Use a Servlet Filter. It sits in front of servlets and you can do stuff
before a servlet executes and after it has done its work.
http://www.jsptutorial.org/content/filter
-- J.
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2012 01:53:18 UTC+2 schrieb Carlos Silva:
Hi,
I'm using an RpcRequestBuilder to add a
I'm trying to use a CellTable within a StackLayoutPanel
The CellTable does'nt show Items , probably because the size is unkown
The specs on StackLayoutPanel seem obsolete .
Is there an example somewhere ?
thanks
Patrick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hello,
I have the css properties of the header's top left element (the logo's
place) which has a logo sprite in background :
*@sprite* .*topHeaderLeftAlign* {
gwt-image: sprites_MS;
width: 154px;
height: 60px;
background-position: -1101px -973px; /* logo */
}
I have a different result when I
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:59:33 AM UTC+2, Mike Dee wrote:
A couple of questions regarding a test I'd like to perform. Let's assume
that testing occurs with a live database (and GWT-RPC). I know that
contest of the database and what should be returned for certain queries.
I'd like
If your 'sprite_MS' is already sprited, then don't use an ImageResource;
use a DataResource instead, and use either Image#setUrlAndVisibleRect() or
a normal CSS class (not @sprite) to display it.
If you use an ImageResource with an Image widget, then use g:Image
resource={sprites_MS}/ rather
Hi there
I am trying to create a Custom TextField with a label and replace an
existing ui:TextBox in the main ui.xml file with it but get error
Unable to load module entry point class
com.equillore.mcmexternal.client.Mcmexternal .
public class IndicatorTextField extends Composite implements
Start by looking at the logs, it must print more info than just Unable to
load module entry point, there should be some deferred binding failed of
some kind with additional info.
Try increasing the -logLevel, but the default (INFO) is generally enough to
diagnose your own mistakes.
On
I'm using UiRenderer for cells, but I'm getting this error at compile time.
(I'm using the trunk)
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.InternalCompilerException: Unexpected error during
visit.
at
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.ast.JVisitor.translateException(JVisitor.java:109)
at
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:53:50 PM UTC+2, Cristian Rinaldi wrote:
I'm using UiRenderer for cells, but I'm getting this error at compile
time. (I'm using the trunk)
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.InternalCompilerException: Unexpected error during
visit.
at
I added event handelers to my custom textbox and was wondering if this may
be the reason for the errors.
Here are the related error logs. Any further advice perhaps on where the
errors could come from.?
at com.google.gwt.event.shared.HandlerManager.fireEvent(HandlerManager.java:129)
at
I've been away from my work for a few days but today I got around to
solving this issue. As the images were only temporarily needed, I decided
on using the working directory to store and retrieve.
To serve the images correctly, I wrote a simple image reading servlet that
copies the input
Hello Tomas,
I am trying this solution (but no image is displayed ) :
//uibinder.xml
*g:Image* ui:field=eventoImg /
//view.java (in the constructor, just after widget =
binder.createAndBindUi(this) ) :
eventoImg.*setUrlAndVisibleRect*(./common/sprites_MS.png, 0, 0, 64, 64);
//css -
I forgott to precize that I used the DATA RESOURCE declaration :
* @Source(./common/sprites_MS.png)*
* @ImageOptions(preventInlining = true)*
* ImageResource sprites_MS();*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view
http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=verify+email+domain
Joe
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/E9K1e8Ucd4UJ.
To post to this group,
Is it possible to set the column width of g:cell in the ui.xml file?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/36yrordUcd4J.
To post to
Since non of them is doing any nasty JSNI event binding its very likely that
you are causing the leak within your own code.
How did you find the leak? How did you test for it?
Am 26.05.2012 um 10:39 schrieb sylvanco:
No 3rd pary libraries, just the frameworks listed.
On May 17, 10:41 pm,
I updated my local copy, I compiled and it worked!
It's weird because I had done, something must have been wrong.
A.U.S Cristian Rinaldi
Logikas - Conectando Ideas
www.logikas.com
2012/6/13 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:53:50 PM UTC+2, Cristian Rinaldi
I'm sure other folks' examples will differ, but we did the following:
1. Entitlements set as an Enum like *enum UserEntitlement { VIEW_HOME,
VIEW_ITEM, ADD_ITEM, DELETE_ITEM }*
2. On user login, *UserEntitlement[] *fetch sent from backend to client
3. Restricted UI elements are
If that is causing so much trouble, how about just use a CSS class like *
visibleIcon*. Leave the visibility/display property changing to the browser
by adding/removing a class name.
Joseph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
Thanks Joseph for sharing your experiences.
I have a question regards this, for example you have a button that is
enabled to *ADD_ITEM. *Do you extends GWT compents for show for some
'actions' or make some if statements?
Is a simple question, but is nice to know how deal with this. The extend of
I can confirm that copying the CodeServer's .gwt.rpc files in the local war
dir, works but it's a pain: every time they change, they need to be copied.
Using a -workDir under the war didn't work for me. The CodeServer output
directory structure does not help.
