Comment by daniel.florey:
I'd like to see annotation based model description. It is less verbose.
See:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/wiki/TreeTable
For some compiler reason my approach is working in dev-mode but fails in
compiled output :-(
For more information:
On Feb 1, 9:33 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't translatable code generally going into /trunk/user/super, and
the subpackage being called translatable rather than super?
Those are JRE and infrastructure
Hi,
The subject of roadmap ... when will we see a 2.0.1 ? We currently
need to run with a patch gwt-servlet) due to a classloading issue
which is now in fixed state in the issue database.
Moving to a Wave would be great! I'm always waving alone :-S... maybe
I can then finally grasp why it is
We are in the process of smoke testing 2.0.1. We expect for it to be
released in the next day or so.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:18 AM, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The subject of roadmap ... when will we see a 2.0.1 ? We currently
need to run with a patch gwt-servlet) due to a
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand how user/src/com/google/gwt/regexp/super is any
different from user/super/com/google/gwt/regexp/translatable, it's
just a matter of including user/super in the classpath (which it
already is).
One
We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses. Inconvenient,
but it's not that big a deal.
On Feb 2, 2010 7:18 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand how...
One advantage is that super is
Hi,
I have tried to set up the eclipse development environment as
described in /trunk/eclipse/readme but when I have imported projects
into the eclipse workspace I noticed that all the project have
references to gwt-user and/or gwt-dev. The problem is that those
projects do not exist - it seems
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Marko Vuksanovic markovuksano...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have tried to set up the eclipse development environment as
described in /trunk/eclipse/readme but when I have imported projects
into the eclipse workspace I noticed that all the project have
references to
I'd hate to see even more discussions moving away from here (because I,
and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave).
Paul
Ray Ryan wrote:
We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses.
Inconvenient, but it's not that big a deal.
That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who
wants to participate, but there's nothing we could do yet to make such waves
visible to non-members, and that would be really bad.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd hate to see even
Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish
static views of waves. But without that…
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who
wants to participate, but there's nothing
LGTM, with a few nits.
Also, if there is no specific reason to have the annotations white list,
I think we could simplify our code and drop it for now.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/134810/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/HasAnnotations.java
(right):
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] I, and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave.
We can probably do something about that. I'll start another thread where
people who don't have Wave access yet can indicate interest in signing up.
Hi folks,
There has been some discussion about having design discussions in Wave, but
maybe not everybody has access yet.
Disclaimer: I can't promise the rate at which everyone will get invites, but
as GWT contributors, I'll happily argue that you should be early in the
queue.
Reply to this
Yes please.
Reply to this thread if you'd like to get an invitation.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Hi Bruce,
thank you for your commitment regarding Wave participation for GWT
folks.
I really appreciate that.
- Daniel
On 2 Feb., 18:12, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Hi folks,
There has been some discussion about having design discussions in Wave, but
maybe not everybody has access
I have checked out the project once again on another machine and followed
the procedure as in readme file once again - this time the projects were
named correctly but I got a lot of warnings - mostly unread local variable
or possible accidental assignement and a few others...
Is this normal? or I
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Marko Vuksanovic markovuksano...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have checked out the project once again on another machine and followed
the procedure as in readme file once again - this time the projects were
named correctly but I got a lot of warnings - mostly unread
Hey, all. I've just set up a de facto GWT Contrib Home Wave:
https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252Boe8GWDliE
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Daniel Dietrich cafeb...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi Bruce,
thank you for your commitment regarding Wave participation for GWT
Hi Ray,
your link doesn't work for me. Do I need a Wave account?
Thanks in advance
- Daniel
On 2 Feb., 18:33, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Hey, all. I've just set up a de facto GWT Contrib Home Wave:
https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252Boe8G...
On Tue, Feb
Committed at r7516 .
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/132815
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Yes, you'll need an invitation to Wave.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Dietrich cafeb...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi Ray,
your link doesn't work for me. Do I need a Wave account?
Thanks in advance
- Daniel
On 2 Feb., 18:33, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Hey, all. I've just set
Hi,
I have some wave invitations to give. Send me a private email if you want
one of it.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Yes, you'll need an invitation to Wave.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Daniel Dietrich
cafeb...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi Ray,
your
Seems like we need a bot to publish Waves as Google Code wikis :)
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish
static views of waves. But without that…
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at
Hi,
I have some questions and proposals around the JsArray-classes because
they are handy when working with JSNI but I believe they could be
improved a bit.
a) Why are not all native methods provided through the wrapper.
Missing methods are:
* concat
* pop
* reverse
* slice
* splice
* sort
b)
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tom tomson...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some questions and proposals around the JsArray-classes because
they are handy when working with JSNI but I believe they could be
improved a bit.
a) Why are not all native methods provided through the wrapper.
One
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:19 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tom tomson...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some questions and proposals around the JsArray-classes because
they are handy when working with JSNI but I believe they could be
improved a bit.
a) Why
Hello gwters,
I'm going to add some BiDi functionality to TextBox and TextArea. Given that
their parent, TextBoxBase, doesn't implement HasDirection, this has to be
done (in an identical manner) for TextBox and TextArea separately. But then,
why won't TextBoxBase implement HasDirection instead of
Extending TextBoxBase sounds perfectly reasonable, but what exactly are you
proposing to implement there?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Tomer Greenberg tomer...@google.comwrote:
Hello gwters,
I'm going to add some BiDi functionality to TextBox and TextArea. Given
that their parent,
Revision: 7520
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Feb 2 13:02:43 2010
Log: Add missing merge record.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7520
Modified:
/releases/2.0/branch-info.txt
===
--- /releases/2.0/branch-info.txt Mon Feb
@John T: Are you saying we wouldn't want those methods on JsArray classes,
though? Seems like that's an appropriate place to put them. People don't
usually subclass containers like that (do they?).
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Tom Schindl tomson...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
@John T: Are you saying we wouldn't want those methods on JsArray classes,
though? Seems like that's an appropriate place to put them. People don't
usually subclass containers like that (do they?).
Since we didn't make
Reviewers: jgw,
Message:
Review, please
Description:
Bring back UiBinderUtilTest after fixing IE6 failure in testDetach. Was
checking for null parentNode instead of parentElement,and on ie6 you
still have the former after the latter dumps you.
Test was rolled back in svn tr...@6318.
Please
Revision: 7521
Author: guillaume.ry...@google.com
Date: Tue Feb 2 13:27:34 2010
Log: Adds explicit pure Java test support to GWTTestCase, via a setter.
Calling setForcePureJava(true) on a GWTTestCase forces running the test in
pure Java mode (non-GWT). This feature has the same effect than
Revision: 7522
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Feb 2 17:25:02 2010
Log: Create 2.0.1 release tag.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7522
Added:
/tags/2.0.1
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
The GWT 2.0.1 point release is now available for download. It contains fixes
for bugs found in the 2.0.0 release.
Potentially breaking changes and fixes
- Fixed a bug in how code generators collect method arguments from
generated source, which impacted the Messages interfaces generated for
Hey great job! Thanks a mil!
On Feb 2, 9:01 pm, Miguel Méndez mmen...@google.com wrote:
The GWT 2.0.1 point release is now available for download. It contains fixes
for bugs found in the 2.0.0 release.
Potentially breaking changes and fixes
- Fixed a bug in how code generators collect
Comment by andrew.pietsch:
...and while I'm at it, is anything like (or preferably better than)
Swing's ListSelectionModel planned? It'd also like to be able to veto
selection events if possible.
For more information:
38 matches
Mail list logo
