hi Daniel!
if the fix affects only non-private members, the best is to extend the
widget by your own.
if not possible, then one possibility i have been using is super-
source.
hth
Michael
On Oct 14, 2:35 pm, Daniel dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a common GWT widget and is used in many GWT
good hint!
thanks for sharing
Michael
On Aug 28, 11:29 am, George Georgovassilis
g.georgovassi...@gmail.com wrote:
There've been some requests to perform RPC invocations with HTTP GET,
as the response is cacheable by the browser (and if you believe the
word on the net, it's faster [1] than
good hint, i did not know about the epfe plugin, looks promising.
thanks for sharing
Michael
On Aug 28, 3:57 am, Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com wrote:
Checkout this plugin:http://sourceforge.net/projects/epfe/
2010/8/27 Fernando spiderkens...@gmail.com
So, in my company we face a
hi, anabillo!
for me the best design for testability is to start writing the test
cases (at least the unit test cases) before writing the actual code!
HTH
Michael
PS: and what has that to do with GWT?
On Jul 13, 1:17 am, anabillo bilal.all...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Guys ,
I start writing a
hi, Shedokan!
does it matters?
first the generated code is obfuscated so you wont find your class,
ctor or var so easily.
second the GWT compile optimizes a lot, so it could inline any use of
your var and completely remove it.
HTH
Michael
On Jun 16, 5:23 pm, Shedokan shedok...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
regards
Michael
On Jun 10, 7:58 pm, hbf kaspar.fisc...@dreizak.com wrote:
Hi,
Does the new RPC mechanism, DeRPC, see
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunicat...
offer serialization of non-static final fields?
We have so many immutable classes that use
hi Aljosa!
i have no idea which one is better (svg or canvas) nor which one has
better browser support nor which one has better gwt support.
i only know this is the most amazing game implementation for a browser
i have ever seen:
http://code.google.com/p/quake2-gwt-port/
regards
Michael
On Jun
hi daniel, stefan!
i have not had this problem, but wow, i would have never come to that
idea, never ever!!
but this looks pretty much to me like a compiler bug so it would be
good to file an issue, just to get it first better documented.
i mean non static inner classes are valid java cosntructs
Hi, Matic!
It would be a really huge reference
i think Google Wave is a better example anyway!
regards
Michael
On Jun 9, 3:03 pm, rudolf michael roud...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah you're right...just the obfuscated js made think that it is GWT,
but apparently there is not
hi,
would not it be better to have a compilation error in such case, with
precise information like class and problem description??
see
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4828
regards
Michael
On Jun 3, 6:15 am, Sripathi Krishnan sripathi.krish...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi fmod!
it is possible, but not out of the box nor easy to implement nor good
practice.
just use a composite rule with some parent like the body element, ie.
.longItems .myRule {
width: 500px;
}
and do:
RootPanel.getBodyElement().setClassName(longItems);
of course, using a css resource bundle
hi Mark!
you should take a look at this in first place:
http://blog.themeforest.net/tutorials/vertical-centering-with-css/
HTH
Michael
On May 30, 3:51 pm, Tristan tristan.slomin...@gmail.com wrote:
have you tried...
g:HorizontalPanel width=100%
g:Cell horizontalAlignment=ALIGN_CENTER
hi lucas!
i think what you are looking for is:
outline: none;
HTH
Michael
On May 25, 10:18 pm, outsource lucas outsourcelu...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that you can edit text areas in google wave without getting the
default yellow focus bar (yellow/orange in Chrome) around the area and
google
Hi,
we do also prefetch all messages in the host page and it works pretty
well for us.
Michael
On May 24, 7:23 pm, Alexandros Papadakis alpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 mai, 17:30, Alexandros Papadakis alpa...@gmail.com
Dear all,
I have a serializable object that overrides the Object.clone() method
and implements the cloneable interface.
and i have the problem that eclipse (and me too) wants to have the
Override annotation but while compiling the GWT compiler fails with
following error message
[java][ERROR]
a class AND I refresh the
browser. Do you have anything in your environment that gets involved
in class lifecycles? I haven't solved my problem yet, but maybe we can
find something in common between our problems.
