HI,
PLEASE FIND THE BELOW LINK FOR .NET ONLINE TRAINING AND PROJECT SUPPORT.
http://onlinenettrainings.blogspot.com/
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT FOR ANY QUERIES TO BELOW MAIL ID
rudrajayku...@gmail.com
THANK YOU
AJAY KUMAR
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I always pick the for Java developers flavor. Some will prefer the for
Java EE developers one.
Choose among those two.
Note that these are only about which plugins are packaged with the core,
you can still install other plugins later as needed.
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 10:32:58 PM UTC+1,
Horray, ResizeLayoutPanel did the trick, thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/s7Lls8m2BEAJ.
To post to this group, send email
Hi niloc, thank you very much for your ideas. In my case your solution 3)
(inlining the js) is not what I want. In my case I want two things:
1) easy to the end user (it shouldn't have to worry about adding
thirdLibrary.js file anywhere)
2) easy for me to update to new versions of
I'm starting to think...unless I am doing something stupid...this is a
GWT error.
At the very least the behavior contradicts the documentation:
The ClientBundle generator combines all of the images defined in your
interface into a single, optimized image.
This certainly doesn't seem to be the
try to prevent any inlining or other optimizations using :
@Source(img0001.png)
@ImageOptions(preventInlining=true)
ImageResource img0001();
From ImageResource.java :
/**
* Set to {@code true} to require the ImageResource to be downloaded as
a
* separate resource at runtime.
Email updates to me
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/a1CYTlNnDG0J.
To post to this group, send email to
Thanks I already disabled inlining with :
set-property name=ClientBundle.enableInlining value=false /
In my gwt.xml, which disables DataURLs, but still doesn't make everything
image strips - some are image strips but many are still just separate PNGs
images.
I'll try your method as well, but I
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 3:14:50 PM UTC+1, Sebastián Gurin wrote:
Hi niloc, thank you very much for your ideas. In my case your solution 3)
(inlining the js) is not what I want. In my case I want two things:
1) easy to the end user (it shouldn't have to worry about adding
There is indeed a max size for image bundles. Take a look at:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/releases/2.5/user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/rg/ImageBundleBuilder.java#471
You can configure it by setting the system property
gwt.imageResource.maxBundleSize to your
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 5:27:09 PM UTC+1, darkflame wrote:
Thanks I already disabled inlining with :
set-property name=ClientBundle.enableInlining value=false /
In my gwt.xml, which disables DataURLs, but still doesn't make everything
image strips - some are image strips but many are
Thanks, but that seems to be a dimension size limit, not a file size limit:
...
if (lossy || toReturn.getHeight() IMAGE_MAX_SIZE
|| toReturn.getWidth() IMAGE_MAX_SIZE) {
...
Is there a filesize limit too?
On 20 January 2013 18:05, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday,
The following code attaches a new element with every subsequent click on
the 2nd *div*. With each adding, the focus is set to the added element, so
that it is ready for *blur* methods (I am setting the *tabIndex* attribute
just for this purpose).
However, on clicking outside the new
I'm using Hibernate envers to keep a history of my entities. To display the
history of an entity I want to transfer a list of different versions of the
entity to the client. When I return a list of different versions of the
same entity through Request Factory I get the correct number of items
I'm looking at the project and there's nearly zero activity. The last
chatter was about Maps v3, and that was 9 months ago.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/GWT-Google-Apis
Should I be worried?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6112
Star the issue so you can get notified when the capability is added.
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:51:43 PM UTC-5, Luis Costa wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using GWT 2.5 and I'm wondering if there's an easy way to enabled /
disabled
Hi,
I draw ellipses on a canvas on click, and want to remove them on
doubleclick.
Therefor I track them in a list with coordinates tracked, and iterate if on
mouseclick. I'm already detecting if an element is under mouseclick or not.
BUT: how do I remove that element from the canvas? Would I
This question is so confusing I can only respond with an equally confusing
answer:
Have you tried V http://www.vim.org/im?
Ok, a more serious answer would be: Can you tell us what you're trying to
accomplish? Why would you try to edit a txt or js file in a browser?
:-) Ryan
On Sunday,
This is opensource.
How about getting your hands dirty ? :)
2013/1/20 Charles Youakim charlie.youa...@passportparking.com
I'm looking at the project and there's nearly zero activity. The last
chatter was about Maps v3, and that was 9 months ago.
Assuming your build is including the resource, your image will be under
/WEB-INF/classes/resource/icons/image.gif. Generally, you wouldn't access a
resource from your classes like that though. You could make a resource
servlet that would use the getResourceAsStream facility to load and serve
I pretty much agree with Ashton. I also like to us Gin (Guice for GWT) but
learning that might be too much overhead to quickly prototype something.
On Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:27:25 PM UTC-6, Ashton Thomas wrote:
I recommend using Activity and Places for organizing at a high level:
I would like to write some desktop javascripts ,
where the user can stay within the browser and do their text editing ,
like (maybe) this editor that i am using to Post this reply ,
but locally , not using the webServer (,txt , .rtf , .html , .js) ,
If there is a way to Copy/Paste from
Just to confirm/clarify this problem as I found it today.
PopupPanel test = new PopupPanel();
test.add(new Label(test));
test.setAnimationEnabled(true);
test.center();
Is all it takes to reproduce it for me.
Animation seems to
easiest way to clear a canvas is to use the context clearRect function and
pass the canvas co-ordinate space width height. This would clear the
entire canvas. And you can redraw the shapes you want to remain on screen.
You can also clear portion of a screen, using the above function by passing
Are folks out there just wrapping js libs with JSNI and going from there?
It seems very plausible.
You don't really need a GWT API's library when you can easily wrap objects.
I'm really just wondering what others out there are doing? Are you
wrapping js libs such as google maps?
On
On Monday, January 21, 2013 5:58:48 AM UTC+1, Charles Youakim wrote:
Are folks out there just wrapping js libs with JSNI and going from there?
It seems very plausible.
You don't really need a GWT API's library when you can easily wrap
objects.
I'm really just wondering what others
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Stop using prefixed API's in AnimationScheduler by default.
Firefox and Safari will use the Timer-based implementation. For Chrome we
can use requestAnimationFrame because it's unprefixed starting in Chrome 24.
Not using the most efficient implementation by default seems overly
harsh and likely to bias people against using GWT, so I tend to side
with making the efficient one the default. Javascript programmers
would usually react differently, by doing capability tests, and
selecting the appropriate
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.comwrote:
Not using the most efficient implementation by default seems overly
harsh and likely to bias people against using GWT, so I tend to side
with making the efficient one the default. Javascript programmers
would usually
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:35 PM, John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org wrote:
I agree, plus I think if we are going to do this there should be a more
global deferred binding property like useExperimentalApis in core.
What do you think about flags to turn on each prefixed symbol separately:
30 matches
Mail list logo
