[gwt-contrib] Experimental release of Elemental2

Would it be possible to break the project into a few packages? It would make it easier to find things. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[gwt-contrib] Current snapshots failing with JDK 7

Hi all, Current snapshots fail with JDK 7: [INFO] [INFO]Tracing compile failure path for type 'java.util.Comparator' [INFO] [INFO] [ERROR] Errors in

[gwt-contrib] Re: Bean Validation

On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 11:40:56 PM UTC+2, ManfredTremmel wrote: > > I've read in the 2.8rc1 release notes > that JSR 303 Bean > Validation in GWT is unmaintaned and marked as deprecated. For me, the > client and server side validation is

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Experimental release of Elemental2

+1 to add some type-safe, in my current mini-project (almost 50 lines of code) there are 5 cast! 2 elements, 2 events and 1 event target... the event target is mandatory, but the events and elements will be nice to be type-safe. On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:07 PM Manuel Carrasco Moñino

[gwt-contrib] Bean Validation

I've read in the 2.8rc1 release notes that JSR 303 Bean Validation in GWT is unmaintaned and marked as deprecated. For me, the client and server side validation is a killer feature and I've already solve the problems I had and also improved the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Experimental release of Elemental2

I'm wondering if it would be possible to have type-safe convenience methods for creating elements, so as the user does not have to provide the string tag name, nor cast the object, maybe something like : HTMLButtonElement button = HTMLButtonElement.createElement(); instead of HTMLButtonElement

[gwt-contrib] Re: Compile specific files only

Without any background, the question is how can I add a compiler option so >> that the source inside a module is compiled without resolving its >> dependency? For example, a module as simple as below >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Only the .java files inside utils folder are translated into

Re: What is happening to GWT???

> > But it also takes some time to write release notes for every release. > So again, mostly a problem of time to spend. > I think if we take care on good commit messages and bug tracking we could automate releases including good enough release notes on Github using their API. -- J. -- You

Re: What is happening to GWT???

On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 4:22:28 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote: > > > As said above, Google doesn't really care about "releases", except for >> that they care enough about the community "outside" who, they know, do care >> about releases. >> > > @Thomas: And thats exactly why I think GWT will have

Re: What is happening to GWT???

On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 5:36:58 PM UTC+2, Gilberto wrote: > > Guys, threads asking if GWT is dead/dying shouldn't appear as often as it > does. Actually they shouldn't appear at all. But they do. Something is > definitely wrong. As community we should do something. > Glad you're using

Re: What is happening to GWT???

Hi, +1 on the regular releases. I am perfectly aware that this is an open source project so nobody is entitled in asking anything. However with long standing releases it is getting difficult to justify use of GWT in my organization. It is much easier to carry custom patches or skip a buggy

Re: What is happening to GWT???

> As community we should do something. In my opinion the communication is > pretty poor and should be improved. GWT is "too blackbox" in my opinion, > because of the reasons I stated before. > Its as open as any other open source project. But if the communication is fine, it's just a

Re: Any elegant approach to integrate Spring security with GWT RPC based application?

See https://groups.google.com/forum/m/?fromgroups#!topic/google-web-toolkit/fkbowz5-5do it's old but maybe ir is still useful for your needs El sáb., jul. 2, 2016 7:52, Gilberto escribió: > Not the answer you would like to hear, but... > > In my humble opinion, the

Re: What is happening to GWT???

Guys, threads asking if GWT is dead/dying shouldn't appear as often as it does. Actually they shouldn't appear at all. But they do. Something is definitely wrong. As community we should do something. In my opinion the communication is pretty poor and should be improved. GWT is "too blackbox"

Re: What is happening to GWT???

> As said above, Google doesn't really care about "releases", except for > that they care enough about the community "outside" who, they know, do care > about releases. > @Thomas: And thats exactly why I think GWT will have a better life if we would do fixed, automated monthly / quarterly

Re: What is happening to GWT???

On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 12:29:32 PM UTC+2, Gilberto wrote: > > ... and that's a problem, at least the way it is developed now. > > GWT is a more-or-less open-source project. While it is indeed open-source > (you can look at the code), the process of developing it depends heavily on >

[gwt-contrib] Re: Compile specific files only

> Without any background, the question is how can I add a compiler option so > that the source inside a module is compiled without resolving its > dependency? For example, a module as simple as below > > > > > > > Only the .java files inside utils folder are translated into javascript.

[gwt-contrib] Compile specific files only

Hi guys, Without any background, the question is how can I add a compiler option so that the source inside a module is compiled without resolving its dependency? For example, a module as simple as below Only the .java files inside utils folder are translated into javascript.

Re: Any elegant approach to integrate Spring security with GWT RPC based application?

Not the answer you would like to hear, but... In my humble opinion, the elegant solution would be not using GWT RPC at all. Go RESTful. For the annotation problem, I don't know if there's a way to escape... maybe you could try code generation (which usually also relies on annotations...

Re: gwt material and uibinder

Hi Pierre! Welcome to GWT and GWT Material =) If you want a faster, direct communication with the developers from GWT Material, join us at the Gitter chat: https://gitter.im/GwtMaterialDesign/gwt-material Also, I advise you to really try to use Maven. I know it's hard and sometimes

Re: What is happening to GWT???

... and that's a problem, at least the way it is developed now. GWT is a more-or-less open-source project. While it is indeed open-source (you can look at the code), the process of developing it depends heavily on closed-source, blackbox projects made by Google, that nobody really knows about