was unusable for me too but now it works again however it is still
pretty slow for me.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors
We decided that we are holding GWT 2.7 for the new per file compilation and
GSS support.
Both of them are shaping up to be really cool features, but are not done
yet. As soon as we consider them done (being live within google and not
causing issues anymore), we will put out a release candidate.
Hi Richard,
I emailed the internal team to help with this. I'll update this thread once
I hear back from them.
-Daniel
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Richard Wallis rdwal...@gmail.com wrote:
This still isn't working this morning. I get that this is my first
commit. Most likely there's
Just a guess: Maybe the email address is missing a real name in your google
apps domain?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Michael Vogt i...@michaelvogt.eu wrote:
The problem is, as it seem to me, that the field for the full name is
empty, and it is not editable. Clicking the edit button tells
This was only done in demo code. You will need to rebuild that item from
scratch.
-Daniel
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Michael Vogt i...@michaelvogt.eu wrote:
Hello.
Tried to reproduce the JsInterop demo, but the type HTMLElement can't
be found. Is this not provided, yet?
Thanks,
Hi Patrick,
do you mind sending a patch for gwt-site?
(Let me know if you need any help..)
-Daniel
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick M. Tucker
patrick.tuc...@macefusion.com wrote:
There are still links on the gwtproject.org site that point to the old
code. For example:
On Monday, June 23, 2014 9:57:11 AM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Thanks.
I'll post the script here for review before committing.
(I could also post the patch, I'm not sure it'll be that useful; maybe on
gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com?)
On Monday, June 23, 2014 4:39:42 AM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote:
I
I think updating the trunk branch is a good idea. I just gave you commit
rights and I did hide the source tab from the project.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
When we moved from SVN at code.google.com to Git at gwt.googlesource.com,
I wanted
...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I would like to added a clone method to the java.lang.Object class in the
GWT SDK which simply throws a CloneNotSupportedException.
This makes it possible to implement the clone method in subclasses.
See: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/6035/
Daniel Kurka has already done
Hi Zied,
thanks for bringing this up. I think the right place to start discussions
about any GWT feature is gwt-contrib.
In the past a lot of new features have been added to the GWT SDK in a very
short amount of time. This leaves all the contributors with a huge
maintenance burden and limits the
Hi GWT community,
We're excited to announce the GWT 2.6.1 release! Many of you noticed it
was uploaded a few days ago, but if you missed it, you can download it
herehttp://goo.gl/BLc6R8.
This release has also been uploaded to Maven Central with the version
string of 2.6.1”.
GWT 2.6.1 is
build if
we don't use maven?
Regards,
Matic
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 5:28:52 AM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote:
Hi all,
we updated our Jenkins setup to publish the daily open source GWT build
to the sonatype maven repository. Currently snapshots are posted as
*2.7.0-SNAPSHOT*.
A new
Hi all,
RC2 is now available from maven central and as download from here:
http://storage.googleapis.com/gwt-releases/gwt-2.6.1-rc2.zip
-Daniel
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Hi all,
we updated our Jenkins setup to publish the daily open source GWT build to
the sonatype maven repository. Currently snapshots are posted as
*2.7.0-SNAPSHOT*.
A new snapshot is only uploaded after a successful build and google is
following trunk closely, so these snapshots should be
Hello Stephan,
we already closed of changes for the GWT 2.6.1 release.
You should always make a fix against trunk and when it is reviewed and
submitted, cherrypick it to an appropriate release branch.
What issue are you talking about?
-Daniel
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Stephan Beutel
Hi all,
I just build the GWT 2.6.1 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The complete
SDK is also available from
herehttp://storage.googleapis.com/gwt-releases/gwt-2.6.1-rc1.zip
.
Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble. If you
want to get involved into the testing of this
As a reminder, we are going to start building GWT 2.6.1 from the GWT 2.6
release branch
(https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/q/status:open+project:gwt+branch:release/2.6)
this Friday (11th April).
If you want to get your changes into GWT 2.6.1, they need to get in before
Friday.
There's
I am really not sure if we want to include any other changes than easy
bugfixes here.
@goktug since you reviewed the change what do you think about possible
breakages?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Stephen Haberman stephen.haber...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
If you want to get your
If you move stuff around you will need to make sure that links (also
external) won't break. (we still get a lot of traffic from external links)
But I think working on the navigation menu of the page is quite overdue.
-Daniel
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote:
Speaking as a SC member, I think this should be worth a shot and might
drive interesting ideas towards GWT, curious to know what the others think?
-Daniel
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino man...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if it was possible that GWT can
, we fielded fewer online questions and got more from the room,
and seemed to center around how GWT will change going forward - which
browsers can be dropped, how we might continue to make Dev Mode work or
otherwise keep in-IDE debugging.
On Thursday, January 2, 2014 9:56:39 AM UTC-6, Daniel
Hey Patrick,
if you are looking for any kind of guidance, feel free to just ask here and
we will do our best to respond. This is what gwt-contrib is for!