-Brian
On May 19, 5:06 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
compiler with source=1.5 does not trigger this error.
Finally, eclipse is the third culprit. It automatically puts in those
annotations, and I haven't yet figured out a way to tell it don't put those
annotations when I am implementing an interface..
--Sri
On 25 May 2010 15:49, mmoossen
Hi tapas!
that is most likely a timing issue. what i mean is that you have to
check that:
- your widget is attached to the doc when calling that method, *AND*
- that it is also visible!
HTH
Michael
On May 25, 7:09 am, Tapas Adhikary tapas4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,,
Can anybody give any
for your clone() to override.
Paul
mmoossen wrote:
hi Sri!
i thought it was something like that but:
- i am using java 1.6
- clone() is a method in Object and not in the interfac, and
- as said, eclipse wants that annotation (if not i get a warning) and
i get an error only when
hi sky!
that looks pretty much like our implementation...;)
this is the problem of such a big toolkit like GWT, there are too many
'features' (like widgets, rpc, jre emulation, java-to-js compilation,
the new data driven widgets and so on) which is great for a fast start
and even enough for many
check also gwt-exporter:
http://code.google.com/p/gwtchismes/wiki/Tutorial_ExportingGwtLibrariesToJavascript_en
HTH
Michael
On May 20, 7:17 am, Sky myonceinalifet...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out these two
sections:http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsJSNI...
What's about rpc-prefetching?
http://development.lombardi.com/?p=1329
HTH
Michael
On May 20, 3:16 pm, mariyan nenchev nenchev.mari...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to create some .properties file on the server side. And every
client must make request for it. If it is on the client side it could
Dear all!
I am getting following error message:
Found interface com.google.gwt.user.client.Element, but class was
expected
when doing something like:
myWidget.getElement().getStyle().setOpacity(0);
where myWidget has been just attached to the doc a few LoC before.
it is not reproducible, it
as a
security measure, because there are several ways to bypass it, syncproxy
being one of them. My point was that this particular feature is a
performance issue and in no way a security issue.
--Sri
On 18 May 2010 01:35, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again!
btw, i checked
or
approach. Suggest good tools. Reframe the question.
Regards,
Olivier
On 16 mai, 08:39, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Despite that i wrote the patch for sync-rpc, I completely agree with
kozura that in this case sync-rpc would be a bad idea.
BUT, who cares? if fomba wants to use
Dear all!
i just found this:
http://degwt.googlecode.com
and i was really surprised to actually find a classname table in the
generated production js code.
i know that the rpc classes and methods are used (which i do not like
very much, but that is another story).
but i do not see any need for
/wiki/NoClassMetadataOptim...
Olivier
On 17 mai, 12:18, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i just found this:http://degwt.googlecode.com
and i was really surprised to actually find a classname table in the
generated production js code.
i know that the rpc classes
Monaco olivier.mon...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Maybe it's about this :
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/NoClassMetadataOptim...
Olivier
On 17 mai, 12:18, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i just found this:http://degwt.googlecode.com
and i was really
and ugly! Instead GWT forces you to understand this issue up front,
when you can do a better clean design that fits the problem.
On May 17, 12:37 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
i completely agree with you Oliver!
i said already that i think that sync-rpc is a really bad idea
Hi,
Despite that i wrote the patch for sync-rpc, I completely agree with
kozura that in this case sync-rpc would be a bad idea.
BUT, who cares? if fomba wants to use it, it is up to him, if his
application is not responsive it is his problem not mine.
(this reminds me the apple-adobe conflict:
Hi Sri!
i did check these lightweight metrics just a couple of weeks ago
programming a small metrics panel, but your solution is far better!
Thank you very much for sharing.
