Hello,
I'm trying to use gwt CellBrowser and RequestFactory to show some
stored data as Cells in the cellbrowser. But I can't do it because of
the context of requestfactory.
Any Ideas ?
class CustomTreeModel implements TreeViewModel {
{
...
..
...
List composerproxy = new
> side. It is built on top of RequestBuilder and converts your data
> into a content-type of (what I read was) text/plain. From here, it
> will reconstruct your java object onto the servlet.
>
> JavaScript Overlays says that it has no overhead.
>
> RequestFactory is suppos
From here, it
will reconstruct your java object onto the servlet.
JavaScript Overlays says that it has no overhead.
RequestFactory is supposed to be even faster than GWT-RPC. No
serialization is required, but apparently deserialization is.
Upon these, there is the old RequestBuilder with a JSON
never mind...
I moved my locator class from client package to server and therethere,
it worked.
sry for spam
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, kayser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed an example in this list on how to use a spring bean via
> ServiceLocator. Everything works great using mvn gwt:debug
Hi,
I followed an example in this list on how to use a spring bean via
ServiceLocator. Everything works great using mvn gwt:debug but when I
try to package everything using mvn package I get compiler errors.
Here is my code:
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
import org.springframework
ry;
import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.ServiceLocator;
/**
* Gives a RequestFactory system access to the Google AppEngine
UserService.
*/
public class UserServiceLocator implements ServiceLocator {
public UserServiceWrapper getInstance(Class clazz) {
final UserService u
Both solutions are great, and I re-read RF official documentation ,it
actually uses Jesse's solution which I did't get it in the first place.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https:
Both solutions are great. I re-read RequestFactory official documentation,
it uses Jessie's solution. Thomas's solution is good to ,but I don't know
if there's any side effect.
在 2012年3月12日星期一UTC+8下午10时07分31秒，Jesse Hutton写道：
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Thomas
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> On Monday, March 12, 2012 5:39:00 AM UTC+1, Lopakhin wrote:
>>
>> In a common scenario of Web application, we usually populate
>> cellTable,cellList with our data from RequestFactory context's method, such
&
On Monday, March 12, 2012 5:39:00 AM UTC+1, Lopakhin wrote:
>
> In a common scenario of Web application, we usually populate
> cellTable,cellList with our data from RequestFactory context's method, such
> as findAll(), at this point , we already done the database query that
In a common scenario of Web application, we usually populate
cellTable,cellList with our data from RequestFactory context's method, such
as findAll(), at this point , we already done the database query that get
all entity ,but RequestFactory dictate that , to prepare with approp
;
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to create an application which is able to work even when
> network is down.
> The idea is to store data returned from RequestFactory on the
> localStorage, and to use localStorage when network isn't available.
> My problem - I'm not sure
Hello,
I'm trying to create an application which is able to work even when network
is down.
The idea is to store data returned from RequestFactory on the localStorage,
and to use localStorage when network isn't available.
My problem - I'm not sure exactly how to differentiate
I created an issue:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7231
I also tried adding this ValueProxy check to the if statement and it
fixed the problem:
if (id.isEphemeral() && !
ValueProxy.class.isAssignableFrom(bean.getType()))
Thanks Thomas,
Do you know of some existing good examples for working with
ServiceLayerDecorators?
We really want to use RequestFactory, but it seems that there are a lot of
hidden disadvantages for every visible advantage it gives.
On Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:34:03 PM UTC+2, Thomas
*Solution:*
*
*
A *
*in the **.gwt.xml* is your/my friend.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/1HiOnmRNiTYJ.
To post to this group,
I guess, you're running your GWTTestCases with Eclipse? I'm using IntelliJ
and when I run the test cases, no folder like *dp.verp.planer.Planer**.JUnit
*is being created. However this folder is created when running the test
cases with Eclipse (although they failed for other, Eclipse-specific
re
public void onSuccess(MyType response) {*
*}*
On Friday, March 2, 2012 10:31:13 PM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 2, 2012 8:45:36 PM UTC+1, Alexander Orlov wrote:
>>
>> When I call RequestFactory calls containing methods from my
>&
On Friday, March 2, 2012 8:45:36 PM UTC+1, Alexander Orlov wrote:
>
> When I call RequestFactory calls containing methods from my
> *GWTTestCase*extending JUnit test I always get:
>
> *[WARN] 404 - POST /dp.verp.actas.ActAs.JUnit/gwtRequest (192.168.1.51)
> 1422 bytes
>
When I call RequestFactory calls containing methods from my
*GWTTestCase*extending JUnit test I always get:
*[WARN] 404 - POST /dp.verp.actas.ActAs.JUnit/gwtRequest (192.168.1.51)
1422 bytes
*
*Mar 2, 2012 7:36:54 PM
com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.javascript.background.JavaScriptJobManagerImpl
On Friday, March 2, 2012 5:38:17 PM UTC+1, Jakob Mar wrote:
>
> Thanks Thomas for your reply.