-Daniel
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Michael Prentice splak...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the Workshops were not recorded in the
Just an idea: We could think about doing a hangout maybe every quarter with
a pre populated moderator.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Michael Prentice splak...@gmail.comwrote:
That would be great. I know that they are busy with the EU conference this
week, but there were a lot more
I think mostly the holidays keep us from releasing something, as soon as we
are back to work you can expect something.
On Dec 30, 2013 5:42 PM, Cristiano cristiano.costant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
it is many days I don't see info about the release date for GWT 2.6.0...
I see in GWT
I think the original graphic mockups had a search box planned (about where
the gwt.create banner is currently located). If someone wants to do
something in this direction, I can share the mock up.
I think maintenance-wise it might be smart to not write code for this, but
if someone wants to go
We have not decided on a Java minimum version for GWT code with 3.0. Maybe
we go with an approach to leave server side code at Java 6 and may require
a newer version for the client side. This would allow us to leverage Java 8
features while still being able to run Java 6 server side.
On Nov 13,
I think we still need to update the release notes:
http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html
Did we already track stuff that needs to go in there?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com wrote:
Okay, 2.6.0-rc1 is available here now:
Can somebody update the missing plugin page to recognize the IE11 user
agent string as IE11?
(IE11 preview is different from actual IE11)
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
IE10 does not handle dates the same way other browser do anymore. This
breaks a test in the EmulSuite.
// IE10 (Standards mode)
new Date(Date.parse(3/31/2000)).toUTCString()
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:00:00 UTC
// IE9 (Standards mode) and previous versions of IE
new
Hi all,
It is about time to start tagging issues for the GWT.create workshops. I
added michael from vaadin to the gwtproject, so he can help with this as
well.
I created a label for the issues that are possible candidates for the
workshops (Category-GWT-create-conference).
If you find anything
Hi all,
IE10 is returning subpixels for DOM element positions. This breaks tests
and prevents IE10 support right now.
We had a discussion and a patch a while back on that topic:
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/3090/
I am proposing that we implement sub pixel in our DOM implementation in
I think we can require Java7 or 8 to build GWT applications, but we need to
make sure that GWT applications can be deployed to servers running Java6
for a while. This would mean not using any Java7 or 8 language features in
gwt-servlet and RequestFactory.
For many companies it is a problem to
Should be turned off now.
-Daniel
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone with admin rights on the
code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkitdisable submitting patches?
We're starting to receive spam through patches:
:
On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:56:29 AM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote:
Should be turned off now.
Thanks.
BTW, I just noticed the home page links to the /source/checkout page,
bypassing our custom Source tab page. That would explain why some people
don't see that page (which explains the code has
the
bill just fine. :)
Overall, I think what gwt-site has now, works fine, although I thought it
might be handy to move the images. :)
Brandon
On Thursday, September 5, 2013 11:10:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel Kurka wrote:
Hi Brandon,
the markdown already supports relative urls for images and all
Hi Brandon,
the markdown already supports relative urls for images and all other
resources. However right now all resources except the markdown are kept in
src/main/site while the markdown is located in src/main/markdown.
I am open for discussing that we might want to change that and if that
Hi Allahbaksh,
if you like you can contribute an article to the webpage. For more
information see: http://www.gwtproject.org/makinggwtbetter.html#webpage
Let me know if you need help,
Daniel
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Allahbaksh Asadullah
a.allahba...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
If this is purely JavaScript related you can use d8 (the v8 command line
profiler) to do the profiling for you.
I recently added source maps support to it so you can actually profile
obfuscated GWT code just fine.
Here is what you need to do:
1. Build v8 yourself
2. Compile your code using a
SGTM
There might be legal implications though. Bhaskar?
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In light of https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3780 (see diff between
patchsets 5 and 6, and my comments after I uploaded patchset 6), I think
committers
Matthew changed gerrit to email to a separate list
gwt-revi...@gwtproject.orghttps://groups.google.com/a/gwtproject.org/forum/#!forum/gwt-reviews
.
You can not trigger a presubmit build (for security reasons), one of the
commiters has to give at least a +1. This triggers a build.
- Daniel
On
The source code is still in the gwt-site-webapp project, see:
https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt-site-webapp/+/master/src/main/java/com/google/gwt/site/webapp/client/GWTProjectEntryPoint.java
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Kerry Wilson kerryrwil...@gmail.comwrote:
I am tinkering around with
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Kerry Wilson ke...@allthingswilson.comwrote:
Should that exist within the markdown site? Which project is built to
package the final deployable archive?
kw
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
wrote:
The source code is still
Hi Michael,
there are not published guide lines on the content for gwtproject.org.
Those guidelines are handled by a subset of the GWT steering committee
(which I am part of).
In general: Information we publish on gwtproject.org needs to be of high
quality and vendor independent.
So if you feel
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3690
Change subject: Update DockLayoutPanel to match implementation
..
Update DockLayoutPanel to match implementation
Change-Id
Daniel Kurka has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: Move arrow key functions from Tree to KeyCodes
..
Move arrow key functions from Tree to KeyCodes
remove handling for old Webkit keycodes (version 525
Daniel Kurka has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: Utility to store multiple HandlerRegistrations
..
Utility to store multiple HandlerRegistrations
fixes issue 8246
Change-Id
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Move arrow key functions from Tree to KeyCodes
..