In
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:53:35 PM UTC+2, Andrea Boscolo wrote:
I can confirm that copying the CodeServer's .gwt.rpc files in the local
war dir, works but it's a pain: every time they change, they need to be
copied.
Using a -workDir under the war didn't work for me. The CodeServer
I have a custom TextBox that has a IndicatorTextBox.ui.xml file as well as
IndicatorTextBox.java file.
Ussually adding an evenhadler to a textbox is simple.
@UiHandler(txtFirstName)
void onTxtFirstNameKeyUp(KeyUpEvent event)
{
validateFields();
}
How would I add the handler if the
I got this HyperlinkCell class somewhere and it works pretty good.
public class HyperlinkCell extends AbstractCellHyperlink
{
@Override
public void render( com.google.gwt.cell.client.Cell.Context context,
Hyperlink h, SafeHtmlBuilder sb )
{
sb.append( SafeHtmlUtils.fromTrustedString(
Jaun,
Our application is nearly 100% custom components. We did not use many of
the default GWT widgets. We also used UiBinder for everything and thus most
screens are a bundle of widgets stitched together with UiBinder.
If there was a custom panel/button/widget, it would have a
Thanks Joseph for sharing your experiences on this!! You are really helpful
at the group
Juan
2012/6/13 Joseph Lust lifeofl...@gmail.com
Jaun,
Our application is nearly 100% custom components. We did not use many of
the default GWT widgets. We also used UiBinder for everything and thus most
Implement the HasXYZHandlers interfaces you need in your
IndicatorTextField, e.g.:
public class IndicatorTextField extends Composite implements HasText,
HasKeyUpHandlers, ...other handlers you need... {
public HandlerRegistration addKeyUpHandler(KeyUpHandler handler) {
return
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 11:48:22 PM UTC+2, Mike Dee wrote:
I got this HyperlinkCell class somewhere and it works pretty good.
public class HyperlinkCell extends AbstractCellHyperlink
{
@Override
public void render( com.google.gwt.cell.client.Cell.Context context,
Hyperlink h,
Then i will wait for 2.5.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Cristian Rinaldi csrina...@gmail.comwrote:
I updated my local copy, I compiled and it worked!
It's weird because I had done, something must have been wrong.
A.U.S Cristian Rinaldi
Logikas - Conectando Ideas
www.logikas.com
if a panel that implements
RequiresResizehttp://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.4/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RequiresResize.htmladd
a widget, the panel always cannot be visible.
is it a necessary that a panel implements
Have a look at
http://www.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/gwt-continuous-build-testing.html
The Wave guys came up with a model where the presenter controls the view,
so there's no getter; the view calls the presenter back with the values
when needed (i.e. your find() method would have
I'll leave the final word to Brian.
Some minor comments below, but otherwise looks good.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727807/diff/14001/user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/impl/SimpleViolation.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/impl/SimpleViolation.java
(right):
Sorry for not having spotted it in the previous patch set: the new
'private static' methods are not ordered alphabetically (yes, they're in
logical order, but the coding style for GWT mandates alphabetical
ordering...)
Otherwise good (I'd still have splitted the for() loop with the if/else
[junit] Exception in thread pool-1-thread-569
java.lang.NullPointerException [junit] at
com.google.gwt.dev.util.DiskCache.transferToStream(DiskCache.java:187)
[junit] at
com.google.gwt.dev.util.DiskCacheToken.writeObject(DiskCacheToken.java:91)
At the very
Only looked at elemental.json.* so far.
Looks like the Js implementations haven't been used much in DevMode
(which is not really surprising given the super-source implementation of
element.json.Json, which is @GwtScriptOnly, so only an explicit 'new
JsJsonFactory()', or casting a JSO to a
Reviewers: rdayal,
Description:
MeniItem should use ScheduledCommand instead of Command
Repost of 1698803
Thanks Patrick!
Patch by: tucker...@gmail.com
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1726805/
Affected files:
M tools/api-checker/config/gwt24_25userApi.conf
M
Great change, but UiRenderer is not a part of GWT 2.4.0 release while
project's
pom file depend on it. Any comments?
That'd be a bug. I guess it should be 2.5.0, but that version has not
been released yet. What is the Maven way to do this?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1733805/
--
Reviewers: skybrian, cromwellian,
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727808/diff/1/build.xml
File build.xml (left):
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727808/diff/1/build.xml#oldcode57
build.xml:57: gwt.ant dir=dev/codeserver /
See
On 2012/06/13 16:23:11, kromanovs wrote:
Well, you can add dependency to 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT if it's available in
the maven
central repo. If it's not - then I think it's not yet a time to push
this change
out.
GWT 2.5 is in the process of being released. I rather think it is time
to update the
I've removed the changes concerning javax.validation, so it's still
distributed as a separate JAR.
org.json is now bundled in gwt-dev, no longer bundled into
requestfactory-* JARs, and distributed as a separate JAR in the SDK (so
that requestfactory users have the choice to user
Submitted as r11052
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1726805/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2012/05/25 23:01:27, jat wrote:
LGTM
Committed as r11044.