>
> My Locator's never get called during this method call and the
> performance issue is only on my ValueProxy's (no Locator's on them).
> The time is about 1 to 50 millisec. per ValueProxy, increasing
Thanks Thomas for your reply.
My Locator's never get called during this method call and the
performance issue is only on my ValueProxy's (no Locator's on them).
The time is about 1 to 50 millisec. per ValueProxy, increasing in each
loop. Any idea why it's taking so long or what could by wrong?
--
On Friday, March 2, 2012 2:35:06 PM UTC+1, Jakob Mar wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm encountering performance issue in RequestFactory when sending
> large complicated object graphs to the server.
> After some debuging I found out that the pr
Hello,
I'm encountering performance issue in RequestFactory when sending
large complicated object graphs to the server.
After some debuging I found out that the problem is in line 267 in
SimpleRequestProcessor.createReturnOperations
if (id.isEphemeral()) {
// See if the entit
OK, I got it, explaining the problem gave me the insight I needed.
My QuoteRequestProxy.setProperty() method got mixed with the method
generated by RequestFactory. I changed the method name, and it worked.
Le vendredi 2 mars 2012 00:46:15 UTC+1, Mikael Couzic a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I
Hi,
I have a very strange problem with RequestFactory. I have a hierarchy of
embedded proxies :
QuoteRequestProxy
|_ PropertyInfoProxy
|_ LocationProxy
Everything was working fine, until I tried to create a new proxy from the
client :
QuoteRequestContext ctx
RequestFactory uses the name of the classes and methods to lookup
"obfuscated tokens" to send over the wire (and the reverse, when processing
the response from the server), so you have to keep your RF interfaces
(services and proxies) names untouched, or change the class and method
/AndroidRuntime(18174): java.lang.RuntimeException:
The RequestFactory ValidationTool must be run for the com.project.mms.a.a
RequestFactory type
02-29 17:24:04.195: E/AndroidRuntime(18174): at
com.google.e.a.c.b.a.b.a(Unknown Source)
02-29 17:24:04.195: E/AndroidRuntime(18174): at
Problem solved, turned out to be the polymorphism problem.
On Monday, February 27, 2012 11:50:59 AM UTC+8, July wrote:
>
> HI:
> Just like below, Is it possible to transfer list of EntityProxy between
> client and server using RequestFactory? i didn't see any spec related to
HI:
Just like below, Is it possible to transfer list of EntityProxy between
client and server using RequestFactory? i didn't see any spec related to
this in RF doc. And i always get NPE when using maven processor plugin to
validate. Thanks.
@Service( value =foo.class, locator = bar.
On Thursday, February 23, 2012 6:30:38 PM UTC+1, Gilad Egozi wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas
>
> I'm not talking about two instances of the same RequestFactory class,
> but rather on two different RFs with different services.
> Does your explanation apply in that case too?
Absol
Hi Thomas
I'm not talking about two instances of the same RequestFactory class,
but rather on two different RFs with different services.
Does your explanation apply in that case too?
Thanks,
Gilad.
On Feb 18, 1:09 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Because RF works with reflection and sto
Thanks Brandon.
I'm using ValueProxy to send to the server.
Look at the code and the entities (EntityProxy) always validated regardless
of the method is called on the server (select or persist).
Perhaps the validation should performed only in methods that require it,
not always.
Regards
A.U.S Cri
BTW, i use *requestfactory-client+src.jar* and *
requestfactory-server+src.jar* which contains source files of this
libraries. Without this sources requestfactory doesn't works.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit"
Here is an example of using Activities & Places, RequestFactory and
Editors.
http://c.gwt-examples.com/home/ui/places
I find RequestFactory is quite simple once you master the 3 classes you
need to get stuff done. It's by far superior to RPC.
Brandon Donnelson
http://c.gwt-examples
I also noticed that -strict flag should not be used for GWT compiler.
Compiler prints error message but code works well...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com
Do you use a ValueProxy?
like:
@ProxyFor(PeopleJdoFilter.class)
public interface PeopleJdoFilterProxy extends ValueProxy {
void setSearch(List search);
List getSearch();
//...
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To v
Do you have constraints in your entity? @NotNull?
Brandon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/8_PyulPoMDUJ.
