The article is a poor source if one attempts to make a meaningful techincal
assesment on any opinion. Sure theres a lot of buzzwords but almiost no
technically minded examples to back any of the assumptions. Does it show you
why X is better than Y at attempting Z. No, so what your basically left
Minor suggestion but would not ColumnWidthSource be a better name than
ColumnWidths, after all it is a source of column widths given a column. When
i see classes w/ plural names, i think of classes w/ static helpers
java.util.Collections. Guice is another example of this naming style.
--
Translatable means the jsvacript translated equivalent. Your tests are running
inside a jvm using pure java. Even your native methods are emulated js.
On 01/10/2010, at 9:54 AM, Damon Lundin damon.lun...@gmail.com wrote:
We are trying to upgrade from 2.0.4 to 2.1.0.m3 because of some bugs
in
Hi David
What do you mean by IMG tag, do you mean IMG with a src=/somefile on the
server ?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Interesting can you make an official ready to go d/l available so we can
skip the checkout and build step.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Hiho
Taking a look at the demo its not clear what it actually does and does not
do. Please elaborate.
tya
mP
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Radek r.oles...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to present a different approach to the HTML templating:
http://gwtapp.org/
It's runtime HTML
Why not write a little tool with ASM which visits all class dependencies
starting with the remote servlet class. Naturally one would need to add from
a whitelist because of reflection etc. If your tool is accurate then one
should be able to get an accurate list of whats actually used at runtime.
at 3:11 PM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote:
Why use a uber command pattern for all services. This only leads to some
controller code to dispatch the command on the server which means
everything
gets funneled thru a single point with no real gain. Keep the services
give the ultimate approach that we all should be using
?
Yes and discussed above sometimes things don't alwyas work out
perfectly - that's life
David
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it really make sense to give all serivices the same
Why use a uber command pattern for all services. This only leads to some
controller code to dispatch the command on the server which means everything
gets funneled thru a single point with no real gain. Keep the services
separate each w/ their own respective end points and service interfaces.
That
Hi Richard,
You do mean Ray Cromwell ? hes quite active here and should see your
message.
hth
mP
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Richard Vowles richard.vow...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Not sure how to get a hold of the person responsible for GWT-Query,
which was spoken of in terms of
Bit petty but shouldn't Collections be final. Many (most) Collections
inner classes can also be private rather than package private which
should make life for the compiler that bit easier.
Hth
On 18/02/2010, at 6:14 AM, sco...@google.com wrote:
Thinking outload...
What about allowing ctors to take a HM. The other ctors use the default
implementation. If you dont care for a HM then use the ctors without HM in
the parameter list. That way you dont pollute the widget method list with
gets/creates and sets which prolly dont make sense once
Take a look at gwt-pectin. I have only looked at the demo and general
browsing but it seems quite and functional and achieves many of the
objectives you describe.
On 23/01/2010, at 10:28 AM, Jon jon.ner...@gmail.com wrote:
Request for comments: Really Simple Binding
IMO UiBinder is a
, 2:59 pm, Miroslav Pokorny miroslav.poko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Take a look at gwt-pectin. I have only looked at the demo and general
browsing but it seems quite and functional and achieves many of the
objectives you describe.
On 23/01/2010, at 10:28 AM, Jon jon.ner...@gmail.com wrote:
Request
What has protocol buffers got to do with gwt ? There's nothing
stopping one from using it on the server ? What utility does it add to
the clientside ? Where exactly does it fit in the grand ecoscape ?
On 23/01/2010, at 2:19 PM, Allahbaksh Asadullah
a.allahba...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
In your ElementParserToUse annontation why not pass the class instead
of classname which enforces some typesafety.
On 09/01/2010, at 3:30 AM, ggeorg georgopoulos.georg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ray,
Please have a look at:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4461
like ?