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1716804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2012/06/08 19:39:13, rdayal wrote:
On 2012/05/22 16:11:49, tbroyer wrote:
LGTM.
Committed a r11045.
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1713803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We have a few POMs through GWT which need its versions updated for the
release. The question is what to use for version string. We have no process
or infrastructure in place for snapshots so I'd like to keep that out of
this picture.
I propose to use 2.5.0.RCx while we publish release
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:19:52 PM UTC+2, Rodrigo Chandia wrote:
We have a few POMs through GWT which need its versions updated for the
release. The question is what to use for version string. We have no process
or infrastructure in place for snapshots so I'd like to keep that out of
I forgot the mention. The only real change between this and the CL Ray
reviewed was that I added a no-op dependency recorder in the unit test.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:23 PM, skybr...@google.com wrote:
I don't understand this code, but I wonder if there is any way to write
a smoke test for
At this point, the new code is more complicated than the old code. Is
it worth switching anymore? Did you performance test to see if
element.contains() is faster than the old impl code?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1725808/
--
Reviewers: rdayal, tbroyer,
Description:
Update POM versions to 2.5.0-rc1
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1734804/
Affected files:
M samples/dynatablerf/pom.xml
M samples/expenses/pom.xml
M samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml
M samples/validation/pom.xml
Index:
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1734804
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:32:28 PM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:19:52 PM UTC+2, Rodrigo Chandia wrote:
We have a few POMs through GWT which need its versions updated for the
release. The question is what
Did you performance test to see if element.contains() is
faster than the old impl code?
No, no perf tests.
The old code in DOMImplStandardBase walked the DOM, so I thought it was
a pretty safe assumption that Webkit's .contains would be faster (either
from being a single JS call vs. many or,
LGTM.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1734804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I mostly looked over the build process. (Since this is experimental, I
suppose it can all be done later.)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1728806/diff/1/elemental/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
File elemental/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (right):
I don't think we support Java 1.5 anymore?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6790
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-web-toolkit/fATw0rL8lSE/xbxX5Hf8ozUJ
I'm totally fine with dropping support for 1.5 altogether.
- Brian
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:47 AM,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote:
I don't think we support Java 1.5 anymore?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6790
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-web-toolkit/fATw0rL8lSE/xbxX5Hf8ozUJ
I'm totally fine with
Okay, seems fine for now. I'm going to commit this.
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1731804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1731805/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Thomas,
I'm a little knee deep in I/O slide stuff at the moment, so maybe you
can sanity check my thinking here. Let me describe what used to be
happening in the Json stuff and what I was trying to change it to before
2.5, but probably didn't finish.
Essentially, in ProdMode I wanted to run
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1734804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM. I can understand the code now and I'm basically okay with it; the
rest is nitpicks.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1727807/diff/15003/user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/impl/SimpleViolation.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/impl/SimpleViolation.java
(right):
On 2012/06/13 23:33:46, cromwellian wrote:
Thomas,
I'm a little knee deep in I/O slide stuff at the moment, so maybe
you can
sanity check my thinking here. Let me describe what used to be
happening in the
Json stuff and what I was trying to change it to before 2.5, but
probably didn't
On 2012/06/13 21:45:00, skybrian wrote:
Okay, seems fine for now. I'm going to commit this.
FYI, I just removed all occurrences of json-1.5.jar, so we consistently
use json.jar everywhere.
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1731804/
--
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Introduce -XfragmentCount to replace -XfragmentMerge
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1739804/
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/PrecompileTaskOptionsImpl.java
M
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1739804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: skybrian,
Description:
Comment out an invalid test in TreeMapTest.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1735805/
Affected files:
M user/test/com/google/gwt/emultest/java/util/TreeMapTest.java
Index:
I'm getting failing tests because JSON is gone from gwt-user.jar and the
requestfactory jars. I could add the dependency internal to google, but
I think we might still be trying to do too much at once - this is
looking more like churn than an actual improvement.
To fix the compiler and close
On 2012/06/14 01:33:21, skybrian wrote:
LGTM
It seems like we should also change the web implementation to behave
like JDK 7.
But that can wait.
Unless we are going to upgrade the rest of the JRE to match JDK 7, I
disagree.
More likely, this behavior should be considered undefined and
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Include json-1.5.jar in gwt-dev.jar. JSON is needed by the Closure
compiler and also to generate source maps.
Fixes issue 7397
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1732804/
Affected files:
M dev/build.xml
M
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1739803/diff/8001/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/cellview/client/CellTreeNodeView.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/cellview/client/CellTreeNodeView.java
(right):
I missed the changes to the other files. This makes the standard impl
simpler and makes all versions of IE use the fixed IE-version. I'll
review it closely and submit tomorrow. Thanks for the patch.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1725808/
--
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1739803/diff/8001/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/cellview/client/CellTreeNodeView.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/cellview/client/CellTreeNodeView.java
(right):
70 matches
Mail list logo
