On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Eric Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Miguel
Attached is a demo for the WorkerPool class that I would like for you to
review.
The demo is a bit more rich than the demos for the other Gears features. I
intend to add documentation for a simple worker pool
LGTM
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Eric Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Miguel,
This patch addresses issue 183, a typo in a method name:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-apis/issues/detail?id=183
I renamed the method in the library class and updated the test.
M
Attached file that belongs in
samples/Showcase/src/com/google/gwt/sample/showcase/client/gwtLogoThumb.png
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Miguel Méndez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Eric Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Miguel
Attached is a demo for the
We all seem to be talking about data binding and validation a lot, and some
of us are even implementing code about it. We on the GWT team hear the need
and feel it ourselves.
We have some notions of how we'd like to tackle this in a way that blends
seamlessly with the rest of GWT, and are looking
Thanks for sending the image. I think that you meant to say that the file
belongs
in:
samples/workerpool/src/com/google/gwt/gears/sample/workerpool/public/gwtLogoThumb.png?
You should add more text to the sample to call out that you can interact
with the animation only when using a worker thread
Committed as r873.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Miguel Méndez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LGTM
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Eric Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Miguel,
Here is another patch I'd like for you to review. It addresses issue 189
in the issue tracker:
Hi Ian,
I *think* validation
could be tied into the data binding framework in a pretty
straightforward way by extending EditorT and ViewerT to be
validation-aware.
I agree, it shouldn't be too hard to tie validation into data binding,
but...
I think data binding and validation probably
Yes it is, consider:
public class Parent {
@NotNull
private String parentString = null;
@NotNull
@Valid
private Child child = null;
/*
GETTER AND SETTER METHODS GO HERE
*/
}
public class Child {
@NotEmpty
@NotNull
private String childString = null;
In the above Example the Parent field should also have an @Valid
annotation.
Also, instead of updating in the GWT issue 343 thread I'm updating
here:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation/
It also has the Java5 release for download.
On Oct 8, 12:51 pm, chris.ruffalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent...thanks!
I was missing the @Valid on the parent.
On Oct 8, 12:52 pm, chris.ruffalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the above Example the Parent field should also have an @Valid
annotation.
Also, instead of updating in the GWT issue 343 thread I'm updating
here:
There now appears to be a lot of activity in this area. Data binding,
Validation, and now visibility has been raised so far. We've also seen
inter-field dependent calculations (Ian's @Calculate) I would strongly
urge contributors on this list to take a good look at XForms before
reinventing the
Hi Ray,
I can't answer you fully right now because I'm supposed to be leaving,
but I'll think about your suggestion and get back to you. As it is,
BoundFieldImpl constructs its editor lazily so perhaps a BoundField
could be given an editor rather than constructing one itself.
Also, regarding
12 matches
Mail list logo