Michael
On May 14, 11:20 am, Sripathi Krishnan sripathi.krish...@gmail.com
wrote:
I created a
other parts i have seen developing are:
- lightweight collections (http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/
wiki/LightweightCollections)
- logging
- serializable unmodifiable collections
- BigInteger co translation
but i have to say that i can not really follow developers priorities,
i mean
i am also interested in a way to do that...
there has to be a way, since gmail as well as youtube both check the
file size limit before uploading...
but most likely it is flash :(
regards
Michael
On May 5, 1:38 pm, abhiram wuntakal abhir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Ankit,
AFAIK, you wont get
now improved patch providing a simple to use @SynchronizedRpcRequest
annotation ;)
HTH
Michael
On Apr 29, 4:20 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i just submitted a patch for
sync-rpc:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4898
may be somebody can use
Hi Bruno!
the problem is that RPC methods are async, so you fire the RPC
request, and the page is unloaded before the request finishes, leaving
your app in a unknown state.
my solution is to teach gwt to handle sync rpc requests. see
??
thanks
Michael
On Apr 29, 3:56 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
please, somebody help!
thanks
Michael
On Apr 27, 2:54 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i tried the described RPC prefetching mechanism and i am facing one
problem:
first, on the server-side
i thought i was subscribed to lombardi dev channel, but i was not :(
but now i am, at least i hope so ;)
thanks for the ref
Michael
On May 3, 11:34 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 3, 10:32 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
i got it working
the problem
Dear all!
i just submitted a patch for sync-rpc:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4898
may be somebody can use it ;)
HTH
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send
please, somebody help!
thanks
Michael
On Apr 27, 2:54 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i tried the described RPC prefetching mechanism and i am facing one
problem:
first, on the server-side to serialize/RPC.encode(...) i need the
serialization policy, but i need the strong
.
thanks
Michael
On Apr 26, 7:55 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, thomas!
good hint that RPC prefetching method... i was using json for that,
but with this method i can skip the java to json conversion, cool ;)
thanks for sharing
Michael
--http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web
Hi, thomas!
good hint that RPC prefetching method... i was using json for that,
but with this method i can skip the java to json conversion, cool ;)
thanks for sharing
Michael
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
an answer for your question, but why don't you use
SSL?
I can't trust my data going and coming without been encrypted.
This way you don't need to worry about obfuscation.
Hope can help.
Regards.
Tercio
On Apr 22, 10:47 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
dear all!
i am
good hint Thomas, i did now about that.
i will try it now.
thanks
Michael
On Apr 24, 11:28 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 24, 10:02 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I don't have an answer for your question, but why don't you
use SSL?
it is not about
hi samurai!
check out this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/beea0609e288fa56/6b304eb69b5c92ee
HTH
Michael
On Apr 24, 9:09 pm, keyboard_samurai yog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I need to know if there is a way we can inject in a piece of code when
dear all!
i am preparing for going online, so i started to try out the RPC
obfuscation mechanism:
inherits name=com.google.gwt.user.RemoteServiceObfuscateTypeNames /
and to my surprise (or not, if you stop to read the module name) only
classnames get obfuscated but not method names (from the
Hi, Paul!
if you really want one service instance per thread make your service
additionally implement SingleThreadModel.
or you could also use the standard synchronization mechanism.
HTH
Michael
On Apr 15, 10:48 am, Sripathi Krishnan sripathikrish...@gmail.com
wrote:
Servlet containers
that is a really good hint for debugging RPC calls, until now i was
using just a breakpoint there...
thanks for sharing
Michael
On Apr 14, 12:09 pm, Sripathi Krishnan sripathikrish...@gmail.com
wrote:
In your RPC Servlet, override the doUnexpectedFailure(Throwable t) method
and log the stack
dear all!
i just learned this:
set-configuration-property name=CssResource.style value=pretty /
which takes me to ask the question:
is there anywhere a complete list of supported configuration
properties?
or
which configuration properties do you use/know?
google (search) could not find much :(
From time to time, i have the same problem here... right now with
the hosted.html
and i think only in dev mode, but not sure...
