Hi folks,
I'd like my application to avoid a on-init RPC call to retrieve context
data. I'd like such data to be included in the HTML host page (generated by
a JSP)
My first option was to encode such data in JSON and us a JavaScriptObject to
overlay it and access it form my GWT code.
BUT My data
For info,
I'll speak at JugSummerCamp http://www.jugsummercamp.org/ conference
tomorrow on GWT 2.
Long live GWT :D
Nicolas
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Hi
I'm the maintainer of codehaus-mojo gwt-maven-plugin and I wonder the plugin
is deployed with a 1.3.1.google version at
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/2.1.0.M1/gwt/maven/
Is it a internal release of the codehaus trunk to get a fixed version, or
a custom build with some fixes ?
they have just been generated using a mvn deploy:deploy-file ?
Cheers,
Nicolas
2010/5/18 nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
Hi
I'm the maintainer of codehaus-mojo gwt-maven-plugin and I wonder the
plugin is deployed with a 1.3.1.google version at
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn
Hi
I've migrated some nice HTML/CSS code to uibinder, and would like now to
listen to clickEvents on the button present in this HTML fragment.
according to
http://code.google.com/intl/fr-FR/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinder.html#Simple_binding,
I need to use a gwt:Button as replacement for
that IsSerializable had been deprecated de
facto. John, does IsSerializable currently override the serialization
policy or this this a proposed behavior?
On Sep 9, 4:27 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:06 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
I wonder
Hi
I'm trying to reduce my build time by setting appropriate properties.
Reducing number of permutation seems to be the simpliest way to reduce the
gwt-complation time.
Anyway I get some strange result as number of permutation proceed, and would
like to trace what property combination was used
Hi,
I wonder that IsSerializable is still in trunk without a depreaction
annotation. java.io.Serializable is supported by GWT-RPC since few major
versions, maybe it's time to remove such legacy marker interface.
Maybe it could also extends Serializable so that it can be easier to switch
the
Just for info, JBoss guys use to suffix releases with GA (General
Availability)hibernate-3.4.0.GA for example
2009/8/28 Andrew Bowers abow...@google.com
The current problem we are trying to solve is that it is hard to know which
build is a major release for those who aren't intimate.
For 1.6,
I'm back from holliday and will publish it ASAP
cheers,
Nicolas
2009/7/15 Andrew Pietsch andrew.piet...@gmail.com
Howdy,
Is there any plan to upload 1.7 to a public maven repository?
Cheers
Andrew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
I notice there is not tag in SVN for this release :
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/tags/
2009/7/15 nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
I'm back from holliday and will publish it ASAP
cheers,
Nicolas
2009/7/15 Andrew Pietsch andrew.piet...@gmail.com
Howdy
Transparent support for CSS3/HTML5 on all browsers including IE would be a
killer feature !+1
2009/7/1 tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com
+1
On Jun 29, 10:24 am, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been wondering how GWT should deal with upcoming new features in
HTML5/CSS3.
Hi
is there a pulic CI server for GWT 2.0 where I could get the latest 2.0
artifacts ?
I'd like to improve the gwt-maven-plugin for gwt-2.0, but for Integration
testing I'd like to use the latests code, not just the one I could build
myself
Cheers,
Nicolas
Hi
I notice the gen2.table TableModelHelper uses IsSerializable marker
interface. For sur this one is not depreacted, but from GWT 1.5 RPC data can
use the more standard ;ava.io.Serializable marker interface.
Is there a reason not to use the latest one here ?
Nicolas
new Model() or
get a Model bean from RPC, my code can be easily unit tested.
Cheers,
Nicolas
2009/4/21 Bruce Johnson br...@google.com
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
The only critism I'd have is the requirement to use GWT.create() to get
, you only need a single
GWT.create() and this is isolated to your startup code while in your
JUnit version, you kick off a Guice-injected class instead.
-Ray
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:28 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
A simple example : databinding
Lets consider I
I wonder if there is any way to also pre-process Java sources, for
example
this would enable support for Aspect Oriented Programming or maybe some
DataBinding framework.
Depends what you mean by pre-process... Generally, generators
analyze the class they're called for (for example,
can
with a classloader if that's what you're trying to do. But with Gin,
the dependency injection is transitive, so in effect, you can
intercept other classes that appear as injected parameters or fields.