To post to this group,
Because RF works with reflection and stores some state in static variables,
you cannot expose only a subset of proxies/services on a given endpoint
(servlet instance). You can however do some runtime checks using
ServiceLayerDecorators, just take care of overriding only the methods that
are rea
I am developing a filter to search for an entity.
The filter creates a proxy for the entity to seek, and then use this proxy
with RequestFactory.
The problem is that the entity being validated do not know why.
The request is:
*Request > findByProxy (EntityBaseProxy proxy);*
Their counterpart
Gilad,
You can have multiple RequestFactoryServlets. check out the example below.
If you look at it closely, I have a different url mapping. You will have
to define individual RequestTransports to be associated with the
url-mapping in your client.
Also, you will have to controll operation
I dont think, this is something to do with RequestFactoryServlet.
This has to be done in your web server not in any servlet.
For example,
You can have a login page accessed through https, after the successful
authentication you can redirect to another page(accessed through http, this
is your GW
Is it possible to have this? And how can this be achieved?
The motivation - I want one secured (SSL) service for user-
provisioning (passwords...), and one non-secured.
Thanks,
Gilad.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To po
Just googled a bit because I have never thought about it and based on the
search results I think I would try it the following way (untested):
1.) Send the current client side locale as a HTTP header (e.g.
X-GWT-LOCALE) to the server using a custom RequestTransport for
RequestFactory (extend
+1.
I also want to know.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/57FbAFJ2ijUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@g
Hello,
I do it like this:
public interface IMyObject{
public int getA();
public int getB();
}
public class MyObject implements IMyObject{
}
public interface MyObjectProxy extends EntityProxy,IMyObject{
...
}
public static int sum(IMyObject domain){
return domain.getA() + domai
Hello,
I want to run the same method on the client and server side. The reason is
that the user can call that method when interacting with the UI, but the
same method can also be called at a later time by a Task on the server
side. I already wrote the method using the proxy object. I wanted to
post (and the
referenced blog post) inspired me to write a little about our experience
with request factory here:
http://www.joshisonit.com/2012/02/our-experience-with-gwts-requestfactory/.
For such a mature and well used library, GWT really does have a dearth of
strong documentation/tuto
No, I hadn't! Simple solution, fixed. I've been on that page all day but
missed that!
Thanks Thomas,
Richard
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/goog
Have you referenced the property in a .with() on your request on the
client-side?
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideRequestFactory.html#relationships
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussi
I have a Map in a domain object and I'd really like to pass it through
RequestFactory. RF doesn't do Maps, so I now generate a List of KeyValue
in a getter in my domain object and they have KeyValueProxy equivalents on
the client side. It seems that RF bypasses the getter when popu
Hi,
Can I set custom request url when running from browsers that enforce SOP?
We would like to have a data server baked with RF on abc.com and app served
on xyz.com..
Thanks a lot in advanced,
Ido
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit
Thanks, Thomas. I came back here just to report that. I had designed
my services to take Entities (and EntityProxies on the GWT side) as
arguments to "filter" what the Selector will return as its list of
choices out of habit of design. I should have considered passing the
ID from the start given
> I took a look at:
> http://fascynacja.wordpress.com/tag/autobean-has-been-frozen/and this helped
> alot, but I'm astounded that my code has to trap for all this stuff.
This is a great post!
You don't have many things to do if you just follow the "flow" of operations.
> 1. Does anyone know if
I really want to like RequestFactory, really I do, but I'm astounded
by the complexity. I finally got my head around the Locator, the
proxies, etc and now I'm getting Frozen beans and "edited by another
RequestContext" errors.
I took a look at: http://fascynacja.wordpress.
Er, well, don't pass the EntityProxy as an argument to your method in the
oracle; pass its ID instead.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-to
forms an asynchronous
RequestFactory service call to the server to query for the EntityProxy
values - which causes the RequestContext "streams to cross" and an
error.
Is there any way to perform a RequestFactory based service call to the
server while the root Editor is currently be
Hi hkopp Right now I'm facing the argument type mismatch error, but i'm
unable to find the cause. I guess you were able to do it since there were
no more comments. How did you found the cause? how did you solved? thanks a
lot.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Can you look in the Deobfuscator.Builder generated by the RF ValidationTool
(if you configured annotation processing in Eclipse, it should be in a
.apt_generated folder unless you changed it; and note that if you
ValidationTool from the command line, it won't output the Java code, only
the comp
Hi,
I'm trying out GWT RequestFactory but hit a problem, my entity is an
JPA(Hibernate) and I have a Dao class like this
public abstract class GenericDao () {
List list() {
some code to return a list.