Michael
On Apr 12, 7:26 pm, Simon Botting simon.bott...@enbuenosaires.com
wrote:
Hi,
In firefox firebug a red message is showing in the net tab that the
request for
Dear all!
currently i am not able to serialize unmodifiable collections getting
some exception because the class signature can not found in the
serialization policy file.
so i thought let's just create a dummy RPC method explicitely
declaring Collections.EmptyList and co. as parameters to tell
on my progress
Michael
On Apr 12, 9:43 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
currently i am not able to serialize unmodifiable collections getting
some exception because the class signature can not found in the
serialization policy file.
so i thought let's just create a dummy RPC
to extend the TypeSerializerCreator but it is hard
wired the same as the ProxyCreator :(
any idea on how to continue without patching GWT?
thanks
Michael
On Apr 12, 11:19 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
well, i created my own serialization policy facade that does whitelist
thanks for the reply.
i just filed an enhancement request:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4843
thanks
Michael
On Apr 9, 4:38 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 9, 3:28 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
dear all!
i am using a legacy class
dear all!
i am using a legacy class with gwt.
first i got it working on the client using super-source :)
but then serialization was not working so i had to write a
CustomFieldSerializer which is actually also working :)
i have now only one question: is there any way to have the serializer
class
we do generate json data in the host page (with JSP) to save that
first RPC.
HTH
Michael
On Mar 26, 8:11 am, jocke eriksson jock...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I am no expert on the subject but I have also seen that video. I think
the best solution is to download the data with your hostpage. But for
looks great, i will give it a try.
thanks for sharing
Michael
On Mar 26, 1:29 pm, Harald Pehl harald.p...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm pleased to announce Piriti 0.3.1. Piriti is a JSON and XML mapper
for GWT. It is based on annotations and deferred binding. Here are
some of the
+1
great idea, i think caching has to be handled carefully but there
should not be any stoppers.
Michael
On Mar 23, 5:15 pm, Nathan Wells nwwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Ooo good point... but couldn't you just set caching headers on the
result? I guess I'm not clear on the intricacies of how each
Hi, Mariyan!
you have just to set window.onload handler in your module's entry
point, ie:
(we aware that i have not tried to compile it, and i am not sure if it
will trigger if installed after the window is actually load, which
could happen for instance when the images are in the browser cache)
the point is that your EntryPoint#onModuleLoad method triggers at
document load, which is when the dom is ready, but not when the images
are ready, so you have to wait until the window load event is
triggered. that is all.
HTH
Michael
On Mar 24, 12:45 pm, mariyan nenchev
hi,
I just ran into the same issue.
but i did change the code before trying to compile, so i still have
the question:
it is just an eclipse error, or will also the compiler fail in finding
the xml file?
thanks
Michael
On Mar 17, 8:14 pm, Jason Parekh jasonpar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bilousme,
Dear all!
i was surprised, even disappointed, when i realized how GWT (ab)uses
html tables.
For instance the vertical panel and the tree widget ARE html tables.
why it is so??
should not it be much better just to use a list of DIVs (or even a UL)
for the vertical panel and nested ULs for the
mode, and you can make do without
Tables (VerticalPanel etc). You can still use them for data tables, in
which case they're semantically correct.
On Mar 12, 2:19 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i was surprised, even disappointed, when i realized how GWT (ab)uses
html
GWT 2.0 Layout Panel address pretty much that -
they're designed for standards mode, and you can make do without
Tables (VerticalPanel etc). You can still use them for data tables, in
which case they're semantically correct.
On Mar 12, 2:19 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear
Dear all!
i was surprised, even disappointed, when i realized how GWT (ab)uses
html tables.
For instance the vertical panel and the tree widget ARE html tables.
why it is so??
should not it be much better just to use a list of DIVs (or even a UL)
for the vertical panel and nested ULs for the
Hi, patrick!
i think your problem is just this bug:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4720can=4
i had a very similar setup and using the recommended patch did solve
all my problems.
HTH
Michael
On Mar 11, 6:37 pm, Patrick Tucker tucker...@gmail.com wrote:
I have
thanks eric for the info.
that seems to be an interesting project.
Michael
On Mar 9, 5:19 pm, Eric erjab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 2:41 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
i found the problem
inhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/user/...
line 114
that looks really great.
thanks for sharing
Michael
On Mar 10, 7:32 am, Sebastien chassa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I extracted the code to a dedicated
project:http://code.google.com/p/gwt-i18n-server/
Now It supports Constants, ConstantsWithLookup, Messages (plural
included).
Regards,
Seb
well i found the answer:
super-src
with it you can have different classes for server and client.
and it is how GWT provides JRE classes on the client.
just what i was looking for.
but i am a bit disappointed by the 0 answers i got.