-Ray
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:43 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote
AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
What I'm looking for is both some AOP capability and a way to port javaFx
bind keyword to Java / GWT.
gwt-beans-binding is doing databinding using marker interface in model
and
wrappers for widgets. This makes impossible to use
Hi
If I understand well the GWTCompiler process, The generator are used to
create complementary Java files to be added in the project sources and
compiled to JavaScript.
I wonder if there is any way to also pre-process Java sources, for example
this would enable support for Aspect Oriented
surfaces.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:25 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Some more infos about this bug :
it happens in eventTargetsPopup as the NativeEvent beeing passed has no
eventTarget set.
Find attached a screen capture from the developper that detected this
issue
Hi
I just tried the new gwt 1.6 RC and get this stacktrace :
[FATAL] Uncaught JavaScript exception [*
com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException*: (TypeError): 'nodeType' a
la valeur Null ou n'est pas un objet.
[FATAL] number: -2146823281
[FATAL] description: 'nodeType' a la valeur Null
Nice translation ;)
The dev team repported me this error but I'm not working on the module
myself.
I'll try to get more info on how the PopupPanel is used. I think it is part
of the DatePicker but have to confirm.
Must also ask which browser is used in this test.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:18
Hi,
I just was warned by my dev team about an issue with gwt-dev.jar :
This jar contains som apache libs, and our application (for gwt-rpc
services) also uses commons-collection, but with a distinct version.
When we run the server side unit tests we get NoSuchMethodError as the
gwt-dev jar comes
...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:26 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I just was warned by my dev team about an issue with gwt-dev.jar :
This jar contains som apache libs, and our application (for gwt-rpc
services) also uses commons-collection, but with a distinct
(really, so's the first), but I mostly trust Apache. Still, YMMV.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:36 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
gwt-dev is not on my servelt classpath but on my project classpath used to
run Junit tests with maven.
I need gwt-dev in project classpath
I'm not used to configure Jetty, but maybe the web-jetty.xml file can be
used to set the default Content-type header charset to use ?
Nicolas
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:22 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:39 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
wrote
Hi,
I'm trying to customize DatPicker for custom use-cases.
I had to use some visibility hacks using new classes declared in
package com.google.gwt.user.datepicker.client to access some package-visible
types and methods.
Is there any reason the DatePicker is so ... package restricted ? This makes
AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
From eclipse compiler point of view I can extend MonthSelector, but I
then have the reported exception running the widget in hosted mode.
Just can't understand what's wrong with this...
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:56 PM, John LaBanca jlaba
Hi,
I try to customize the GWT 1.6 DatePicker and I've created a
STDMonthSelector that extends MonthSelector
I the get this error running the hosted browser. It seems some
securityController checks me trying to access methods
in DatePickerComponent, but according to Java type hierarchy this is
, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:01 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I try to customize the GWT 1.6 DatePicker and I've created a
STDMonthSelector that extends MonthSelector
I the get this error running the hosted browser. It seems some
securityController checks me trying to access
a protected refreshAll() method to SDTMonthSelector() as
a possible workaround. I'm not sure if it'll work, but it might:
protected void refreshAll() {
super.refreshAll();
}
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:09 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del
Please ignore, I just discovered
http://google-web-toolkit-incubator.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/super/com/google/gwt/gen2/logging/translatable/
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:15 PM, nicolas.deloof nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I plan to migrate from gwt-log to gen2 logging API
I
at 11:52 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said my application has many other libs, including xerces (and
spring, hibernate, aspectJ ...) so there is MANY reason for me to have
another SAX parser in my classpath.
The issue here is that in my case I can manually put
the WEB-INF/lib with
project libs - code doing this allready exists - but with more impact on
Hosted mode launch speed.
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:59 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
I've found an (ugly ?) workaround by adding xercesImpl in the bootstrap
to avoid such costy setup.
Nicolas
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:38 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
To make things a little clearer, here is how I understand the way
classloader are built by Hosted mode :
bootClasspath gwt-dev
|_ HostedMode
|_ Hosted Browser
could be
integrated into hosted mode ?
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:55 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
I tested the create exploded webapp structure in maven plugin before
creating lauch configurations strategy.