}
void persist(E entity) {
entityManager.persist(entity);
}
}
public
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:48:42 PM UTC+1, Johann wrote:
>
> hi everyone,
>
> i build my first gwt requestfactory app and got first an error in the
> development output..
>
> 21:43:01.805 [INFO] x] Ignored 1 unit with compilation errors in first
> pass.
> C
I already suspected that I should use maven build tool.
ok thanks for ur hint. that make sense. i will test it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/goog
thank you for your reply,
im using gwt 2.4 with eclipse 3.7 Indigo.
the containing gwt jars are directly copied from the plugin folder
e.g requestfactory-server.jar
how can i determine what version im using of this libaries?
greez
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
were generated by jaxws.
The second project is the GWT project that contains my requestFactory
stuff. I was creating an "EntityProxy" in my GWT project that was a
"proxyfor" one of those Jaxws generated objects. After following all
the directions, I was not getting anything
Been a couple weeks since anyone chimed in on this issue. Has anyone
solved this? I am experiencing the same issues.
On Jan 15, 3:53 am, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Eclipse seems to have issues with annotation processors (it regularly
> generates errors when I modify source code; generally it resolv
None. This is server-side code. Whether you'll see the error or not really
depends on how you compile your project. When your project grows, I'd
suggest using 2 Eclipse/Maven/whatever projects for client and server code
(and possibly a third one for shared code), then you'd compile client-side
Check your java build path entries contain proper version of gwt that
is 2.4.0. This kind of thing happens when you try to run
RequestFactoryValidation with older version of gwt jars.
On 26 sij, 21:48, Johann wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> i build my first gwt requestfactory app and got
code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5724
> andhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5776
> (see "chained persistence"
> inhttp://tbroyer.posterous.com/gwt-211-requestfactory-part-ii, this article
> is a little old, but still mostly releva
hi everyone,
i build my first gwt requestfactory app and got first an error in the
development output..
21:43:01.805 [INFO] x] Ignored 1 unit with compilation errors in first
pass.
Compile with -strict or with -logLevel set to TRACE or DEBUG to see all
errors.
i did it and the console
Hi everyone,
i try to build my first project with gwt requestfactory.
after many other errors e.g annotation and missing jason classes.
the development output show me an hint
" [INFO] [x] - Ignored 1 unit with compilation errors in first pass.
Compile with -strict or with -logLeve
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:36:31 PM UTC+1, salk31 wrote:
>
> Where can I put code that works on the entity that I can use in the
> server and the client?
>
> e.g. Person and PersonProxy with getSalutation, getFirstName,
> getLastName and I want getFullName to work on client and server...
Where can I put code that works on the entity that I can use in the
server and the client?
e.g. Person and PersonProxy with getSalutation, getFirstName,
getLastName and I want getFullName to work on client and server...
Where should this code live?
The only thing I can think of is to have a new i
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 10:02:24 PM UTC+1, Ryan McFall wrote:
>
> I have an entity class Header, which contains a list of Response
> objects. Via a RequestFactory service I create a Header object and
> send it back to the client, ensuring that the list of Response o
I have an entity class Header, which contains a list of Response
objects. Via a RequestFactory service I create a Header object and
send it back to the client, ensuring that the list of Response objects
is initialized before sending it to the client.
Then, on the client, I use the create method
When the RequestFactory validates my domain objects using a jsr303
validator it gets localized contraint violation message and a message
key. I debuged the code and on the server side the default locale is
used no matter what locale is used on the client side. I did not find
any locale settings in
Address
the firts three times and an empty one the next time. I have a random
NPE.
Could you tell me if there is a specific EntityProxy creation order to
respect when using RequestFactory and entities relationship ? Same
question when filling properties ?
Is there something particular with the w
Thx for your response,
I solved it using merge instead of persist :
entityManager.merge(articulo);
//entityManager.persist(articulo);
Hope it helps
On 20 ene, 00:41, -sowdri- wrote:
> This usually doesn't happen, as the entities with existing id will be only
> m
This usually doesn't happen, as the entities with existing id will be only
merged rather than creating the new instance. Try checking your equals and
hashcode implementations for 'Articulo' class, as that plays a central role
in merge mechanism.
If you still want a workaround,
public void pe
Hello,
My question is how can I update an existing Entity instead of creating
a new one. When I use my persist method in my Entity I always create a
new Entity in my DB whith a new Id, even when the object passed in my
persist method has an existing Id.
Im using Editors and RequestFactory, the
Hi,
We are using DataGrid with inline editing handled by RequestFactory.