Patch Set 5:
(3 comments)
File user/src/com/google/gwt
-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Utility to store multiple HandlerRegistrations
..
Patch Set 3:
(3 comments)
File
user/src/com/google/web
: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jens Nehlmeier jens.nehlme...@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer t.bro
: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jens Nehlmeier jens.nehlme...@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer t.bro
-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer
-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer
-Project: gwt
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jens Nehlmeier jens.nehlme...@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Utility to store multiple HandlerRegistrations
..
Patch Set 5:
(2 comments)
File user/src/com/google/web
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3661
Change subject: Utility to store multiple HandlerRegistrations
..
Utility to store multiple HandlerRegistrations
fixes issue 8246
: gwt
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Utility to store multiple HandlerRegistrations
..
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File
user/src/com/google/web
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Utility to store multiple HandlerRegistrations
..
Patch Set 1:
(3 comments)
File
user/src/com/google/web
: gwt
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Log warning when wrongly using RootPanel
..
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
I think we should go with adding a comment to add (since all other adds
calls this one
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3662
Change subject: Move arrow key functions from Tree to KeyCodes
..
Move arrow key functions from Tree to KeyCodes
remove handling
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3662
To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Change-Id: I811520d330c181958dd67cbfbe30c46becebbe43
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Project: gwt
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku
Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Move arrow key functions from Tree to KeyCodes
..
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
File user/src/com/google/gwt
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Move arrow key functions from Tree to KeyCodes
..
Patch Set 4:
(2 comments)
File user/src/com/google/gwt
-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3637
Change subject: Log warning when wrongly using RootPanel
..
Log warning when wrongly using RootPanel
fixes issue 5874
Change-Id
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3639
Change subject: Remove deprecated use of isChecked in javadoc
..
Remove deprecated use of isChecked in javadoc
fixes issue 6232
+2, Daniel Kurka wrote:
Today we finally flipped the switch and moved all the GWT content from
developers.google.com to gwtproject.org. The old homepage will redirect
to gwtproject.org so there should be no broken links. However if you
encounter any missing content or broken links please file
Today we finally flipped the switch and moved all the GWT content from
developers.google.com to gwtproject.org. The old homepage will redirect to
gwtproject.org so there should be no broken links. However if you encounter
any missing content or broken links please file a
Hi there,
the problem is not that we do not want to use your patch, we can not do
that for legal reasons (You need to sign a contributor license agreement).
This is something that gerrit helps with since the only way to post a patch
there is to sign the agreement first.
I can surely provide help
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3611
Change subject: Let ValueListBox implement HasEnabled
..
Let ValueListBox implement HasEnabled
fixes issue 6112
Change-Id
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3612
Change subject: Making DialogBox clear handlers on auto hide
..
Making DialogBox clear handlers on auto hide
fixes issue 6356
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Making DialogBox clear handlers on auto hide
..
Making DialogBox clear handlers on auto hide
fixes issue 6356
Change-Id
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3613
Change subject: Add wrap method to Canvas
..
Add wrap method to Canvas
fixes issue 6683
Change-Id
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add wrap method to Canvas
..
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
File user/src/com/google/gwt/canvas/client
-review.googlesource.com/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ieca5c14e41b495da75004fa080409fca1b21b3d5
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Project: gwt
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins
: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jens Nehlmeier jens.nehlme...@gmail.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add wrap method to Canvas
..
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File user/src/com/google/gwt/canvas/client
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3614
Change subject: Add toString to SafeHtmlString to help debuging
..
Add toString to SafeHtmlString to help debuging
Change-Id
(-)
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3612
To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaa4c76643eecf1b51820861f193de36ed44e9f41
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Project: gwt
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Making DialogBox clear handlers on auto hide
..
Patch Set 3:
I think not duplicating code, but adding a test is the best way to go here.
--
To view, visit
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3615
Change subject: Undeprecate setMultipleSelect in ListBox
..
Undeprecate setMultipleSelect in ListBox
Changing ListBox from multi
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3616
Change subject: Add Object.clone as throwing implementation
..
Add Object.clone as throwing implementation
fixes issue 5068
(-)
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3616
To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie89b7874953e1d6378fa2a5cb19beb3c34689218
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Project: gwt
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add Object.clone as throwing implementation
..
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File user/super/com/google/gwt
-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you
-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk...@gwtproject.org
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you
Daniel Kurka has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: changes for 5113
..
Patch Set 1:
Could you update the commit message (git commit --amend) to say something
like:
Fix os detection in I18NCreater
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/3617
Change subject: Make DateCell use non deprecated DateTimeFormat
..
Make DateCell use non deprecated DateTimeFormat
fixes issue
Daniel Kurka has uploaded a new patch set (#2).
Change subject: Make DateCell use non deprecated DateTimeFormat
..
Make DateCell use non deprecated DateTimeFormat
fixes issue 8201
Change-Id
To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4fe3065313a019ef5c97427e925d45dadc6ef434
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Project: gwt
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Daniel Kurka danku...@google.com
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leeroy Jenkins jenk
101 - 200 of 509 matches
Mail list logo