I can launch the hosted browser but this has
with Jetty
;-)
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:09 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
You may be interested to see how jetty guys integrate with maven :
http://www.mortbay.org/jetty/jetty-6/xref/org/mortbay/jetty/plugin/Jetty6MavenConfiguration.html
They use a classPathFiles List created
maven dependencies.
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:42 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:59 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another question about configuring jetty : it expects a web.xml to define
the RPC servlets. Many of us
I notice running the Hosted mode server with wrong parameters output a help
message with :
-serverPrevents the embedded Tomcat server from running, even if a
port is specified
But Tomcat is supposed to have been replaced by Jetty, isn't it :D
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Robert
I may misunderstand your suggestion, but my issue is not about where to
define the url-pattern, but having to define as many url-pattern my
application has GWT modules (and it has many)
I plan to migrate to gwt 1.6, but what does this changes ? RemoteLogging
will still call module/logging URI and
Hi
I'm testing the Eclipse lauch configuration generated by the
gwt-maven-plugin for gwt 1.6.
My webapp project has many dependencies managed as an Eclipse
classpath-container (thanks to m2eclipse plugin).
Running the lauch file I get a classpath issue :
16:57:29,331 ERROR [log.invoke0](?) failed
for the embedded web server (defaults to ). Are you sure that's
still an issue in M2?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:57 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
wrote:
I notice running the Hosted mode server with wrong parameters output a
help message with :
-serverPrevents
Yes, servlet-api defines url-pattern to be [ somepath/* | *.somextension ]
Using gwt logging in a web application with multiple modules require to
setup as many servlet mappings as modules, just because url-pattern
*/logging is invalid. If gwt-incubator uses an extension based pattern like
-through in WebAppContextWithReload to
allow this package. Can you file an issue and write back on this thread
with a link to it?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:24 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm testing the Eclipse lauch configuration generated by the
gwt-maven
-incubator/issues/entry
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Ah, okay. So it's not really a GWT problem. CC'ing some of the incubator
folks so they know about this use case.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes
...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:09 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
wrote:
I may be wrong, but doesn't the ProcessBuilder use the OS interpreter to
parse the forked process command line arguments ? (This may be JRE
dependenant)
Not sure, but it's worth pointing out
I may be wrong, but doesn't the ProcessBuilder use the OS interpreter to
parse the forked process command line arguments ? (This may be JRE
dependenant)
In such case, it may fail on windows with long classpath String as we can
have on JEE web applications and maven projects
For my personnal
Please note 1.5.x history at
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=4q=colspec=Filename+Summary+Uploaded+Size+DownloadCount
1.5.0 was RC1
1.5.1 was RC2
GWT-1.5 final is 1.5.2 !
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:53 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note 1.5.x history at
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=4q=colspec=Filename+Summary+Uploaded+Size+DownloadCount
1.5.0 was RC1
1.5.1 was RC2
GWT-1.5 final is 1.5.2 !
On Sat
1.6.0
C:\sandbox\gwt-windows-1.6.0
This seems correct to me.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:51 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
I just notice the About class has not the GWT_VERIOSN_NUMBER set.
Seems the code expects some String replacement for @gwt_vers...@.
I'm using
What make you say ths is the default one ?
Index of /maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/
../
1.4.60/17-Sep-2007 17:57
-
1.4.62/23-Mar-2008 09:10
-
1.5-M1/
AFAIK, mvnrepository latest is based on textual version comparison, so
1.5-RC* 1.5.3
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
What make you say ths is the default one ?
Index of /maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/
../
1.4.60
also
see from the size graph that 1.5-RC1 is considered newer then 1.5.3.
This might be a problem for some people.
P.S. Will 1.6-M1 hit central or will it be just the final release?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:57 AM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK
I just notice the About class has not the GWT_VERIOSN_NUMBER set.
Seems the code expects some String replacement for @gwt_vers...@.
I'm using About.GWT_VERSION_NUM constant in gwt-maven-plugin to detect the
GWT version used when user provides it's own implementation.
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Thu, Feb
The same script can run the shell with a inlined classpath :
set
CLASSPATH=D:\platina\repository\com\google\gwt\gwt-user\1.5.3\gwt-user-1.5.3.jar;D:\platina\repository\com\google\gwt\gwt-dev\1.5.3\gwt-dev-1.5.3-windows.jar
...
java -cp %CLASSPATH%
56 matches
Mail list logo