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:29 AM, federico federico.mona...@gmail.comwrote:
- clean EventBus implementation with transparents server-push events
On 19 Dic, 00:29, federico federico.mona...@gmail.com wrote:
- runtime modularity to avoid monolitic compilations
On 16 Dic, 18:01,
I would like more control over which classes/packages were actually
sucked into a module for compilation. I appreciate there are
workarounds like sticking diff java files under diff src dirs but
that's ugly.
I don't like how including a particular package also sucks in sub
packages. I
Hi Toth
I would suggest not to use gwt-from-x as it sounds like you wrote gwt.
I would suggest either something dash / for gwt so it's named along
the style log4j where log is your something etc.
Hth
On 18/12/2009, at 10:11 AM, Tóth Imre tothi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All!
Within a few
traces on all browsers by default (IE requires an extra
flag
that generates a fair amount of overhead -- don't use lightly), but could
help somewhat.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why not just include the class.method name
It sounds like an alternative might be to have the compiler to spit
out properties files full of key value pairs with one per locale.
Naturally the compile would output shortened keys etc and record a
mapping file. A tool would be made available to update just these text
resources and the
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like an alternative might be to have the compiler to spit
out properties files full of key value pairs with one per locale.
Naturally the compile would output shortened keys etc and record
The main hurdle remains that the compiler works on source and not
bytecode, was there not a plan to change this sometime in the future.
If it worked on bytecode one could use any language as it would not
matter. Fir the moment it's too late got that now, unless some dies
the work of
This is contribution group where the team talk about developments, the other
group is for questions.
Of course you can make another http request on the server. You can do
whateer you want on the server, after all its all Java.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:19 AM, jobzino jobfm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
This group is not for general gwt help and questions - try the regular
gwt group.
Some suggestions:
1/ don't write java code inside a jsp. Move it into a real class and
write up some tests. Write tests for all the main steps showing inputs
and expected outputs.
2/ what do you
Extras...
Are there any plans to build a ui tool (maybe in swing) so designers
can drag n drop available widgets and have the view instantly updated?
Other kool features might include save the file etc.
Some of the extra features in interface builder.
Thoughts...?
On 26/08/2009, at 2:14 AM,
Re/ Selections
I have Selections for all the big 4 in my library. Ive implemrmted
most of the needed functionality to mimic the w3c interfaces including:
• creation by specifying end points ( Elements, offset)
• testing if a selection exists.
• expanding / moving either the start / end.
•
@Gary
I have not seen the GoogleIo vid, why do you say wave uses json AND
protocol buffers to talk between client - server...?
On 12/08/2009, at 11:01 AM, Gary Miller miller.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the problem is begging out for a more elegant solution.
From the Google IO
It's a difficult juggling act, balancing the need to have interfaces
fir everything and the practical value in actually doing it. I recall
rwading/listening to something Josh Bloch said about why there are not
any read only collection interfaces Vs the way it was done and what we
have
@Matt
I was just wondering if it were possible to specify a concrete substitute
for an interface type - this would this help solve the too many serializer
problem. By too many Serializers i mean of course the need for the
generator to create Serializers for all concrete types implementing List
As with all thi gs computer related each action has some kind of
reaction of cost. Sometimes this cost is visible other times it's not
as noticable.
By introducing an Insertxxx interface and having all the right Panels
implement it you are making your compiled JavaScript that much bigger.
The Async interface is necessary because one does not want to use sync
(blocking) rpc calls back to the server. When using blocking calls the
entire browser freezes which is especially bad give responses arenot
instantwous.
Hth
On 03/08/2009, at 1:10 AM, jd jdpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
To implement Interceptors in gwt one does just needs to follow the
same general patterns that exist in real java and aop.
I have already done interceptors / aop for gwt as part of my own di
module in gwt. One does not need interceptors in gwt a lot of extra
behind the scenes classes are
be
inferred final, and this will lead to bloat. Perhaps future compiler
hints like @DoNotInline could help, or maybe reusing 'volatile' some
how, like if a method references a violate parameter, it can't be
inlined or staticified.
-Ray
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Miroslav Pokorny
be
inlined or staticified.