We are looking for a way to nicely update the table after object was
successfully updated (on failure we just clearViewData() the cell)
In plain English, how can we replace single object in the DataProvider
(async) without
Eclipse seems to have issues with annotation processors (it regularly
generates errors when I modify source code; generally it resolves itself
after either a new change, a refresh or a rebuild).
Is your app working if you compile your code outside Eclipse?
As for your "build.properties does not
I'm still stuck on this. Some projects I've ported to 2.4 now work,
but others still just won't budge. I have tried all the additional
steps, but my *DeobfuscatorBuilder.java just won't appear in those
projects (event thought the .apt_generated folder does, and is
replaced if I change the name).
On Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:24:38 PM UTC+1, Tapomay Dey wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am using following code.
>
> Note:
> request is of type ? extends RequestContext
> entity is of type ? extends EntityProxy
>
> (request).persist().using(entity).fire(
> new Receiver() {
> @Override
> public
in
request is of type ? extends RequestContext
add your own persist method that returns the newly created entity instead
of void. The you receive it using Receiver instead of
Receiver
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
Hi,
I am using following code.
Note:
request is of type ? extends RequestContext
entity is of type ? extends EntityProxy
(request).persist().using(entity).fire(
new Receiver() {
@Override
public void onSuccess(Void unUsed) {
I need the entity ID generated in the DB here.
If I do entit
Yes you can do it, using
RequestFactorySource<http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/latest/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/vm/RequestFactorySource.html>,
and an
InProcessRequestTransport<http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.3/com/google/gwt/reque
Hi,
I want to be able to use code like this on the client and server:
MyRequestFactory myFactory ...
myFactory.getFooFinder().find(queryString).fire(new
Receiver>(){
public void onSuccess(List response){
}
});
Has anyone used RequestFactory interfaces like this on
Answered on SO: http://stackoverflow.com/q/8728243/116472
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/qQJyETXujIEJ.
To post to this group, s
Hi,
what is the recommended way to inform the client about a 404 Not Found or a
401 Unauthorized?
Greetings Andreas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/ms
check that, actually i a slightly different error only difference is
instead of JobHistory, i get JobHistoryPk can't be sent to the client.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Elhanan Maayan wrote:
> ok, they really REALLY need to fix that thing, i changed the directory of
> .apt_generated to .apt_g
ok, they really REALLY need to fix that thing, i changed the directory of
.apt_generated to .apt_gen and got an exception on the serve side (some
stupid bug in eclipse link which doesn't make it compatible with jpa), i
dunno if this was the original problem, but after fixing it still get the
origin
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 9:08:50 PM UTC+1, Elhanan wrote:
>
> hi..
> i'm trying use an entity employee which has JobHistory entities related to
> it..i should add that although jobHistory is considered an entity, it has
> an embeddedId which is a dervied from manytoOne relationships.
>
>
hi..
i'm trying use an entity employee which has JobHistory entities related to
it..i should add that although jobHistory is considered an entity, it has
an embeddedId which is a dervied from manytoOne relationships.
anyway i tried using eager loading, but it still doesn't work. i get this:
com
That was it.
*facepalm*
Thanks for the help guys.
On Dec 29, 3:56 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> I confirm the need to always use the same instance on the server side in a
> given request. I do believe it's a bug though fwiw.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I confirm the need to always use the same instance on the server side in a
given request. I do believe it's a bug though fwiw.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google
In your addOrUpdate() method, check to see you are returning the exact same
instance that was passed in, just remembered I did actually run into the
same problem when you return a different instance that has the same
identity.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Jeff Rodriguez wrote:
> Yeah, I put
Yeah, I put that code into a click handler for a button so I can just
repeatedly fire it off. It's the only code in the function.
It seems like something is trying to edit the result before my
receiver callbacks are called. I say that because it works on the
server side every single time. If I cli
The difference between ValueProxy and EntityProxy is that ValueProxy-s do
not have "identity". Two EntityProxy-s can be said to represent the same
object if they share the same stableId(); that cannot be said for
ValueProxy, where each instance is a distinct object. For instance, when
you Reque
>From the code you posted, it should work fine (even the original code). Is
it all executed in one function? It sounds like there's some paths of
execution which differ from it, and somehow end up calling setName() on a
frozen proxy.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi Aidan, thanks for the reply.
I just tried with the corrected edit() call, and I'm seeing the same
behavior as before.
If I remove the edit call entirely, it also behaves the same.
I've noticed that it actually behaves a bit more erratically than I first
thought. Not every subsequent call su
601 - 700 of 2057 matches
Mail list logo