HTH
Michael
--
You received this message because you are
Dear All!
I am having following problem:
i have my serializable bean to be used as result of a RPC service.
everything was working but suddently i started to get following error
message:
The response could not be deserialized
i debugged the problem until the
...
so the solution was just to remove the final flag from the fields i
wanted to serialize.
HTH
Michael
On Mar 8, 2:55 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All!
I am having following problem:
i have my serializable bean to be used as result of a RPC service.
everything was working
Dear all!
i want to serialize a bean that has a field of type java.util.ListT
but while serializing i get following error message:
com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException: Type
'java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableRandomAccessList' was not included
in the set of types which can be
is emulated,
so it would work.
On Mar 8, 7:06 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i want to serialize a bean that has a field of type java.util.ListT
but while serializing i get following error message:
com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException: Type
Dear all!
my GWT application can only run in the context of a CMS so it does not
make any since for my project to have the war folder. but the eclipse
plugin tries to enforce it.
any chance to get rid of it?
thanks
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
://code.google.com/intl/en/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideI18n.htm...
The hard part - that you must resolve - is how to mix dinamic and
static I18N.
Hope it helps
And Dictionar
On 25 feb, 20:43, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i was wondering what is the best way to add support
to set this up, let me know..
NTDeaf
On Feb 25, 8:07 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
dear all!
i just wanted to know what are the best practices for serving my gwt
app in production.
i mean, in my case, there will be an apache http server in front of
tomcat communicating via
Dear all!
i was wondering what is the best way to add support for a new locale
without compiling the whole module again.
my use case, to distribute a CMS plugin written in GWT and we want
that users can easily localize it.
in java. you just put an additional properties file to the right
package
thanks dave for sharing :)
i think i will start using your code for browser identification
Michael
On Feb 25, 10:44 am, DaveC david.andrew.chap...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Thanks for all the replies.
Thomas, I get your point - but I don't agree ;o), I think there are
more reliable ways for
dear all!
i just wanted to know what are the best practices for serving my gwt
app in production.
i mean, in my case, there will be an apache http server in front of
tomcat communicating via mod-jk.
so, what are your experiences with compression, setting cache headers,
etc?
thanks
Michael
--
dear all!
i have following use case:
i have, for instance, a client class that is responsible to add the
widgets to a dialog and i would like that my gwt app would be so
extensible that 'users' can change the behaviour of that case to
display other widgets in the dialog.
in java, i would have a
dear all!
what we do is at compilation time, with ant, to move the policy files
to the package of the server side implementation of the service, and
to use following loader:
/**
* We do not want that the server goes to fetch files from the
servlet context, so we keep the .gwt.prc files
hi Dariusz!
you should NOT set the keywords via a RPC call.
since that info is only usefull to search engine robots, and they do
not understand nor execute js code, your rpc call wont never be
executed...
just do it the 'OLD' way, getting the keywords from DB when rendering
the page.
HTH
, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Dariusz!
you should NOT set the keywords via a RPC call.
since that info is only usefull to search engine robots, and they do
not understand nor execute js code, your rpc call wont never be
executed...
just do it the 'OLD' way, getting the keywords
)
gwt code:
- BeanService
- method SharedBean getBean() { return LegacyFactory.getBean(); }
can somebody tell what is wrong here?
or how to achieve something similar?
many thanks
Michael
On Feb 16, 1:23 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all!
i am wondering if the is a good way
Dear all!
i am quite new to GWT and i just realized that the rpc service
implementations read the so called serialization policy files
(strongname.gwt.rpc) from the servlet context, which is quite
problematic if using a cms webapp. so i overwrote the
Dear all!
gwt encourages(forces) you to have following strcuture for writing a
rpc service:
- package.client:
- Service
- ServiceAsync
- package.server:
- ServiceImpl implements Service
- package.shared:
- Bean
so at the end when i compile the server side code i get:
- package.client
Dear all!
i am wondering if the is a good way to re-use legacy code in GWT.
the use case is to extend a well established webapp with GWT, where
the legacy code has several beans that perfectly fit in the 'shared'
package of a GWT module, ie. that can/should be used in the server, as
well as
86 matches
Mail list logo