-Ray
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote:
To implement Interceptors in gwt one does just needs to follow the
same general patterns that exist in real java and aop.
I have already done interceptors / aop for gwt as part
Maybe the simpler answer is to have a read resolve / write object
equivalent.
I personally think coupling these value objects all the way from your
database tier to the browser smells.
The detached object problem seems like a symptom of the smell.
On 23/04/2009, at 12:22 PM, Ray Cromwell
to do it, the answer is, maybe there is. I don't think it is helpful
to just shutdown discussion over a particular pattern because one
doesn't like it.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Miroslav Pokorny
miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote:
Too much extra nonsense adding annotations everywhere
Provide some tests and make sure it works on all officially supported
browsers even if the implementation is suboptimal. There are many js
libs out there so it's not hard to find the best way to do it fir the
various browsers...
On 18/04/2009, at 12:39 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com
If one were to serialize the entries rather than recreating the map
via put alot of other things would need to be changed.
For one the calculation of hashcodes in emulated jre would need to
match those on the server otherwise look ups by string in a hashmap
sent over the wire would never
Another useful RemoteServiceServlet method would be soMething that
allows the developer to coerse types into another compatible type.
This would make it easy to send foe example the value object instead
of the enhanced type instance. It might also potentially allow
anonymous Lists to be
Another option to assist with mass one step removal is to add said
listeners to a container class that also implements the listener. Then
add the listener to the widget. To remove all listeners in one
operation simply remove the container. This and similar types of
organisation do not
Hiho
The best thing to do is you implement the very feature yourself by
wrapping the widgets you wish to target inside a composite and
override the ondetach() etc.
There are many simple similar strategies you could use to auto cleanup
listeners belonging to unneeded widgets.
Hth
On
example of how this would even be used and how the end
user (not generally aware of CSS and cascade rules) would even
decide what to do?
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Miroslav Pokorny miroslav.poko...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's correct because they cascade. The benefit of specifying which
This is probably the wrong time to ask -but updating styles via the
addition of style tags seems very limiting.
If I recall IE (cant recall which vetsion was probably 7) chokes when
a page has more than thirty odd style elements.
Why not add new rules using StyleSheet.addRule/insertRule or
at once using text. If
there is, it's certainly not part of the W3C DOM CSS OM.
-Ray
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Miroslav Pokorny miroslav.poko...@gmail.com
wrote:
One does not have to add the rules one by one. If I recall it is
possible to get the entire content of a stylesheet using
@mark
Your trick as mentioned (using jsni to avoid casting ) was/is used by
the generated rpc serializers to avoid / skip casts ...
Mp
On 01/04/2009, at 5:44 AM, Mark Renouf mark.ren...@gmail.com wrote:
Got bit by this the other day. This is my current workaround for
Comparable, since
Hello Jarrod
I have implemented an IOC and AOP framework for GWT - rocket-gwt -
everything is defined in a Spring like xml file and the factory realised at
runtime via a generator.
I am however after looking back not convinced of the need for AOP in a GWT
environment because of the extra crap
Wrong forum try the regular GWT forum.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Sandeep Khanna
sandeep.p.kha...@gmail.comwrote:
Can someone guide me as to how one would go about to build a very very
simple multi-page image (TIFF) viewer/editor using GWT.
The interface would be similar to Adobe
Your problem is because the jetty classes have been re-packaged under
com.goolgle.gwt.thirdparty etc but somewhere there's some reflection
code try to instantiate a jetty class using it's org.mortbay name. The
class name must be coming from a string or text file which
unfortunately did
What about having two forms of the Jso class a regular .java which
would be read by javac another under a super source source directory
which would actually be used during a gwt compile aka like emulated
JDk / junit etc classes. Any superclasses of jso would also need the
same treatment.
This problem could be solved by introducing the ability to remove methods
marked with a particular annotation when some option was enabled and have
them eliminated accordingly.
Imagine the ClassCastChecking and ArrayIndexChecking were done by two
methods on some imaginary helper class used by the
52 matches
Mail list logo
